In this issue, Militsin et al. (https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202411203) reveal how STIM1 and STIM2—beyond their typical role as ER Ca2+ sensors that activate Orai1—control IP3R-mediated Ca2+ dynamics, thereby regulating breast cancer cell migration and invasion.

Ca2+ signaling mediates numerous cell functions, including cell proliferation and migration, and as such plays a dominant role in many aspects of cancer (1). The canonical receptor-evoked Ca2+ signal is initiated by activation of PLC that hydrolyzes PI(4,5)P2 to IP3 and diacylglycerol. IP3 opens IP3 receptors (IP3Rs), releasing Ca2+ stored in the ER to increase cytoplasmic Ca2+ ([Ca2+]i) rapidly. Ca2+ release from the ER causes unfolding and homo or hetero dimerization of the ER Ca2+ sensors STIM1 and STIM2. STIM1 recruits and activates primarily the Ca2+ influx channel Orai1. Ca2+ influx sustains the intracellular Ca2+ signal and provides the Ca2+ needed to replenish the ER Ca2+ store. In addition to activating Orai1, STIM proteins tether the ER and PM to form and stabilize junctions between them. In fact, the ER/PM junctions are where Ca2+ signaling complexes are formed and the Ca2+ signal is initiated and regulated (2, 3). The function of all pathways generating the receptor-evoked Ca2+ signal, including STIM1 and STIM2, are involved in the classical and emerging hallmarks of cancers (1).

Physiologically, most Ca2+ signals are in the form of repetitive short Ca2+ increases called Ca2+ puffs that are confined to cellular domains and which only infrequently globalize to cause a large and sustained increase in [Ca2+]i. Ca2+ puffs involve repetitive transient activation of IP3Rs to transiently release Ca2+ from the ER; the frequency of Ca2+ puffs is determined by the strength of cell stimulation, and thus the level of IP3. Confined Ca2+ puffs are common in polarized cells like exocrine, neuronal, and muscle cells, as well as at the leading edge of migrating cells (4, 5). However, the mechanism of transition from Ca2+ puffs to global Ca2+ signals is not well understood, nor is the role of each form of the Ca2+ signal patterns in cell proliferation, migration, and tumorigenesis. A study in this issue by Militsin et al. (6) provides fresh insight on these two imperative questions.

STIM1 and STIM2 play a unique role in Ca2+ signaling by mediating the communication between the cell surface (PM) and cell interior (ER) and by dynamically regulating cell signaling hubs at the ER/PM junctions (7, 8). Militsin et al. examined the role of STIM1 and STIM2 in the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line by generating STIM1−/− (S1KO), STIM2−/− (S2KO), and STIM1−/−+STIM2−/− double knockout (S1/S2DKO) cancer cells. Measuring in vitro cell proliferation and colony formation and in vivo tumor growth revealed that both STIMs are required for these activities. However, a surprising observation was made when comparing the effects of S1KO, S2KO, and S1/2DKO on cell adhesion, cell migration, and focal adhesion. While S1KO and S2KO cells showed reduced activity, S1/2DKO cells showed normal cell adhesion, migration, and focal adhesion. Interestingly, cell migration and focal adhesion indicate formation of polarized cell domains, which are controlled by dynamic ER/PM junction gradients (9), in which the STIM isoforms have critical roles (7, 8).

These findings not only reveal the participation of STIM isoforms in breast cancer initiation, migration, and invasion but also raise the question of why removing the two STIM isoforms restored, rather than eliminated, their involvement in these activities. Both pharmacological inhibitors and genetic modifications demonstrated that the unexpected results in S1/2DKO cells were due to altered IP3R function (6). Moreover, analysis of the pattern of Ca2+ signals evoked by IP3R activation in cells expressing the various STIM combinations revealed a novel mechanism of STIM-mediated IP3R gating. Additionally, the Ca2+ signal pattern had a novel and remarkable role in cell migration and cancer invasion (6). As illustrated in Fig. 1, controlled IP3R activation in WT breast cancer cell lines resulted in periodic Ca2+ puffs that never globalized. By contrast, similar IP3R activation in S1KO and S2KO resulted in Ca2+ puffs that rapidly globalized to generate a diffuse Ca2+ pattern. Notably, IP3R activation in S1/2DKO resulted in periodic Ca2+ puffs that never globalized. Overall, the findings by Militsin et al. provide strong support that STIM1 and STIM2 facilitate the opening of IP3Rs, in addition to their well-established role in opening Orai channels. By opening IP3R, STIMs set the Ca2+ signaling pattern to either Ca2+ puffs or a diffuse global increase in [Ca2+]i. In cancer, the Ca2+ puff pattern supports cell migration and invasion, while global [Ca2+]i induction restricts cell migration.

The findings by Militsin et al. also raise the key questions of how STIMs regulate IP3Rs and why Ca2+ signaling in S1/2DKO cells does not globalize. The authors suggest STIMs indirectly regulate IP3R gating since the two proteins could not be co-immunoprecipitated in MDA-MB-231 cell lysates. However, co-immunoprecipitation of native STIM1-IP3Rs and FRET between the expressed proteins as part of a signaling complex has been reported in several studies (for example, [3]). Therefore, modification of IP3R function by the N terminus of STIM1 and STIM2, which has been described in colorectal cancer (10), may partly account for STIM-mediated IP3R gating. An additional mechanism can be IP3R sensitization by PI(4,5)P2, which facilitates Ca2+ release (11). STIMs assemble Ca2+ signaling complexes at PI(4,5)P2-rich domains that may be necessary for PI(4,5)P2-mediated sensitization of IP3Rs and globalization of the Ca2+ signal. Finally, the most vital mechanism may be the control of ER Ca2+ content by STIMs. ER Ca2+ content controls STIM clustering (7) and IP3R activity (12), whereas STIM deletion reduces ER Ca2+ content (6). Reduced ER Ca2+ would, therefore, be expected to cluster STIM1 and STIM2 homodimers at the ER/PM junctions to facilitate and enhance IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release and globalize the Ca2+ signal (Fig. 1, middle).

Altered IP3R clustering may account for the puzzling observations in S1/2DKO cells. IP3-mediated Ca2+ release increases with increased IP3R clustering (4). IP3R clustering takes place at the ER/PM junctions (3), and STIM proteins have a major role in ER/PM junction formation and stabilization (7, 8). In S1/2DKO cells, the complete absence of STIM proteins reduces ER/PM junction formation, thereby preventing IP3R clustering. This mechanism may underlie the failure of Ca2+ puffs to globalize in complete STIM deficiency (Fig. 1, right), although other mechanisms may also contribute. Considering the critical role of STIM in regulation and shaping Ca2+ signal patterns in cancer and the observation that STIM expression changes during tumorigenesis (10), it is important and clinically relevant to further explore the mechanisms by which STIMs gate IP3Rs to shape Ca2+ signals.

We thank Ava Movahed Abtahi for helping with the illustration.

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants NIH/NIDCR DE000735-16. The contributions of the NIH authors were made as part of their official duties as NIH federal employees, are in compliance with agency policy requirements, and are considered works of the United States Government. However, the findings and conclusions presented in this commentary are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NIH or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Author contributions: W.Y. Chung: writing—review and editing. S. Muallem: conceptualization, funding acquisition, validation, and writing—original draft, review, and editing.

1.
Robitaille
,
M.
, and
G.R.
Monteith
.
2025
.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect. Biol.
2.
Chung
,
W.Y.
, et al
.
2023
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
.
4.
Prole
,
D.L.
, and
C.W.
Taylor
.
2019
.
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.
5.
Takano
,
T.
, and
D.I.
Yule
.
2024
.
J. Physiol.
6.
Militsin
,
R.
, et al
.
2025
.
J. Cell Biol.
7.
Ahuja
,
M.
, et al
.
2020
.
Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.
8.
Lin
,
W.Y.
, et al
.
2025
.
Nat. Commun.
10.
Pathak
,
T.
, et al
.
2025
.
Sci. Signal.
11.
12.
Woll
,
K.A.
, and
F.
Van Petegem
.
2022
.
Physiol. Rev.

Author notes

Disclosures: The authors declare no competing interests exist.

This article is distributed under the terms as described at https://rupress.org/pages/terms102024/.