The resting membrane potential (Δψ) of the cell is negative on the cytosolic side and determined primarily by the plasma membrane’s selective permeability to K+. We show that lysosomal Δψ is set by lysosomal membrane permeabilities to Na+ and H+, but not K+, and is positive on the cytosolic side. An increase in juxta-lysosomal Ca2+ rapidly reversed lysosomal Δψ by activating a large voltage-dependent and K+-selective conductance (LysoKVCa). LysoKVCa is encoded molecularly by SLO1 proteins known for forming plasma membrane BK channels. Opening of single LysoKVCa channels is sufficient to cause the rapid, striking changes in lysosomal Δψ. Lysosomal Ca2+ stores may be refilled from endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca2+ via ER–lysosome membrane contact sites. We propose that LysoKVCa serves as the perilysosomal Ca2+ effector to prime lysosomes for the refilling process. Consistently, genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of LysoKVCa, or abolition of its Ca2+ sensitivity, blocks refilling and maintenance of lysosomal Ca2+ stores, resulting in lysosomal cholesterol accumulation and a lysosome storage phenotype.
The precise delivery of hydrolases and cargoes to lysosomes for degradation and the timely removal of lysosomal catabolites require the establishment of luminal ionic homeostasis, ionic membrane gradients, and a membrane potential (Δψ; Morgan et al., 2011; Mindell, 2012; Xu and Ren, 2015). The lysosomal membrane maintains 1,000- to 5,000-fold concentration gradients for H+ and Ca2+ (Xu and Ren, 2015). It has been established that lysosomal H+ homeostasis is required for hydrolase activation (Mindell, 2012) and that lysosomal Ca2+ efflux mediates signals integral to lysosomal membrane trafficking; however, the lysosomal effectors on which Ca2+ acts are largely unknown (Kiselyov et al., 2010; Shen et al., 2012). Several specific ion-dependent channels/transporters have been identified in lysosomes, including the V-ATPase H+ pump and transient receptor potential mucolipin channels (TRPMLs), the principle Ca2+ release channels in the lysosome (Medina et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Xu and Ren, 2015). H+ channels and Ca2+ transporters in the lysosomes, however, remain to be molecularly identified (Xu and Ren, 2015; Garrity et al., 2016).
Much less is understood about the roles of Na+ and K+ in lysosomal physiology. Although manipulations of lysosomal Na+ and K+ with ionophores can affect several lysosomal functions (Morgan et al., 2011), it was not recognized until recently that, based on ionic composition analysis of isolated lysosomes, there may exist large concentration gradients (>10-fold) across lysosomal membranes for both ions ([Na+]Lumen >> [Na+]Cytosol, ENa > 57 mV; [K+]L << [K+]C, EK < −57 mV; Wang et al., 2012; Xu and Ren, 2015). With these ionic concentration gradients, and based on knowledge extrapolated from plasma membrane studies, resting lysosomal Δψ has been expected to be set by the membrane’s relative permeability to K+ over Na+ ions (PK/PNa; Cang et al., 2015; Xu and Ren, 2015). Lysosomal Δψ, considered essential for lysosome function (Mindell, 2012), is thought to be negative (VLumen = 30 mV; VCytosol is defined to 0 mV; Δψ = VCytosol − VLumen = −VLumen = ∼−30 mV), which is suggestive of high PK/PNa in rest conditions. Considering that lysosomal H+ permeability may also contribute a positive value to lysosomal Δψ, background PK at resting conditions is expected to be even higher to maintain a negative lysosomal Δψ. Note that depending on the ratio of [Cl−]L versus [Cl−]C, background PCl would also contribute a small positive or negative value to lysosomal Δψ (Mindell, 2012).
Recently, we identified two-pore channels (TPCs) as the major Na+-selective channels in the lysosome that affect Δψ (Wang et al., 2012). Although still controversial, TPCs may also mediate lysosomal Ca2+ or H+ conductance (Patel, 2015). The main goal of the current study was to identify the lysosomal K+ channels that regulate lysosomal Δψ (Xu and Ren, 2015). During the course of this study, two other research groups reported the existence of K+-selective channels in the lysosome (Cang et al., 2015; Cao et al., 2015). The functional identification of Na+- and K+-selective channels in the lysosome is consistent with the notion that the lysosome lumen is a high Na+ but low K+ compartment (Wang et al., 2012; Xu and Ren, 2015). However, our voltage- and current-clamping analyses of isolated lysosomes in the current study suggest that in contrast to previous views, lysosomal Δψ is positive, and background PK is minimal.
Ubiquitous Ca2+-activated K+-current in the lysosomes, but not early endosomes
To investigate lysosomal K+-selective conductances, we performed whole-endolysosome recordings using a high K+ bath/cytoplasmic solution ([K+]C = 140 mM; [K+]L = 5 mM; pHLY = 4.6; Fig. 1 A) in various mammalian cell lines and primary cells. In Cos-1 cells, endolysosomes were enlarged from <0.5 to ≤5 µm with vacuolin-1 (Dong et al., 2008). Vacuolin-1 selectively enlarged endosomes and lysosomes, but not other intracellular organelles such as mitochondria or ER (Cerny et al., 2004). Although EEA1-positive early endosomes were also slightly enlarged, only Lamp1-positive vacuoles were enlarged to patchable sizes (Fig. S1 A). Enlarged vacuoles were then isolated and patch-clamped (Dong et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2012). Negligible or no outward currents (<50 pA at 120 mV) were seen in most vacuoles, suggesting that the background TMEM175-like K+ conductance reported by Cang et al. (2015) under high luminal K+ and pH recording conditions is minimally active under our experimental conditions. However, increasing the concentration of Ca2+ from the bath/cytoplasmic side ([Ca2+]C) to 100–1,000 µM induced the rapid appearance of large (>200 and ≤3,000 pA at 120 mV) outwardly rectifying currents (Fig. 1, B and C). Similar Ca2+-activated outward currents were detected in endolysosomes enlarged spontaneously (Dong et al., 2010), by sucrose treatment (Bandyopadhyay et al., 2014), or by apilimod treatment (Cai et al., 2014; Fig. S1 B). In contrast, Ca2+-activated outward currents were not detected in isolated early endosomes, which could be artificially enlarged by either overexpression of a dominant-negative Rab5 mutant (Rab5-Q79L) in the cells (Wegner et al., 2010) or pretreatment with vicenistatin (Nishiyama et al., 2016; Fig. 1, D and E; and Fig. S1 C), suggesting the lysosome specificity of the currents.
Substitution of luminal Cl− with gluconate−, which largely abolished the background outwardly rectifying Cl− currents seen in some patches, did not affect the Ca2+-activated outward currents, suggesting that the currents were mediated by influx of K+ into the luminal side (Fig. 1 F). Consistent with this interpretation, replacement of K+ with Na+ or Cs+ in the bath solution abolished the currents completely (Fig. 1 G). Because current activation is also strongly dependent on membrane voltage (Fig. 1, B, F, and G), we define this Ca2+-activated current as the lysosomal voltage- and Ca2+-activated K+ current (LysoKVCa). Notably, LysoKVCa was noisy (Fig. 1, B, F, and G), as is characteristic of channels with high unitary conductance. LysoKVCa was detected ubiquitously in various mammalian cell types, including HEK293T cells, CV1 monkey kidney cells, A7r5 smooth muscle cells, INS-1 pancreatic cells, primary mouse cortical neurons, mouse bladder epithelial cells (BECs), mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), and mouse parietal cells (Fig. 2, A and D; and Fig. S2, A–F and J).
LysoKVCa is mediated by SLO1
LysoKVCa resembles the BK (maxi-K) currents at the cell surface of excitable cells, such as muscle cells and neurons (Shi et al., 2002; Salkoff et al., 2006; Yuan et al., 2010). BK channels are formed by the coassembly of the pore-forming SLO1 (KCNMA1) subunit and auxiliary β (KCNMB1–4) or γ subunits (Salkoff et al., 2006; Yuan et al., 2010). Unlike wild-type (WT) MEFs, in the KCNMA1 knockout (KO) MEFs (Fig. S2 I), no LysoKVCa-like currents were seen (Fig. 2, A, B, and D). Likewise, LysoKVCa currents were detected in WT but not KCNMA1 KO mouse parietal cells (Figs. 2 D and S2 J). In contrast, endogenous, background, whole-cell K+-selective outward currents were not different between WT and KCNMA1 KO MEF cells (Fig. S2 K). It should be noted that the plasma membrane background K+ conductances (Fig. S2 K), which are known to set the resting membrane potential of the cell, were undetectable in the lysosomes of KCNMA1 KO cells (Fig. 2, B and D; and Fig. S2 I), suggesting that BK channels are uniquely targeted to lysosomes.
On the other hand, overexpression of mouse SLO1-YFP (YFP tag is in the cytoplasmic side) or human SLO1-GFP in Cos-1 cells resulted in large LysoKVCa-like currents, even under basal conditions ([Ca2+]C = 0.1 µM; Fig. 2, C and D), and those currents could be augmented further by increasing cytoplasmic Ca2+ (Fig. 2 C). In contrast, overexpression of other KV channels (e.g., KV2.1-GFP) failed to increase whole-endolysosomal K+ currents. Collectively, these results suggest that SLO1 proteins are the molecular mediators of LysoKVCa.
SLO1 has been observed in intracellular organelles, including the nucleus and mitochondria, of excitable cells in addition to the plasma membrane (Singh et al., 2012, 2013; Li et al., 2014). Organelle fractionation analysis revealed that SLO1-YFP proteins (splicing variants containing the VEDEC sequence; Singh et al., 2013) in transfected Cos-1 cells were enriched in both Lamp1-resident lysosomal fractions and complex II–resident mitochondrial fractions (Fig. 2 E). Furthermore, fluorescence analysis showed that overexpressed SLO1 proteins were localized predominantly in the Lamp1-positive late endosomal and lysosomal compartments (Fig. 2, F and G). In contrast, under the same microscopic settings, SLO1 was rarely colocalized to a significant degree with markers for nuclear membranes, early endosomes, ER, Golgi apparatus, or even the plasma membrane, although partial colocalization was also observed for mitochondrial markers (Fig. 2, F and G; and Fig. S2 L). Intriguingly, although large whole-cell BK currents can be measured (Fig. S4 G), in nonexcitable cells, plasma membrane localization of overexpressed SLO1 proteins could be detected only with the aid of surface-specific labeling (Liu et al., 2014). Collectively, these results suggest that, consistent with electrophysiological analyses, the localized, high levels of SLO1 protein expression in lysosomal membranes gives rise to LysoKVCa. Dileucine motifs could be responsible for specific targeting of SLO1 proteins to lysosomes (Cao et al., 2015). However, mutations in these motifs did not significantly decrease SLO1-mediated lysosomal (Lyso-SLO1) currents in our hands (Fig. S2, M and N).
Dual activation of LysoKVCa by Ca2+ and voltage
A unique gating property of BK channels is their dual activation by membrane voltage and cytoplasmic Ca2+ (Salkoff et al., 2006). Whole-endolysosomal currents elicited by voltage steps revealed that increasing [Ca2+]C from basal levels (0.1 µM) to 100–1,000 µM activated outwardly rectifying currents robustly at positive voltages (Figs. 3 A and S3 A). Consistent with LysoKVCa’s K+ selectivity, the Ca2+-activated step currents had an Erev of less than −60 mV under physiology-mimicking recording conditions (calculated EK = −85.6 mV) and an Erev of ∼0 mV under symmetric K+ solutions.
In SLO1-YFP–expressing Cos-1 cells, whole-endolysosome LysoKVCa step currents were observed in basal Ca2+ level conditions at voltages that were less positive than in nontransfected cells (Figs. 3 B and S3 B). An analysis of normalized conductance–voltage curves revealed significant leftward shifts in half-maximal activation voltage (V0.5) when [Ca2+]C was increased in the range of 3–100 µM (Fig. S3, C and D). Similar to BK channels (Yang et al., 2008), cytoplasmic Mg2+ activated LysoKVCa and Lyso-SLO1 channels, but blocked the conductance (Fig. S3, F–H).
LysoKVCa exhibits a high single-channel conductance
Consistent with our whole-endolysosome recordings, in a subset of large-sized cytoplasmic-side-out endolysosomal patches, increasing [Ca2+]C induced robust large-amplitude single-channel openings of LysoKVCa (Fig. 3 C), with a half-maximal concentration (EC50) of ∼20 µM at 80 mV (Fig. S3 D). These results suggest that small changes in local juxta-lysosomal Ca2+ could readily activate LysoKVCa. Single-channel LysoKVCa currents were occasionally seen in small-sized lysosomal patches from SLO1-expressing Cos-1 cells (Fig. S3 E), which typically displayed large macroscopic currents (Fig. 3 D). At 100 µM [Ca2+]C, the channel open probability (Popen) of LysoKVCa displayed strong voltage dependence (Figs. 3 E and S3 E). In symmetric K+ solutions, the single-channel conductances for LysoKVCa and Lyso-SLO1 were 231 ± 61 and 219 ± 59 pS (n = 3), respectively (Figs. 3 F and S3 I). Hence, LysoKVCa conducts K+ efficiently with a large conductance.
Pharmacological and physiological modulation of LysoKVCa
Both LysoKVCa and Lyso-SLO1 exhibited pharmacological properties similar to those of BK channels. Paxilline, a relatively specific membrane-permeable BK inhibitor (Salkoff et al., 2006), inhibited LysoKVCa and Lyso-SLO1 completely (Figs. 3 G and S4, A and E). Quinidine and clofilium, membrane-permeable BK inhibitors with lower specificity than paxilline (Tang et al., 2010), also inhibited both LysoKVCa and Lyso-SLO1 (Figs. 3 H and S4, B and E). Likewise, in the luminal-side-out patches, iberiotoxin (IBTX), a membrane-impermeable BK-specific toxin inhibitor (Tang et al., 2010), completely inhibited single LysoKVCa currents (Fig. 3 I). Conversely, NS1619 (Olesen et al., 1994) and isopimaric acid (Yamamura et al., 2001), BK-specific channel openers, augmented LysoKVCa (Fig. S4, C–E).
Both luminal and cytoplasmic pH are critical determinants of lysosomal physiology (Xu and Ren, 2015). Interestingly, an elevation of lysosomal pHL from 4.6 to 7.4 markedly enhanced the Ca2+ activation of Lyso-SLO1 (Fig. S4, F–H). On the other hand, acidic pHC readily activated LysoKVCa at basal Ca2+ levels (Fig. S4, I–K). These results suggest that under physiological conditions, lysosomal H+ release may activate LysoKVCa by simultaneously raising luminal pH and decreasing juxta-lysosomal pH.
Regulation of LysoKVCa by auxiliary subunits and trafficking
The functional diversity of BK channels can be conferred by cell type–specific or location-specific assembly of SLO1 with various auxiliary β and γ subunits (Yan and Aldrich, 2010; Hoshi et al., 2013). For example, β2 and a subset of β3 isoforms are known to confer fast and voltage-dependent inactivation of BK currents, respectively, in both heterologous expression and endogenous settings (Zeng et al., 2001; Xia et al., 2003; Torres et al., 2014). Notably, overexpression of β2-GFP together with SLO1 resulted in fast-inactivating Lyso-SLO1 currents (Fig. 4 A). In INS-1 cells, which express β3 subunits (Braun et al., 2008; Torres et al., 2014), and cultured BECs, LysoKVCa exhibited voltage-dependent inactivation or blockage at high voltages (Fig. S2, D and E, and Fig. S5 A). Notably, heterologously expressed β subunits, including β2, were found to be localized in Lamp1-positive compartments (Figs. 4 B and S5 B).
We examined whether endogenous SLO1 proteins are present at the plasma membrane of LysoKVCa-expressing nonexcitable cells. In Cos-1 cells, measurable whole-cell paxilline- and IBTX-sensitive BK-like currents were detected (Fig. 4 C and Fig. S5, C–F), but the current density was, at most, a tenth of that of LysoKVCa (Fig. 4 D). Consistently, in MEFs, no measurable whole-cell BK-like currents were detected (Figs. 4 D and S5 G). Hence, in nonexcitable cells, SLO1 proteins may be preferentially or specifically targeted to lysosomes where they mediate LysoKVCa.
Regulation of lysosomal membrane potential by Ca2+ and LysoKVCa
In excitable cells, BK acts as a negative-feedback regulator of membrane excitability (Salkoff et al., 2006). To investigate the role of LysoKVCa in regulating lysosomal excitability, we performed current-clamp recordings on isolated enlarged endolysosomes. Lysosomal Δψ (i.e., VCytosol − VLumen = −VLumen, because VCytosol is defined to 0 mV; Fig. 5, A and B) is thought to be negative (approximately −30 mV; Morgan et al., 2011). Under our experimental conditions (high lysosomal Na+ and low lysosomal K+; Wang et al., 2012; Fig. 5, A and B), direct electrophysiological measurement revealed that Δψ was in fact positive (15–30 mV; Fig. 5, C–F). Removal of either luminal Na+ or H+ reduced Δψ by ∼15–20 mV, whereas removal of both ions simultaneously caused a reversal of Δψ to approximately −30 mV (Fig. 5 D). Similarly, bath application of the K+ ionophore valinomycin (Van Dyke, 1995) also reversed lysosomal Δψ (Fig. 5 C), suggesting a limited K+ permeability at rest conditions and, in contrast to the plasma membrane, an increase of K+ permeability in the lysosome that would result in a large change of lysosomal Δψ. Conversely, bath application of H+ ionophores niclosamide (Fonseca et al., 2012) or activation of TPCs with PI(3,5)P2 (Wang et al., 2012) caused a further positive shift in Δψ (Fig. 5, C and J). In the absence of PI(3,5)P2, inclusion of ATP in the bath solution had a minimal effect on lysosomal Δψ (Fig. 5 E). Together, these results suggest that in the enlarged lysosomes, the primary determinants of “resting” lysosomal Δψ are the lysosomal membrane’s Na+ and H+ permeabilities under our experimental conditions (Fig. 5 D), but not its K+ permeability, as the lysosomal Δψ is positive in its value. Even at neutral pH, lysosomal Δψ is slightly positive (Fig. 5 D), suggesting that resting PNa is slightly higher than resting PK.
Notably, increasing cytoplasmic Ca2+ reduced lysosomal Δψ (Fig. 5, F and J; see also Fig. 5, A and B). Indeed, in small-sized vacuoles with only single LysoKVCa channel openings (Fig. S5 H), rapid and transient paxilline-sensitive decreases in lysosomal Δψ were observed (Fig. 5 G). Overexpression of SLO1 (Fig. S5, I–K) also resulted in reduced Δψ (Fig. 5, H and J). Furthermore, in endolysosomes expressing gain-of-function mutant SLO1 (SLO1R207Q) channels (Montgomery and Meredith, 2012), which exhibited large basal currents at less positive voltages (Fig. S5, J–L), lysosomal Δψ was reversed to −20 to approximately −30 mV (Fig. 5, I and J). In SLO1- or SLO1R207Q-expressing vacuoles, increasing cytoplasmic Ca2+ resulted in a much more negative lysosomal Δψ (−60 mV; Fig. 5, H–J). Collectively, these results suggest that LysoKVCa regulates lysosomal Δψ in response to changes in juxta-lysosomal Ca2+ levels.
Lysosomal K+ homeostasis and cytosolic Ca2+ increase are both required for lysosomal Ca2+ store refilling
Lysosomal Δψ is a critical determinant of lysosomal ion homeostasis, including Ca2+ homeostasis, which is maintained at a luminal concentration of ∼0.5 mM (Morgan et al., 2011; Xu and Ren, 2015). To investigate the molecular mechanisms that regulate lysosomal Ca2+ stores, we recently developed a lysosomal Ca2+ refilling assay using ML-SA1, a membrane-permeable synthetic activator of lysosomal TRPML1 (or ML1) channels (Shen et al., 2012). In HEK293 cell lines stably expressing GCaMP3-ML1 (Fig. 6 A; HEK-GCaMP3-ML1 cells), bath application of ML-SA1 in a zero (<10 nM) Ca2+ external solution produced robust lysosomal Ca2+ release indicated by GCaMP3 fluorescence (Garrity et al., 2016). After 3–5 min of refilling time, secondary ML-SA1 responses were largely recovered (Fig. 6 B), suggesting that lysosomal Ca2+ stores were refilled (Garrity et al., 2016). Using this refilling assay, we recently reported that in contrast to previous findings, dissipating the H+ gradient does not block lysosomal Ca2+ refilling (Garrity et al., 2016). Instead, ER Ca2+ may refill lysosomal Ca2+ stores, via the presumed formation of ER–lysosome membrane contacts (Eden, 2016). Remarkably, dissipating the lysosomal K+ gradient with valinomycin resulted in a blockade of lysosomal Ca2+ store filling (Fig. 6, C and D; and Fig. S6 A), suggesting an essential role of lysosomal K+ gradient and efflux in refilling.
In theory, either a reduction in luminal Ca2+ or an increase in perilysosomal Ca2+ could serve as a trigger for Ca2+ refilling. Cytoplasmic Ca2+ increases have been hypothesized to regulate the formation and stabilization of ER–lysosome membrane contacts (Eden, 2016; Kilpatrick et al., 2017), potentially contributing to lysosomal Ca2+ refilling. To investigate the second possibility, we used a complementary refilling assay, based on the use of Oregon Green 488 Bapta-1-dextran (OG-BAPTA) dyes to directly measure lysosomal luminal Ca2+ contents (Garrity et al., 2016). Notably, chelating cytosolic Ca2+ completely blocked refilling (Fig. 6, E and F).
LysoKVCa is required for efficient lysosomal Ca2+ store refilling in normal physiology
We next tested the hypothesis that LysoKVCa mediates Ca2+-activated K+ permeability that participates in perilysosomal Ca2+-triggered lysosomal refilling. Remarkably, in the GCaMP-based refilling assays, when we inhibited LysoKVCa acutely using membrane-permeable BK inhibitors (i.e., paxilline and quinidine) during refilling, lysosomal Ca2+ refilling was completely inhibited (Fig. 7, A–C). In contrast, refilling was not affected by IBTX (a membrane-impermeable BK inhibitor) or NS1619 (a membrane-permeable BK opener; Fig. S6, D and E). Prolonged inhibition (3 h) of LysoKVCa abolished the naive Ca2+ release responses (Fig. S6, B, C, and E), suggesting that refilling is an ongoing process with constitutive Ca2+ release in the cells (Garrity et al., 2016). Note that paxilline did not directly affect the activity of lysosomal ML1 channels (Fig. S6, F and J) or luminal pH (Fig. S6, H and I).
Consistently, when LysoKVCa was genetically inactivated, as was seen in GCaMP7-ML1–transfected KCNMA1 KO MEFs, lysosomal Ca2+ refilling was also significantly reduced, but not abolished compared with WT MEFs (Fig. 7, D and G). Heterologous expression of WT SLO1-mCherry largely restored lysosomal refilling in KCNMA1 KO MEFs (Fig. 7, F and G). In contrast, when the Ca2+-sensitivity of SLO1-mCherry was abolished by mutations (SLO1M513I/D898A) in the Ca2+-binding sites (Bao et al., 2004; Fig. 7 E), the restoration effect was lost (Fig. 7, F and G). Hence, Ca2+ activation of LysoKVCa is specifically required for refilling of lysosomal Ca2+ stores.
To further investigate the role of LysoKVCa in regulating lysosomal Ca2+ store refilling, we studied refilling in cells loaded with Fura-2 using glycylphenylalanyl-2-naphthylamide (GPN), a lysosome-specific reagent that is widely used to deplete lysosomal Ca2+ stores (Berg et al., 1994), to induce ML1-independent Ca2+ release from lysosomes (Garrity et al., 2016). Blocking LysoKVCa in the refilling phase by using paxilline markedly attenuated the refilling response in both HEK293 cells and WT MEFs (Fig. 7, H–J; and Fig. S6, K–M) but had no effect on the residual refilling response observed in KCNMA1 KO MEFs (Fig. 7 J). It is of note that the naive ML-SA1– or GPN-induced Ca2+ release responses in the KCNMA1 KO cells or WT cells treated with paxilline acutely were comparable to those in nontreated WT cells (Fig. 7, D and H). Likewise, no difference was noted between WT and KCNMA1 KO cells in the OG-BAPTA assay (Fig. 8). Hence, LysoKVCa is not required for ML1-mediated lysosomal Ca2+ release per se.
The recovery of lysosomal Ca2+ contents was profoundly inhibited by paxilline treatment in WT MEFs (Fig. 8, A and B). In contrast, the partial recovery seen in KCNMA1 KO MEFs was completely insensitive to paxilline (Fig. 8, A and B). Furthermore, overexpressing SLO-mCherry, but not SLO1M513I/898A-mCherry, in KCNMA1 KO MEFs largely rescued the refilling of lysosomal Ca2+ contents (Fig. 8 C). Finally, pretreatment with paxilline dramatically decreased lysosomal Ca2+ contents in WT MEFs but had no effect on lysosomal Ca2+ stores or refilling in KCNMA1 KO MEFs (Fig. 8 D). Collectively, these results suggest that although there exist compensatory mechanisms for lysosomal store refilling in cells lacking KCNMA1, LysoKVCa is required for efficient refilling of lysosomal Ca2+ stores in normal physiology.
Genetic ablation or pharmacological inhibition of LysoKVCa leads to lysosomal dysfunction
Lysosomal Ca2+ and Δψ are important for lysosomal function (Medina et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Xu and Ren, 2015). Lysosomal dysfunction is commonly associated with a compensatory increase in lysosome biogenesis, manifested as increased expression of essential lysosomal genes (Xu and Ren, 2015). For example, the expression of Lamp1, a housekeeping gene for the lysosome, is elevated in most lysosomal storage diseases (Medina et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2015; Xu and Ren, 2015). Likewise, LysoTracker staining is also often elevated in LSD cells that yet have normal lysosomal pH (Xu and Ren, 2015). Indeed, both Lamp1 expression and LysoTracker staining were elevated significantly in KCNMA1 KO MEFs relative to WT cells (Fig. 9, A and B), suggestive of an up-regulation of lysosomal biogenesis caused by lysosomal dysfunction. Note that lysosomal pH was normal in KCNMA1 KO cells (Fig. S6 I).
Lysosomal Ca2+ signaling is required for the regulation of lysosomal proteolytic activity and cholesterol homeostasis, presumably via the regulation of lysosomal trafficking (Wang et al., 2015). Lysosomal proteolytic activity was measured using an assay that yields red fluorescence according to the proteolytic degradation of DQ-red-BSA, an artificial substrate (Yue et al., 2013). DQ-BSA degradation was found to be enhanced after complete starvation (withdrawal of both serum and amino acids in the culture medium) of Cos-1 cells (Fig. 9 C). Pharmacological inhibition of LysoKVCa using membrane-permeable, but not membrane-impermeable, BK inhibitors resulted in a marked reduction in the starvation-induced enhancement of proteolytic activity (Fig. 9, C and D). Likewise, in KCNMA1 KO MEFs, proteolytic activity was also attenuated (Fig. 9 E), and the remaining activity became resistant to BK inhibition (Fig. 9 E). Lysosomal cholesterol metabolism is regulated by lysosomal Ca2+, and cholesterol accumulation is observed in multiple LSD cells, including ML-IV and NPC cells (Wang et al., 2015; Xu and Ren, 2015). Compared with WT cells, KCNMA1 KO MEFs exhibited mild but significant cholesterol accumulation (Fig. 9, F and G), suggesting that lysosomal BK is required for efficient cholesterol transport in the lysosomes. Collectively, these results suggest that LysoKVCa is required for the normal function of lysosomes.
BK channels are negative-feedback regulators of Ca2+ overload and membrane hyperexcitability in excitable cells. We demonstrated in the current study that BK channels are functionally present in the lysosomes of both excitable and nonexcitable cells. In contrast, the expression of BK channels at the plasma membrane and early endosomes is absent or very low in the nonexcitable cells. Therefore, BK channels are specifically targeted to the lysosomes, and endogenous SLO1 proteins are bona fide lysosomal channels in many cell types, including MEFs. In another contrast, other plasma membrane background K+ conductances are undetectable in the lysosomes. Using our lysosome-specific Ca2+ release and content measurement assays, we showed that lysosomal BK channels are required for efficient refilling of lysosomal Ca2+ stores and normal function of lysosomes.
An unexpected finding in the current study is that in the isolated enlarged lysosomes that are used for our electrophysiological measurements, lysosomal Δψ is positive. Our measurement was based on a high [Na+]L/K+]L ratio previously determined from ionic composition analysis of isolated lysosomes (Wang et al., 2012). If the [Na+]L/K+]L ratio were lower in intact cells (Steinberg et al., 2010), lysosomal Δψ would be still positive. Several previous studies have reported that lysosomal Δψ are negative, with the values scattered between −10 and −100 mV in different studies and cell types (Morgan et al., 2011). For example, using fluorescence resonance energy transfer–based indicators, one recent study reported that phagolysosomal Δψ is −19 mV in intact single cells (Koivusalo et al., 2011). Recent studies suggest that lysosomal pH is highly heterogeneous, with some of the primary lysosomes completely unacidified (Bright et al., 2016; Johnson et al., 2016). Therefore, our measured lysosomal Δψ based on fixed luminal composition might not be faithfully extrapolated in vivo. It is possible that certain physiological regulators of lysosomal Δψ are lost in our isolated lysosome recordings. However, based on our current study, such unidentified physiological regulators would have to up-regulate lysosomal K+ permeability, as both PNa and PH contribute to positive Δψ.
The vacuolin-1–enlarged vacuoles that we used for patch-clamping most likely originated primarily from late endosomes and lysosomes, as they were positive for Lamp1, but not for ER or mitochondrial markers (Fig. S1 A). Admittedly, the membrane properties of enlarged vacuoles may not be identical to native lysosomal membranes. KVCa currents are undetectable in the early endosomes, and the background and resting K+ conductances at the plasma membrane are also undetectable in the lysosome. Therefore, enlarged endolysosomes do not accumulate any nonlysosomal channel proteins in their limited/perimeter membranes, and the whole-endolysosome technique is reasonably specific in detecting ion channels on the lysosomal membranes. Using this technique, we found that LysoKVCa represents the major K+ conductance in the lysosome, although we estimated based on the single-channel recording data that there are few channels per lysosome (approximately one channel per 1 µm2 of lysosomal membrane). However, because of the large single-channel conductance, opening of single LysoKVCa currents was sufficient to confer significant changes in lysosomal Δψ. Unlike the plasma membrane, in which the opening of ion channels would not significantly change the concentration gradients of ions, opening of LysoKVCa for 100 ms is sufficient to cause the dissipation of the lysosomal K+ gradients. Hence the mean open and close times of single LysoKVCa channels may have large impacts on lysosomal physiology.
It is likely that the primary function of LysoKVCa in lysosomes is to regulate lysosomal Δψ, which in turn regulates lysosomal Ca2+ refilling and signaling (Fig. 10). In the absence of other major K+ conductances at rest, even with submaximal activation, a brief opening of a single large-conductance K+ channel in the small-sized lysosome can change Δψ rapidly and effectively. During the course of this study, it was reported that TMEM175 proteins may mediate a background K+ leak conductance. However, this background K+ current was very small in the original study (20 pA at 100 mV; Cang et al., 2015) and barely detectable in our current experimental conditions. Future studies may reveal the relative contributions of LysoKVCa, TMEM175, and other lysosomal K+ conductances to lysosomal Δψ in various cell types under various cellular conditions. It is important to note that a positive lysosomal Δψ favors the channel openings of LysoKVCa in response to small increases in juxta-lysosomal Ca2+ that occur during membrane fusion and fission events. Reversal of Δψ may increase the driving force for ML1-mediated Ca2+ release initially, but then deactivate LysoKVCa to shape the duration of lysosomal Ca2+ signaling. However, the role of LysoKVCa in lysosomal Ca2+ refilling is independent of its effect on lysosomal Ca2+ release.
The mechanisms by which the 5,000-fold Ca2+ gradient across lysosomal membranes is established and maintained are not clear (Xu and Ren, 2015). We recently reported that the ER serves as a primary source of lysosomal Ca2+, presumably via ER–lysosome membrane contacts (Garrity et al., 2016). However, it remains to be determined how the Ca2+ refilling process is triggered. Theoretically, either a reduction in luminal [Ca2+] or an increase of juxta-lysosomal [Ca2+] could trigger the refilling process. In the case of ER Ca2+ refilling, STIM proteins mediate luminal Ca2+ sensing, and activation of STIM1 triggers the formation of ER–plasma membrane junction and subsequent ORAI channel openings. For lysosomal Ca2+ refilling, given that refilling is completely blocked by the chelation of cytoplasmic Ca2+, the latter is more likely the case. However, it is not clear whether Ca2+ chelation may affect the formation of ER–lysosome membrane contact sites or the local Ca2+ concentrations at the contact sites. Nevertheless, we provide evidence that LysoKVCa could serve as an effector for juxta-lysosomal Ca2+, mediating store refilling. Presumed local Ca2+ increases in the ER–lysosome membrane contact sites during the seemingly quiescent refilling phase, but not increases in bulk cytoplasmic Ca2+ (e.g., during SERCA inhibition), are required for refilling (Garrity et al., 2016), in which presumed LysoKVCa activation may play a role. However, the mechanisms by which LysoKVCa and Δψ regulate lysosomal Ca2+ refilling are unknown, largely because of the lack of the knowledge on the molecular identity of the Ca2+ uptake transporters and the regulatory mechanisms of ER–lysosome interaction. Based on our results in the current study, recent studies on ER–lysosome interaction (Phillips and Voeltz, 2016), and previous Ca2+ uptake studies on isolated lysosomes (Lemons and Thoene, 1991), we hypothesize that ER refilling of lysosomal stores is a regulated two-step process. First, lysosome store depletion may trigger an arrangement of ER–lysosome contact configuration (Phillips and Voeltz, 2016). Perilysosomal Ca2+ increases were proposed to regulate ER–lysosome membrane contact, but the direct evidence is still lacking (Eden, 2016). Second, at these relatively stable, functional ER–lysosome contact sites, a passive Ca2+ transport process can occur from ER to lysosomes, because of the large chemical gradient of Ca2+ that is created when lysosome stores are actively depleted. It is conceivable that both steps are dependent on lysosomal Δψ, either directly or indirectly. For example, it is recently reported that Δψ may affect dynamics of phosphoinositide (Zhou et al., 2015), which is known to regulate the interaction of lysosomes with other organelles (Chu et al., 2015). Furthermore, we show that LysoKVCa is required for the lysosomal export of cholesterol, which is known to affect ER–lysosome interaction and the activities of lysosomal channels and transporters (Xu and Ren, 2015). Future studies may reveal whether lysosomal Δψ regulates ER–lysosome interaction or Ca2+ uptake mechanisms via cholesterol export and signaling. Testing these hypotheses comprehensively will require expanding our knowledge of transporters and channels in endolysosomal membranes and the development of accurate methods of measuring endolysosomal potentials in intact cells.
Materials and methods
Mouse SLO1R207Q-YFP, SLO1L1233I/1234A, SLO1L488M/I489M/L733V/I734V, and SLO1M513I/D898A were generated from mouse SLO1-YFP (a gift from R. Brenner, University of Texas, San Antonio, TX) with the Quick-Change Lightning Site-Direct Mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies). GFP-tagged β1, β2, and β4 constructs were provided by T. Hoshi (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA). Genetically encoded Ca2+ indicator GCaMP3 and GCaMP7 was fused directly to the N terminus of ML1 (GCaMP3-ML1 and GCaMP7-ML1), as described previously (Shen et al., 2012). All constructs were confirmed by sequencing, and protein expression was verified by Western blotting and fluorescence imaging.
KCNMA1 KO (Kcnma–/– or Slo1–/–) mice were generated and characterized as described previously (Montgomery and Meredith, 2012). All animal experiments were conducted using an approved protocol (#6577) and Institutional Animal Care Guidelines of the University of Michigan.
Mammalian cell culture
Cos-1 cells, HEK-293T cells, CV1 cells, A7r5 cells, and BECs were grown at 37°C in a 1:1 mixture of DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator. INS-1 cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 (11 mM glucose) supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 mM β-mercaptoethanol. HEK293 cells stably expressing GCaMP3-ML1 (HEK-GCaMP3-ML1 cells) were generated using the Flip-In T-Rex 293 cell line (Invitrogen). HEK-GCaMP3-ML1 cells were grown in Tet-free FBS, and GCaMP3-ML1 expression was induced using doxycycline.
Sterilized skin specimens from WT and KCNMA1 KO mice were minced into small fragments (∼1 mm2) and incubated in 0.05% trypsin and 0.2% collagenase at 37°C for 1 h. Single fibroblasts, isolated by repeated pipetting, were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 20% FBS and an antibiotic and antimycotic cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator.
Primary cortical neurons
Mouse pups were killed within 2 d of birth, and brains were dissected in ice-cold HBSS. After the removal of meninges, the dissected brains were minced into small fragments (∼1 mm3). Tissue fragments were then incubated in 0.05% trypsin at 37°C for 1 h. Cortical neurons were isolated mechanically by repeated pipetting and plated on poly-l-lysine–coated glass coverslips. Cultures were maintained in a neurobasal medium containing B27 supplement (1×), GlutaMAX (1×), and antibiotic cocktail (100 U/ml penicillin, 100 mg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25 mg/ml fungizone) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Whole-endolysosomal recordings were performed in neurons that were cultured for more than 10 d.
Lysosome isolation by subcellular fractionation
Lysosomes were isolated as described previously (Wang et al., 2012). In brief, cell lysates were obtained by Dounce homogenization in a homogenizing buffer (HM buffer: 0.25 M sucrose, 1 mM EDTA, and 10 mM Hepes, pH 7.0). Nuclei and intact cells were removed by centrifugation at 1,900 g at 4°C for 10 min. Supernatant was then collected and further centrifuged through a Percoll density gradient using a Beckman L8-70 centrifuge and a 70.1 Ti rotor. The Percoll gradient was prepared with 0.7 ml of 2.5 M sucrose at the bottom, 6 ml of 18% Percoll (mixture of 1.08 ml Percoll and 4.92 ml HM buffer) in the middle, and 1 ml postnuclear supernatants on the top. The centrifuge was performed at 4°C for 1 h at 67,200 g (14,000 rpm). Heavy membrane fractions containing lysosomes were concentrated at the bottom of the Percoll gradient. They were carefully collected and laid over a discontinuous iodixanol gradient. The centrifuge tube was loaded with 0.5 ml of 2.5 M sucrose at the bottom, and the iodixanol gradient was generated through dilution of iodixanol (by HM buffer) to a final vol/vol (from bottom of the centrifuge tube to top) of 27, 22.5, 19, 16, 12, and 8%. The heavy membrane fraction (1 ml) was laid carefully on top, and the fractionation was performed at 130,000 g (44,200 rpm) for 2.5 h at 4°C. After fractionation, the sample was carefully divided into fractions of 0.5 ml. Fractions containing the highest purity of lysosomes were determined using Western blotting and used for subsequent analysis.
Standard Western blotting procedures were used. In brief, cells were lysed with ice-cold RIPA buffer (Boston BioProducts) in the presence of 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich), 1 mM NaF, and 1 mM Na3VO4. Total cell lysates were mixed with 2× SDS loading buffer and boiled at 95°C for 10 min. Protein samples (10–100 µg) were then loaded and separated on 4–12% gradient SDS-PAGE gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked for 1 h with 1% BSA in PBS supplemented with 0.1% Tween20 and incubated with antibodies against GFP (1:10,000; Covance), Lamp1 (1:1,000; Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), EEA1 (1:1,000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and Complex II (1:1,000; Abcam). Bound antibodies were detected using HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit (65-6120) or anti-mouse (62-6520) secondary antibodies (1:5,000; Invitrogen) and enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare). Band intensities were quantified with ImageJ software.
Immunofluorescent labeling and confocal imaging
Cells were grown on glass coverslips, fixed with 4% PFA, and permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100. They were then blocked with 1% BSA in PBS. After three washes with PBS, the slides with Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech) were processed for imaging using a confocal microscope (TCS SP5; Leica Biosystems) with a 100× oil objective NA 1.40 (HCX PL APO; Leica Biosystems). PMT detector was used for DAPI signal (excitation, 405 nm; emission, 410–440 nm); HyD detector was used for GFP (excitation, 488 nm; emission, 492–535 nm) and mCherry/Alexa Fluor 568 (excitation, 561 nm; emission, 575–625nm) signals. Images were acquired with LAS AF software (Leica Biosystems) and analyzed with ImageJ and Photoshop CS6 (Adobe).
Tet-On HEK-GCaMP3-ML1 stable cells were used for Ca2+ imaging. Doxycycline (0.01 µg/ml) was applied 20–24 h before the experiments to induce GCaMP3-ML1 expression. Cells were trypsinized and plated on coverslips 4–6 h before experiments. GCaMP3 fluorescence intensity at 470 nm (F470) was monitored and recorded at RT (21–23°C) using a EasyRatio Pro system (Photon Technology International), which includes an invert microscope (Olympus 1X71) with a 20×/0.75 objective lens (Olympus UApo/340), a high-resolution CoolSNAP HQ2 CCD camera (Photometrics), and a high-speed DeltaRam X monochromator (Photon Technology International) operated with EasyRatioPro software 18.104.22.168 (Photon Technology International). During recording, cells were bathed in Tyrode’s solution containing 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4. Lysosomal Ca2+ release was measured by briefly switching to a 0 Ca2+ solution, which contained 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 10 mM glucose, 1 mM EGTA, and 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.4; free Ca2+ concentration is estimated to be <10 nM based on Maxchelator software (Shen et al., 2012). Alterations of Ca2+ levels were normalized and shown as ΔF/F0, where F0 is baseline F, and ΔF is changes in F upon treatment.
Cells were loaded with OG-BAPTAn (100 µg/ml; Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37°C in the culture medium for 4–12 h, and then pulsed/chased for additional 4–16 h. Fluorescence imaging was performed at 37°C with a Spinning Disc Confocal Imaging System, which includes an IX81 inverted microscope (Olympus), a 60× oil objective NA 1.42 (Olympus; PlanApo N), a CSU-X1 scanner (Yokogawa Electric Corporation), and an iXon EM-CCD camera (Andor). Images were acquired and analyzed with MetaMorph Advanced Imaging acquisition software v. 22.214.171.124 (Molecular Devices). In vitro calcium-binding (Kd) affinities of OG-BAPTA were determined using KCl-based solutions (140 mM KCl, x mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes, 10 mM MES, and 0 or 1 mM BAPTA) adjusted to different pH levels (4.5, 5.0, 6.0, and 7.0). By varying the amount of added Ca2+ (x = 0–10 mM), solutions with different pH and free [Ca2+] were made based on Maxchelator software. OG-BAPTA (5 µg/ml) fluorescence for each solution was obtained to plot the calibration curve (Christensen et al., 2002; Dickson et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2015). In cells that were pretreated with ionomycin, nigericin, and valinomycin, in vivo minimal and maximal fluorescence (Fmin and Fmax) were determined by perfusing the cells with 0 or 10 mM Ca2+ external solutions, respectively (Christensen et al., 2002; Dickson et al., 2012; Morgan et al., 2015). Lysosomal [Ca2+] were at different pH were determined using the following calibration equation: [Ca2+] = Kd × (F − Fmin)/(Fmax − F).
Lysosomal pH measurement
Cells seeded on coverslips were pulsed with OG-BAPTA (100 µg/ml) at 37°C in the culture medium for 6 h and chased for additional 12 h (Johnson et al., 2016). Cells were then bathed in Tyrode’s solution. Images were captured at RT using an EasyRatio Pro system (Photon Technology International). Fluorescence was continuously recorded at RT with alternated excitation wavelengths of 480 and 430 nm (F480 and F430, respectively). To convert fluorescence ratios (F480/F430) to pH values, a pH standard curve was constructed using isotonic K+ solutions (145 mM KCl, 5 mM glucose, 1 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, 10 mM Hepes, and 10 mM MES, adjusted to various pH values ranging from 4.0 to 8.0) containing 10 µM nigericin and 10 µM monensin (Johnson et al., 2016).
Endolysosomal electrophysiology was performed on isolated endolysosomes using a modified patch-clamp method (Dong et al., 2008). In brief, cells were treated with 1 µM vacuolin-1, a lipid-soluble polycyclic triazine that can increase the size of endosomes and lysosomes selectively (Cerny et al., 2004), for at least 1 h and up to 12 h. Large vacuoles (up to 5 µm in diameter; capacitance = 1.9 ± 0.1 pF, n = 35 vacuoles) were observed in most vacuolin-treated cells. Occasionally, enlarged vacuoles were also seen in nontreated cells; no significant difference in LysoKVCa channel properties were seen for enlarged vacuoles obtained with or without vacuolin-1 treatment (Fig. S1 B). To isolate vacuoles, a patch pipette (electrode) was pressed against individual cells and then pulled away quickly to sever the cell membrane. Whole-endolysosome recordings were then performed on enlarged vacuoles from cells that were released into the dish. Note that the membrane properties of enlarged vacuoles may not be identical to native lysosomal membranes. However, the whole-endolysosome technique is thus far the only feasible approach for directly studying lysosomal channels (Xu and Ren, 2015).
Unless otherwise stated, the bath (internal/cytoplasmic) solution contained 140 mM K+-gluconate, 4 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, and 10 mM Hepes (pH adjusted with KOH to 7.2). Solutions with 0.1–10 µM free Ca2+ were prepared by combining various concentrations of EGTA and CaCl2, as calculated with Maxchelator. Bath solutions with 100–1,000 µM Ca2+ contained various amounts of CaCl2 without EGTA. pH adjustments (6.0, 7.2, and 9.0) were made in either 0.1 µM Ca2+ internal solution with 1 mM EGTA or 100 µM Ca2+ internal solution without EGTA. The pipette (luminal) solution contained 145 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes, 10 mM MES, and 10 mM glucose (pH adjusted to 4.6 with NaOH). To avoid contamination of background Cl− currents existing in some patches, low-Cl− pipette solutions were used in many experiments, in which Na-gluconate was used as a substitute for NaCl. All bath solutions were applied via a fast perfusion system to achieve a complete solution exchange within a few seconds. Data were acquired with an Axopatch 2A patch-clamp amplifier and a Digidata 1440 digitizer and recorded with pClamp 10.0 software (Axon Instruments). Whole-endolysosome currents were digitized at 10 kHz and filtered at 2 kHz. All experiments were conducted at RT (21–23°C), and all recordings were analyzed in pCLAMP10 (Axon Instruments) and Origin 8.0 (OriginLab) software.
Endolysosomal excised-patch electrophysiology
For giant excised-patch, endolysosomal luminal-side-out recordings, polished pipette electrodes (resistance, 1–2 MΩ) were filled with a solution containing 140 mM K+-gluconate, 4 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM CaCl2, and 10 mM Hepes (pH adjusted with KOH to 7.2). The bath solution contained 153 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 20 mM Hepes, and 10 mM glucose, pH 7.4. Excised-patch, endolysosomal cytoplasmic-side-out (Dong et al., 2008) recordings were performed in isolated enlarged endolysosomes with the same pipette and bath solutions that were used in the whole-endolysosome recordings.
Whole-cell recordings were performed in Cos-1 cells via pipette electrodes (resistance 3–5 MΩ) filled with the following solution: 140 mM K+-gluconate, 4 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM CaCl2 (unless otherwise indicated), and 10 mM Hepes (pH adjusted with KOH to 7.2). The standard extracellular bath solution (modified Tyrode’s solution) contained 153 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 2 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Hepes, 10 mM MES, and 10 mM glucose (pH adjusted to 4.6 with NaOH). Data were acquired with an Axopatch 2A patch-clamp amplifier and a Digidata 1440 digitizer and recorded with pClamp software.
DQ-BSA proteolytic assay
DQ-red-BSA was used as an artificial substrate to evaluate lysosomal proteolytic degradation (Yue et al., 2013). In brief, cells were treated with DQ-red-BSA (10 µg/ml; Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 2 h at 37°C in complete culture medium. After removal of extracellular DQ-red-BSA by washing twice with PBS, cells were starved in amino acid– and serum-free DF12 medium (US Biological) for 2 h to trigger autophagic degradation. To examine the effects of BK blockers on lysosomal proteolytic activities, paxilline (10 µM), quinidine (500 µM), or IBTX (100 nM) was applied during starvation. Cells were then fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min at RT, washed twice with PBS, and mounted on slides with Fluoromount-G (SouthernBiotech). DQ-red-BSA fluorescence was detected with a 561/607 filter set using the Spinning Disc Confocal Imaging System under an 60× oil objective NA 1.42 (Olympus; PlanApo N). Images were acquired and analyzed with MetaMorph Advanced Imaging acquisition software v. 126.96.36.199 (Molecular Devices). Quantification was performed using ImageJ.
Cells were fixed in 4% PFA for 1 h, washed three times with PBS, and then incubated with 1.5 mg/ml glycine in PBS for 10 min to quench the PFA. Cells were then stained for 2 h with 0.05 mg/ml filipin in PBS supplemented with 10% FBS. All procedures were conducted at RT (21–23°C). Images were obtained using a fluorescence microscope with a UV filter. Filipin intensity was calculated using ImageJ.
All reagents were dissolved and stored in DMSO or water. DQ-BSA-red was from Life Technologies; anti-SLO-1 antibodies were purchased from NeuroMab; vacuolin-1 was from Calbiochem; ML-SA1 was from Princeton BioMolecular Research Inc.; quinidine, paxilline, clofilium tosylate, NS1619, IBTX, TEA chloride, and filipin complex were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons were performed using Student’s t test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows that vacuolin-1 selectively enlarges endosomes and lysosomes. Fig. S2 shows that LysoKVCa currents are present in a variety of cell types. Fig. S3 shows the regulation of LysoKVCa by Ca2+, Mg2+, and membrane voltages. Fig. S4 shows the regulation of LysoKVCa by BK modulators and pH. Fig. S5 shows cell type–specific properties of LysoKVCa conferred by lysosomal localization of auxiliary β subunits. Fig. S6 shows the regulation of lysosomal Ca2+ refilling by LysoKVCa.
We are grateful to Drs. Robert Brenner, Jianming Cui (Washington University), and Fumitaka Kudo (Tokyo Institute of Technology) for sharing the reagents, as well as to former laboratory members Drs. Xianping Dong and Xiang Wang for their pilot studies on Ca2+-activated conductances in lysosomes. We appreciate the encouragement and helpful comments from other members of the Xu laboratory.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants NS062792 and AR060837 (to H. Xu) and HL102758 (to A. Meredith).
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Author contributions: W. Wang conceived, designed, and performed the electrophysiology and Ca2+ imaging experiments; W. Wang and H. Xu drafted the manuscript with inputs from all authors; X. Zhang and M. Gu performed electrophysiological experiments; Q. Gao performed the proteolytic assay; M. Lawas performed the Ca2+ imaging experiments; Q. Gao, L. Yu, and X. Cheng performed the confocal imaging experiments; N. Sahoo and X. Li performed the biochemistry experiments; S. Ireland and A. Meredith provided reagents; H. Xu supervised the project.