Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Naïve T cell output from the thymus varies across the human lifespan and is a key determinant of health, differing between individuals by age, sex, and genetics. How thymic output is dynamically regulated early in life in response to initial microbial colonization remains unclear. We report longitudinal thymic output dynamics, measured as T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), in 136 newborns from Stockholm, Sweden. Thymic output increases after birth following initial microbial colonization, peaking at 3–4 mo. Peak height correlates with plasma levels of RANKL and lymphotoxin-α and with a common genetic variant in the TCRD locus previously linked to adult thymopoiesis. B cell lymphopoiesis measured by KRECs reveals divergent dynamics between B and T cell branches of the adaptive immune system in early life. Findings are corroborated by thymic tissue analyses, in which local RANKL secretion correlates with medullary, but not cortical, epithelial cell numbers. These results illuminate the establishment of healthy immune–microbe interactions in early human life.

The thymus reaches its peak size and function during late fetal development and early infancy, serving as the primary site for T cell development and maturation. During this critical period, the thymus produces a diverse repertoire of naïve T cells through a complex process of positive and negative selection that establishes the foundation of adaptive immunity, as well as immune tolerance through the generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs). In healthy newborns, thymic output is remarkably high, with estimates suggesting the production of >109 new T cells daily (1), and these naïve T cells are functionally heterogeneous (2, 3). In children thymectomized early in life, numbers of naïve T cells are greatly reduced and their function less diverse at 5 years of age, but thymic tissue regeneration later in life can partially restore the diversity of the naïve T cell compartment (2). Maternal health status and stress hormones during delivery have been reported to hamper thymic output in newborn mice (4) and human newborns (5). Changes in thymic output in response to postnatal environmental exposures are poorly understood.

Thymic output gradually declines with age, beginning in early childhood and continuing throughout life, although the thymus maintains some functional capacity even in adulthood. A powerful method to track thymic output is the analysis of T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs), first discovered in the late 1980s as circular DNA fragments generated during T cell receptor gene rearrangement in developing T cells (6, 7) (Fig. S1 a). Their significance for clinical applications was recognized in the late 1990s when researchers found that TRECs could serve as reliable markers of recent thymic emigrants (8). A pivotal development occurred in 2005 when researchers demonstrated that TREC analysis could be performed using dried blood spots from newborns to detect severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) (9). In 2008, Wisconsin became the first US state to implement TREC-based newborn screening for SCID, following validation studies showing that this approach could effectively identify infants with various forms of primary immunodeficiency. TREC screening is now a standard component of newborn screening programs in the United States and many other countries and has led to improved detection and treatment outcomes for infants with SCID and other T cell lymphopenic immunodeficiencies (10).

By carrying out signal-joint TREC (sjTREC) quantification in the peripheral blood of healthy adults, we previously identified, in addition to strong age and sex-dependent differences, a genetic control of human thymopoiesis at the TCRA-TCRD locus between DD2–DD3 gene segments (genetic variant rs2204985) (11). However, it remains unknown whether this genetic variation impacts thymic function in newborns. Similar to TREC generation, DNA excision circles generated during immunoglobulin K-chain rearrangements (κ-deleting recombination excision circles, or KRECs) have been developed to evaluate B cell generation (12) (Fig. S1 a), the monitoring of which has been proposed alongside that of TRECs in neonatal screening for SCID (13).

Here, we analyze thymic output and B cell neogenesis in a cohort of healthy children born in Stockholm, Sweden, sampled frequently during their first months and years of life (14, 15). We find an initial surge in thymic output, significantly impacted by a recently described common genetic variant rs2204985, as well as gestational age at birth, but not impacted by mode of delivery or sex. B cell neogenesis, however, was found to be independent of these parameters. We also describe correlates of thymic output in the developing postnatal immune system of human newborns.

Cohort description and multiomic profiling of immune development

The cohort contains 265 longitudinal whole blood samples from 136 children born preterm (n = 68) or at term (n = 68) at Karolinska University Hospital between 2016 and 2019 (Fig. 1 a). Whole blood samples were collected at birth (cord blood), week 1, week 4, week 12, and longitudinally up to 2 years of age. We performed mass cytometry using a panel of 40 antibodies targeting markers of activation and differentiation and characterized 14 immune subpopulations. Plasma protein profiles were described using Olink assays (16) (Olink) detecting a panel of 76 proteins. sjTRECs and KRECs were measured to quantify thymic output and B cell generation respectively. The detailed schedule of sampling and analysis in the cohort is presented (Fig. S1 b).

sjTREC analysis of thymic output

The thymic output of newborn children, unlike that of healthy adults, increased with every day of life for the first 100 days and reached a plateau thereafter (Fig. 1 b). A surge in thymic output was observed around 3 mo after birth. Confirming previous observations (17, 18, 19), the difference between children born at term and preterm was significant within the first week (Fig. 1 c). However, this difference disappeared after 100 days (Fig. S2 a), following the pattern of other postnatal immune changes as previously described (14, 15). The genotypes of the rs2204985 variant, which have been reported to influence thymic output in healthy adults (11), also affect the thymic output of newborn children following the same trend as observed in adults. No difference in thymic output was observed at birth (0–3 days) between AA, GA, and GG genotypes (Fig. 1 d). However, children with GA and GG genotypes had significantly higher thymic output compared with AA later in life (88–100 days, Fig. 1 e). No difference was observed in the delta value between 0–3 days and 88–100 days, probably due to limited statistical power (Fig. 1 f). While investigating the longitudinal changes, children with the GG genotype have the highest thymic output, followed by GA and then AA (Fig. 1 g). The contributions made by mode of delivery, sex, rs2204985, gestational age at birth, and age (log10 transformed) were modelled using a generalized linear model (Fig. 1 h). According to the model, postnatal thymic output is significantly impacted by the rs2204985 variant (P = 0.0095), preterm or term birth (P = 3.2 × 10−7), and postnatal age (P = 3.1 × 10−25), but not mode of delivery or sex. In the model, a higher thymic output is associated with the GG genotype, mature birth and older age. Additionally, we have analyzed the association between sjTREC levels and rs2204985 genotype in born at term and preterm children separately, considering age in a generalized linear model (Fig. S2, b and c). We confirm the association between rs2204985 genotype and TREC levels in the cohort both for preterm (P = 0.02) and born at term children (P = 0.042).

Peripheral blood cell and protein correlates of thymic output

Due to the dynamic and heterogenous thymic output levels of newborn children, we investigated their associations with other immune characteristics. The frequencies of CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells, and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) show a positive correlation with thymic output, while neutrophils show a negative correlation (Fig. 2 a). Associations with CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, and neutrophils are consistent with results observed in adults, but the NK and pDC associations suggest a potential age-specific regulation. Among the plasma proteins, RANK ligand (RANKL), and TNFB (or lymphotoxinα, LTα) were most strongly correlated with sjTREC levels (Fig. 2 b). Individual data points according to age for RANKL and LTα are shown in Fig. S3, a and b. RANKL and LTα are both potent inducers of medullary thymic epithelial cell (TEC) (mTEC) growth and AIRE+ mTEC differentiation (11, 20). In mice, the administration of RANKL can boost thymic regeneration, both after bone marrow transplantation (21) as well as in aged mice (22). RANKL also increases TEC cellularity in human organotypic cultures (22). Here, we show that the levels of circulating RANKL and LTα correlate strongly with thymic output in healthy newborns. The association between RANKL and sjTREC levels is significant in both preterm children (P = 2.9.10−5) and in children born at term (P = 0.00016) (Fig. S3, c and d). There is no significant difference in serum RANKL and LTα levels according to rs2204985 genotype. Conversely, we observed a negative correlation between sjTREC levels and inflammatory mediators such as IL-8, oncostatin M, and IL-6. IL-8 expression was previously associated with preterm birth in children (15). In normal human thymi, elevated levels of IL-6 and oncostatin M have been associated with decreased thymic function and sjTREC levels (23). RANKL and LTα levels also correlate with CD4 T cells frequencies (Fig. S3, e and f), CD4 T cells being one of the main RANKL producers. As steroid administration could potentially impact RANKL levels, we validated the correlations between RANKL, sjTRECs levels, and CD4 frequencies in the group of children who did not receive this treatment (Fig. S3, g and h). Taken together, these findings could reflect the influence of the environment on thymic function in newborns.

B cell development in newborns

B cell generation can be studied by quantification of KRECs generated in the bone marrow during B cell development (12). The coding joint (Cj) of this rearrangement is duplicated during each cell division, whereas the signal joint KREC (sjKREC) remains stable as episomal DNA (Fig. S1 a). Therefore, in the periphery, CjKRECs and sjKRECs reflect total and recently produced B cells, respectively, whereas the ratio between Cj and sjKRECs is an indication of the mean number of divisions achieved by B cells following K-chain invalidation. sjKREC levels followed the same general pattern as sjTRECs; however, they reached a plateau during the second month after birth (Fig. 3 a), which is earlier than that of sjTRECs. This could be explained by differences in T and B cell development, with T cells requiring an additional and specific step in the thymus to differentiate from circulating bone marrow-derived progenitors. Newly generated B cells underwent a high division rate during the first month after birth to raise total B cell levels as reflected by CjKRECs (Fig. 3, b and c). Neither gestational age at birth nor the rs2204985 SNP had any influence on B cell development (Fig. 3 d).

Postnatal thymic tissue analysis

To investigate whether factors affecting thymic output in newborn blood occurred because of the intrinsic effects of thymopoiesis, we assessed thymic production by measuring sjTRECs in ex vivo thymic samples obtained from birth up to 2 years of age (Fig. 4 a). To match the analysis made in blood samples, and to decipher the genetic contribution to thymic production, we used a generalized linear model that investigated the contributions made by age (days log10 transformed), sex, and rs2204985 genotype to thymopoiesis. According to the model, postnatal thymic production is significantly influenced by age and rs2204985 genotype but not by sex (Fig. 4 b). In thymic tissue, the rs2204985 GG genotype was associated with higher sjTREC levels compared with GA and AA genotypes (Fig. 4 c), suggesting a direct impact of the variant on thymopoiesis that is independent of peripheral T cell homeostasis. As T cell generation rapidly declines with age, we analyzed the correlation between sjTREC levels and age (days log10 transformed) and observed a negative correlation already during the first months of life (Fig. 4 d). These findings largely corroborate what is seen in the blood of young children and indicate that blood measurements are reflective of effects within the thymus.

The correlation between RANKL in blood with sjTREC inspired us to look at this protein also within the thymus. We directly analyzed the intracellular expression level of RANKL in CD4+, TCRγδ T cells, and NKT by intracellular flow cytometry and related the expression level (geometric mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]) to the numbers of mTECs and cortical TECs (cTECs) per gram of thymic tissue from 13 children previously described (22). This analysis revealed a positive correlation between RANKL and numbers of mTECs, but not cTECs (Fig. 4, e and f). This finding is in line with previously reported roles of RANKL in thymic medulla formation and a possible explanation for its association with thymopoiesis in human newborns.

The concept of a layered hematopoietic development (24) requires a critical assessment of the parameters governing the molecular switches that give rise to the timely evolution of the adaptive immune system in relation to changing needs and environmental exposures. Thymic function is likely to play an important role in this regard, as the need for a large and diverse T cell pool is important for the establishment of healthy immune–microbe interactions early in life (25). For instance, in mice, Tregs produced during the perinatal period have a distinct role that persists during adulthood and maintains self-tolerance (26). Also in mice, intestinal microbes in early life shape the repertoire of PLZF-expressing innate lymphoid cells, impacting disease susceptibility in adulthood (27). In humans, thymic generation of γδ T cells also follow a wave-like pattern during fetal life and infancy (28) with distinct tissue-homing properties (29).

Thymic cross talk between developing thymocytes, TECs, and other stromal cells is critical for constructing the thymic microenvironment during human fetal life (30) and involves lymphotoxin signaling and the RANK-RANKL axis (31). During pregnancy, thymic function transiently involutes, with a decreased cellularity and an increased medullary to cortex ratio. This is a physiological process induced by progesterone, the receptor for which is expressed by TECs (32). Postpartum thymic regeneration in mice is associated with the overexpression of FOXN1-regulated genes in TECs (33). Interestingly, in mice, progesterone drives the expansion of natural Tregs through RANK expression in mTECs (34). Here, we provide direct evidence of a positive association between RANKL, LTα, and thymic output in human newborns.

sjTRECs measured in thymic tissue largely reflect thymocytes that have successfully undergone TCRα rearrangement, which occurs at the double-positive (CD4+CD8+) stage in the thymic cortex, before selection steps. Consequently, thymic sjTREC levels primarily reflect the size and proliferative dynamics of the cortical thymocyte pool and the efficiency of early thymocyte differentiation. In contrast, sjTRECs detected in peripheral blood represent recent thymic emigrants, mature naïve single-positive T cells that have successfully completed both positive and negative selection and exited the thymus. These differences highlight that thymic and blood sjTREC measurements capture distinct stages of T cell development and may therefore be differentially affected by changes in the thymic microenvironment. In this context, the positive association we evidence here between blood RANKL, LTα, and sjTREC levels may reflect an active thymic microenvironment in which thymocyte-derived signals support TEC differentiation and thymic architecture, which in return support thymic production.

Using a large adult cohort, it was identified that in addition to age and biological sex, a common genetic variant (rs2204985, A/G alleles) at the TCRA-TCRD locus located between DD2–DD3 gene segments has effects on human thymopoiesis (11), where the G allele was associated with a higher thymic output. Here, we report that this variant is also associated with differences in thymic function in newborns, as assessed by sjTREC levels in both peripheral blood and thymic tissue. Although the precise mechanism by which this genetic polymorphism regulates thymopoiesis remains elusive, there is some evidence for an impact on health and disease. In one study of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) recipients from an unrelated donor, the donor rs2204985 AA genotype was associated with an adverse outcome (35). However, it should be noted that only weak support for an association between rs2204985 and the outcome of SCT could be found in a cohort of four European populations (36). In an additional study, the rs2204985 GG genotype was associated with a higher incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease after allo-HSCT, underlining the complexity of immune reconstitution in different transplant setting (37). Finally, in COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia, the GG genotype at rs2204985 was associated with improved outcome and a more sustained immune response (38).

Our data also suggest an interplay between the thymic function of mother and child, which could in turn be affected by multiple factors such as maternal health status or inflammatory conditions causing preterm birth, such as preeclampsia, chorioamnionitis, or other microbial infections, and potentially also the rs2204985 genetic determinant. In this regard, a small fetal thymus as revealed by ultrasound monitoring has been associated with a higher risk of preterm birth (39).

In summary, we identify important factors associated with inter-individual differences in the early life output of T and B cells in human newborns during the first 3 mo of life. Whether these differences translate into functional consequences or altered immune-microbe interactions remains to be determined with longer follow-up and larger cohorts analyzed prospectively.

Inclusion and ethics

The study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and the study protocol was approved by the regional ethical board in Stockholm, Sweden (DNR: 2014/921-3 and 2016/512-31/1). After obtaining informed consent from parents, blood samples from newborns and parents were collected at the Karolinska University Hospital. Whole blood was frozen directly in EDTA tubes at −80°C. Clinical metadata such as mode of delivery, nutrition, growth, and medications were gathered in a clinical database.

Mass cytometry

Blood samples obtained longitudinally from children were processed by mixing with an equal amount of stabilizer (Cytodelics AB) (40), incubated for 10 min at ambient temperature and stored at −80°C until further processing. Stabilized samples were thawed, fixed, and lysed using Lysis and Wash buffers (whole blood processing kit; Cytodelics AB). After fixation/lysis of stabilized whole blood samples, 1–2 × 106 cells/sample were plated and cryopreserved using standard cryoprotective solution. For staining, cells were thawed at 37°C, barcoded using an automated liquid handling robotic system (Agilent technologies) using the Cell-ID 20-plex Barcoding kit (Standard BioTools Inc.) as per the manufacturer’s recommendations, and stained batch-wise after pooling. Antibodies targeting the surface antigens are listed in Table 1, washed with cell staining buffer (CSB) (Standard BioTools Inc.), and fixed with 2% formaldehyde, all of which were performed using a custom-built liquid handling robotic platform (41). Cells were then stained with iridium-labeled DNA intercalator at a final concentration of 0.125 mM (MaxPar Intercalator-Ir, Standard BioTools Inc.) on the day of sample acquisition. Following washes with CSB, PBS, and cell acquisition solution (Standard BioTools Inc.), cells were counted and diluted to 500,000 cells/ml containing 0.1× EQ Four Element Calibration Beads (Standard BioTools Inc.) and filtered through a 35-mm nylon mesh. Samples were acquired on a Helios mass cytometer (Standard BioTools Inc.) using CyTOF software version 6.0.626 with noise reduction, a lower convolution threshold of 200, event length limits of 10–150 pushes, a sigma value of 3, and flow rate of 0.045 ml/min.

Antibody staining of cells

The panel of monoclonal antibodies used for this study is indicated in Table 1. Monoclonal antibodies were either purchased pre-conjugated from Standard BioTools or in purified carrier/protein-free buffer formulation from other vendors. Purified antibodies were conjugated to lanthanide metals using the MAXPAR X8 polymer conjugation kit (Standard BioTools Inc.), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Antibody concentration before and after conjugation was measured by NanoDrop 2000 spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 280 nm. Following conjugation of antibodies, they were diluted 1:1 in Protein Stabilizer PBS (Candor Bioscience GmbH) prior to use in experiments.

Plasma protein analyses

Plasma samples were gently thawed on ice and centrifuged at 1,500  × g, 4°C for 20 min. 20 μl per sample was transferred to 96-well microtiter plates. Plasma proteins were analyzed using multiplex proximity extension assay technology (Olink Bioscience) as previously described (41). Briefly, each kit consists of a microtiter plate for measuring 92 protein biomarkers in all 88 samples/plate, and each well contained 96 pairs of DNA-labeled antibody probes. Longitudinal samples from each baby were allocated to the same plate to reduce batch-effects related to inter-individual variability. To minimize inter- and intra-run variation, the data were normalized using both an internal control (extension control) and an inter-plate control and then transformed using a predetermined correction factor. The inflammation panel was used for this analysis. The preprocessed data were provided in the arbitrary unit normalized protein expression (NPX) on a log2 scale, where a high NPX represents high protein concentration. Limit of detection (LOD) for each protein was defined as three standard deviations above the background. Protein panels from samples with >10% below LOD values were removed from the analysis.

Quantification of TREC and B cell receptor excision circle (sjTREC/KREC) and genotyping for the rs2204985 SNP

DNA was extracted from whole blood samples using a Chemagen kit. 500 ng of genomic DNA was preamplified in a 40 μl reaction mix that contained the probes and primers (Eurogentec, Thermo Fisher Scientific) listed in Table S1 and 1× preamplification Master Mix (Standard BioTools) for 10 min at 95°C and then 14 cycles of 95°C for 15 s; 60°C for 4 min with PCR Master Nexus Gradient (Eppendorf). Then sample inlets of 192.24 Dynamic array IFCs (Standard BioTools) were loaded with 3 μl of a mix of 1.8 μl of a 1/20th dilution of preamplified DNA, 2 μl of 2× TaqMan GTXpress (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.2 μl of 2× sample Loading Reagent (Standard BioTools). Assays inlets were loaded with 3 μl of an equal mixture of 2× Assay loading Reagent (Standard BioTools) and 20× Assay that contains the primers and the probe specific for each assay (listed in Table S1). Each assay was loaded in quadruplicate. The IFC was placed into the Juno controller where sample and assay inlets were loaded into the reaction chamber using the Load Mix 192.24 GE program. Real-time PCR data were collected using a Biomark HD instrument after each cycle with the following thermal protocol: 96.5°C for 20 s and 40 cycles of 96°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s. All assays were normalized to 150,000 cells using albumin gene quantification and log10 transformed.

Thymocyte isolation

Pediatric thymus samples were obtained from children undergoing cardiac surgery and used according to and with the approval of the French Ministry of Research (Hôpital Necker, Paris, DC-2014-2272). The thymus tissue was mechanically disrupted by cutting the thymic lobes into small pieces and then squeezing the pieces with the plunger of a 5-ml syringe through a 70-μm cell strainer to obtain a single-cell suspension. The cells were then frozen as a dry pellet and stored until further use.

Quantification of TREC (sjTREC) in thymocytes

DNA extraction was performed using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen). Multiplex real-time quantification was performed using the 7500 Fast PCR system (Life Technologies) in 96-well plates loaded with 20 μl containing 8 μl of DNA (0.5 µg of genomic DNA), 10 μl of 2× Takyon Low Rox Probe MM (Eurogentec), and 2 μl of specific primer-probe mix (Table S2) with the following thermal protocol: 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s sjTRECs were normalized to 150,000 cells using the albumin gene quantification and log10 transformed.

Genotyping for rs2204985 SNP in thymocytes

The rs2204985 SNP was genotyped in thymic samples using the 7500 Fast PCR system (Life Technologies) in 96-well plates loaded with 10 μl containing 4 μl of DNA (20 ng of genomic DNA), 5 μl of 2× Takyon Low Rox Probe MM (Eurogentec), 0.125 μl of 80× TaqMan Genotyping Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and 0.875 μl of TE Buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The following thermal protocol was applied: 95°C for 10 min and 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s.

TEC isolation, flow cytometry analysis, and quantification of TECs

Human TECs were isolated using a Multi Tissue Dissociation Kit and a gentleMACS dissociator according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec). CD45+ hematopoietic cells were depleted using anti-human CD45 microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) to enrich for epithelial cells. Sample preparation and antibody staining were performed using standard procedures. CD45 cells were stained in fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) buffer (PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 5 mM EDTA) with the following antibodies: EpCAM BUV737 (EBA-1), DEC205 BV421 (MMRI-7), CD45 PerCP (HI30), and CD31 PE (L133.1) (BD Biosciences). Staining was performed for 30 min at 4°C. Flow cytometry data were acquired using an LSR II Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (BD Life Sciences). TECs were defined as CD45EpCAM+CD31 cells. The DEC205 marker was used to segregate cTECs (DEC205+) from mTECs (DEC205). Absolute numbers of cTECs and mTECs were calculated from total FACS cell counts and normalized to the weight of thymic tissue (cells per gram) included in the digestion.

Flow cytometry and quantification of RANKL expression in thymocytes

Sample preparation and antibody staining were performed using standard procedures. Thymocytes were stained in FACS buffer (PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin and 5 mM EDTA) with the following antibodies: TCRαβ BUV737 (IP26), CD4 BUV395 (RPA-T4), CD8 BV785 (SK1), TCRγδ PE-CF594 (B1), Vβ11 BV421 (REA559), CD3 FITC (UCHT1), and Vα24 PE-Cy7 (REA948) (BD Biosciences, Miltenyi Biotec). For intracellular staining of RANKL, cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained using the FOXP3 Transcription Factor Staining Kit (eBioscience) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Flow cytometry data were acquired using an LSR II Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and analyzed with FlowJo software (BD Life Sciences). RANKL-expressing cells (TCRγδ+, CD4+, and NKT) were gated, and RANKL MFI was quantified.

Online supplemental material

Fig. S1 shows cohort design and TREC analysis description. Fig. S2 shows thymic output in preterm and term delivered children. Fig. S3 shows RANKL and LTα correlation with thymic output and cell population independently of delivery status and steroids administration. Table S1 list of primers and probes used for dosage of sjTREC, cjKREC, sjKREC and genotyping for rs2204985 in newborn’s blood. Table S2 list of primers and probes used for dosage of sjTREC in postnatal thymocytes. Table S3 lists affiliations for the Milieu Intérieur Consortium.

All code to reproduce analyses and the data necessary to perform the analyses described in the manuscript are available via GitHub: https://github.com/Brodinlab/newborn_TREC/.

Computational analyses were enabled by resources at Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science. We thank Affinity Proteomics, SciLifeLab for generating Olink data.

The Brodin laboratory is supported by the HORIZON HLTH-2021-DISEASE-04 program under grant agreement 01057100 (UNDINE), HORIZON-HLTH-2022-STAYHLTH-02 grant agreement 101094099 (INITIALISE), European Advanced infraStructure for Innovative-Genomics (ID: 824110), the Swedish Research Council (2019-01495, 2020-06190, 2020-02889, 2021-06529, 2021-05450, and 2022-01567), the Swedish Cancer Society (CAN2015/587, CAN2018/764, and 20 1175 PjF) and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW2023-0344, VC-2021-0026, and KAW 2020.0102), Göran Gustafsson Foundation (GG20200040), Swedish Society for Medical Research (CG-22-0148-H-02), and Karolinska Institutet (2019-01019 and 2018-02229). The Toubert laboratory is supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Project Hu-Thy-L ANR-21-CE15-0008-01 to A. Toubert and grant RANKLthym ANR-19-CE18-0021-01 to A. Toubert and M. Irla). INSERM UMR 1342 is a member of OPALE Carnot Institute, the Organization for Partnerships in Leukemia, Institut de Recherche Saint-Louis, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France (https://www.opale.org). The Milieu Interieur study was supported by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche French government’s Invest in the Future program (reference ANR-10-LABX-69-01).

Author contributions: Ziyang Tan: data curation, formal analysis, methodology, software, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Camille Kergaravat: formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Laura Gonzalez: methodology. Anette Johnsson: resources. Erika Negrini: methodology. Christian Pou: investigation, methodology, validation, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. Anna Karin Bernhardsson: resources. Hugo Barcenilla: investigation. Margarita Ivanchenko: methodology. Yang Chen: software. Ewa Henckel: investigation and methodology. Tadepally Lakshmikanth: investigation, methodology, validation, and writing—review and editing. Jaromír Mikeš: methodology and writing—review and editing. Anna James: funding acquisition, project administration, and writing—review and editing. Agata Cieslak: resources. Vahid Asnafi: resources. Jonathan Desponds: conceptualization and methodology. Magnus Fontes: conceptualization, methodology, resources, supervision, validation, and writing—review and editing. Magali Irla: conceptualization, funding acquisition, and writing—review and editing. Emmanuel Clave: conceptualization, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, and writing—review and editing.

1.
Haynes
,
B.F.
,
M.L.
Markert
,
G.D.
Sempowski
,
D.D.
Patel
, and
L.P.
Hale
.
2000
.
The role of the thymus in immune reconstitution in aging, bone marrow transplantation, and HIV-1 infection
.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18
:
529
560
.
2.
van den Broek
,
T.
,
E.M.
Delemarre
,
W.J.
Janssen
,
R.A.
Nievelstein
,
J.C.
Broen
,
K.
Tesselaar
,
J.A.
Borghans
,
E.E.
Nieuwenhuis
,
B.J.
Prakken
,
M.
Mokry
, et al
.
2016
.
Neonatal thymectomy reveals differentiation and plasticity within human naive T cells
.
J. Clin. Investig.
126
:
1126
1136
.
3.
Dinges
,
S.S.
,
K.
Amini
,
L.D.
Notarangelo
, and
O.M.
Delmonte
.
2024
.
Primary and secondary defects of the thymus
.
Immunol. Rev.
322
:
178
211
.
4.
García-Tamayo
,
F.
, and
L.I.
Terrazas
.
1997
.
Stressful stimulation of newborn mice increases the in vitro proliferative response in T cells from thymus
.
Arch. Méd Res.
28
:
337
342
.
5.
Huda
,
M.N.
,
S.M.
Ahmad
,
M.J.
Alam
,
A.
Khanam
,
M.N.A.
Afsar
,
Y.
Wagatsuma
,
R.
Raqib
,
C.B.
Stephensen
, and
K.D.
Laugero
.
2019
.
Infant cortisol stress–response is associated with thymic function and vaccine response
.
Stress
.
22
:
36
43
.
6.
Okazaki
,
K.
,
D.D.
Davis
, and
H.
Sakano
.
1987
.
T cell receptor β gene sequences in the circular DNA of thymocyte nuclei: Direct evidence for intramolecular DNA deletion in V-D-J joining
.
Cell
.
49
:
477
485
.
7.
Fujimoto
,
S.
, and
H.
Yamagishi
.
1987
.
Isolation of an excision product of T-cell receptor α-chain gene rearrangments
.
Nature
.
327
:
242
243
.
8.
Douek
,
D.C.
,
R.D.
McFarland
,
P.H.
Keiser
,
E.A.
Gage
,
J.M.
Massey
,
B.F.
Haynes
,
M.A.
Polis
,
A.T.
Haase
,
M.B.
Feinberg
,
J.L.
Sullivan
, et al
.
1998
.
Changes in thymic function with age and during the treatment of HIV infection
.
Nature
.
396
:
690
695
.
9.
Chan
,
K.
, and
J.M.
Puck
.
2005
.
Development of population-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
.
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
115
:
391
398
.
10.
Kwan
,
A.
,
R.S.
Abraham
,
R.
Currier
,
A.
Brower
,
K.
Andruszewski
,
J.K.
Abbott
,
M.
Baker
,
M.
Ballow
,
L.E.
Bartoshesky
,
F.A.
Bonilla
, et al
.
2014
.
Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in 11 screening programs in the United States
.
JAMA
.
312
:
729
738
.
11.
Clave
,
E.
,
I.L.
Araujo
,
C.
Alanio
,
E.
Patin
,
J.
Bergstedt
,
A.
Urrutia
,
S.
Lopez-Lastra
,
Y.
Li
,
B.
Charbit
,
C.R.
MacPherson
, et al
.
2018
.
Human thymopoiesis is influenced by a common genetic variant within the TCRA-TCRD locus
.
Sci. Transl Med.
10
:eaao2966.
12.
Zelm
,
M.C.van
,
T.
Szczepanski
,
M.
van der Burg
, and
J.J.M.
van Dongen
.
2007
.
Replication history of B lymphocytes reveals homeostatic proliferation and extensive antigen-induced B cell expansion
.
J. Exp. Med.
204
:
645
655
.
13.
Borte
,
S.
,
U.
von Döbeln
,
A.
Fasth
,
N.
Wang
,
M.
Janzi
,
J.
Winiarski
,
U.
Sack
,
Q.
Pan-Hammarström
,
M.
Borte
, and
L.
Hammarström
.
2012
.
Neonatal screening for severe primary immunodeficiency diseases using high-throughput triplex real-time PCR
.
Blood
.
119
:
2552
2555
.
14.
Henrick
,
B.M.
,
L.
Rodriguez
,
T.
Lakshmikanth
,
C.
Pou
,
E.
Henckel
,
A.
Arzoomand
,
A.
Olin
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Mikes
,
Z.
Tan
, et al
.
2021
.
Bifidobacteria-mediated immune system imprinting early in life
.
Cell
.
184
:
3884
3898.e11
.
15.
Olin
,
A.
,
E.
Henckel
,
Y.
Chen
,
T.
Lakshmikanth
,
C.
Pou
,
J.
Mikes
,
A.
Gustafsson
,
A.K.
Bernhardsson
,
C.
Zhang
,
K.
Bohlin
, and
P.
Brodin
.
2018
.
Stereotypic immune system development in newborn children
.
Cell
.
174
:
1277
1292.e14
.
16.
Fredriksson
,
S.
,
M.
Gullberg
,
J.
Jarvius
,
C.
Olsson
,
K.
Pietras
,
S.M.
Gústafsdóttir
,
A.
Ostman
, and
U.
Landegren
.
2002
.
Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays
.
Nat. Biotechnol.
20
:
473
477
.
17.
Atkins
,
A.E.
,
M.F.
Cogley
, and
M.W.
Baker
.
2021
.
Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: Do preterm infants require special consideration?
Int. J. Neonatal. Screen.
7
:
40
.
18.
Remaschi
,
G.
,
S.
Ricci
,
M.
Cortimiglia
,
E.
De Vitis
,
L.
Iannuzzi
,
L.
Boni
,
C.
Azzari
, and
C.
Dani
.
2021
.
TREC and KREC in very preterm infants: Reference values and effects of maternal and neonatal factors
.
J. Matern-fetal Neonatal. Med.
34
:
3946
3951
.
19.
Zhao
,
Q.
,
R.
Dai
,
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Chen
,
Z.
Shu
,
L.
Zhou
,
Y.
Ding
,
X.
Tang
, and
X.
Zhao
.
2022
.
Trends in TREC values according to age and gender in Chinese children and their clinical applications
.
Eur. J. Pediatr.
181
:
529
538
.
20.
Borelli
,
A.
, and
M.
Irla
.
2021
.
Lymphotoxin: From the physiology to the regeneration of the thymic function
.
Cell Death Differ.
28
:
2305
2314
.
21.
Lopes
,
N.
,
H.
Vachon
,
J.
Marie
, and
M.
Irla
.
2017
.
Administration of RANKL boosts thymic regeneration upon bone marrow transplantation
.
EMBO Mol. Med.
9
:
835
851
.
22.
Santamaria
,
J.C.
,
J.
Chevallier
,
L.
Dutour
,
A.
Picart
,
C.
Kergaravat
,
A.
Cieslak
,
M.
Amrane
,
R.
Vincentelli
,
D.
Puthier
,
E.
Clave
, et al
.
2024
.
RANKL treatment restores thymic function and improves T cell–mediated immune responses in aged mice
.
Sci. Transl. Med.
16
:eadp3171.
23.
Sempowski
,
G.D.
,
L.P.
Hale
,
J.S.
Sundy
,
J.M.
Massey
,
R.A.
Koup
,
D.C.
Douek
,
D.D.
Patel
, and
B.F.
Haynes
.
2000
.
Leukemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M, IL-6, and stem cell factor mRNA expression in human thymus increases with age and is associated with thymic atrophy
.
J. Immunol.
164
:
2180
2187
.
24.
Herzenberg
,
L.A.
, and
L.A.
Herzenberg
.
1989
.
Toward a layered immune system
.
Cell
.
59
:
953
954
.
25.
Brodin
,
P.
2022
.
Immune-microbe interactions early in life: A determinant of health and disease long term
.
Science
.
376
:
945
950
.
26.
Yang
,
S.
,
N.
Fujikado
,
D.
Kolodin
,
C.
Benoist
, and
D.
Mathis
.
2015
.
Regulatory T cells generated early in life play a distinct role in maintaining self-tolerance
.
Science
.
348
:
589
594
.
27.
Ennamorati
,
M.
,
C.
Vasudevan
,
K.
Clerkin
,
S.
Halvorsen
,
S.
Verma
,
S.
Ibrahim
,
S.
Prosper
,
C.
Porter
,
V.
Yeliseyev
,
M.
Kim
, et al
.
2020
.
Intestinal microbes influence development of thymic lymphocytes in early life
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
.
117
:
2570
2578
.
28.
Sanchez
,
G.S.
,
S.
Emmrich
,
M.
Georga
,
A.
Papadaki
,
S.
Kossida
,
A.
Seluanov
,
V.
Gorbunova
, and
D.
Vermijlen
.
2024
.
Invariant γδTCR natural killer-like effector T cells in the naked mole-rat
.
Nat. Commun.
15
:
4248
.
29.
Gray
,
J.I.
,
D.P.
Caron
,
S.B.
Wells
,
R.
Guyer
,
P.
Szabo
,
D.
Rainbow
,
C.
Ergen
,
K.
Rybkina
,
M.C.
Bradley
,
R.
Matsumoto
, et al
.
2024
.
Human γδ T cells in diverse tissues exhibit site-specific maturation dynamics across the life span
.
Sci. Immunol.
9
:eadn3954.
30.
Yayon
,
N.
,
V.R.
Kedlian
,
L.
Boehme
,
C.
Suo
,
B.T.
Wachter
,
R.T.
Beuschel
,
O.
Amsalem
,
K.
Polanski
,
S.
Koplev
,
E.
Tuck
, et al
.
2024
.
A spatial human thymus cell atlas mapped to a continuous tissue axis
.
Nature
.
635
:
708
718
.
31.
Park
,
J.-E.
,
R.A.
Botting
,
C.
Domínguez Conde
,
D.-M.
Popescu
,
M.
Lavaert
,
D.J.
Kunz
,
I.
Goh
,
E.
Stephenson
,
R.
Ragazzini
,
E.
Tuck
, et al
.
2020
.
A cell atlas of human thymic development defines T cell repertoire formation
.
Science
367
:eaay3224.
32.
Tibbetts
,
T.A.
,
F.
DeMayo
,
S.
Rich
,
O.M.
Conneely
, and
B.W.
O'Malley
.
1999
.
Progesterone receptors in the thymus are required for thymic involution during pregnancy and for normal fertility
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
.
96
:
12021
12026
.
33.
Dumont-Lagacé
,
M.
,
T.
Daouda
,
L.
Depoërs
,
J.
Zumer
,
Y.
Benslimane
,
S.
Brochu
,
L.
Harrington
,
S.
Lemieux
, and
C.
Perreault
.
2020
.
Qualitative changes in cortical thymic epithelial cells drive postpartum thymic regeneration
.
Front. Immunol.
10
:
3118
.
34.
Paolino
,
M.
,
R.
Koglgruber
,
S.J.F.
Cronin
,
I.
Uribesalgo
,
E.
Rauscher
,
J.
Harreiter
,
M.
Schuster
,
D.
Bancher-Todesca
,
B.
Pranjic
,
M.
Novatchkova
, et al
.
2021
.
RANK links thymic regulatory T cells to fetal loss and gestational diabetes in pregnancy
.
Nature
.
589
:
442
447
.
35.
Tsamadou
,
C.
,
S.
Gowdavally
,
U.
Platzbecker
,
E.
Sala
,
T.
Valerius
,
E.
Wagner-Drouet
,
G.
Wulf
,
N.
Kröger
,
N.
Murawski
,
H.
Einsele
, et al
.
2022
.
Donor genetic determinant of thymopoiesis rs2204985 impacts clinical outcome after single HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
.
Bone Marrow Transpl.
57
:
1539
1547
.
36.
Nihtilä
,
J.
,
U.
Salmenniemi
,
M.
Itälä-Remes
,
R.E.
Crossland
,
D.
Gallardo
,
K.
Bogunia-Kubik
,
P.
Łacina
,
M.
Bieniaszewska
,
S.
Giebel
,
K.
Hyvärinen
, et al
.
2024
.
Donor genetic determinant of thymopoiesis, rs2204985, and stem cell transplantation outcome in a multipopulation cohort
.
Hum. Immunol.
85
:
110791
.
37.
Arruda
,
L.C.M.
,
A.
Gaballa
,
M.
Schaffer
,
E.
Clave
,
M.
Solders
,
O.
Ringden
,
A.
Toubert
, and
M.
Uhlin
.
2025
.
The donor genetic determinant of human thymopoiesis rs2204985 is associated with acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients
.
Cytotherapy
.
27
:
956
961
.
38.
Roux
,
H.M.
,
A.
Marouf
,
J.
Dutrieux
,
B.
Charmeteau-De Muylder
,
S.
Figueiredo-Morgado
,
V.
Avettand-Fenoel
,
P.
Cuvelier
,
C.
Naudin
,
F.
Bouaziz
,
G.
Geri
, et al
.
2023
.
Genetically determined thymic function affects strength and duration of immune response in COVID patients with pneumonia
.
Sci. Adv.
9
:eadh7969.
39.
Caissutti
,
C.
,
A.
Familiari
,
A.
Khalil
,
M.E.
Flacco
,
L.
Manzoli
,
G.
Scambia
,
A.
Cagnacci
, and
F.
D'antonio
.
2018
.
Small fetal thymus and adverse obstetrical outcome: A systematic review and a meta‐analysis
.
Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.
97
:
111
121
.
40.
Brodin
,
P.
,
D.
Duffy
, and
L.
Quintana-Murci
.
2019
.
A call for blood—In human immunology
.
Immunity
.
50
:
1335
1336
.
41.
Lundberg
,
M.
,
A.
Eriksson
,
B.
Tran
,
E.
Assarsson
, and
S.
Fredriksson
.
2011
.
Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
39
:e102.

The Milieu Intérieur Consortium is composed of the following team leaders: Laurent Abel, Andres Alcover, Hugues Aschard, Philippe Bousso, Nollaig Bourke, Petter Brodin, Pierre Bruhns, Nadine Cerf-Bensussan, Ana Cumano, Christophe D’Enfert, Ludovic Deriano, Marie-Agnès Dillies, James Di Santo, Gérard Eberl, Jost Enninga, Jacques Fellay, Ivo Gomperts-Boneca, Milena Hasan, Gunilla Karlsson Hedestam, Serge Hercberg, Molly A Ingersoll, Olivier Lantz, Rose Anne Kenny, Mickaël Ménager, Frédérique Michel, Hugo Mouquet, Cliona O'Farrelly, Etienne Patin, Antonio Rausell, Frédéric Rieux-Laucat, Lars Rogge, Magnus Fontes, Anavaj Sakuntabhai, Olivier Schwartz, Benno Schwikowski, Spencer Shorte, Frédéric Tangy, Antoine Toubert, Mathilde Touvier, Marie-Noëlle Ungeheuer, Christophe Zimmer, Matthew L. Albert, Darragh Duffy, and Lluis Quintana-Murci. Affiliations are listed in Table S3.

Author notes

*

Z. Tan, C. Kergaravat, A. Toubert, and P. Brodin contributed equally to this paper.

Disclosures: T. Lakshmikanth reported nonfinancial support from Cytodelics AB outside the submitted work, and is a cofounder of Cytodelics AB (Stockholm, Sweden), which produces and distributes whole blood cell stabilizer solutions used within this study. J. Mikes is a cofounder of Cytodelics AB. P. Brodin is a cofounder of Cytodelics AB (Stockholm, Sweden), which produces and distributes whole blood cell stabilizer solutions used within this study. He is a scientific advisor for Pixelgen Technologies AB, Helaina Inc., Scailyte AG, Oxford Immune Algorithmics Ltd., and the Swedish Olympic committee and an executive board member of Sention Health AB, Stockholm, Sweden. No other disclosures were reported.

This article is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution 4.0 International, as described at https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Data & Figures

+ Expand view − Collapse view
Figure S1
Cohort design and TREC analysis description. (a) Scheme of TREC and KREC assay. Right: sjTREC are generated in the thymus during T cell differentiation, between the ISP and DP stages. It corresponds to the excision of the delta locus excision between the δREC and the ΨJα segments. This rearrangement occurs in around 80% of αβ T cells. sjTRECs are small episomal circular DNA without an origin of replication, so they are not replicated during subsequent T cell division and are directly proportional to thymic T cell production. Left: KREC are generated in the bone marrow during B cell differentiation, between Small preB and immature B stages. It corresponds to the invalidation of the nonfunctional κ chain, by excision of the Cκ segment between the intron recombination signal sequences (RSS) and the κde elements. This rearrangement occurs in around 30% of κ+ cells and in 100% of λ+ cells (around 50% of all B cells). Like sjTREC, sjKREC are not replicated and are directly proportional to B cell production. CjKREC are on the genomic DNA and are so proportional to the total number of B cells; log2(CjKREC/sjKREC) corresponds to the mean number of B cell division since the K invalidation. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; TSP, thymic seeding progenitor; DN, double negative; ISP, immature single positive; DP, double positive; SP, single positive. (b) Summary of samples and type of analysis included in the study according to the children’s age. N represents number of samples according to analysis performed and the shape of the point to the preterm or term group. Refer to the image caption for details. Panel a illustrates the process of TREC and KREC assays. On the right side, it shows the generation of signal joint TRECs (sjTRECs) in the thymus during T cell differentiation between the Immature Single Positive (ISP) and Double Positive (DP) stages. This process involves the excision of the Delta locus between the recombination excision circle (REC) and the J segments, occurring in around 80 percent of T cells. sjTRECs are small episomal circular DNA fragments that are not replicated during subsequent T cell division and are directly proportional to thymic T cell production. On the left side, it shows the generation of signal joint KRECs (sjKRECs) in the bone marrow during B cell differentiation between the Small preB and immature B stages. This process involves the excision of the C segment between the intron recombination signal sequence (RSS) and the de elements, occurring in around 30 percent of positive cells and 100 percent of positive cells (around 50 percent of all B cells). Like sjTRECs, sjKRECs are not replicated and are directly proportional to B cell production. Coding joint (cj)KRECs are on the genomic DNA and are proportional to the total number of B cells. The log2(cjKREC/sjKREC) corresponds to the mean number of B cell divisions since the K inactivation. Panel b shows two plots summarizing the samples and types of analysis included in the study according to children's age. The horizontal axis represents children's age in weeks. The vertical axis represents individual children. Different shapes and colors indicate the type of analysis performed (TREC olink_MS, TREC olink, TREC) and the group (Preterm, Term). The plot shows the distribution of samples across different ages and analysis types, with preterm and term groups distinguished by different symbols.

Cohort design and TREC analysis description. (a) Scheme of TREC and KREC assay. Right: sjTREC are generated in the thymus during T cell differentiation, between the ISP and DP stages. It corresponds to the excision of the delta locus excision between the δREC and the ΨJα segments. This rearrangement occurs in around 80% of αβ T cells. sjTRECs are small episomal circular DNA without an origin of replication, so they are not replicated during subsequent T cell division and are directly proportional to thymic T cell production. Left: KREC are generated in the bone marrow during B cell differentiation, between Small preB and immature B stages. It corresponds to the invalidation of the nonfunctional κ chain, by excision of the Cκ segment between the intron recombination signal sequences (RSS) and the κde elements. This rearrangement occurs in around 30% of κ+ cells and in 100% of λ+ cells (around 50% of all B cells). Like sjTREC, sjKREC are not replicated and are directly proportional to B cell production. CjKREC are on the genomic DNA and are so proportional to the total number of B cells; log2(CjKREC/sjKREC) corresponds to the mean number of B cell division since the K invalidation. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; TSP, thymic seeding progenitor; DN, double negative; ISP, immature single positive; DP, double positive; SP, single positive. (b) Summary of samples and type of analysis included in the study according to the children’s age. N represents number of samples according to analysis performed and the shape of the point to the preterm or term group.

Figure S1.
A multi-panel image depicts the analysis of T cell receptor excision circles (TRECs) and their relation to thymic output in children. Panel a illustrates the process of TREC and KREC assays. On the right side, it shows the generation of signal joint TRECs (sjTRECs) in the thymus during T cell differentiation between the Immature Single Positive (ISP) and Double Positive (DP) stages. This process involves the excision of the Delta locus between the recombination excision circle (REC) and the J segments, occurring in around 80 percent of T cells. sjTRECs are small episomal circular DNA fragments that are not replicated during subsequent T cell division and are directly proportional to thymic T cell production. On the left side, it shows the generation of signal joint KRECs (sjKRECs) in the bone marrow during B cell differentiation between the Small preB and immature B stages. This process involves the excision of the C segment between the intron recombination signal sequence (RSS) and the de elements, occurring in around 30 percent of positive cells and 100 percent of positive cells (around 50 percent of all B cells). Like sjTRECs, sjKRECs are not replicated and are directly proportional to B cell production. Coding joint (cj)KRECs are on the genomic DNA and are proportional to the total number of B cells. The log2(cjKREC/sjKREC) corresponds to the mean number of B cell divisions since the K inactivation. Panel b shows two plots summarizing the samples and types of analysis included in the study according to children's age. The horizontal axis represents children's age in weeks. The vertical axis represents individual children. Different shapes and colors indicate the type of analysis performed (TREC olink_MS, TREC olink, TREC) and the group (Preterm, Term). The plot shows the distribution of samples across different ages and analysis types, with preterm and term groups distinguished by different symbols.

Cohort design and TREC analysis description. (a) Scheme of TREC and KREC assay. Right: sjTREC are generated in the thymus during T cell differentiation, between the ISP and DP stages. It corresponds to the excision of the delta locus excision between the δREC and the ΨJα segments. This rearrangement occurs in around 80% of αβ T cells. sjTRECs are small episomal circular DNA without an origin of replication, so they are not replicated during subsequent T cell division and are directly proportional to thymic T cell production. Left: KREC are generated in the bone marrow during B cell differentiation, between Small preB and immature B stages. It corresponds to the invalidation of the nonfunctional κ chain, by excision of the Cκ segment between the intron recombination signal sequences (RSS) and the κde elements. This rearrangement occurs in around 30% of κ+ cells and in 100% of λ+ cells (around 50% of all B cells). Like sjTREC, sjKREC are not replicated and are directly proportional to B cell production. CjKREC are on the genomic DNA and are so proportional to the total number of B cells; log2(CjKREC/sjKREC) corresponds to the mean number of B cell division since the K invalidation. HSC, hematopoietic stem cell; TSP, thymic seeding progenitor; DN, double negative; ISP, immature single positive; DP, double positive; SP, single positive. (b) Summary of samples and type of analysis included in the study according to the children’s age. N represents number of samples according to analysis performed and the shape of the point to the preterm or term group.

Close modal
Figure 1.
A multi-panel figure depicts thymic output in newborn children. Panel a: Cohort overview detailing the timeline of sample collection and the specific longitudinal analyses performed. Panel b: Longitudinal analysis of DNA samples, plotted as log 10 TREC levels against age. The trend highlights a significant surge in thymic output occurring approximately three months post-birth. Panel c: Comparative box plot of thymic output between preterm and term infants during the first week of life; preterm neonates exhibited significantly lower levels (p equals 0.0076). Panel d: Box plot evaluating thymic output at 0–3 days of life stratified by genotype (AA, GA, GG), showing no statistically significant differences. Panel e: Analysis of thymic output at 88–100 days of life by genotype, revealing significant associations (p equals 0.006 and p equals 0.027). Panel f: Box plot of intra-individual delta values (change in thymic output) between the 0–3 day and 88–100 day time points, indicating no significant genotype-dependent differences in growth. Panel g: Scatter plot with linear regression modeling postnatal thymic output trajectories, disaggregated by rs2204985 genotype. Panel h: Coefficient plot from a generalized linear model (GLM) identifying predictors of thymic output, with labeled p-values denoting the significance of each variable.

Thymic output in newborn children. (a) Cohort overview and samples collected and analyses performed. (b) Longitudinal changes of DNA samples showing a surge of thymic output 3 mo after birth in healthy human newborns. (c) Thymic output levels of preterm and born at term children in the first week of life. P values are from Wilcoxon test. (d) Thymic output of children at 0–3 days of life. (e) Thymic output of children at 88–100 days of life. (f) The delta values of thymic output for each child between 88–100 days and 0–3 days of life. P values are from Wilcoxon test and adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg method. P values >0.05 are shown as n.s. (g) Postnatal monitoring of thymic output levels separated by rs2204985. All samples across time points of each genotype are used in the regression line. (h) Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting thymic output using the listed variables. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals from 500 bootstrap iterations. P values are from ANOVA test of the model.

Figure 1.
A multi-panel figure depicts thymic output in newborn children. Panel a: Cohort overview detailing the timeline of sample collection and the specific longitudinal analyses performed. Panel b: Longitudinal analysis of DNA samples, plotted as log 10 TREC levels against age. The trend highlights a significant surge in thymic output occurring approximately three months post-birth. Panel c: Comparative box plot of thymic output between preterm and term infants during the first week of life; preterm neonates exhibited significantly lower levels (p equals 0.0076). Panel d: Box plot evaluating thymic output at 0–3 days of life stratified by genotype (AA, GA, GG), showing no statistically significant differences. Panel e: Analysis of thymic output at 88–100 days of life by genotype, revealing significant associations (p equals 0.006 and p equals 0.027). Panel f: Box plot of intra-individual delta values (change in thymic output) between the 0–3 day and 88–100 day time points, indicating no significant genotype-dependent differences in growth. Panel g: Scatter plot with linear regression modeling postnatal thymic output trajectories, disaggregated by rs2204985 genotype. Panel h: Coefficient plot from a generalized linear model (GLM) identifying predictors of thymic output, with labeled p-values denoting the significance of each variable.

Thymic output in newborn children. (a) Cohort overview and samples collected and analyses performed. (b) Longitudinal changes of DNA samples showing a surge of thymic output 3 mo after birth in healthy human newborns. (c) Thymic output levels of preterm and born at term children in the first week of life. P values are from Wilcoxon test. (d) Thymic output of children at 0–3 days of life. (e) Thymic output of children at 88–100 days of life. (f) The delta values of thymic output for each child between 88–100 days and 0–3 days of life. P values are from Wilcoxon test and adjusted with Benjamini–Hochberg method. P values >0.05 are shown as n.s. (g) Postnatal monitoring of thymic output levels separated by rs2204985. All samples across time points of each genotype are used in the regression line. (h) Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting thymic output using the listed variables. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals from 500 bootstrap iterations. P values are from ANOVA test of the model.

Close modal
+ Expand view − Collapse view
Figure S2
Thymic output in preterm and term delivered children. (a–c) Thymic output in preterm (n = 34) and in term (n = 23) children after 100 days of life. Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting thymic production using the listed variables in preterm (b) and term (c) born children. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals. P values are from the generalized linear model. Refer to the image caption for details. Panel a: A box plot comparing thymic output in preterm and term children. The horizontal axis represents the groups (Preterm and Term), and the vertical axis represents the log-transformed thymic output (log10 TREC). The p-value indicates no significant difference between the groups. Panel b: A coefficient plot for variables affecting thymic output in preterm children. The horizontal axis represents the coefficient values, and the vertical axis lists the variables (SNPGG, SNPGA, log10age). Red and black points indicate significant and non-significant variables, respectively, with corresponding p-values. Panel c: A coefficient plot for variables affecting thymic output in term children. The horizontal axis represents the coefficient values, and the vertical axis lists the variables (SNPGG, SNPGA, log10age). Red and black points indicate significant and non-significant variables, respectively, with corresponding p-values.

Thymic output in preterm and term delivered children. (a–c) Thymic output in preterm (n = 34) and in term (n = 23) children after 100 days of life. Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting thymic production using the listed variables in preterm (b) and term (c) born children. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals. P values are from the generalized linear model.

Figure S2.
A multi-panel figure shows thymic output in preterm and term children. Panel a: A box plot comparing thymic output in preterm and term children. The horizontal axis represents the groups (Preterm and Term), and the vertical axis represents the log-transformed thymic output (log10 TREC). The p-value indicates no significant difference between the groups. Panel b: A coefficient plot for variables affecting thymic output in preterm children. The horizontal axis represents the coefficient values, and the vertical axis lists the variables (SNPGG, SNPGA, log10age). Red and black points indicate significant and non-significant variables, respectively, with corresponding p-values. Panel c: A coefficient plot for variables affecting thymic output in term children. The horizontal axis represents the coefficient values, and the vertical axis lists the variables (SNPGG, SNPGA, log10age). Red and black points indicate significant and non-significant variables, respectively, with corresponding p-values.

Thymic output in preterm and term delivered children. (a–c) Thymic output in preterm (n = 34) and in term (n = 23) children after 100 days of life. Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting thymic production using the listed variables in preterm (b) and term (c) born children. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals. P values are from the generalized linear model.

Close modal
Figure 2.
Two scatter plots show correlations between thymic output and immune characteristics. Panel a: A scatter plot showing the correlation between thymic output and the frequencies of various immune subpopulations. The horizontal axis represents Spearman correlation, ranging from minus 0.8 to 0.8. The vertical axis represents the negative log 10 of the adjusted p-value, ranging from 0 to 10. Several data points are plotted, with notable points labeled as Neutrophils, CD4 plus T, CD8 plus T, NK, and PDC. Neutrophils show a negative correlation, while CD4 plus T, CD8 plus T, NK, and PDC show positive correlations. A reference line is present at a Spearman correlation of 0.05. Panel b: A scatter plot showing the correlation between thymic output levels and the relative protein concentration levels of various proteins. The horizontal axis represents Spearman correlation, ranging from minus 0.8 to 0.8. The vertical axis represents the negative log 10 of the adjusted p-value, ranging from 0 to 10. Several data points are plotted, with notable points labeled as RANKL, TNFB, SCF, TWEAK, CD5, NT 3, CXCL 5, TRAIL, IL 7, IL 17A, OSM, IL 8, FGF 23, IL 6, MCP 1, MMP 10, CCL 20, CASP 8. RANKL, TNFB, SCF, TWEAK, CD5, NT 3, CXCL 5, TRAIL, IL 7, and IL 17A show positive correlations, while OSM, IL 8, FGF 23, IL 6, MCP 1, MMP 10, CCL 20, and CASP 8 show negative correlations. A reference line is present at a Spearman correlation of 0.05.

Associations between thymic output and blood immune profiles. (a) Spearman correlation between thymic output (TREC) and frequencies of 14 immune subpopulations characterized by mass cytometry. (b) Spearman correlation between thymic output levels and relative protein concentration levels (NPX) of 76 proteins characterized by Olink Target 96 inflammation panel. P values are corrected using Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment.

Figure 2.
Two scatter plots show correlations between thymic output and immune characteristics. Panel a: A scatter plot showing the correlation between thymic output and the frequencies of various immune subpopulations. The horizontal axis represents Spearman correlation, ranging from minus 0.8 to 0.8. The vertical axis represents the negative log 10 of the adjusted p-value, ranging from 0 to 10. Several data points are plotted, with notable points labeled as Neutrophils, CD4 plus T, CD8 plus T, NK, and PDC. Neutrophils show a negative correlation, while CD4 plus T, CD8 plus T, NK, and PDC show positive correlations. A reference line is present at a Spearman correlation of 0.05. Panel b: A scatter plot showing the correlation between thymic output levels and the relative protein concentration levels of various proteins. The horizontal axis represents Spearman correlation, ranging from minus 0.8 to 0.8. The vertical axis represents the negative log 10 of the adjusted p-value, ranging from 0 to 10. Several data points are plotted, with notable points labeled as RANKL, TNFB, SCF, TWEAK, CD5, NT 3, CXCL 5, TRAIL, IL 7, IL 17A, OSM, IL 8, FGF 23, IL 6, MCP 1, MMP 10, CCL 20, CASP 8. RANKL, TNFB, SCF, TWEAK, CD5, NT 3, CXCL 5, TRAIL, IL 7, and IL 17A show positive correlations, while OSM, IL 8, FGF 23, IL 6, MCP 1, MMP 10, CCL 20, and CASP 8 show negative correlations. A reference line is present at a Spearman correlation of 0.05.

Associations between thymic output and blood immune profiles. (a) Spearman correlation between thymic output (TREC) and frequencies of 14 immune subpopulations characterized by mass cytometry. (b) Spearman correlation between thymic output levels and relative protein concentration levels (NPX) of 76 proteins characterized by Olink Target 96 inflammation panel. P values are corrected using Benjamini–Hochberg adjustment.

Close modal
+ Expand view − Collapse view
Figure S3
RANKL and LTα correlation with thymic output and cell population independently of delivery status and steroids administration. (a–h) Relative protein concentration (NPX) of RANKL (a) and LTα (b) according to delivery status and age group. Spearman correlation of RANKL and thymic output in all cohort (c) or separated by term status (d). Spearman correlation of CD4 T cells percentages with RANKL (e) and LTα (f) colored by delivery status. Correlation of RANKL levels and sjTREC (g) or CD4 frequency (h) in children who did not received steroids. Refer to the image caption for details. Panel a shows a box plot of RANKL protein concentration across different age groups and delivery statuses. The x-axis represents age groups in days, and the y-axis represents RANKL levels. Panel b shows a similar box plot for LT protein concentration. Panel c is a scatter plot showing the correlation between RANKL and thymic output (Log10TREC) for the entire cohort, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.58 and p-value of 1.1e-10. Panel d shows the same correlation separated by term status, with R values of 0.52 and 0.59 for term and preterm groups, respectively. Panel e is a scatter plot showing the correlation between CD4 T cell percentages and RANKL levels, colored by delivery status, with an R value of 0.399 and p-value of 0.00208. Panel f shows a similar scatter plot for LT levels, with an R value of 0.405 and p-value of 0.00175. Panel g is a scatter plot showing the correlation between RANKL levels and sjTREC in children who did not receive steroids, with an R value of 0.57 and p-value of 1.7e-9. Panel h shows the correlation between RANKL levels and CD4 frequency in the same group, with an R value of 0.42 and p-value of 0.0016.

RANKL and LTα correlation with thymic output and cell population independently of delivery status and steroids administration. (a–h) Relative protein concentration (NPX) of RANKL (a) and LTα (b) according to delivery status and age group. Spearman correlation of RANKL and thymic output in all cohort (c) or separated by term status (d). Spearman correlation of CD4 T cells percentages with RANKL (e) and LTα (f) colored by delivery status. Correlation of RANKL levels and sjTREC (g) or CD4 frequency (h) in children who did not received steroids.

Figure S3.
A multi-part figure depicts correlations between RANKL, LT, thymic output, and cell populations. Panel a shows a box plot of RANKL protein concentration across different age groups and delivery statuses. The x-axis represents age groups in days, and the y-axis represents RANKL levels. Panel b shows a similar box plot for LT protein concentration. Panel c is a scatter plot showing the correlation between RANKL and thymic output (Log10TREC) for the entire cohort, with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.58 and p-value of 1.1e-10. Panel d shows the same correlation separated by term status, with R values of 0.52 and 0.59 for term and preterm groups, respectively. Panel e is a scatter plot showing the correlation between CD4 T cell percentages and RANKL levels, colored by delivery status, with an R value of 0.399 and p-value of 0.00208. Panel f shows a similar scatter plot for LT levels, with an R value of 0.405 and p-value of 0.00175. Panel g is a scatter plot showing the correlation between RANKL levels and sjTREC in children who did not receive steroids, with an R value of 0.57 and p-value of 1.7e-9. Panel h shows the correlation between RANKL levels and CD4 frequency in the same group, with an R value of 0.42 and p-value of 0.0016.

RANKL and LTα correlation with thymic output and cell population independently of delivery status and steroids administration. (a–h) Relative protein concentration (NPX) of RANKL (a) and LTα (b) according to delivery status and age group. Spearman correlation of RANKL and thymic output in all cohort (c) or separated by term status (d). Spearman correlation of CD4 T cells percentages with RANKL (e) and LTα (f) colored by delivery status. Correlation of RANKL levels and sjTREC (g) or CD4 frequency (h) in children who did not received steroids.

Close modal
Figure 3.
A multi-part figure illustrates B cell neogenesis and divisions in human children. Panel a: A box plot with individual data points shows the distribution of log10 sjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children across different age groups. The horizontal axis represents age groups, starting from cord blood (CB) and progressing through various days and months. The vertical axis represents the log10 sjKREC levels. Each box plot displays the median, lower quartile (Q1), and upper quartile (Q3) values, with whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum values, and individual data points scattered around. Panel b: Another box plot with individual data points depicts the log10 CjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children across the same age groups. The horizontal axis represents age groups, and the vertical axis represents the log10 CjKREC levels. Each box plot shows the median, Q1, and Q3 values, with whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum values, and individual data points scattered around. Panel c: A box plot with individual data points illustrates the mean number of B cell divisions estimated by log2(CjKREC/sjKREC) across different age groups. The horizontal axis represents age groups, and the vertical axis represents the mean number of B cell divisions. Each box plot displays the median, Q1, and Q3 values, with whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum values, and individual data points scattered around. Panel d: A linear model shows coefficient estimates from a generalized linear model predicting B cell generation using variables such as rs2204985 G/G, Preterm/Term, Mode of delivery, Male sex, and Age. The horizontal axis represents coefficient estimates, and the vertical axis lists the variables. Each point represents a coefficient estimate with its corresponding p-value, indicating significance or non-significance.

B cell neogenesis in newborn children. (a) Longitudinal monitoring of sjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children showing a surge 2 mo after birth, earlier than their thymic outputs. (b) CjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children. (c) Mean number of B cell divisions estimated by log2(CjKREC/sjKREC). (d) Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting B cell generation using the listed variables. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals from 500 bootstrap iterations. P values are from ANOVA test of the model.

Figure 3.
A multi-part figure illustrates B cell neogenesis and divisions in human children. Panel a: A box plot with individual data points shows the distribution of log10 sjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children across different age groups. The horizontal axis represents age groups, starting from cord blood (CB) and progressing through various days and months. The vertical axis represents the log10 sjKREC levels. Each box plot displays the median, lower quartile (Q1), and upper quartile (Q3) values, with whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum values, and individual data points scattered around. Panel b: Another box plot with individual data points depicts the log10 CjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children across the same age groups. The horizontal axis represents age groups, and the vertical axis represents the log10 CjKREC levels. Each box plot shows the median, Q1, and Q3 values, with whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum values, and individual data points scattered around. Panel c: A box plot with individual data points illustrates the mean number of B cell divisions estimated by log2(CjKREC/sjKREC) across different age groups. The horizontal axis represents age groups, and the vertical axis represents the mean number of B cell divisions. Each box plot displays the median, Q1, and Q3 values, with whiskers extending to the minimum and maximum values, and individual data points scattered around. Panel d: A linear model shows coefficient estimates from a generalized linear model predicting B cell generation using variables such as rs2204985 G/G, Preterm/Term, Mode of delivery, Male sex, and Age. The horizontal axis represents coefficient estimates, and the vertical axis lists the variables. Each point represents a coefficient estimate with its corresponding p-value, indicating significance or non-significance.

B cell neogenesis in newborn children. (a) Longitudinal monitoring of sjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children showing a surge 2 mo after birth, earlier than their thymic outputs. (b) CjKREC levels in the blood of newborn children. (c) Mean number of B cell divisions estimated by log2(CjKREC/sjKREC). (d) Coefficient estimates from generalized linear model predicting B cell generation using the listed variables. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals from 500 bootstrap iterations. P values are from ANOVA test of the model.

Close modal
Figure 4.
A multi-panel figure depicts thymic tissue analysis in young children. Panel a shows a diagram of thymic production evaluation and RANKL expression analysis. Panel b showing coefficient estimates from a generalized linear model predicting thymopoiesis levels, with days of life, male sex, and rs2204985 GA/GG status as variables. The y-axis represents the variables, and the x-axis represents coefficient estimates. Panel c is a box plot showing thymic tissue TREC levels in newborn children separated by their genotypes for SNP rs2204985. The x-axis shows genotypes (AA, GA, GG), and the y-axis shows log10 TREC levels. Panel d is a scatter plot showing thymic tissue TREC levels in relation to postnatal age, with the x-axis representing age (log10 days) and the y-axis representing log10 TREC levels. Panel e is a scatter plot showing intracellular RANKL levels in relation to estimated numbers of cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTEC) per gram of tissue, with the x-axis representing cTEC counts per gram and the y-axis representing RANKL gMFI. Panel f is a scatter plot showing intracellular RANKL levels in relation to estimated numbers of medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) per gram of tissue, with the x-axis representing mTEC counts per gram and the y-axis representing RANKL gMFI.

Thymopoiesis measured in thymus tissue from young children. (a) Thymus samples collected from children undergoing surgery and subject to TREC analysis. (b) Coefficient estimates from a generalized linear model predicting thymopoiesis (TREC) levels taking variables age, sex, and rs2204985 status into account. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals for coefficients. P values are from ANOVA tests. (c) Thymopoiesis (TREC) levels in newborn children separated by their genotypes for SNP rs2204985 (AA: n = 11, GA: n = 29, GG: n = 14). P values are from Wilcoxon pairwise test. (d) Thymopoiesis (TREC) levels in newborn children in relation to postnatal age. (e and f) Intracellular RANKL (in CD4+, gdT, and NKT thymocytes; geometric MFI, gMFI) by flow cytometry from thymi of young children (n = 13) and shown in relation to estimated numbers of cells per gram of tissue for (e) cTECs or (f) mTECs.

Figure 4.
A multi-panel figure depicts thymic tissue analysis in young children. Panel a shows a diagram of thymic production evaluation and RANKL expression analysis. Panel b showing coefficient estimates from a generalized linear model predicting thymopoiesis levels, with days of life, male sex, and rs2204985 GA/GG status as variables. The y-axis represents the variables, and the x-axis represents coefficient estimates. Panel c is a box plot showing thymic tissue TREC levels in newborn children separated by their genotypes for SNP rs2204985. The x-axis shows genotypes (AA, GA, GG), and the y-axis shows log10 TREC levels. Panel d is a scatter plot showing thymic tissue TREC levels in relation to postnatal age, with the x-axis representing age (log10 days) and the y-axis representing log10 TREC levels. Panel e is a scatter plot showing intracellular RANKL levels in relation to estimated numbers of cortical thymic epithelial cells (cTEC) per gram of tissue, with the x-axis representing cTEC counts per gram and the y-axis representing RANKL gMFI. Panel f is a scatter plot showing intracellular RANKL levels in relation to estimated numbers of medullary thymic epithelial cells (mTEC) per gram of tissue, with the x-axis representing mTEC counts per gram and the y-axis representing RANKL gMFI.

Thymopoiesis measured in thymus tissue from young children. (a) Thymus samples collected from children undergoing surgery and subject to TREC analysis. (b) Coefficient estimates from a generalized linear model predicting thymopoiesis (TREC) levels taking variables age, sex, and rs2204985 status into account. Grey lines represent 95% confidence intervals for coefficients. P values are from ANOVA tests. (c) Thymopoiesis (TREC) levels in newborn children separated by their genotypes for SNP rs2204985 (AA: n = 11, GA: n = 29, GG: n = 14). P values are from Wilcoxon pairwise test. (d) Thymopoiesis (TREC) levels in newborn children in relation to postnatal age. (e and f) Intracellular RANKL (in CD4+, gdT, and NKT thymocytes; geometric MFI, gMFI) by flow cytometry from thymi of young children (n = 13) and shown in relation to estimated numbers of cells per gram of tissue for (e) cTECs or (f) mTECs.

Close modal
Table 1.

Panel of antibodies used for mass cytometry

TagMarkerCloneVendor
89Y CD45 HI30 Standard BioTools 
113In CD57 HCD57 BioLegend 
115In HLA-A, B,C W6/32 BioLegend 
141Pr CD49d 9F10 Standard BioTools 
142Nd CD19 HIB19 Standard BioTools 
143Nd CD5 UCHT2 BioLegend 
144Nd CD16 3G8 BioLegend 
145Nd CD4 RPA-T4 Standard BioTools 
146Nd CD8a SK1 BioLegend 
147Sm CD11c Bu15 Standard BioTools 
148Nd CD31 WM59 BioLegend 
149Sm CD25 2A3 Standard BioTools 
150Nd CD64 10.1 BioLegend 
151Eu CD123 6H6 BioLegend 
152Sm TCRgd 5A6.E9 Thermo Fisher Scientific 
153Eu Siglec-8 837535 R&D Systems 
154Sm CD3e UCHT1 Standard BioTools 
155Gd CD33 WM53 BioLegend 
156Gd CD26 BA5b BioLegend 
157Gd CD9 SN4 C3-3A2 eBioscience 
158Gd CD34 581 BioLegend 
159Tb CD22 HIB22 BioLegend 
160Gd CD14 M5E2 BioLegend 
161Dy CD161 HP-3G10 BioLegend 
162Dy CD29 TS2/16 BioLegend 
163Dy HLA-DR L243 BioLegend 
164Dy CD44 BJ18 BioLegend 
165Ho CD127 A019D5 Standard BioTools 
166Er CD24 ML5 BioLegend 
167Er CD27 L128 Standard BioTools 
168Er CD38 HIT2 BioLegend 
169Tm CD45RA HI100 Standard BioTools 
170Er CD20 2H7 BioLegend 
171Yb CD7 CD7-6B7 BioLegend 
172Yb IgD IA6-2 BioLegend 
173Yb CD56 NCAM16.2 BD 
174Yb CD99 HCD99 BioLegend 
175Lu CD15 W6D3 BioLegend 
176Yb CD39 A1 BioLegend 
191Ir DNA-Ir Cell-ID Intercalator-Ir Standard BioTools 
193Ir 
209Bi CD11b Mac-1 Standard BioTools 
TagMarkerCloneVendor
89Y CD45 HI30 Standard BioTools 
113In CD57 HCD57 BioLegend 
115In HLA-A, B,C W6/32 BioLegend 
141Pr CD49d 9F10 Standard BioTools 
142Nd CD19 HIB19 Standard BioTools 
143Nd CD5 UCHT2 BioLegend 
144Nd CD16 3G8 BioLegend 
145Nd CD4 RPA-T4 Standard BioTools 
146Nd CD8a SK1 BioLegend 
147Sm CD11c Bu15 Standard BioTools 
148Nd CD31 WM59 BioLegend 
149Sm CD25 2A3 Standard BioTools 
150Nd CD64 10.1 BioLegend 
151Eu CD123 6H6 BioLegend 
152Sm TCRgd 5A6.E9 Thermo Fisher Scientific 
153Eu Siglec-8 837535 R&D Systems 
154Sm CD3e UCHT1 Standard BioTools 
155Gd CD33 WM53 BioLegend 
156Gd CD26 BA5b BioLegend 
157Gd CD9 SN4 C3-3A2 eBioscience 
158Gd CD34 581 BioLegend 
159Tb CD22 HIB22 BioLegend 
160Gd CD14 M5E2 BioLegend 
161Dy CD161 HP-3G10 BioLegend 
162Dy CD29 TS2/16 BioLegend 
163Dy HLA-DR L243 BioLegend 
164Dy CD44 BJ18 BioLegend 
165Ho CD127 A019D5 Standard BioTools 
166Er CD24 ML5 BioLegend 
167Er CD27 L128 Standard BioTools 
168Er CD38 HIT2 BioLegend 
169Tm CD45RA HI100 Standard BioTools 
170Er CD20 2H7 BioLegend 
171Yb CD7 CD7-6B7 BioLegend 
172Yb IgD IA6-2 BioLegend 
173Yb CD56 NCAM16.2 BD 
174Yb CD99 HCD99 BioLegend 
175Lu CD15 W6D3 BioLegend 
176Yb CD39 A1 BioLegend 
191Ir DNA-Ir Cell-ID Intercalator-Ir Standard BioTools 
193Ir 
209Bi CD11b Mac-1 Standard BioTools 

References

1.
Haynes
,
B.F.
,
M.L.
Markert
,
G.D.
Sempowski
,
D.D.
Patel
, and
L.P.
Hale
.
2000
.
The role of the thymus in immune reconstitution in aging, bone marrow transplantation, and HIV-1 infection
.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18
:
529
560
.
2.
van den Broek
,
T.
,
E.M.
Delemarre
,
W.J.
Janssen
,
R.A.
Nievelstein
,
J.C.
Broen
,
K.
Tesselaar
,
J.A.
Borghans
,
E.E.
Nieuwenhuis
,
B.J.
Prakken
,
M.
Mokry
, et al
.
2016
.
Neonatal thymectomy reveals differentiation and plasticity within human naive T cells
.
J. Clin. Investig.
126
:
1126
1136
.
3.
Dinges
,
S.S.
,
K.
Amini
,
L.D.
Notarangelo
, and
O.M.
Delmonte
.
2024
.
Primary and secondary defects of the thymus
.
Immunol. Rev.
322
:
178
211
.
4.
García-Tamayo
,
F.
, and
L.I.
Terrazas
.
1997
.
Stressful stimulation of newborn mice increases the in vitro proliferative response in T cells from thymus
.
Arch. Méd Res.
28
:
337
342
.
5.
Huda
,
M.N.
,
S.M.
Ahmad
,
M.J.
Alam
,
A.
Khanam
,
M.N.A.
Afsar
,
Y.
Wagatsuma
,
R.
Raqib
,
C.B.
Stephensen
, and
K.D.
Laugero
.
2019
.
Infant cortisol stress–response is associated with thymic function and vaccine response
.
Stress
.
22
:
36
43
.
6.
Okazaki
,
K.
,
D.D.
Davis
, and
H.
Sakano
.
1987
.
T cell receptor β gene sequences in the circular DNA of thymocyte nuclei: Direct evidence for intramolecular DNA deletion in V-D-J joining
.
Cell
.
49
:
477
485
.
7.
Fujimoto
,
S.
, and
H.
Yamagishi
.
1987
.
Isolation of an excision product of T-cell receptor α-chain gene rearrangments
.
Nature
.
327
:
242
243
.
8.
Douek
,
D.C.
,
R.D.
McFarland
,
P.H.
Keiser
,
E.A.
Gage
,
J.M.
Massey
,
B.F.
Haynes
,
M.A.
Polis
,
A.T.
Haase
,
M.B.
Feinberg
,
J.L.
Sullivan
, et al
.
1998
.
Changes in thymic function with age and during the treatment of HIV infection
.
Nature
.
396
:
690
695
.
9.
Chan
,
K.
, and
J.M.
Puck
.
2005
.
Development of population-based newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency
.
J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.
115
:
391
398
.
10.
Kwan
,
A.
,
R.S.
Abraham
,
R.
Currier
,
A.
Brower
,
K.
Andruszewski
,
J.K.
Abbott
,
M.
Baker
,
M.
Ballow
,
L.E.
Bartoshesky
,
F.A.
Bonilla
, et al
.
2014
.
Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency in 11 screening programs in the United States
.
JAMA
.
312
:
729
738
.
11.
Clave
,
E.
,
I.L.
Araujo
,
C.
Alanio
,
E.
Patin
,
J.
Bergstedt
,
A.
Urrutia
,
S.
Lopez-Lastra
,
Y.
Li
,
B.
Charbit
,
C.R.
MacPherson
, et al
.
2018
.
Human thymopoiesis is influenced by a common genetic variant within the TCRA-TCRD locus
.
Sci. Transl Med.
10
:eaao2966.
12.
Zelm
,
M.C.van
,
T.
Szczepanski
,
M.
van der Burg
, and
J.J.M.
van Dongen
.
2007
.
Replication history of B lymphocytes reveals homeostatic proliferation and extensive antigen-induced B cell expansion
.
J. Exp. Med.
204
:
645
655
.
13.
Borte
,
S.
,
U.
von Döbeln
,
A.
Fasth
,
N.
Wang
,
M.
Janzi
,
J.
Winiarski
,
U.
Sack
,
Q.
Pan-Hammarström
,
M.
Borte
, and
L.
Hammarström
.
2012
.
Neonatal screening for severe primary immunodeficiency diseases using high-throughput triplex real-time PCR
.
Blood
.
119
:
2552
2555
.
14.
Henrick
,
B.M.
,
L.
Rodriguez
,
T.
Lakshmikanth
,
C.
Pou
,
E.
Henckel
,
A.
Arzoomand
,
A.
Olin
,
J.
Wang
,
J.
Mikes
,
Z.
Tan
, et al
.
2021
.
Bifidobacteria-mediated immune system imprinting early in life
.
Cell
.
184
:
3884
3898.e11
.
15.
Olin
,
A.
,
E.
Henckel
,
Y.
Chen
,
T.
Lakshmikanth
,
C.
Pou
,
J.
Mikes
,
A.
Gustafsson
,
A.K.
Bernhardsson
,
C.
Zhang
,
K.
Bohlin
, and
P.
Brodin
.
2018
.
Stereotypic immune system development in newborn children
.
Cell
.
174
:
1277
1292.e14
.
16.
Fredriksson
,
S.
,
M.
Gullberg
,
J.
Jarvius
,
C.
Olsson
,
K.
Pietras
,
S.M.
Gústafsdóttir
,
A.
Ostman
, and
U.
Landegren
.
2002
.
Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays
.
Nat. Biotechnol.
20
:
473
477
.
17.
Atkins
,
A.E.
,
M.F.
Cogley
, and
M.W.
Baker
.
2021
.
Newborn screening for severe combined immunodeficiency: Do preterm infants require special consideration?
Int. J. Neonatal. Screen.
7
:
40
.
18.
Remaschi
,
G.
,
S.
Ricci
,
M.
Cortimiglia
,
E.
De Vitis
,
L.
Iannuzzi
,
L.
Boni
,
C.
Azzari
, and
C.
Dani
.
2021
.
TREC and KREC in very preterm infants: Reference values and effects of maternal and neonatal factors
.
J. Matern-fetal Neonatal. Med.
34
:
3946
3951
.
19.
Zhao
,
Q.
,
R.
Dai
,
Y.
Li
,
Y.
Wang
,
X.
Chen
,
Z.
Shu
,
L.
Zhou
,
Y.
Ding
,
X.
Tang
, and
X.
Zhao
.
2022
.
Trends in TREC values according to age and gender in Chinese children and their clinical applications
.
Eur. J. Pediatr.
181
:
529
538
.
20.
Borelli
,
A.
, and
M.
Irla
.
2021
.
Lymphotoxin: From the physiology to the regeneration of the thymic function
.
Cell Death Differ.
28
:
2305
2314
.
21.
Lopes
,
N.
,
H.
Vachon
,
J.
Marie
, and
M.
Irla
.
2017
.
Administration of RANKL boosts thymic regeneration upon bone marrow transplantation
.
EMBO Mol. Med.
9
:
835
851
.
22.
Santamaria
,
J.C.
,
J.
Chevallier
,
L.
Dutour
,
A.
Picart
,
C.
Kergaravat
,
A.
Cieslak
,
M.
Amrane
,
R.
Vincentelli
,
D.
Puthier
,
E.
Clave
, et al
.
2024
.
RANKL treatment restores thymic function and improves T cell–mediated immune responses in aged mice
.
Sci. Transl. Med.
16
:eadp3171.
23.
Sempowski
,
G.D.
,
L.P.
Hale
,
J.S.
Sundy
,
J.M.
Massey
,
R.A.
Koup
,
D.C.
Douek
,
D.D.
Patel
, and
B.F.
Haynes
.
2000
.
Leukemia inhibitory factor, oncostatin M, IL-6, and stem cell factor mRNA expression in human thymus increases with age and is associated with thymic atrophy
.
J. Immunol.
164
:
2180
2187
.
24.
Herzenberg
,
L.A.
, and
L.A.
Herzenberg
.
1989
.
Toward a layered immune system
.
Cell
.
59
:
953
954
.
25.
Brodin
,
P.
2022
.
Immune-microbe interactions early in life: A determinant of health and disease long term
.
Science
.
376
:
945
950
.
26.
Yang
,
S.
,
N.
Fujikado
,
D.
Kolodin
,
C.
Benoist
, and
D.
Mathis
.
2015
.
Regulatory T cells generated early in life play a distinct role in maintaining self-tolerance
.
Science
.
348
:
589
594
.
27.
Ennamorati
,
M.
,
C.
Vasudevan
,
K.
Clerkin
,
S.
Halvorsen
,
S.
Verma
,
S.
Ibrahim
,
S.
Prosper
,
C.
Porter
,
V.
Yeliseyev
,
M.
Kim
, et al
.
2020
.
Intestinal microbes influence development of thymic lymphocytes in early life
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
.
117
:
2570
2578
.
28.
Sanchez
,
G.S.
,
S.
Emmrich
,
M.
Georga
,
A.
Papadaki
,
S.
Kossida
,
A.
Seluanov
,
V.
Gorbunova
, and
D.
Vermijlen
.
2024
.
Invariant γδTCR natural killer-like effector T cells in the naked mole-rat
.
Nat. Commun.
15
:
4248
.
29.
Gray
,
J.I.
,
D.P.
Caron
,
S.B.
Wells
,
R.
Guyer
,
P.
Szabo
,
D.
Rainbow
,
C.
Ergen
,
K.
Rybkina
,
M.C.
Bradley
,
R.
Matsumoto
, et al
.
2024
.
Human γδ T cells in diverse tissues exhibit site-specific maturation dynamics across the life span
.
Sci. Immunol.
9
:eadn3954.
30.
Yayon
,
N.
,
V.R.
Kedlian
,
L.
Boehme
,
C.
Suo
,
B.T.
Wachter
,
R.T.
Beuschel
,
O.
Amsalem
,
K.
Polanski
,
S.
Koplev
,
E.
Tuck
, et al
.
2024
.
A spatial human thymus cell atlas mapped to a continuous tissue axis
.
Nature
.
635
:
708
718
.
31.
Park
,
J.-E.
,
R.A.
Botting
,
C.
Domínguez Conde
,
D.-M.
Popescu
,
M.
Lavaert
,
D.J.
Kunz
,
I.
Goh
,
E.
Stephenson
,
R.
Ragazzini
,
E.
Tuck
, et al
.
2020
.
A cell atlas of human thymic development defines T cell repertoire formation
.
Science
367
:eaay3224.
32.
Tibbetts
,
T.A.
,
F.
DeMayo
,
S.
Rich
,
O.M.
Conneely
, and
B.W.
O'Malley
.
1999
.
Progesterone receptors in the thymus are required for thymic involution during pregnancy and for normal fertility
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
.
96
:
12021
12026
.
33.
Dumont-Lagacé
,
M.
,
T.
Daouda
,
L.
Depoërs
,
J.
Zumer
,
Y.
Benslimane
,
S.
Brochu
,
L.
Harrington
,
S.
Lemieux
, and
C.
Perreault
.
2020
.
Qualitative changes in cortical thymic epithelial cells drive postpartum thymic regeneration
.
Front. Immunol.
10
:
3118
.
34.
Paolino
,
M.
,
R.
Koglgruber
,
S.J.F.
Cronin
,
I.
Uribesalgo
,
E.
Rauscher
,
J.
Harreiter
,
M.
Schuster
,
D.
Bancher-Todesca
,
B.
Pranjic
,
M.
Novatchkova
, et al
.
2021
.
RANK links thymic regulatory T cells to fetal loss and gestational diabetes in pregnancy
.
Nature
.
589
:
442
447
.
35.
Tsamadou
,
C.
,
S.
Gowdavally
,
U.
Platzbecker
,
E.
Sala
,
T.
Valerius
,
E.
Wagner-Drouet
,
G.
Wulf
,
N.
Kröger
,
N.
Murawski
,
H.
Einsele
, et al
.
2022
.
Donor genetic determinant of thymopoiesis rs2204985 impacts clinical outcome after single HLA mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
.
Bone Marrow Transpl.
57
:
1539
1547
.
36.
Nihtilä
,
J.
,
U.
Salmenniemi
,
M.
Itälä-Remes
,
R.E.
Crossland
,
D.
Gallardo
,
K.
Bogunia-Kubik
,
P.
Łacina
,
M.
Bieniaszewska
,
S.
Giebel
,
K.
Hyvärinen
, et al
.
2024
.
Donor genetic determinant of thymopoiesis, rs2204985, and stem cell transplantation outcome in a multipopulation cohort
.
Hum. Immunol.
85
:
110791
.
37.
Arruda
,
L.C.M.
,
A.
Gaballa
,
M.
Schaffer
,
E.
Clave
,
M.
Solders
,
O.
Ringden
,
A.
Toubert
, and
M.
Uhlin
.
2025
.
The donor genetic determinant of human thymopoiesis rs2204985 is associated with acute graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation recipients
.
Cytotherapy
.
27
:
956
961
.
38.
Roux
,
H.M.
,
A.
Marouf
,
J.
Dutrieux
,
B.
Charmeteau-De Muylder
,
S.
Figueiredo-Morgado
,
V.
Avettand-Fenoel
,
P.
Cuvelier
,
C.
Naudin
,
F.
Bouaziz
,
G.
Geri
, et al
.
2023
.
Genetically determined thymic function affects strength and duration of immune response in COVID patients with pneumonia
.
Sci. Adv.
9
:eadh7969.
39.
Caissutti
,
C.
,
A.
Familiari
,
A.
Khalil
,
M.E.
Flacco
,
L.
Manzoli
,
G.
Scambia
,
A.
Cagnacci
, and
F.
D'antonio
.
2018
.
Small fetal thymus and adverse obstetrical outcome: A systematic review and a meta‐analysis
.
Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.
97
:
111
121
.
40.
Brodin
,
P.
,
D.
Duffy
, and
L.
Quintana-Murci
.
2019
.
A call for blood—In human immunology
.
Immunity
.
50
:
1335
1336
.
41.
Lundberg
,
M.
,
A.
Eriksson
,
B.
Tran
,
E.
Assarsson
, and
S.
Fredriksson
.
2011
.
Homogeneous antibody-based proximity extension assays provide sensitive and specific detection of low-abundant proteins in human blood
.
Nucleic Acids Res.
39
:e102.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal