Cell sensing of externally applied mechanical strain through integrin-mediated adhesions is critical in development and physiology of muscle, lung, tendon, and arteries, among others. We examined the effects of strain on force transmission through the essential cytoskeletal linker talin. Using a fluorescence-based talin tension sensor (TS), we found that uniaxial stretch of cells on elastic substrates increased tension on talin, which was unexpectedly independent of the orientation of the focal adhesions relative to the direction of strain. High-resolution electron microscopy of the actin cytoskeleton revealed that stress fibers (SFs) are integrated into an isotropic network of cortical actin filaments in which filamin A (FlnA) localizes preferentially to points of intersection between SFs and cortical actin. Knockdown (KD) of FlnA resulted in more isolated, less integrated SFs. After FlnA KD, tension on talin was polarized in the direction of stretch, while FlnA reexpression restored tensional symmetry. These data demonstrate that a FlnA-dependent cortical actin network distributes applied forces over the entire cytoskeleton–matrix interface.
Live cells sense and respond to externally generated stretch, shear, and compression, and internal changes in actomyosin contractility (Geiger et al., 2009). Applied forces can vary by several orders of magnitude and on temporal scales from sub-seconds to days. Immediate responses are thought to mainly involve protein conformational changes that lead to changes in binding affinities or enzymatic activity (Vogel and Sheetz, 2006; Hsu et al., 2010; Humphrey et al., 2014; Goult et al., 2018). Ultimately, these events regulate signaling pathways, gene expression, and changes in cell and tissue phenotype. Over the past decade, our molecular understanding of mechanotransduction has rapidly expanded. However, major questions remain about how applied forces are distributed and act upon force-sensitive molecules.
The cell–ECM interface is a critical location for mechanical regulation. The focal adhesion (FA) protein talin is a key component of this linkage and a key player in mechanotransduction. Talin contains an N-terminal FERM domain that binds to integrin β subunit cytoplasmic tails. Talin’s C-terminus is comprised of a rod domain consisting of 13 helix bundles with two binding sites for F-actin: ABS2 (actin binding site 2) between residues 951 and 1327 and ABS3 near C-terminal between residues 2300 and 2541 (Himmel et al., 2009; Atherton et al., 2015; Klapholz and Brown, 2017). These helix bundles were found to open under force, exposing cryptic vinculin-binding sites, such that tension induces vinculin recruitment and reinforcement of the link to actin (Patel et al., 2006; del Rio et al., 2009; Hirata et al., 2014). Previous studies measuring force across talin showed that talin tension requires actomyosin contractility and is modulated by ECM stiffness (Austen et al., 2015; Kumar et al., 2016, 2018).
In vivo, most, if not all, cells respond to mechanical stretch. These effects are most prominent in cardiac cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, vascular endothelial and smooth muscle cells, intestinal smooth muscle, and multiple cell types in the lung, where mechanical stretch plays major roles in development and physiology. In vitro, cyclic uniaxial mechanical stretching of nonmuscle cell types induces orientation perpendicular to the direction of stretch, with similar orientation of FAs and the actin cytoskeleton (Wang et al., 2004; Kaneko et al., 2009; Hsu et al., 2010; Nagayama et al., 2012). Presumably, these events are a consequence of forces transmitted through the integrin–talin–actin linkage, but our understanding of how these forces are transmitted is limited. The goal of this study was to investigate the role of talin in cell responses to strain using our previously described talin tension sensor (TS). Our results unexpectedly showed that polarized forces from uniaxial stretch are transmitted to talin in a depolarized way. Further analysis showed that an actin cytoskeletal network that requires filamin A (FlnA) redistributes the applied force.
Results and discussion
Talin tension within FAs increases after uniaxial sustained stretch
To apply uniaxial stretch to live cells, we built custom uniaxial stretchers by 3D printing (Fig. 1, A and B). The magnitude of stretch was precisely controlled using break pins located on the base of stretcher. Strain profiles with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) membranes were determined by imaging fluorescent beads before and after stretch in the central region of the stretcher that was used for cell imaging (Fig. S1 A). Bead tracks, obtained using particle imaging velocimetry (PIV; Fig. S1 B), showed that displacements parallel and perpendicular to the direction of stretch were uniform in these regions (Fig. S1, C and D) as shown previously (Shao et al., 2013). For 10% stretch along the x axis, there was compression of 3.3 ± 0.2% along the y axis, consistent with previous results (Shao et al., 2013). The force on talin was measured using the previously characterized fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)–based TS in which the donor fluorophore, EGFP, is linked to an acceptor fluorophore, tagRFP through a 40–amino acid spring-like peptide (Kumar et al., 2016, 2018). Tension extends the spring and decreases FRET efficiency in a well-defined way (Grashoff et al., 2010). In Talin-TS, this module is inserted into the flexible linker between talin’s head and rod regions, where it registers force between the integrin binding site in the N-terminus and F-actin– and vinculin-binding sites in the C-terminus (Fig. S1 E). The control sensor, talin-CS, with the module affixed to the C-terminus, localizes similarly but does not register tension (Fig. S1 E).
Talin1−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts transfected with talin-TS were plated on fibronectin-coated ∼400-µm-thick PDMS membranes assembled into the stretch device. Well-spread cells 6 h after plating were left untreated or uniaxially stretched by 10% and then immediately fixed in the same state with 4% paraformaldehyde. The total time taken to manually turn the screw and add fixative is ∼10 s. PDMS membranes were mounted in their stretched or unstretched state on a glass slide and imaged, and the FRET index within FA calculated. Fig. 1 C shows a pseudo-colored FRET index map of talin tension within FA in unstretched and stretched cells with corresponding color bar (high FRET index value indicates low tension, and low FRET index value indicates high tension). Immediately after 10% stretch, FRET index within FA reproducibly decreased, indicating higher tension on talin (quantified in Fig. 1 D). As expected, FRET index for the talin-CS control did not change after 10% stretch (Fig. S1, F and G).
We next examined the stretch response as a function of FA orientation relative to the direction of stretch. Mean FRET index per FA in peripheral FAs was plotted against absolute FA angle, with 0° being the direction of stretch. When FAs oriented at angles within ±30° of 0 or 90° were binned and classified as parallel or perpendicular, respectively, there was no significant difference in FRET index after stretch (Fig. 1, E and F). This result was surprising given that FAs are connected to actomyosin stress fibers (SFs) that are the main source of tension on talin (Kumar et al., 2016). Actin bundles in the direction of stretch will increase in length, whereas those parallel will not. This finding prompted us to consider whether there are additional cytoskeletal networks that contribute to force transmission.
A FlnA-dependent network spatially integrates actin SF bundles
Ultrastructural analysis of the actin cytoskeleton in cultured cells revealed an isotropic network of cortical filaments beneath the plasma membrane into which SF bundles are integrated (Svitkina, 2007, 2018; Eghiaian et al., 2015). This network is therefore positioned to mediate the redistribution of forces observed above. FlnA is a major actin cross-linker in a majority of cell types including fibroblasts and, because of its length and flexibility, is a likely candidate for connecting SFs into the isotropic actin network (Zhou et al., 2010; Razinia et al., 2012). Indeed, platinum replica immuno-EM (PREM) in combination with 18-nm immunogold staining of FlnA revealed FlnA on the actin cytoskeleton throughout the cell but with higher frequency at points of intersection between SF bundles and the isotropic network (Fig. 2, A–D). Quantitative analysis of the gold particle localization within SFs revealed that 62.9 ± 8.0% of the particles were localized within immediate proximity of sites where isotropic actin filaments intersected the SF at high (30°) angles, whereas 37.1 ± 8.0% were found on the parallel actin filament bundles 18 nm from an intersection (Fig. 2 E). To test whether this preferential localization of FlnA at the sites of intersection was specific, we repeated the quantification after rotating the PREM images by 180° but keeping the gold particle positions fixed. Particle counts at sites of intersection versus along SFs were 46.6 ± 8.8% and 53.4 ± 8.8%, respectively, which was significantly different from the unrotated images (P value = 0.0007; Fig. 2 E). In some cases, the same actin filament was visualized as a component of a SF but then diverged or frayed to join the meshwork of loose actin filaments (Fig. 2 C, inset).
SFs become less interconnected after FlnA knockdown (KD)
We next tested the effect of FlnA KD on cell and FA morphology and actin organization using lentiviral infection of shRNA in NIH3T3 fibroblasts, followed by selection in puromycin. Immunofluorescence (IF) imaging (Fig. 3 A) and immunoblotting (Fig. 3 B) using FlnA antibody showed that FlnA was reduced by 97% (Fig. S1 J). Confocal imaging of phalloidin-labeled F-actin showed no obvious changes in actin organization between scrambled (scr) and FlnA shRNA cells (Fig. 3 A; Feng et al., 2006). We further labeled FAs by transfecting cells transiently with talin-TS (Fig. 3 C) to assess changes in adhesion morphology. Cell area (Fig. S1 K), FA area (Fig. S1 L), and FA aspect ratio (Fig. S1 M) were not significantly different after FlnA KD. Further, the FA orientation with respect to cell orientation was no different after FlnA KD (Fig. S1 N). Photobleaching small regions within FAs showed no detectable effect of FlnA KD on exchange dynamics and mobile fractions for talin (Fig. S1 O) and vinculin (Fig. S1 P). Western blotting of whole cell lysate for integrin β1, talin, vinculin, paxillin, phosphorylated paxillin (Y31), phosphorylated FAK (Y397), tensin1, and actin along with tubulin and GAPDH as loading controls showed no change after FlnA KD (Fig. S1, Q–T). However, IF imaging of the same FA proteins within individual FA sites revealed some effects (Fig. S2). Integrin β1 (Fig. S2 A, i and ii) was higher within FAs after FlnA KD, and there were modest increases in FA localization of talin (Fig. S2 B, i and ii), tensin1 (Fig. S2 G, i and ii), and phosphorylated FAK (Fig. S2 F, i and ii). FA localization of vinculin (Fig. S2 C, i and ii), phosphorylated paxillin (Fig. S2 E, i and ii), and actin (Fig. S2 H) was slightly decreased after FlnA KD, with total paxillin (Fig. S2 D, i and ii) showing no change. These changes are consistent with and likely due to the previously observed impaired mobility upon FlnA KD (Baldassarre et al., 2009).
Actin organization was then examined at high resolution by PREM. In control NIH3T3 cells, actin SFs are comprised of thinner interconnected actin sub-bundles that diverge and fuse throughout the length of the SF (Fig. 3, D and E; and Fig. S3 A, i and ii). Importantly, SFs with different orientations, for example, coming from two neighboring protrusions, typically merged to form arc-like structures (Fig. 3, D and E; and Fig. S3 A, i and ii). These SFs thus appeared mechanically connected via the integrating isotropic network. However, upon FlnA depletion, SF interconnectivity decreased. The SFs appeared more discrete (Fig. 3, F and G; and Fig. S3 B, i and ii) with the individual actin bundles less “fluffy” and more easily traced for long distances (Fig. 3, F and G; and Fig. S3 B, i and ii). SFs coming from different directions more often overlapped without the interconnecting network (quantified in Fig. 3 H). SFs were also more compact, as quantified by counting the number of individual actin bundles intersected by a line scan drawn perpendicular to the direction of SFs (Fig. S3 A, ii and iii; and Fig. S3 B, ii and iii). In line scans, actin bundles correspond to high-intensity peaks with values above the mean intensity level of the image. Although intensity fluctuations also occur within the bundle, they remain above the mean. These high-intensity peaks alternated with low-intensity regions with values below the image mean intensity due to gaps between the bundles. In control cells, a large number of actin bundles alternating with small gaps was observed per line scan length, as compared with discrete and less numerous bundles with larger but fewer gaps in FlnA KD cells (Fig. 3 I; and Fig. S3 A, iii, control cell; and Fig. S3 B, iii, FlnA KD cell; see Materials and methods section for more details).
Talin tension after FlnA KD
Talin-TS was then expressed in control and FlnA KD cells, and FRET measured as above. Pseudo-colored FRET index map of talin-TS (Fig. 3 J and quantification in Fig. 3 K) showed that tension on talin is on average slightly higher after FlnA KD but that the pixelwise FRET index distributions substantially overlapped (Fig. 3 L). We next examined cell responses to uniaxial stretch. The scr control and FlnA shRNA cells were plated on elastic substrates and subjected to uniaxial stretch as before. Similar to untransfected cells (Fig. 1), scr shRNA cells showed an increase in talin tension after stretch (Fig. S3 C) that was independent of orientation relative to the direction of strain (Fig. 4 A, i–iii). By contrast, in FlnA KD cells, talin in FAs oriented parallel to the strain showed a larger decrease in FRET index (increase in tension) compared with perpendicular FAs (Fig. 4 B, i–iii). Mean FRET index per FA versus FA orientation angle is shown in Fig. 4, A and B, ii, for scr and FlnA KD cells, respectively. Thus, FlnA is required for the depolarization of tension on talin. Cell orientation in scr and FlnA KD cells when unstretched, immediately and 5 min after 10% stretch, was random under all of these conditions (Fig. S3 D). Rescue by reexpression of SNAP-tagged WT full-length human FlnA in KD cells restored the depolarization (Fig. 4 C, i–iii; FlnA labeled with SNAP-tagged Alexa Fluor 647 dye in Fig. 4 C, ii; and Fig. 4 D, ii). FlnA also binds to integrin β cytoplasmic domains, potentially providing another link to F-actin (Kiema et al., 2006). To test whether this interaction contributes to depolarization of force, we rescued FlnA KD cells with SNAP-tagged I2092C/I2283C FlnA, which is deficient in integrin binding (Kiema et al., 2006). This mutant was equally effective at restoring the polarized response in talin tension upon uniaxial stretch (Fig. 4 D, i–iii).
These studies yielded the unexpected result that an anisotropic stretch led to an isotropic increase in tension on talin across the whole cell. This depolarized response required the actin cross-linker FlnA but did not require FlnA binding to integrins. These results fit well with ultrastructural visualization of a cortical actin network that connects and integrates SFs with different orientations/directions (Svitkina, 2007, 2018). Here, we find that FlnA localizes preferentially to sites where the mesh-like isotropic actin cytoskeleton links to actin SF bundles and that FlnA depletion disrupts connectivity between SFs from different directions without significant changes in cell spread area or FA area and aspect ratio (Fig. 3; Baldassarre et al., 2009). Results from a conformation-sensitive FlnA biosensor suggested that FlnA in cells is under tension (Nakamura et al., 2014). We speculate that when cells are stretched, tension increases in both the actin SFs and the isotropic cortical actin network according to their viscoelasticity. As an essential load-bearing element between these networks, FlnA would thus play a major role in transferring tension between them to redistribute and equalize forces on FAs.
These results may be relevant to the ability of FlnA to promote cell survival under mechanical load (Pinto et al., 2014). Cyclic strain increases expression of FlnA, which promotes rigidity and mechanical stability of the cortical actin cytoskeleton (D’Addario et al., 2001; Zhou et al., 2010; Razinia et al., 2012). Force application was found to rapidly decrease plasma membrane potential, which, in FlnA-deficient cells, contributed to irreversible cell depolarization and cell death (Kainulainen et al., 2002). The ability of FlnA to redistribute applied forces is likely to contribute to its function in promoting cell survival under strain.
While tension on talin may be independent of strain direction, the subsequent evolution of the cytoskeleton need not be. During sustained uniaxial stretch, there is an orientation-independent rapid induction of FA growth/reinforcement that is followed by orientation-dependent slow FA disassembly, an important step for enforcing alignment of cells perpendicular to the direction of stretch (Faust et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2013). FAs grow along actin SFs that serve as scaffolds for recruitment of FA components, a role that is distinct from SF contractility (Choi et al., 2008). Thus, our findings do not conflict with results that parallel and perpendicular FAs remodel differently in response to uniaxial stretch (Chen et al., 2013) and align perpendicular to the direction of cyclic uniaxial stretch (De et al., 2007; Faust et al., 2011). Indeed, detailed imaging suggested that remodeling begins with differential responses of the SFs rather than the FAs (Lee et al., 2010), while SFs show remodeling events in response to stretch at regions far from FAs (Smith et al., 2010). Thus, despite the lack of polarity at the level of talin tension, the orientation of SFs may therefore confer polarized cell responses to applied forces.
In summary, these results reveal a key role for FlnA in integrating FAs and SFs with the isotropic cortical actin network to mediate rapid distribution of forces and thereby modulate cell responses. Further understanding of this “asymmetry breaking” process and its implications for cell mechanics and signaling will be important for understanding both physiological and pathological responses to force, and diseases such as aneurysm and developmental disorders related to filamin mutations (Zhou et al., 2010; Razinia et al., 2012).
Materials and methods
Cell culture and plasmid transfection
Talin1−/− cells (Priddle et al., 1998) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) with 10% FBS (Gibco), penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco), β-mercaptoethanol (5 µl in 500 ml; Sigma-Aldrich), and sodium bicarbonate (8 ml of 7.5% [weight by volume] in 500 ml media; Sigma-Aldrich). NIH3T3 (ATCC) fibroblasts were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) with 10% FBS (Sigma-Aldrich) and penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). Talin-TS was as described (Kumar et al., 2016). SNAP-tagged WT and integrin binding–deficient mutant FlnA constructs were derived from corresponding plasmids WT (pcDNA3-FlnA-GFP) and FlnA with mutations I2092C/I2283C (Kiema et al., 2006; Lad et al., 2007) by replacing EGFP with the sequence encoding SNAP. All plasmids were constructed using PCR-based oligonucleotide synthesis and Gibson cloning and were confirmed by DNA sequencing. Talin1−/− mouse embryonic fibroblast and NIH3T3 cells were transfected with Talin-TS and/or SNAP-tagged FlnA vectors using Jetprime reagent (Polyplus) and Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), respectively, according to the manufacturers’ protocol.
Antibody and dye labeling
The following primary antibodies were diluted in TBS with 0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich) and used overnight at 4°C: rabbit polyclonal anti-human FlnA antibody, which cross-reacts with mouse FlnA (1:1,000 for Western blot [WB] and 1:200 for IF; Kiema et al., 2006; Heuzé et al., 2008; Iwamoto et al., 2018); mouse vinculin (1:2,000 for WB and 1:1,000 for IF; clone hVIN-1; V9131; Sigma-Aldrich), mouse tubulin (1:2,000 for WB; clone DM1a; T9026; Sigma-Aldrich), mouse talin (1:2,000 for WB and 1:500 for IF; clone 8d4; T3287; Sigma-Aldrich), integrin β1 (1:200 for WB; Chan and Hemler, 1993), Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated Armenian hamster integrin β1 (1:1,000 for IF; clone HMβ1-1; #102214; Biolegend); rabbit paxillin (1:2,000 for WB and 1:500 for IF; ab32084; Abcam); rabbit phosphorylated Y31 paxillin (1:500 for WB and 1:400 for IF; 44-720G; Invitrogen); rabbit tensin1 (1:2,000 for WB and 1:500 for IF; SAB4200283; Sigma-Aldrich); rabbit phosphorylated Y397 FAK (1:2,000 for WB and 1:500 for IF; #3283; Cell Signaling Technology); goat anti-actin (1:2,000 for WB; C-11; sc-1615; Santa Cruz Biotechnology); and rabbit GAPDH (1:2,500 for WB; #2118; Cell Signaling Technology). Actin was labeled using Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated phalloidin (1:200 in PBS; Molecular Probes). Nuclei were labeled using Hoechst 33342 (1:1,000 in PBS; Molecular Probes). SNAP-tagged filamin was labeled using Alexa Fluor 647–conjugated cell-permeable SNAP dye (1:200 in cell culture media; New England Biolabs).
FlnA was depleted using lentivirus targeting mouse shRNA (sequence 5′-CTAGAAGCTCCCATGGCAATG-3′) in pLKO.1 vector. For lentivirus production, HEK 293Tx cells (ATCC) were plated overnight at 70% confluency in 10-cm dishes and transfected with either scr or FlnA shRNA plus equal amounts of the two third-generation packaging plasmids (Addgene) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Transfection media were replaced after 6 h with standard culture media. Lentivirus particle-rich media were collected after 48 h and centrifuged at 300 g at 4°C for 15 min. For infection, this supernatant plus 4 µg/ml polybrene was added to NIH3T3 cells plated overnight at 70% confluency. 1 d later, infection media were replaced with fresh growth medium. After 2 d, cells were replated, and the next day, 6 µg/ml puromycin was added. Cells were used after 5 d of selection, which was sufficient to kill control, uninfected cells.
The uniaxial stretcher was fabricated by 3D printing (Yale Center for Engineering Innovation and Design, New Haven, CT) as shown in Fig. 1, A and B. Membranes were made from PDMS Sylgard 184 (Dow Corning) by thoroughly mixing the base and curing agent in a 10:1 ratio. Thin (∼400 µm) membranes used ∼7.5 g in a 15-cm Petri plate; thick rings for creating wells used ∼45 g in a 10-cm Petri plate. PDMS was polymerized at 80°C for 3 h for curing. Membranes (29 mm × 44 mm) were cut and attached to the stretcher. Thick PDMS rings with inner diameters of 19 mm was kept on the membranes to create wells to hold the cells and culture medium. The devices were UV sterilized for 20 min in a tissue culture hood and then coated with 10 µg/ml fibronectin. Cells were plated on the membrane at low density for 6 h before stretching. The thick PDMS ring was removed, stretch was applied, and cells were immediately fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS. Cells were washed four or five times with PBS. The PDMS membranes (in their stretched or unstretched state) were glued to a plastic slide, which was then glued to a glass slide for stability. Cells were mounted using Prolong Gold mounting medium, and the PDMS membranes were cut from the stretcher and imaged within 2–3 d.
Calibration of uniaxial stretcher device
To calibrate the strain profile of the uniaxial stretcher, 2-µm yellow-green fluorosphere carboxylate fluorescent beads (Invitrogen) were adhered to the PDMS membrane assembled in the device as follows: the PDMS was silanized by adding 300 µl of (3-aminopropyl) triethoxysilane (Sigma-Aldrich) at room temperature for 15 min. Bead solution was prepared by mixing 5 ml borate buffer (0.76 g sodium tetraborate decahydrate and 1 g boric acid [Sigma-Aldrich] in 200 ml water, stirred at 70°C until clear, pH adjusted to 7.4 by adding more boric acid and stirring), 50 µl N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC; Sigma-Aldrich) solution (5 mg EDC in 500 µl water), and 2 µl of stock bead suspension. 1 ml freshly prepared bead solution was placed on the freshly silanized membrane and incubated for 2 h at room temperature. The membranes were thoroughly washed with water, and the density of the beads was checked under a fluorescence microscope.
For characterization, the device was kept upside down on the microscope slide holder, and four different regions of interests (1,785 µm × 1,785 µm), each within the central region of the well on the membrane, were imaged using 4× objective (0.2 NA; Plan Apo Nikon) before and after 10% stretch. Paired bead images were aligned using Template Matching plugin in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health) by choosing a 250 pixel × 250 pixel region in the center of image. Averaged relative beads displacement vector was determined using PIV using the Iterative PIV (cross-correlation) plugin in ImageJ. Three-pass PIV analysis was performed using 256 × 256, 128 × 128, and 64 × 64 pixel interrogation window size. Post-PIV processing was performed using the normalized median test, and invalid vectors were replaced by median vectors. PDMS has a Poisson’s ratio of ∼0.5, which means that to conserve the volume of the total material under a given stretch, there will be compression close to 50%. However, the profile of stretch and compression depends on the aspect ratio of the membrane used and the boundary conditions. As shown earlier (Shao et al., 2013), the central region has a uniform strain profile that is also found our custom-built uniaxial stretcher. For 10% stretch along the x axis, there is compression of 3.3 ± 0.2% along the y axis. Both stretch and compression strain profiles are uniform in the areas of the PDMS used for plating cells and imaging before/after stretch.
FA threshold and error in angle estimation
FA segmentation was performed as described before (Kumar et al., 2016, 2018). Images were individually checked manually after segmentation. To estimate the error in angle calculation, four different thresholding conditions were applied to FAs within the same cell, and the mask from each condition was used to get the angle of the ellipse that best fits the mask using ImageJ. Fig. S1 H shows inverted intensity image of FAs from a cell along with four different threshold masks (Fig. S1 I, upper panel) in decreasing order of lower-intensity cut-off and corresponding ellipse (Fig. S1 I, lower panel) that best fits these FA masks. The angle of the FA was estimated from the major axis of these ellipse. The average SD in angle measurement was determined to be 1.2 ± 0.7° from n = 10 FAs. FAs oriented at angles within ±30° of 90° and 0° were segregated into perpendicular and parallel; thus, angle estimation and FA classification are very robust without any overlap between the two categories.
Imaging and analysis
FRAP experiments were performed on a microscope (Eclipse Ti; Nikon) equipped with a spinning disk confocal imaging system (Ultraview Vox; PerkinElmer) and an electron-multiplying charged-coupled device camera (C9100-50; Hamamatsu Photonics), using a 100×, 1.4 NA oil objective. Cells were maintained at 37°C with humidity and CO2 control. Images were acquired using Velocity 6.6.1 software. Three prebleach images at 2-s intervals and then a laser pulse at 100% power of the 488-nm line were used to bleach a circular region of 1 µm diameter. Time-lapse images were then acquired every 5 s for 2.5 min. Images were corrected for photobleaching during image acquisition, and normalized FRAP curves were plotted in Origin (9.1; 64 bit). FRET imaging and analyses were done as described previously (Kumar et al., 2016). ImageJ was used for basic image processing. All analyses were done using custom-written software (MATLABR2014a; MathWorks; Kumar et al., 2016). All of the graphs were plotted in Origin (9.1; 64 bit). For statistical analysis, data distribution was assumed to be normal, but this was not formally tested. P value for statistical significance was determined from Student’s t test, and one-way ANOVA analysis was performed to check the statistical significance in Origin software for all the plots in figures.
Cells were plated on coverslips coated with 10 μg/ml fibronectin and cultured overnight. Detailed procedures for PREM and immunogold staining were described previously (Svitkina and Borisy, 1998, 2006; Svitkina, 2007, 2009). Briefly, cells were extracted for 2 min at room temperature with 1% Triton X-100 in PEM buffer (100 mM Pipes-KOH, pH 6.9, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA) containing 30% glycerol and 10 µM phalloidin (Sigma-Aldrich). 10 µM phalloidin was added at all subsequent steps before fixation. After three quick rinses with PEM buffer, detergent-extracted cells were incubated with FlnA antibody at 1:200 in PEM buffer for 30 min at room temperature. Samples were rinsed twice in PEM, incubated in the third change of PEM for 15 min, and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in PBS for 20 min. Samples were quenched with 2 mg/ml NaBH4 in PBS, washed three times in PBS, incubated with goat Alexa anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Molecular Probes) for 40 min, washed three times in PBS, blocked in 0.1% bovine serum albumin, incubated overnight with 18-nm gold-conjugated donkey anti-goat antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch), and washed and fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde. Samples were then fixed with tannic acid and uranyl acetate, critical point dried, coated with platinum and carbon, transferred onto EM grids, and analyzed using a JEM 1011 transmission EM (JEOL USA) operated at 100 kV. Images were captured with an ORIUS 832.10W CCD camera (Gatan) and presented in inverted contrast.
PREM image analysis
Quantification of the SF connection types at the lamella junctions was done on PREM images taken at 20,000× magnification. The SFs at the lamella junctions were manually classified into one of three categories: merging, partially merging, or overlapping (not merging). The quantification was done on 36 lamella junctions (14 control cells) and 34 lamella junctions (20 FlnA-depleted cells). Analysis of SF interconnectivity was done on PREM images taken at 20,000× magnification using Metamorph imaging software (Molecular Devices). Line scans of 3 µm length (1,200 pixels) were drawn across the cell lamella perpendicular to the direction of SFs. The pixels corresponding to the SFs (actin bundles) appear bright (high pixel intensity), and the gaps between them are dark (low pixel intensity). Continuous bright pixels, which were above average pixel intensity in the line scan, were considered as one actin bundle, or intensity peak. The number of intensity peaks per micrometer of a line scan was counted in line scans of 14 control and 14 FlnA KD cells and represented as mean ± SD. Quantification of immunogold particles was done on PREM images taken at ≥60,000× magnification after contrast enhancement to distinguish the gold particles from other bright objects. Color labeling of other structures of interest was performed using Hue/Saturation tool in Adobe Photoshop to avoid obscuring the structural details. FlnA immunogold particles located on SFs were classified into two categories: (1) located on crossing actin filaments and (2) located on parallel actin filaments. The gold particles from the two groups were color-labeled in red or green using a brush tool in Adobe Photoshop and counted. In total, we analyzed 4,234 gold particles from a 137-µm2 SF area of 10 cells.
Online supplemental material
Fig. S1 shows the calibration of custom-made uniaxial stretch device; schematic of control and TS; control talin-CS FRET in unstretched and 10% stretch conditions; estimate of the error in FA angle determination; quantification of FlnA KD from WBs; and various comparisons of morphometric parameters, FRAP curves, and total proteins in control and FlnA KD cells. Fig. S2 shows the difference in localization of various FA-associated proteins within individual adhesions by IF image quantification in scr and FlnA KD cells. Fig. S3 shows additional PREM images of scr and FlnA KD cells and representative line scans, and quantification of talin-TS FRET index and cell orientation (at different time points) of scr and FlnA KD cells in unstretched and 10% stretched conditions.
We thank Koen Van Den Dries, Tyler D. Ross, and Tristan P. Driscoll for help in fabricating uniaxial stretcher devices.
This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Defense/Army Research Office through Multidisciplinary University Research Initiative grant W911NF1410403 to M.A. Schwartz and National Institutes of Health grant R01 GM 095977 to T.M. Svitkina.
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Author contributions: A. Kumar and M.A. Schwartz conceived the project and designed the experiments. A. Kumar carried out the experiments and analyzed the data. M.S. Shutova and T.M. Svitkina carried out EM and data analysis. K. Tanaka made the FlnA-SNAP plasmids. D.V. Iwamoto and D.A. Calderwood provided the shRNA for FlnA KD and EGFP-tagged WT and mutant FlnA constructs. A. Kumar wrote the first draft. M.A. Schwartz revised the manuscript with input from all authors.