Issues
1 February 2010
-
Cover Image
Cover Image
Cover picture: (Top) Schematic representation of classical signaling by M1 muscarinic receptors (M1R). (Bottom) FRET measurements of individual signaling steps (dots) compared to predictions of a kinetic model of the M1R signaling cascade (numbered curves). (1) Agonist binding reported by intramolecular FRET. (2) G protein binding to the receptor, FRET from M1R-CFP/Gβ-YFP. (3) Nucleotide exchange, FRET from Gαq-CFP/ Gβ-YFP. (4) Gαq binding to PLC, FRET from Gαq-CFP/ PLC-YFP (see article by Falkenburger et al., 81–97).
- PDF Icon PDF LinkTable of Contents
- PDF Icon PDF LinkEditorial Board
ISSN 0022-1295
EISSN 1540-7748
In this Issue
Commentary
Article
Correction
Email alerts
Most Read
Voltage-Gated Na Channels
Drugs exhibit diverse binding modes and access routes in the Nav1.5 cardiac sodium channel pore
Mechanotransduction by Membrane Proteins
Mechanosensitive channel MscS is critical for termination of the bacterial hypoosmotic permeability response
Advertisement
