Volume 134, No. 4, October 5, 2009. Pages 323–337.

Please note that in the original Fig. 2 B, the circles were mislabeled. The data for GK are indicated by filled circles, whereas the data for GCl are indicated by open circles. The correct figure appears below.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Component conductances, GK and GCl, in slow-twitch soleus fibers firing APs. From experiments conducted at two concentrations of extracellular Cl−, it was possible to extract GK and GCl using Eq. 4 from Pedersen et al. (2009). (A) Gm dynamics at 50 and 127 mM Cl2 obtained using AP trains of 30 Hz. (B) Calculated GK and GCl. Average data are presented as mean ± SEM.
View large Download slide

Component conductances, GK and GCl, in slow-twitch soleus fibers firing APs. From experiments conducted at two concentrations of extracellular Cl−, it was possible to extract GK and GCl using Eq. 4 from Pedersen et al. (2009). (A) Gm dynamics at 50 and 127 mM Cl2 obtained using AP trains of 30 Hz. (B) Calculated GK and GCl. Average data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Figure 2.
Figure 2. Component conductances, GK and GCl, in slow-twitch soleus fibers firing APs. From experiments conducted at two concentrations of extracellular Cl−, it was possible to extract GK and GCl using Eq. 4 from Pedersen et al. (2009). (A) Gm dynamics at 50 and 127 mM Cl2 obtained using AP trains of 30 Hz. (B) Calculated GK and GCl. Average data are presented as mean ± SEM.
View large Download slide

Component conductances, GK and GCl, in slow-twitch soleus fibers firing APs. From experiments conducted at two concentrations of extracellular Cl−, it was possible to extract GK and GCl using Eq. 4 from Pedersen et al. (2009). (A) Gm dynamics at 50 and 127 mM Cl2 obtained using AP trains of 30 Hz. (B) Calculated GK and GCl. Average data are presented as mean ± SEM.

Close modal
View Original Article
© 2010 The Rockefeller University Press
2010