The importance of the B7/CD28/CTLA-4 molecules has been established in studies of antigen-presenting cell-derived B7 and its interaction with the T cell costimulatory molecule CD28. CTLA-4, a T cell surface glycoprotein that is related to CD28, can also interact with B7-1 and B7-2. However, less is known about the function of CTLA-4, which is expressed at highest levels after activation. We have generated an antibody to CTLA-4 to investigate the consequences of engagement of this molecule in a carefully defined system using highly purified T cells. We show here that the presence of low levels of B7-2 on freshly explanted T cells can partially inhibit T cell proliferation, and this inhibition is mediated by interactions with CTLA-4. Cross-linking of CTLA-4 together with the TCR and CD28 strongly inhibits proliferation and IL-2 secretion by T cells. Finally, results show that CD28 and CTLA-4 deliver opposing signals that appear to be integrated by the T cell in determining the response to activation. These data strongly suggest that the outcome of T cell antigen receptor stimulation is regulated by CD28 costimulatory signals, as well as inhibitory signals derived from CTLA-4.
Article|
August 01 1995
CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation.
In Special Collection:
2018 Nobel Prize Collection
M F Krummel,
M F Krummel
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
J P Allison
J P Allison
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
Search for other works by this author on:
M F Krummel
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
J P Allison
Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley 94720, USA.
Online ISSN: 1540-9538
Print ISSN: 0022-1007
J Exp Med (1995) 182 (2): 459–465.
Connected Content
Commentary
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Citation
M F Krummel, J P Allison; CD28 and CTLA-4 have opposing effects on the response of T cells to stimulation.. J Exp Med 1 August 1995; 182 (2): 459–465. doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.182.2.459
Download citation file: