Previous work from this laboratory has indicated that thrombin's influence on cell growth can be negative as well as positive. Addition of enzyme to actively growing or confluent cultures of human skin fibroblasts produced growth stimulation, whereas cultures receiving thrombin at the time of subculture displayed inhibited DNA synthesis and mitosis. The specific binding of [125I]thrombin to cells under stimulatory and inhibitory conditions has been studied. Fibroblasts receiving enzyme at subculture bound about two times more [125I]thrombin than those processed in the same way several hours later. The apparent dissociation constant for both groups was approximately 1.5 x 10(-8) M. In each case binding was saturable, although cells receiving enzyme at subculture showed a much higher rate of binding. Experiments were conducted in which enzyme was added to cells at various times after subculture. It was found that the ability of these fibroblasts to specifically bind [125I]thrombin decreased progressively over a 2-h period after subculture and then remained constant for at least 24 h. Evidence is also presented indicating that the binding of [125I]thrombin in both experimental groups was inversely dependent upon the culture density. The biological effects of elevated thrombin binding in cells receiving enzyme at subculture were examined. It was found that inhibited DNA synthesis and altered cellular morphology were directly to this parameter. This study suggests that fibroblasts may possess cryptic thrombin receptors that become exposed during subculture or after injury in vivo. These possibilities and the relationship of cell shape to the availability of thrombin receptors are discussed.
Article| December 01 1980
Binding of thrombin to cultured human fibroblasts: evidence for receptor modulation.
W M Hall
Online Issn: 1540-8140
Print Issn: 0021-9525
J Cell Biol (1980) 87 (3): 601–610.
- Views Icon Views
- Share Icon Share
- Search Site
W M Hall, P Ganguly; Binding of thrombin to cultured human fibroblasts: evidence for receptor modulation.. J Cell Biol 1 December 1980; 87 (3): 601–610. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.87.3.601
Download citation file: