Electron microscope study of rat mast cell maturation corroborates certain interpretations of features of mast cell differentiation based on light microscope studies. In addition, the ultrastructural variation observed in the granules of differentiating mast cells suggests that granule formation begins with the elaboration of dense granules about 70 mµ in diameter inside Golgi vacuoles. These progranules appear to aggregate inside a membrane and fuse to form dense cords 70 to 100 mµ in diameter. These dense cords are embedded in a finely granular material possibly added to the developing granule by direct continuity between perigranular membranes and cisternae of rough endoplasmic reticulum. The dense cords and finely granular material then appear to be replaced by a mass of strands about 30 mµ in diameter, thought to be a reorganization product of the two formerly separate components. A process interpreted as compaction of the strands completes the formation of the dense, homogeneous granules observed in mature rat mast cells. The similarity between mast cell granule formation and the elaboration of other granules is considered, with special reference to rabbit polymorphonuclear leukocyte azurophil granules. The relationships between the ultrastructural, histochemical, and radioautographic characteristics of mast cell granule formation are considered, and the significance of the perigranular membrane is discussed.
Article|
December 01 1966
MATURATION OF RAT MAST CELLS : An Electron Microscope Study
J. W. Combs
J. W. Combs
From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle
Search for other works by this author on:
J. W. Combs
From the Department of Pathology, University of Washington Medical School, Seattle
Received:
May 18 1966
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
Copyright © 1966 by The Rockefeller University Press
1966
J Cell Biol (1966) 31 (3): 563–575.
Article history
Received:
May 18 1966
Citation
J. W. Combs; MATURATION OF RAT MAST CELLS : An Electron Microscope Study . J Cell Biol 1 December 1966; 31 (3): 563–575. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.31.3.563
Download citation file: