Whether chromosomes maintain their nuclear positions during interphase and from one cell cycle to the next has been controversially discussed. To address this question, we performed long-term live-cell studies using a HeLa cell line with GFP-tagged chromatin. Positional changes of the intensity gravity centers of fluorescently labeled chromosome territories (CTs) on the order of several μm were observed in early G1, suggesting a role of CT mobility in establishing interphase nuclear architecture. Thereafter, the positions were highly constrained within a range of ∼1 μm until the end of G2. To analyze possible changes of chromosome arrangements from one cell cycle to the next, nuclei were photobleached in G2 maintaining a contiguous zone of unbleached chromatin at one nuclear pole. This zone was stably preserved until the onset of prophase, whereas the contiguity of unbleached chromosome segments was lost to a variable extent, when the metaphase plate was formed. Accordingly, chromatin patterns observed in daughter nuclei differed significantly from the mother cell nucleus. We conclude that CT arrangements were stably maintained from mid G1 to late G2/early prophase, whereas major changes of CT neighborhoods occurred from one cell cycle to the next. The variability of CT neighborhoods during clonal growth was further confirmed by chromosome painting experiments.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
3 March 2003
Article Contents
Article|
February 25 2003
Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages
Joachim Walter,
Joachim Walter
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Lothar Schermelleh,
Lothar Schermelleh
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Marion Cremer,
Marion Cremer
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Satoshi Tashiro,
Satoshi Tashiro
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Thomas Cremer
Thomas Cremer
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Joachim Walter
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Lothar Schermelleh
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Marion Cremer
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Satoshi Tashiro
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Thomas Cremer
Department of Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU), 80333 Munich, Germany
Address correspondence to Thomas Cremer, Dept. Biologie II, Lehrstuhl für Anthropologie und Humangenetik, LMU, Richard-Wagner-Strasse 10/I, 80333 München, Germany. Tel.: 49 (89) 2180-6710. Fax: 49 (89) 2180-6719. E-mail: [email protected]
J. Walter and L. Schermelleh contributed equally to this paper.
The online version of this article includes supplemental material.
S. Tashiro's present address is Department of Biochemistry, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.
*
Abbreviations used in this paper: CN, center of the nucleus; CT, chromosome territory; RAC, radial autocorrelation function.
Received:
November 22 2002
Revision Received:
January 13 2003
Accepted:
January 14 2003
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
The Rockefeller University Press
2003
J Cell Biol (2003) 160 (5): 685–697.
Article history
Received:
November 22 2002
Revision Received:
January 13 2003
Accepted:
January 14 2003
Citation
Joachim Walter, Lothar Schermelleh, Marion Cremer, Satoshi Tashiro, Thomas Cremer; Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages . J Cell Biol 3 March 2003; 160 (5): 685–697. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200211103
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement