Many analyses have examined subnucleolar structures in eukaryotic cells, but the relationship between morphological structures, pre-rRNA processing, and ribosomal particle assembly has remained unclear. Using a visual assay for export of the 60S ribosomal subunit, we isolated a ts-lethal mutation, rix9-1, which causes nucleolar accumulation of an Rpl25p-eGFP reporter construct. The mutation results in a single amino acid substitution (F176S) in Rlp7p, an essential nucleolar protein related to ribosomal protein Rpl7p. The rix9-1 (rlp7-1) mutation blocks the late pre-RNA cleavage at site C2 in ITS2, which separates the precursors to the 5.8S and 25S rRNAs. Consistent with this, synthesis of the mature 5.8S and 25S rRNAs was blocked in the rlp7-1 strain at nonpermissive temperature, whereas 18S rRNA synthesis continued. Moreover, pre-rRNA containing ITS2 accumulates in the nucleolus of rix9-1 cells as revealed by in situ hybridization. Finally, tagged Rlp7p was shown to associate with a pre-60S particle, and fluorescence microscopy and immuno-EM localized Rlp7p to a subregion of the nucleolus, which could be the granular component (GC). All together, these data suggest that pre-rRNA cleavage at site C2 specifically requires Rlp7p and occurs within pre-60S particles located in the GC region of the nucleolus.
In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, ribosome biogenesis is one of the most energy-consuming processes in the cell. rRNA transcription represents >60% of the total transcription (Warner, 1999). Two pre-rRNAs are produced, the pre-5S rRNA transcribed by RNA polymerase III, and a large RNA polymerase I transcript (35S pre-rRNA in yeast). Ribosomal proteins are synthesized in the cytoplasm and actively imported into the nucleus, where they associate with newly transcribed pre-rRNAs to generate preribosomal particles (Woolford, 1991). These precursor particles are large ribonucleoprotein complexes in which the rRNAs undergo nucleotide modification at many positions and are processed at multiple sites to generate the 25S/28S, 18S, and 5.8S rRNAs present in the mature ribosomes (Kressler et al., 1999).
Most steps in ribosome synthesis occur in the nucleolus, a specialized nuclear compartment. The nucleolus is a highly dynamic structure, and three subregions, fibrillar centers (FCs),*
Abbreviations used in this paper: DFC, dense fibrillar component; FC, fibrillar center; GC, granular component; snoRNA, small nucleolar RNA.
The relationship between the observed subnucleolar structures and the different steps of ribosome biogenesis is not well established and remains somewhat controversial (for review see Shaw and Jordan, 1995; Scheer and Hock, 1999). A plausible model is that pre-rRNA transcription occurs at the boundary between the FC and DFC. In the DFC, the pre-rRNA may assemble with the pre-rRNA processing and modification machinery, followed by small nucleolar RNA (snoRNA)-mediated rRNA modification and early processing reactions, with late processing and assembly reactions occurring in the GC. Final maturation of the subunits occurs after their release from the nucleolus and export to the cytoplasm via the nucleoplasm and nuclear pores. Many components required for the correct assembly and trafficking of the preribosomes have been identified, but how these function together in the various preribosomal particles remains unclear.
Three types of ribosomal precursor particles of different sizes were identified from yeast by sucrose gradient centrifugation (Trapman et al., 1975). The 90S preribosomal particle was reported to contain the 35S pre-rRNA (itself identified by sucrose gradient velocity) and many early-assembling ribosomal proteins. However, this size is substantially smaller than that expected for a pre-rRNA associated with the many modification guide snoRNPs, and a more recent analysis (Milkereit et al., 2001) indicates that the 35S pre-rRNA is actually found distributed in much higher weight gradient fractions. This particle is then divided into two smaller particles, presumably by cleavage of the pre-rRNA at site A2 in ITS1 (below and see Fig. 4)
, generating the 66S and 43S preribosomes that are the precursors to the mature 60S and 40S subunits, respectively (Trapman et al., 1975). The 66S preribosomal particle contains the 27SA2, 27SB, and 7S pre-rRNA species, whereas the 43S particle contains the 20S pre-rRNA (Milkereit et al., 2001). Many nonribosomal proteins were shown to be associated with the preribosomal particles (Bassler et al., 2001; Harnpicharnchai et al., 2001; Saveanu et al., 2001). For example, the Noc1p–Noc2p and the Noc2p–Noc3p protein complexes cofractionate with the 35S and the 27S/7S pre-rRNAs, respectively, under the extraction conditions used in this work (Milkereit et al., 2001).
Using an in vivo assay in yeast for nuclear and nucleolar retention of a fusion between a 60S subunit protein and green fluorescent protein (Rpl25p-eGFP), we identified a class of mutants impaired in 60S ribosomal subunit export (rix) (Gadal et al., 2001). Here we report the analysis of the rix9-1 mutant, which showed nucleolar accumulation of the Rpl25p-eGFP reporter. The rix9-1 strain has a single amino acid substitution in Rlp7p, which is homologous to the 60S subunit protein Rpl7p (Lalo et al., 1993). While this work was in progress, it was reported that Rlp7p is not a ribosomal protein, but an essential nucleolar protein that functions in the processing of precursors to the large ribosomal subunit rRNAs (Dunbar et al., 2000). The rix9-1 allele shows a defect in pre-rRNA cleavage at site C2. Rlp7p is shown to associate with 66S preribosomes and to localize to the GC subcompartment of the nucleolus. We suggest that Rlp7p has an essential function in C2 cleavage occurring in preribosomes within the nucleolar GC.
Isolation and characterization of the
Our screen for ribosome export defects (Gadal et al., 2001) identified rix9-1, which is a temperature-sensitive mutant that stops cell growth after shift to the restrictive temperature of 37°C (Fig. 1
A). The 60S subunit reporter Rpl25p-eGFP was cytoplasmic with nuclear exclusion in the rix9-1 strain at 23°C, but accumulated in the nucleus 3 to 4 h after transfer to 37°C (Fig. 1 B). The distribution of Rpl25p-eGFP inside the nucleus was different in the various rix mutants, with accumulation throughout the entire nucleoplasm in some strains and predominantly nucleolar accumulation in others (Gadal et al., 2001). The rix9-1 strains showed a predominant nucleolar accumulation of Rpl25p-eGFP at 37°C, suggesting that the release of preribosomal particles from the nucleolus to the nucleoplasm is inhibited (Fig. 1 B).
The wild-type RIX9 gene was cloned by complementation of the ts phenotype of the rix9-1 mutant and was shown to be identical to the gene RLP7 (Fig. 1 A). DNA from the chromosomal locus was recovered by PCR from rix9-1 and isogenic wild-type strains. A single nucleotide substitution was found in the RLP7 ORF changing a conserved phenylalanine (176) to serine; therefore, this mutant was designated rlp7-1.
Rlp7p is strikingly homologous to the conserved ribosomal protein L7 (Rpl7p), which has close homologues in archaea and bacteria (Fig. 2
A). Three conserved domains were identified in Rpl7p homologues, with domain II best conserved. The mutation in rlp7-1 alters a conserved residue within this domain (Fig. 2 B). Two RNA-binding domains have been mapped in human L7, designated RBD1 and RBD2 in Fig. 2 B. RBD2 is present in all homologues and binds preferentially to 28S rRNA (von Mikecz et al., 1999). These two RNA-binding domains are present in Rlp7p, and are not affected in the rlp7-1 mutant, raising the possibility that Rlp7p binds to the same rRNA sequence as Rpl7p (see Discussion).
Rlp7p associates with preribosomes and is required for 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis
The high degree of homology between Rlp7p and a ribosomal protein of the 60S subunit, and its apparent involvement in subunit release from the nucleolus suggested that Rlp7p might be associated with preribosomal particles. To assess this, sucrose gradient centrifugation and Western blotting was performed on a strain expressing a Protein A–tagged Rlp7p (see Materials and methods). When whole- cell lysates were fractionated, Rlp7p was detected in the fraction that contained the 60S ribosomal subunits (Fig. 3
A). We conclude that Rlp7p is associated with preribosomal particles of ∼60S, presumably corresponding to the 66S preribosomes previously reported (Trapman et al., 1975).
Many strains with defects in 60S subunit biogenesis show a characteristic phenotype, with a reduced level of free 60S subunits, increased free 40S, and the presence of half-mer polysomes (polysomes containing a single 40S subunit at the initiation site). To assess the involvement of Rlp7p in 60S subunit biogenesis, polysome profiles were compared for rlp7-1 and an isogenic wild-type strain (Fig. 3 B). The polysome profile of the mutant strain was already mildly perturbed when grown at permissive temperature, with an increase in the ratio-free 40S to 60S. When rlp7-1 cells were shifted to restrictive temperature, the amount of 60S subunits dropped further and the appearance of half-mer polysomes was noticed (Fig. 3 B). We conclude that Rlp7p is required for 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis.
Pre-rRNA processing is defective in
rlp7-1 mutant strains
To test whether the depletion of 60S ribosomal subunits observed in the rlp7-1 strain is a consequence of defects in pre-rRNA processing (for the structure of the pre-rRNA and processing scheme see Fig. 4), we performed Northern hybridization (Figs. 5, A and B)
. After transfer of the rlp7-1 strain to 37°C for 2 h, the 35S pre-rRNA was mildly accumulated (Fig. 5 A). The 27SA2 and 20S pre-rRNAs were reduced, indicating that processing at sites A1 and A2 was partially inhibited, but there was little accumulation of the 23S RNA (the product of cleavage of 35S at site A3 in the absence of prior cleavage at sites A0 to A2), which is seen in many other processing mutants. The 27SB pre-rRNA was also reduced (Fig. 5 A), and primer-extension analysis suggested that 27SBS was reduced to a greater extent than 27SBL (Fig. 5 C, stops at B1S and B1L, respectively). In the rlp7-1 strain at 37°C, a rapid and strong reduction was seen in the levels of the 7S pre-rRNAs (Fig. 5 B) which are generated from the 27SB pre-rRNAs by cleavage at site C2. The other product of C2 cleavage, the 26S pre-rRNA, cannot be detected by Northern hybridization, but primer extension through site C2 (Fig. 5 C) shows that this pre-rRNA is rapidly lost, within 2 h of transfer to 37°C. In strains depleted of a recently reported processing factor, Ssf1p, cleavage at site C2 leads to the appearance of the A2–C2 fragment (Fatica et al., 2002), but this does not occur in the rlp7-1 strain (Fig. 5 B). The 25S′ pre-rRNA, a short 5′ extended form of 25S shown by the primer extension stop at site C1′, was strongly depleted in the rlp7-1 strain. This is consistent with the loss of cleavage at site C2, which acts as an entry site for the 5′ exonucleases Rat1p and Xrn1p that generate the 5′ end of 25S rRNA.
The 27SA3 pre-rRNA cannot be detected by Northern analysis, but its abundance is indicated by the primer extension stop at site A3 which was strongly elevated even at the permissive temperature (Fig. 5 C). Site A3 acts as an entry site for the Rat1p and Xrn1p exonucleases, which in this case generate the 5′ end of the 27SBS pre-rRNA and 5.8SS rRNA at site B1S. The apparent reduction in the stop at site B1S relative to B1L would be consistent with reduced or delayed exonuclease processing from 27SA3 to 27SB.
Primer extension analysis through site A0 showed that the 33S pre-rRNA was little affected in the rlp7-1 strain, whereas the reduction in the stop at A2 was consistent with the reduced level of 27SA2 seen in Northern analyses. Cleavage at all sites was accurate at the nucleotide level.
Pulse-chase labeling of the rlp7-1 strain 2 h after transfer to 37°C, with either [H3]-uracil or [H3]-methyl methionine, showed a dramatic reduction in the synthesis of both the 25S and 5.8S rRNAs (Fig. 6). In contrast, 18S synthesis continued, but with some delay consistent with the results of Northern hybridization. The 7S pre-rRNA was not detected in the rlp7-1 strain. Northern hybridization of the filter shown in Fig. 6 C showed that the weak band visible in the rlp7-1 strain at the approximate position of 7S does not hybridize with a 7S pre-rRNA probe and migrates above 7S on the gel.
From these results, we conclude that the rlp7-1 mutation leads to a delay in exonuclease processing from site A3, together with strong inhibition of cleavage at site C2. The delay in cleavage at sites A0 to A2 and 18S synthesis is a common feature of strains with defects in 60S subunit synthesis (Venema and Tollervey, 1999) and is likely to be an indirect effect.
Pre-rRNA containing ITS2 accumulates in the
rlp7-1 ts mutant
Ultrastructural detection of pre-60S ribosomal precursors by in situ hybridization was performed in wild-type and mutant rlp7-1 cells with an ITS2-specific probe (Gleizes et al., 2001). As shown in Fig. 7
, the labeling in rlp7-1 cells at permissive temperature was found in the nucleolus, and its intensity was the same as in wild-type cells. Upon a shift to 37°C, rlp7-1 cells displayed a strong buildup of ITS2 containing pre-rRNAs. Quantitation of these immuno-EM data (in total 30 nuclei were analyzed) yielded in the nucleoplasm 15 gold particles/μm2 for wild-type and 19 gold particles/μm2 for rlp7-1 at 37°C. Moreover, the density of the gold in the nucleolus is 99 particles/μm2 in wild-type cells and 207 particles/μm2 in the rlp7-1 ts mutant at 37°C. Thus, accumulating pre-rRNAs did not appear to move to the nucleoplasm, but remained confined in the nucleolus. Similar observations were made by FISH with oligonucleotidic probes complementary to the ITS2 (unpublished data). These results are consistent with the localization of Rpl25p-eGFP in the nucleolus at 37°C, and with a defect in 27S pre-rRNA processing.
Rlp7p is localized in the GC of the nucleolus
Rlp7p-GFP was expressed as a construct integrated at the RLP7 gene locus to avoid overexpression. To confirm that Rlp7p concentrates in the nucleolus as previously shown (Dunbar et al., 2000), it was coexpressed with the nucleolar marker DsRed-Nop1p (Gadal et al., 2001). As expected, the DsRed-Nop1 exhibits a crescent-like staining close to the nuclear periphery, which does not overlap with the DNA staining (Fig. 8
A). However, the fluorescence signal of Rlp7p-GFP, although concentrated in the nucleolus, did not fully overlap with the fluorescence signal of DsRed-Nop1p (Fig. 8 A). This suggests that Rlp7p and Nop1p are nucleolar components, but located in different subnucleolar compartments. To further substantiate this finding, not only Rlp7p and Nop1p, but also additional nucleolar markers, Gar1p as a DFC component (Henras et al., 1998) and Nug2p, which associates with late 60S preribosomes (Bassler et al., 2001), were tagged with spectral variants of GFP (YFP and CFP, respectively), and colocalization was determined by double fluorescence microscopy. Similar to the data shown above, YFP-Nop1p and Rlp7p-CFP expressed in the same strain (for construction of strains, see Materials and methods; Table I)
do not reside in the same subnucleolar compartment (Fig. 8 B). Similarly, the Nug2p-YFP and CFP-Nop1p labeling do not overlap (Fig. 8 B). In contrast, Gar1p-YFP and CFP-Nop1p colocalize within the nucleolus (Fig. 8 B), supporting the previous conclusions that both proteins are DFC components. In contrast, Nug2p-YFP and CFP-Gar1p do not fully overlap (Fig. 8 B), whereas Rlp7p-CFP and Nug2-YFP colocalize within the yeast nucleolus (Fig. 8 B). Moreover, Nug2p-YFP can be also detected in the nucleoplasm, consistent with a role in nuclear export (Bassler et al., 2001), but Rlp7-CFP is restricted to the nucleolar region (Fig. 8 B). Thus, the DFC marker proteins Nop1p and Gar1p colocalize in the yeast nucleolus, whereas Rlp7p and Nug2p also colocalize, but are adjacent to the DFC.
To identify at the ultrastructural level the nucleolar subcompartment in which Rlp7p resides, Nop1p and Rlp7p were immunolocalized on ultrathin sections obtained after high-pressure cryofixation, cryosubstitution, and cryoembedding (Fig. 9)
. The presence of nucleolar subdomains in S. cerevisiae was clearly established by electron microscopy on cells prepared by ultrafast freezing and cryosubstitution in the presence of osmium tetroxide (Léger-Silvestre et al., 1999). Under these conditions, the DFC appeared as a region of high electron density. Here, osmium tetroxide was omitted during cryosubstitution in order to preserve the epitopes on proteins and immunolocalize Nop1p, a marker of the DFC, and Rlp7p-ProtA. In this case, the subnucleolar regions display less contrast. That Rlp7p and Nop1p are differentially located within the nucleolus is confirmed by double labeling experiments in which the two proteins are detected with gold particles of two sizes (Fig. 9). Thus, immuno-EM showed that Rlp7p and Nop1p are not located in the same nucleolar subregions, which explains the data obtained by fluorescence microscopy. We conclude that Rlp7p is associated with pre-60S particles in the nucleolar GC, and is the first identified processing factor to be so localized.
Here we report that the rix9-1 (rlp7-1) allele is a mutation in the essential gene RLP7. Rlp7p is a nucleolar protein concentrated in the GC and is associated with ribosomal precursors. The rlp7-1 mutation results in a single phenylalanine176 to serine change in Rlp7p, which leads to a ts-lethal phenotype, nucleolar accumulation of an Rpl25p-eGFP reporter construct, and inhibition of pre-rRNA processing.
Subnucleolar structures have long been identified by EM and are the subject of a vast body of research (for review see Shaw and Jordan, 1995; Scheer and Hock, 1999). However, the relationship between nucleolar structures and the steps in ribosome synthesis are not well established. Transcription of the rRNA is likely to occur in the FCs or at the interface between the FCs and the DF). The FCs contain RNA polymerase I and transcription factors, whereas the DFC contains processing factors including fibrillarin (Nop1p in yeast) (Benavente et al., 1988; Pierron et al., 1989; Ochs and Smetana, 1991; Puvion-Dutilleul et al., 1991; Thiry and Goessens, 1992; Léger-Silvestre et al., 1999), which is associated with the box C/D snoRNAs, including U3, that are involved in early pre-rRNA processing and modification steps. In contrast to the FCs and DFC, very little is known about molecular markers for the GC, where late assembly and processing reactions are believed to occur. As an example, ribocharin, which is a nuclear 40-kD protein, was reported to specifically associate with the GC of the nucleolus and with a nucleoplasmic 65S particles (Hügle et al., 1985). Here we identify Rlp7p as a specific GC marker in yeast. Previously, Rlp7p was shown to be present in three different pre-60S particles (Fig. 10
; Bassler et al., 2001; Harnpicharnchai et al., 2001; Saveanu et al., 2001; Fatica et al., 2002), indicating that each of these are concentrated in the GC. The 90S preribosomes contain the 35S pre-rRNA and are strongly predicted to be associated with the box C/D snoRNAs that direct the 35S pre-rRNA 2′-O-methylation. Therefore, the localization of the 2′-O-methylase, Nop1p/fibrillarin, to the DFC is good evidence for the localization of the 90S preribosomes to this region. Nop1p is not associated with the characterized pre-60S particles, and we predict that release from the DFC coincides with the formation of an early pre-60S particle, e.g., the pre-60S E1 complex shown in Fig. 10. Maturation through pre-60S E2 and pre-60S M is proposed to occur in the GC, with release of a complex located on the pathway between pre-60S M and pre-60S L from the GC into the nucleoplasm.
Rlp7p is required for efficient processing from site A3 to B1S, the 5′ end of the major form of the 5.8S rRNA, and for pre-rRNA cleavage at site C2 in ITS2, which separates the precursors to the 5.8S and 25S rRNAs, and is also required for 60S subunit export. It seems likely that these activities take place in different preribosomal particles. Processing from A3 to B1S is believed to occur within the pre-60S E1 complex, cleavage at site C2 within pre-60S E2 and acquisition of export competence within pre-60S M (Fatica et al., 2002; Oeffinger et al., 2002). Another characterized protein, Nop7p, is also found in the same complexes as Rlp7p (Bassler et al., 2001; Harnpicharnchai et al., 2001; Fatica et al., 2002). Depletion of Nop7p also resulted in the inhibition of processing from A3 to B1S and nuclear accumulation of Rpl25p-GFP, suggesting that it performs functions related to Rlp7p within the pre-60S E1 and pre-60S M complexes. In contrast, Nop7p depletion did not prevent C2 cleavage, but expression of Rpl25-GFP was lethal in cells lacking Nop7p. Rpl25p is likely to associate with the pre-60S E2 complex (Harnpicharnchai et al., 2001; Fatica et al., 2002), indicating that Nop7p plays some role in subunit assembly within this complex but, unlike Rlp7p, is not required for C2 cleavage within pre-60S E2.
The inhibition of cleavage at site C2 is a relatively specific phenotype, as several other mutations that inhibit 5.8S and 25S synthesis did not prevent C2 cleavage. These include the mutations noc2-1, rpl10-1, and rix7-1, which inhibit export of the 60S preribosomes, suggesting that the inhibition of C2 cleavage in the rlp7-1 strain is not the direct cause of the transport defect.
While this work was in progress, Dunbar et al. (2000) reported an analysis of the function of Rlp7p in pre-rRNA processing using a depletion approach. Rlp7p depletion was shown to inhibit 5.8S and 25S rRNA production, consistent with our observations.
Rlp7p is highly homologous to ribosomal protein L7, suggesting that they may compete for the same binding site on the rRNA. Because the 3′ end of the 5.8S and the 5′ end of the 25S rRNA are distant from the L7 binding site on the mature ribosome, it is unlikely that Rlp7p binds the ribosome close to the C2 cleavage site (Spahn et al., 2001). Following its function in pre-rRNA cleavage, Rlp7p could be dissociated from the rRNA by the binding of Rpl7p, potentially ensuring the correct succession of processing and assembly events. This strategy may be common in ribosome biogenesis, as three other known pre-rRNA–processing and –assembly factors show high similarity to proteins involved in translation. The U3 snoRNP protein Imp3p, which functions in 40S subunit synthesis, is homologous to the 40S protein Rps9p (Dunbar et al., 2000), the 60S preribosome components Yhr052p and Rlp24p are homologous to Rpl1p and Rpl24p, respectively (Bassler et al., 2001; Saveanu et al., 2001), and Efl1p is homologous to the translation elongation factor EF-2 (Senger et al., 2001).
This finding has potential relevance for the evolution of ribosome biogenesis. Ribosome biogenesis in prokaryotic cells occurs in a single cell compartment, whereas the synthesis of eukaryotic ribosomes involves a succession of transport events from the nucleolus to the cytoplasm. We suggest that intracellular transport systems for preribosomes initially recognized ribosomal proteins. During evolution, duplication of these components led to the separation of the ribosomal proteins and homologous proteins that bind to the same sequence in preribosomes. Replacement of the preribosomal protein with the ribosomal protein could act as a signal for release of the preribosomal particle from a specific region. In the simplest model, Rlp7p might be physically associated with preribosomal particles during their assemblage in the GC. By analogy, Imp3p and perhaps the U3 snoRNP might be required for the retention of the 90S preribosomes in the DFC, whereas the replacement of Efl1p by EF-2 might signal arrival of the subunits in the cytoplasm (Senger et al., 2001; unpublished data).
In summary, using a genetic screen to identify novel components required for the export of the large ribosomal particle, we identified a mutation in Rlp7p. We have shown that Rlp7p is enriched in a subcompartment of the nucleolus, the GC. Rlp7p is required for the C2 cleavage that occurs within a ribosomal precursor particle. Rlp7p belongs to the increasing family of maturation proteins with high homology to a component of the translation machinery. Therefore, we suggest that this family of proteins could allow retention of the premature particles in specific areas of the nucleus during their maturation. Using this strategy eukaryotic cells could achieve precise coupling between ribosome maturation and its nuclear export.
Materials And Methods
Yeast strains, DNA manipulation, and microbiological techniques
Yeast strains used in this study are listed in Table I. Microbiological techniques, plasmid transformation and recovery, mating, sporulation of diploid, and tetrad analysis were performed essentially as described (Santos-Rosa et al., 1998). DNA manipulation was performed according to (Maniatis et al., 1982).
Plasmids pUN100-DsRed-Nop1p, pRS314-DsRed-Nop1p, pRS316-Rpl25p-eGFP, pFA6a-(2*ProtA-TEV)-TRP1, and pFA6a-GFP(S65T)-kanMX6 were described previously (Longtine et al., 1998; Gadal et al., 2001). pFA6-YFP-TRP1, pFA6-CFP-TRP1, pFA6-YFP-HIS3MX6, and pFA6-CFP-HIS3MX6 are derivative of pFA6a-GFP(S65T)-HIS3MX6 and pFA6-GFP-TRP1 (Longtine et al., 1998), where the Pac1-Asc1 fragment, bearing the GFP-coding sequence, was PCR exchanged with the corresponding eYFP and eCFP spectral variant of GFP, using vectors pECFP-C1 and pEYFP-C1 from CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc. Plasmids pUN100-YFP-Nop1p and pUN100-CFP-Nop1p are derivative of pUN100-DsRed-Nop1p where the SphI-SphI fragment, bearing the GFP-coding sequence, was PCR exchanged with the corresponding eYFP and eCFP spectral variant of GFP, using vectors pECFP-C1 and pEYFP-C1 from CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.
Genomic integration of GFP in frame with RLP7 was obtained as described previously (Longtine et al., 1998). Genomic integration of ProtA in frame with RLP7, YFP, and CFP in frame with RLP7, GAR1, and NUG2 were done in the same way, but using, respectively, the pFA6a-(2*ProtA-TEV)-TRP1, pFA6-YFP-TRP1, pFA6-CFP-TRP1, pFA6-YFP-HIS3MX6, and pFA6-CFP-HIS3MX6 vectors.
Cloning of RIX9/RLP7
A yeast genomic library in an LEU2-containing ARS/CEN plasmid (Gautier et al., 1997) was transformed into the rix9-1 strain. From colonies growing at the restrictive temperature (37°C), plasmid pRIX9 with a genomic insert was isolated. The complementing plasmid contained the RLP7 gene. pRLP7 harboring only the RLP7 gene was cloned and shown to complement the ts growth defect of the rix9-1 mutant.
Pulse-chase and Northern analysis of rRNA
Pulse-chase labelling of rRNA, primer extension, and analysis of rRNA processing by Northern hybridization was performed as described (Tollervey, 1987; Tollervey et al., 1993). Oligonucleotides used were: 003, TGT TAC CTC TGG GCC C; 004, CGG TTT TAA TTG TCC TA; 007, CTC CGC TTA TTG ATA TGC; 008, CAT GGC TTA ATC TTT GAG AC; 013, GGC CAG CAA TTT CAA GTT A; 017, GCG TTG TTC ATC GAT GC; 020, TGA GAA GGA AAT GAC GCT; 219, GAA GCG CCA TCT AGA TG, and 5′ A0L GGT CTC TCT GCT GCC GG.
pRS315-Rpl25p-eGFP or pRS316-Rpl25p-eGFP was introduced into yeast cells by transformation and selected on SDC-leu or SDC-ura medium, respectively. Individual transformants were grown in liquid SDC-leu medium at 23°C to OD(600 nm) of ∼1, before shift to 37°C in liquid YPD medium. After centrifugation, cells were resuspended in water, mounted on a slide, and observed in the fluorescence microscope. In vivo, the GFP signal was examined in the FITC fluorescent channel; the DsRed used in fusion with Nop1p was examined in the rhodamine channel of a Zeiss Axioskop fluorescence microscope, and pictures were obtained with a Xillix Microimager CCD camera. Digital pictures were processed by software program Open lab (Improvision) and Adobe Photoshop® (v. 4.0.1).
Fluorescence microscopy of green fluorescent protein spectral variants was done on exponentially growing cells, which were washed in water and stained with Hoechst 33352 (5 ng/μl) for 5 min. Samples were examined using a Leica DMRXA fluorescence microscope. Fluorescent signals were collected with single-band pass filters for excitation of YFP (XF104; Omega Optical), CFP (XF114-2; Omega optical), and Hoechst (Leica). Images were acquired with a Hamamatsu C4742-95 cooled CCD camera controlled by the Openlab® software (Improvision) and processed with the Adobe Photoshop® software.
Protein A–tagged Rlp7p strains were prepared for EM using high-pressure freezing. After preembedding in low–melting point agarose, cells moistened with the freezing medium (1-hexadecene) were loaded into specimen holder and frozen with liquid nitrogen under high pressure using the EM Pact system (Leica SA). The frozen samples were then transferred in 0.4% uranyl acetate in absolute acetone. Substitution fixation was carried out at −90°C for 3 d. The specimen were gradually transferred to −20°C, washed successively with absolute acetone and absolute ethanol at −20°C, infiltrated, and embedded with LR White resin at this temperature. For immunolocalization of the protein A–tagged Rlp7p, we used a polyclonal anti–protein A antibody from Sigma-Aldrich. This antibody was labeled with gold-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG (British Bio-Cell). No nuclear labelling was detected when immunolocalization was performed on cells devoid of Protein A–tagged protein, or when the primary antibodies were omitted. Nop1p was detected using a monoclonal antibody from Dr. J. Aris (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL) and goat anti–mouse IgG gold–conjugated. In situ hybridization of pre-rRNAs using an ITS2-specific riboprobe was performed as previously described (Gleizes et al., 2001). The probe was generated by in vitro transcription in the presence of UTP-biotin and detected on sections with anti-biotin antibodies conjugated to 10-nm gold particles.
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis were performed according to (Siniossoglou et al., 1996), and isolation of ribosomes under low-salt conditions by sucrose gradient centrifugation as described in (Tollervey et al., 1993). Whole-cell lysates and fractions from the sucrose gradients were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by Western blotting using the indicated antibodies.
E.C. Hurt is recipient of grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Schwerpunktprogramm “Funktionelle Architektur des Zellkerns”), E. Petfalski and D. Tollervey were funded by the Wellcome Trust, and O. Gadal was a holder of a Human Frontiers Science Program fellowship. P.E. Gleizes and N. Gas are supported by a grant from the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer.
O. Gadal's present address is Institute Pasteur, 25-28, Rue du Docteur Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France.