Chromosome velocity has been studied in living Melanoplus differentialis spermatocytes by phase contrast cinemicrography. Melanoplus chromosomes (and bivalents) differ in length by as much as 1:3.5. As expected, no size-dependent velocity differences were detected in anaphase, and this is also shown to be true for the less predictable movements during prometaphase congression. The size of the X chromosome can change during observation following x-irradiation, but this is equally without influence on velocity. However, an effect of position on velocity is found in both prometaphase and in anaphase: the chromosomes furthest from the central interpolar axis move 25 per cent faster than more central chromosomes. A simple mechanical model relating frictional resistance and mitotic forces to chromosome velocity is discussed in detail. Calculations from the model suggest that a significant difference in the force acting on a large, as compared with a small chromosome is necessary to account for the observed similarity in velocity. Therefore, it is concluded that the mitotic forces are so organized or regulated that velocity is, within limits, independent of load. The implications of velocity-load independence in relation to the molecular origin of mitotic forces are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 April 1965
Article|
April 01 1965
CHROMOSOME VELOCITY DURING MITOSIS AS A FUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME SIZE AND POSITION
R. Bruce Nicklas
R. Bruce Nicklas
From the Department of Biology, Osborn Memorial Laboratories, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Search for other works by this author on:
R. Bruce Nicklas
From the Department of Biology, Osborn Memorial Laboratories, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Received:
February 10 1964
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
Copyright © 1965 by The Rockefeller Institute Press
1965
J Cell Biol (1965) 25 (1): 119–135.
Article history
Received:
February 10 1964
Citation
R. Bruce Nicklas; CHROMOSOME VELOCITY DURING MITOSIS AS A FUNCTION OF CHROMOSOME SIZE AND POSITION . J Cell Biol 1 April 1965; 25 (1): 119–135. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.25.1.119
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement