In most cells, the DNA damage checkpoint delays cell division when replication is stalled by DNA damage. In early Caenorhabditis elegans embryos, however, the checkpoint responds to developmental signals that control the timing of cell division, and checkpoint activation by nondevelopmental inputs disrupts cell cycle timing and causes embryonic lethality. Given this sensitivity to inappropriate checkpoint activation, we were interested in how embryos respond to DNA damage. We demonstrate that the checkpoint response to DNA damage is actively silenced in embryos but not in the germ line. Silencing requires rad-2, gei-17, and the polh-1 translesion DNA polymerase, which suppress replication fork stalling and thereby eliminate the checkpoint-activating signal. These results explain how checkpoint activation is restricted to developmental signals during embryogenesis and insulated from DNA damage. They also show that checkpoint activation is not an obligatory response to DNA damage and that pathways exist to bypass the checkpoint when survival depends on uninterrupted progression through the cell cycle.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
27 March 2006
Article|
March 20 2006
Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
Antonia H. Holway,
Antonia H. Holway
1The Biological Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Seung-Hwan Kim,
Seung-Hwan Kim
1The Biological Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Adriana La Volpe,
Adriana La Volpe
2Istituto di Genetica e Biofisica “Adriano Buzzati-Traverso,” Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 80125 Naples, Italy
Search for other works by this author on:
W. Matthew Michael
W. Matthew Michael
1The Biological Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Search for other works by this author on:
Antonia H. Holway
1The Biological Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Seung-Hwan Kim
1The Biological Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Adriana La Volpe
2Istituto di Genetica e Biofisica “Adriano Buzzati-Traverso,” Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, 80125 Naples, Italy
W. Matthew Michael
1The Biological Laboratories, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Correspondence to W. Matthew Michael: [email protected]
Abbreviations used in this paper: HU, hydroxyurea; MMS, methanesulphonate; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; RNAi, RNA interference.
Received:
December 23 2005
Accepted:
February 17 2006
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
The Rockefeller University Press
2006
J Cell Biol (2006) 172 (7): 999–1008.
Article history
Received:
December 23 2005
Accepted:
February 17 2006
Connected Content
This article has been corrected
Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos
Related
Escaping a checkpoint
Citation
Antonia H. Holway, Seung-Hwan Kim, Adriana La Volpe, W. Matthew Michael; Checkpoint silencing during the DNA damage response in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos . J Cell Biol 27 March 2006; 172 (7): 999–1008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200512136
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSee also
Email alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement