To investigate the degradation mechanism of misfolded membrane proteins from the cell surface, we used mutant cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulators (CFTRs) exhibiting conformational defects in post-Golgi compartments. Here, we show that the folding state of CFTR determines the post-endocytic trafficking of the channel. Although native CFTR recycled from early endosomes back to the cell surface, misfolding prevented recycling and facilitated lysosomal targeting by promoting the ubiquitination of the channel. Rescuing the folding defect or down-regulating the E1 ubiquitin (Ub)-activating enzyme stabilized the mutant CFTR without interfering with its internalization. These observations with the preferential association of mutant CFTRs with Hrs, STAM-2, TSG101, hVps25, and hVps32, components of the Ub-dependent endosomal sorting machinery, establish a functional link between Ub modification and lysosomal degradation of misfolded CFTR from the cell surface. Our data provide evidence for a novel cellular mechanism of CF pathogenesis and suggest a paradigm for the quality control of plasma membrane proteins involving the coordinated function of ubiquitination and the Ub-dependent endosomal sorting machinery.
Misfolding diverts CFTR from recycling to degradation : quality control at early endosomes
The online version of this article includes supplemental material.
Abbreviations used in this paper: CFTR, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator; CHX, cycloheximide; ESCRT, endosomal sorting complex required for transport; Hrs, hepatocyte growth factor–regulated tyrosine kinase substrate; MVB, multivesicular body; STAM, signal-transducing adaptor molecule; Ub, ubiquitin; Vps, vacuolar protein sorting; wt, wild type.
Manu Sharma, Francesca Pampinella, Csilla Nemes, Mohamed Benharouga, Jeffrey So, Kai Du, Kristi G. Bache, Blake Papsin, Noa Zerangue, Harald Stenmark, Gergely L. Lukacs; Misfolding diverts CFTR from recycling to degradation : quality control at early endosomes . J Cell Biol 15 March 2004; 164 (6): 923–933. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200312018
Download citation file:
Sign in
Client Account
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement