In cells containing disrupted spindles, the spindle assembly checkpoint arrests the cell cycle in metaphase. The budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (Bub) 1, mitotic arrest-deficient (Mad) 1, and Mad2 proteins promote this checkpoint through sustained inhibition of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome. Vertebrate oocytes undergoing meiotic maturation arrest in metaphase of meiosis II due to a cytoplasmic activity termed cytostatic factor (CSF), which appears not to be regulated by spindle dynamics. Here, we show that microinjection of Mad1 or Mad2 protein into early Xenopus laevis embryos causes metaphase arrest like that caused by Mos. Microinjection of antibodies to either Mad1 or Mad2 into maturing oocytes blocks the establishment of CSF arrest in meiosis II, and immunodepletion of either protein blocked the establishment of CSF arrest by Mos in egg extracts. A Mad2 mutant unable to oligomerize (Mad2 R133A) did not cause cell cycle arrest in blastomeres or in egg extracts. Once CSF arrest has been established, maintenance of metaphase arrest requires Mad1, but not Mad2 or Bub1. These results suggest a model in which CSF arrest by Mos is mediated by the Mad1 and Mad2 proteins in a manner distinct from the spindle checkpoint.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
22 December 2003
Article|
December 22 2003
Spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 are required for cytostatic factor–mediated metaphase arrest
Brian J. Tunquist,
Brian J. Tunquist
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Search for other works by this author on:
Patrick A. Eyers,
Patrick A. Eyers
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Search for other works by this author on:
Lin G. Chen,
Lin G. Chen
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Search for other works by this author on:
Andrea L. Lewellyn,
Andrea L. Lewellyn
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Search for other works by this author on:
James L. Maller
James L. Maller
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Search for other works by this author on:
Brian J. Tunquist
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Patrick A. Eyers
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Lin G. Chen
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Andrea L. Lewellyn
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
James L. Maller
Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Denver, CO 80262
Address correspondence to James L. Maller, HHMI and Department of Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, Campus Box C236, Denver, CO 80262. Tel.: (303) 315-7075. Fax: (303) 315-7160. email: [email protected]
Abbreviations used in this paper: APC/C, anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome; Bub, budding uninhibited by benzimidazole; CSF, cytostatic factor; Emi1, early mitotic inhibitor 1; Mad, mitotic arrest deficient; MEK1, MAPK/Erk kinase 1; p90Rsk, 90-kD ribosomal protein S6 kinase.
Received:
June 27 2003
Accepted:
November 10 2003
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
The Rockefeller University Press
2003
J Cell Biol (2003) 163 (6): 1231–1242.
Article history
Received:
June 27 2003
Accepted:
November 10 2003
Citation
Brian J. Tunquist, Patrick A. Eyers, Lin G. Chen, Andrea L. Lewellyn, James L. Maller; Spindle checkpoint proteins Mad1 and Mad2 are required for cytostatic factor–mediated metaphase arrest . J Cell Biol 22 December 2003; 163 (6): 1231–1242. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200306153
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement