fAter being released from transcription sites, messenger ribonucleoprotein particles (mRNPs) must reach the nuclear pore complexes in order to be translocated to the cytoplasm. Whether the intranuclear movement of mRNPs results largely from Brownian motion or involves molecular motors remains unknown. Here we have used quantitative photobleaching techniques to monitor the intranuclear mobility of protein components of mRNPs tagged with GFP. The results show that the diffusion coefficients of the poly(A)-binding protein II (PABP2) and the export factor TAP are significantly reduced when these proteins are bound to mRNP complexes, as compared with nonbound proteins. The data further show that the mobility of wild-type PABP2 and TAP, but not of a point mutant variant of PABP2 that fails to bind to RNA, is significantly reduced when cells are ATP depleted or incubated at 22°C. Energy depletion has only minor effects on the intranuclear mobility of a 2,000-kD dextran (which corresponds approximately in size to 40S mRNP particles), suggesting that the reduced mobility of PABP2 and TAP is not caused by a general alteration of the nuclear environment. Taken together, the data suggest that the mobility of mRNPs in the living cell nucleus involves a combination of passive diffusion and ATP-dependent processes.
The intranuclear mobility of messenger RNA binding proteins is ATP dependent and temperature sensitive
A. Calapez and H.M. Pereira contributed equally to this work.
A. Calado's present address is Institut für Biochemie, ETH Zentrum, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland.
Abbreviations used in this paper: FLIP, fluorescence loss induced by photobleaching; IPB, immunopurification buffer; mRNP, messenger ribonucleoprotein particle; PABP2, poly(A)-binding protein II.
Alexandre Calapez, Henrique M. Pereira, Angelo Calado, José Braga, José Rino, Célia Carvalho, João Paulo Tavanez, Elmar Wahle, Agostinho C. Rosa, Maria Carmo-Fonseca; The intranuclear mobility of messenger RNA binding proteins is ATP dependent and temperature sensitive . J Cell Biol 9 December 2002; 159 (5): 795–805. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200203046
Download citation file:
Sign in
Client Account
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement