During differentiation, skeletal muscle cells withdraw from the cell cycle and fuse into multinucleated myotubes. Unlike quiescent cells, however, these cells cannot be induced to reenter S phase by means of growth factor stimulation. The studies reported here document that both the retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and the cyclin-dependent kinase (cdk) inhibitor p21 contribute to this unresponsiveness. We show that the inactivation of Rb and p21 through the binding of the adenovirus E1A protein leads to the induction of DNA replication in differentiated muscle cells. Moreover, inactivation of p21 by E1A results in the restoration of cyclin E–cdk2 activity, a kinase made nonfunctional by the binding of p21 and whose protein levels in differentiated muscle cells is relatively low in amount. We also show that restoration of kinase activity leads to the phosphorylation of Rb but that this in itself is not sufficient for allowing differentiated muscle cells to reenter the cell cycle. All the results obtained are consistent with the fact that Rb is functioning downstream of p21 and that the activities of these two proteins may be linked in sustaining the postmitotic state.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
17 April 2000
Article|
April 17 2000
P21 and Retinoblastoma Protein Control the Absence of DNA Replication in Terminally Differentiated Muscle Cells
Asoke Mal,
Asoke Mal
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Search for other works by this author on:
Debasis Chattopadhyay,
Debasis Chattopadhyay
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Search for other works by this author on:
Mrinal K. Ghosh,
Mrinal K. Ghosh
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Search for other works by this author on:
Randy Y.C. Poon,
Randy Y.C. Poon
bDepartment of Biochemistry, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Search for other works by this author on:
Tony Hunter,
Tony Hunter
cThe Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
Search for other works by this author on:
Marian L. Harter
Marian L. Harter
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Search for other works by this author on:
Asoke Mal
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Debasis Chattopadhyay
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Mrinal K. Ghosh
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Randy Y.C. Poon
bDepartment of Biochemistry, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Kowloon, Hong Kong
Tony Hunter
cThe Salk Institute, La Jolla, California 92037
Marian L. Harter
aDepartment of Molecular Biology, Lerner Research Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195
Abbreviations used in this paper: BrdU, 5-bromodeoxyuridine; C2, C2C12 murine skeletal muscle cell line; cdk, cyclin-dependent kinase; DM, differentiating medium; GM, growth medium; GST, glutathione S-transferase; MCM, mini chromosome maintenance; MHC, myosin heavy chain; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; pre-RC, prereplication complex; Rb, retinoblastoma protein.
Received:
August 06 1999
Revision Requested:
March 08 2000
Accepted:
March 10 2000
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
© 2000 The Rockefeller University Press
2000
The Rockefeller University Press
J Cell Biol (2000) 149 (2): 281–292.
Article history
Received:
August 06 1999
Revision Requested:
March 08 2000
Accepted:
March 10 2000
Citation
Asoke Mal, Debasis Chattopadhyay, Mrinal K. Ghosh, Randy Y.C. Poon, Tony Hunter, Marian L. Harter; P21 and Retinoblastoma Protein Control the Absence of DNA Replication in Terminally Differentiated Muscle Cells. J Cell Biol 17 April 2000; 149 (2): 281–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.149.2.281
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement