In a previous paper (Lee et al., 1992), it was shown that normal human mammary epithelial cells (NMEC) express two connexin genes, Cx26 and Cx43, whereas neither gene is transcribed in a series of mammary tumor cell lines (TMEC). In this paper it is shown that normal human mammary fibroblasts (NMF) communicate and express Cx43 mRNA and protein. Transfection of either Cx26 or Cx43 genes into a tumor line, 21MT-2, induced the expression of the corresponding mRNAs and proteins as well as communication via gap junctions (GJs), although immunofluorescence demonstrated that the majority of Cx26 and Cx43 proteins present in transfected TMEC was largely cytoplasmic. Immunoblotting demonstrated that NMEC, NMF, and transfected TMEC each displayed a unique pattern of posttranslationally modified forms of Cx43 protein. The role of different connexins in regulating gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC) was examined using a novel two-dye method to assess homologous and heterologous communication quantitatively. The recipient cell population was prestained with a permanent non-toxic lipophilic dye that binds to membranes irreversibly (PKH26, Zynaxis); and the donor population is treated with a GJ-permeable dye Calcein, a derivative of fluorescein diacetate (Molecular Probes). After mixing the two cell populations under conditions promoting GJ formation, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry to determine the percentage of cells containing both dyes. It is shown here that Cx26 and Cx43 transfectants display strong homologous communication, as do NMEC and NMF. Furthermore, NMEC mixed with NMF communicate efficiently, Cx26 transfectants communicate with NMEC but not with NMF, and Cx43 transfectants communicate with NMF. Communication between Cx26 TMEC transfectants and NMEC was asymetrical with preferential movement of calcein from TMEC to NMEC. Despite the presence of Cx43 as well as Cx26 encoded proteins in the GJs of NMEC, few Cx43 transfectants communicated with NMEC. No heterologous GJIC was observed between Cx26- and Cx43-transfected TMEC suggesting that heterotypic GJs do not form or that Cx26/Cx43 channels do not permit dye transfer.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 July 1993
Article|
July 01 1993
Specificity of gap junction communication among human mammary cells and connexin transfectants in culture
C Tomasetto,
C Tomasetto
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Search for other works by this author on:
MJ Neveu,
MJ Neveu
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Search for other works by this author on:
J Daley,
J Daley
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Search for other works by this author on:
PK Horan,
PK Horan
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Search for other works by this author on:
R Sager
R Sager
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Search for other works by this author on:
C Tomasetto
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
MJ Neveu
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
J Daley
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
PK Horan
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
R Sager
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Genetics, Boston, Massachusetts 02115.
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
J Cell Biol (1993) 122 (1): 157–167.
Citation
C Tomasetto, MJ Neveu, J Daley, PK Horan, R Sager; Specificity of gap junction communication among human mammary cells and connexin transfectants in culture. J Cell Biol 1 July 1993; 122 (1): 157–167. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.122.1.157
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement