HL 60 cells were subcloned into variants with different sensitivities to the differentiation-inducing effect of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25(OH)2D3), as shown by increased oxidative and phagocytic activity and the appearance of cytoplasmic alpha-naphthyl butyrate esterase. Brief treatment (4 h) with 1,25(OH)2D3 or 5-azacytidine (5-Aza CR) of sensitive sublines induced monocytic differentiation in a fraction of treated cells. The phenotypic differentiation induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 was preceded by altered expression of oncogenes c-myc and c-fos, but not of c-Ha-ras or of the constitutively expressed p72 gene. Treatment with 5-Aza CR had similar effects but in addition increased the rate of transcription of the c-Ha-ras oncogene. In partially resistant sublines exposure to 1,25(OH)2D3 or 5-Aza CR resulted in changes in the levels of c-myc and c-fos mRNA, but the expression of c-Ha-ras gene did not correlate with the phenotypic differentiation. When induction of differentiation in responsive cells was delayed by cycloheximide, a temporal correlation could be made between changes in the expression of the c-myc gene and differentiation. These results suggest that a reduction of the elevated levels of c-myc gene transcription in HL 60 cells is required for the initiation of monocytic differentiation, that the induction of c-fos gene expression is an early step in this process, and that the transient increase in the expression of c-Ha-ras gene by 5-Aza CR is not related to differentiation.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 June 1986
Article|
June 01 1986
Changes in the expression of oncogenes encoding nuclear phosphoproteins but not c-Ha-ras have a relationship to monocytic differentiation of HL 60 cells.
Z S Brelvi
G P Studzinski
Online ISSN: 1540-8140
Print ISSN: 0021-9525
J Cell Biol (1986) 102 (6): 2234–2243.
Citation
Z S Brelvi, G P Studzinski; Changes in the expression of oncogenes encoding nuclear phosphoproteins but not c-Ha-ras have a relationship to monocytic differentiation of HL 60 cells.. J Cell Biol 1 June 1986; 102 (6): 2234–2243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.102.6.2234
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement
Advertisement