The four voltage sensors in voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels activate upon membrane depolarization and open the pore. The location and motion of the voltage-sensing S4 helix during the early activation steps and the final opening transition are unresolved. We studied Zn2+ bridges between two introduced His residues in Shaker Kv channels: one in the R1 position at the outer end of the S4 helix (R362H), and another in the S5 helix of the pore domain (A419H or F416H). Zn2+ bridges readily form between R362H and A419H in open channels after the S4 helix has undergone its final motion. In contrast, a distinct bridge forms between R362H and F416H after early S4 activation, but before the final S4 motion. Both bridges form rapidly, providing constraints on the average position of S4 relative to the pore. These results demonstrate that the outer ends of S4 and S5 remain in close proximity during the final opening transition, with the S4 helix translating a significant distance normal to the membrane plane.
Voltage-gated potassium (Kv) channels are present in all cells, and they fulfill a wide variety of important roles. In neurons and excitable cells, for example, Kv channels open and close in response to changes in membrane voltage and are involved in the generation and propagation of electrical signals (Hille, 2001). Kv channels are tetramers, with each subunit containing six membrane-spanning helices, termed S1 through S6 (Swartz, 2004). The channel pore is collectively formed by the S5 and S6 portions of each subunit and is surrounded by four voltage-sensing domains, each constructed from the S1–S4 portion of a single subunit (Long et al., 2007). Basic residues in the S4 helix of each voltage-sensing domain move in response to changes in voltage, producing a measurable gating current (Bezanilla, 2002) and driving the opening of the S6 gate located at the intracellular end of the pore (Yellen, 2002).
The gating mechanism of the Shaker Kv channel has been particularly well studied, with extensive evidence revealing that gating involves multiple early activation steps as the four voltage sensors move between resting (R) and activated (A) states, followed by a final opening transition where the S6 gate moves from a closed (C) to an open (O) state. This conceptual model (Scheme 1), taken from the work of Ledwell and Aldrich (1999), is supported by electrophysiological investigation of the wild-type and mutant Shaker Kv channels (Bezanilla et al., 1994; Hoshi et al., 1994; Stefani et al., 1994; Zagotta et al., 1994a,b; Schoppa and Sigworth, 1998a,b,c; Smith-Maxwell et al., 1998a,b; Ledwell and Aldrich, 1999; Sukhareva et al., 2003; del Camino et al., 2005; Pathak et al., 2005). The Shaker ILT mutant (V369I, I372L, and S376T)
has been a particularly useful tool because the R to A steps occur at considerably more negative voltages compared with the final opening transition (Smith-Maxwell et al., 1998a,b; Ledwell and Aldrich, 1999). Although most of the gating charge in ILT moves during the early transitions between the R and A states, a significant gating charge can be measured during the final opening transition (Ledwell and Aldrich, 1999), raising the possibility that the voltage sensors might also move during the late opening transition. The strongest evidence to support this type of late S4 motion is that probes attached to the external end of the S4 helix exhibit fluorescence changes during the final opening transition (Pathak et al., 2005). Although voltage sensor movements may occur during both early and late steps in the gating of Shaker Kv channels, the position of the crucial S4 helix relative to other parts of the protein and the extent to which this helix moves during specific transitions remain unresolved. In addition, linking the x-ray structures of Kv channels to specific states in gating models obtained from functional experiments is not straightforward. The internal gate regions in the three Kv channel structures solved thus far appear to have been caught in an open state (Jiang et al., 2003; Long et al., 2005, 2007); however, more information is needed to understand how the voltage sensors in these structures relate to those in functional channels embedded in a native lipid environment, in particular, given the inherent flexibility of voltage sensors (Jiang et al., 2003; Cuello et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2005; Chakrapani et al., 2008; Vamvouka et al., 2008) and the growing appreciation for the influence of lipids on channel structure and function (Ramu et al., 2006; Schmidt et al., 2006; Milescu et al., 2007, 2009; Schmidt and MacKinnon, 2008; Xu et al., 2008).
Metal bridges between introduced cysteine (Cys) or histidine (His) residues offer a powerful approach to explore the position and motions of defined regions of proteins, as shown for the gate region of the Shaker Kv channel (Holmgren et al., 1998; Webster et al., 2004; del Camino et al., 2005), and more recently for P2X receptor channels (Li et al., 2010). Lainé et al. (2003) discovered that a Zn2+ bridge can form between two His residues introduced in Shaker channels: one at A419 in the extracellular end of the S5 helix in the pore domain, and the other at R362, the R1 position of the S4 helix within the voltage sensor. Zn2+ causes a leftward shift in the voltage–activation relationship for these channels, suggesting either an open-state stabilization or a closed-state destabilization. This bridge occurs in the presence of nanomolar concentrations of Zn2+, indicating that the equilibrium affinity of Zn2+ is quite high. Similar results can be obtained in the Kv1.2 channel after neutralization of several acidic residues that are not present in Shaker (Lewis et al., 2008). One possibility is that the bridge occurs between residues that are in close proximity and thus might be expected to form rapidly (i.e., high on rate). Alternatively, the two His residues might only rarely encounter each other, a scenario in which the bridge would form slowly and the high affinity would result instead from a very low off-rate. Lainé et al. (2003) also examined metal bridges between Cys residues at F416 and R362. These metal bridges cause an apparent rightward shift in the voltage–activation relationship, suggesting either a closed-state stabilization or an open-state destabilization. In contrast, Broomand et al. (2003) found that disulphide bonds between these same two Cys residues do not form when channels are held closed at negative voltages, but do form when cells are repeatedly depolarized to open channels, leading them to conclude that bridging between these residues only occurs in the open state. Although there are apparent discrepancies between these reports, both of these bridges between S4 and S5 have robust effects on channel gating, making them ideal candidates for constraining the position and motions of the S4 helix relative to the pore if the states in which they exist and their rates of formation can be determined. Here, we explore the state dependence and kinetics of Zn2+ bridges between His residues at positions R362 in S4 and either F416 or A419 in S5 of the Shaker Kv channel. Our results offer a resolution to the discrepancies regarding the state dependence of binding at F416, demonstrate that the S4 helices move during the final opening transition, and constrain the distance of this motion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA of Shaker H4 Kv channel, with N-type inactivation removed (IR) by deleting residues 6–46 (Zagotta et al., 1990), subcloned into a GW1-CMV expression vector (Vernalis), was provided by M. Holmgren (National Institutes of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NINDS], National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Onto this channel background, the V369I, I372L, S376T, R362H, and A419H mutations were introduced using either standard two-step PCR or a QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies), and each construct was sequenced in the NINDS core facility.
HEK 293 cells and Chinese hamster ovary cells were obtained from American Type Culture Collection and cultured in either Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM) or DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10 mM glucose and 10% FBS obtained from Invitrogen. On the first day after trypsination and plating onto glass microscope slide coverslips, cells were transfected using 5 µl FuGene6 (Roche) and 1–2 µg each of the appropriate Shaker channel DNA and pGreenlantern (GFP) DNA (originally from Invitrogen). Currents were recorded 20–72 h after transfection, or on occasion, cells were trypsinized 24–48 h after transfection, replated, and recorded 15–48 h later.
All experiments were preformed at room temperature (∼22°C). Recording pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass capillary tubes (model GC150F-7.5; Harvard Bioscience) using a horizontal puller (model P97; Sutter Instrument Co.). Pipette resistances ranged from 1 to 3 MΩ. Extracellular Zn2+ was applied using a rapid solution perfusion system (RSC 200; Bio-Logic), where 10–20-ms exchange times were obtainable with carefully positioned lifted whole cells or outside-out patches (much longer exchange times were observed when cells remained attached to coverslips). The internal (pipette) solution contained (in mM): 160 KCl, 1 EGTA, 10 HEPES, and 0.5 MgCl2, pH 7.4 with KOH. The external solution contained (in mM): 45 KCl, 100 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 0.5 MgCl, and 2 CaCl, pH 7.2 with KOH. Dilute Zn2+-containing recording solutions were made fresh daily from a 1-M stock solution in H2O (a decrease in Zn2+ potency was noted in dilute Zn2+-containing solutions used several days after being made). Membrane voltage was controlled using a patch clamp amplifier (Axon 200B; Axon Instruments). Currents were filtered at 5 kHz (eight-pole Bessel; 900 filter; Frequency Devices, Inc.) and digitally recorded at 20 kHz using a Digidata board and pCLAMP software (both from Axon Instruments).
Off-line analysis was performed using both Clampfit (Axon Instruments) and Solver (Excel; Microsoft). Error bars are ±SEM. Single Boltzmann functions were fit to G-V relations using the equation where G/Gmax is the normalized conductance determined from tail current amplitudes, z is the equivalent charge movement, V1/2 is the half-activation voltage, F is Faraday’s constant, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature in Kelvin.
Markov models were used for kinetic simulations. Microscopic reversibility was specifically observed. For simplicity, it was assumed that channels are either in the open (fully conducting) or closed states, with no subconductance states considered. Rate constants between states were constrained as described below, with voltage-dependent rate constants assumed to have exponential voltage dependence. Time courses describing the occupancy of each state were calculated according to the method described by Colquhoun and Hawkes (1995). In brief, the occupancy of each state at time t is given by p(t) = p(0)eQt, where p(t) is a row vector with one element for each state in the model. p(0) contains the occupancy probabilities of each state at t = 0, which is calculated using the initial rate constants. The tasks of calculating rate constants, building the Q-matrix, and solving for the above equations were performed by original programs run in Mathcad 2000 adapted from those in Phillips et al. (2003).
To model the late opening transitions that are isolated with the ILT mutations, we initially examined how a simple two-state model consisting of an open state and a closed state separated by a single voltage-dependent transition can reproduce the control ILT channel data. All of the models shown in Fig. 7 reduce to a two-state model in the absence of Zn2+. Fitting a single voltage-dependent Boltzmann function to the G-V relation in control provides a measurement of the total voltage dependence of the transition and a ratio for the forward and backward rates. By constraining the total voltage dependence of both the forward and the backward transition, and the ratio of the on-rate to the off-rate, this two-state model can reasonably describe the steady-state G-V relation in control conditions (Fig. 7 A, control). Next, the kinetics of voltage-dependent channel activation and deactivation were fit by adjusting how the total voltage dependence of the transition is distributed between opening and closing and by changing the opening and closing rates. We set values for the opening and the closing rates while keeping them at the fixed ratio that reproduces the steady-state G-V relation. With these constraints, this model provides a reasonable approximation of the kinetics of voltage-dependent channel opening and closing (Fig. 7 B, control). As is the case for all of these two-state models, the redistribution of states occupied after a voltage step occurs at a rate governed by τ = 1/(ko + kc), and the slowest redistribution will thus occur after a voltage step to the voltage at the midpoint (V1/2) of the G-V curve.
Three-state model (Scheme 2).
We extended the two-state model by adding a single state representing Zn2+ binding to the open state, with a single concentration-dependent transition. For all of the models in Fig. 7, we keep all of the rate constants determined for the two-state model in the absence of Zn2+ the same, adjusting only the Zn2+ binding and unbinding rates. By adjusting the ratio of the Zn2+ on-rate to the Zn2+ off-rate, this three-state model reproduces the steady-state G-V curves in both control and in the presence of Zn2+ (Fig. 7, Scheme 2, A). However, with these constraints it is not possible to reproduce the voltage-dependent opening and closing rates in the presence of Zn2+. The simulated current relaxations are always too slow (Fig. 7, Scheme 2, B). Using slower rates for Zn2+ binding and unbinding than those shown further slows the opening and closing rates, whereas using faster Zn2+ on- and off-rates has no effect.
Four-state model (Scheme 3).
The four-state model incorporates Zn2+ binding to both the pre-open (A) and open (O) states. This model has one additional free parameter compared with the three-state model, a constant (c) allowing for faster opening of Zn2+-bound channels and faster Zn2+ binding in the open state. If c approaches 1, then Zn2+ does not promote channel opening (and the model is unable to reproduce the steady-state G-V curve in the presence of Zn2+). As long as c is larger than ∼25, then by adjusting the ratio of the Zn2+ on-rate to the Zn2+ off-rate, this model is able to reproduce the steady-state G-V relation in the presence of Zn2+ (Fig. 7, Scheme 3, A). This model can reproduce any particular voltage-dependent opening and closing rates in the presence of Zn2+. By increasing the Zn2+ on- and off-rates, the voltage-dependent opening and closing rates can be made faster than any of the data. However, the shape of the relationship between opening/closing rates as function of voltage in the presence of Zn2+ does not fit across the entire voltage range with a single set of Zn2+ binding and unbinding rates. When c is larger than ∼200, the shape of this relationship becomes quite steep, and if the closing rate constant is adjusted to fit the closing rate at negative voltages, the rates at positive voltages are too fast, similar to those illustrated in Fig. 7 (Scheme 4, B). As c is lowered to 100, the shape of the relationship becomes shallower, but not enough to adequately describe the data (Fig. 7, Scheme 3, B). Additionally, the predicted relaxation rates in the presence of Zn2+ are biphasic. As c is lowered, the amplitude of the slow phase decreases at negative voltages, becoming insignificant around −40 mV with the rate constants used. When the relaxation is approximated by fitting with a single-exponential function, this disappearance of the slow phase causes an abrupt change in the reported τ near −40 mV (Fig. 7, Scheme 3, B).
10-state model (Scheme 4).
The 10-state model shown in Scheme 4 models each of the four Zn2+ binding sites while allowing Zn2+ to bind to voltage sensors in both the pre-open and the open positions. This 10-state model has the same number of free parameters as the four-state model. In the absence of Zn2+, this model again reverts to the same two-state model. If c is >2.2, the 10-state model is able to reproduce the steady-state G-V in 1 µM Zn2+, as shown in Fig. 7 (Scheme 4, A). With a c value of 30, the 10-state model is able to fit the opening and closing rates at negative voltages (Fig. 7, Scheme 4, B). By adjusting c and the Zn2+ binding and unbinding rate constants, this model can be adjusted to fit the opening rates. At lower values of c (e.g., 3.5) and with kb = 2 × 107 M−1s−1 and ku = 17 s−1, the 10-state model predicts opening and closing rates in Zn2+ that are biphasic, similar to that observed for the four-state model. This model also cannot fit all of the determined opening and closing rates with a single set of rate constants.
15-state model (Scheme 5).
We considered a 15-state model in which the final transition of each voltage sensor can occur independently, with pore opening occurring as the fourth voltage sensor moves into its open-state position. In the absence of Zn2+, this 15-state model simplifies to a five-state model, in contrast to the previous schemes, which simplify to two-state models. In this five-state model, each voltage sensor is assumed to move independently. This five-state model contains the same number of free parameters as the two-state model. Similarly to the two-state model, this five-state model can reproduce the steady-state G-V in the absence of Zn2+ (Fig. 8, Scheme 5, A, control). Unlike the two-state model where the voltage-dependent opening and closing rates at a given voltage are the same (Fig. 7, Schemes 2–4, B, control), the five-state model predicts subtle differences between the opening and closing rates (Fig. 7, Scheme 5, B), better approximating the observed data. In the five-state model, the maximum of the relationships between opening/closing rates and voltage are both leftward shifted from the predictions of the two-state model, more closely resembling the observed channel data. We constrained the 15-state model to reproduce the opening and closing rates observed in the absence of Zn2+. This 15-state model can fit the steady-state G-V relation in the presence of Zn2+ by adjusting the ratio of the Zn2+ on-rate to the Zn2+ off-rate (Fig. 8, Scheme 4, A). By setting appropriate values for the Zn2+ on- and off-rates, this model can reasonably closely reproduce how opening and closing rates vary as a function of voltage (Fig. 8, Scheme 4, B).
To provide constraints on the location and movement of the voltage sensors relative to the pore, we examined Shaker channels with IR (Zagotta et al., 1990) and with mutations R362H in the voltage sensor and either A419H or F416H in the pore domain. We expressed these channels in HEK cells and used either whole cell or outside-out patch recording to examine the macroscopic voltage-activated potassium currents they produce. To determine the state dependence and kinetics of Zn2+ bridge formation between A419H in the channel pore domain and R362H in the voltage sensor, we examined the effects of Zn2+ on the steady-state channel conductance from Shaker IR R362H and A419H (419H/362H) channels (Fig. 1). To assure that steady-state conductance has been reached and is not distorted by changes in the kinetics of channel activation or deactivation, channel conductance was determined from normalized tail currents after both channel activation and channel deactivation. We find that 1 µM Zn2+ causes a dramatic leftward shift in a plot of the average steady-state conductance verses membrane voltage (G-V curve) (Fig. 1 G), revealing that Zn2+ is either stabilizing the open state or destabilizing a closed state, consistent with the previous reports (Lainé et al., 2003; Lewis et al., 2008). To demonstrate that the leftward shift of the G-V curve by Zn2+ application is caused by Zn2+ being coordinated by the two introduced His residues, we examined the effects of Zn2+ on channels with or without single His residues introduced. We find that unlike the effects observed with millimolar Zn2+ concentrations (Sack and Aldrich, 2006), 10 µM Zn2+ causes no appreciable changes in their G-V relationships (Fig. 2), confirming that the bridge is formed between 362 and 419.
The binding of Zn2+ to open channels
The effects of Zn2+ on the 419H/362H G-V curve occur at voltages where these channels exist in a combination of both open and closed states and therefore could result from Zn2+ binding to either open or closed states. Zn2+ binding to and stabilizing channels in the open state would be expected to slow channel closing kinetics, whereas Zn2+ binding to and destabilizing a closed state would speed channel opening. To distinguish between these two possibilities, we examined the effect of Zn2+ on the kinetics of channel opening and closing (Fig. 3). We quantified channel opening and closing rates by fitting single-exponential functions to the changes in macroscopic currents observed after voltage steps (Fig. 3, B, C, E, and F, red lines). By plotting the average time constants (τ) from these single-exponential functions against the membrane voltage at which the traces were recorded (Fig. 3 G), we find that the deactivation rate (filled symbols) in Zn2+ (blue) is dramatically slower than in control (black), whereas the activation rate is relatively unaltered. These results indicate that Zn2+ binds to and stabilizes Shaker 419H/362H channels in the open state.
Preferential binding of Zn2+ to open compared with pre-open channels
The results thus far are consistent with the possibility that the 419H/362H Zn2+ bridge equally stabilizes channels in both the open state and a “pre-open” state, where S4 has already activated and the gate has not yet opened. Equal stabilization of pre-open and open states would be expected if the S4 helix did not actually move during the final opening transition. Alternatively, the Zn2+ bridge might stabilize the open state compared with the pre-open state, which would demonstrate that S4 moves during the final opening transition. Although it is difficult to distinguish between these scenarios in the wild-type Shaker Kv channel because the final opening transition is forward biased, the ILT mutations facilitate isolation of the pre-open state from the open state (Ledwell and Aldrich, 1999). To determine if Zn2+ bridges form between R362H and A419H in both pre-open and open states, we introduced the R362H and A419H mutations into the ILT background (forming 419H/362H/ILT channels) and used protocols similar to those in Fig. 1, adjusting voltages to accommodate the shifted voltage dependence of ILT channels (Fig. 4). Comparing the steady-state G-V curves in Fig. 4 G reveals that Zn2+ causes an ∼85-mV shift to more negative voltages, which is significantly larger than the 35-mV shift in the G-V curve observed in the control (non-ILT) background (Fig. 1 G, illustrated as dashed lines in Fig. 4 G). Although there is large cell-to-cell variability in the voltage dependence of opening in ILT channels (Fig. 4 G), consistent with previous studies of this mutant (Smith-Maxwell et al., 1998b), it is clear that the ILT mutations have a dramatic effect on the voltage dependence of channel opening, and that the addition of Zn2+ shifts the channels from the pre-open into the open state. In ILT channels containing only one or neither of the His substitutions, these concentrations of Zn2+ did not cause any significant shift in the G-V relations (not depicted), suggesting that Zn2+ bridges between 419H and 362H largely counteract the effect of the ILT mutations on the final opening transition. Examination of the effects of Zn2+ on the kinetics of channel opening and closing (Fig. 5) reveals that the closing rate is dramatically slower in the presence of Zn2+ (blue symbols) compared with control (black symbols), and that the activation rates are relatively unaffected (Fig. 5 G), similar to that observed in the 419H/362H channels (Fig. 3 G). Collectively, these results show that Zn2+ binds to and stabilizes 419H/362H/ILT channels in the open state relative to the pre-open state, revealing that there is movement between R362H in S4 and A419H in the pore during the final opening transition.
Kinetics of Zn2+ binding to open channels
Zn2+ coordination between 362H and 419H constrains the location of these two positions in the S4 and S5 helices because coordination can occur only in a limited number of ideal geometries and precise distances (Alberts et al., 1998). However, Zn2+ coordination may trap the S4 in a rarely sampled position that would not be representative of its relative position in the open state. Our next objective was therefore to explore the kinetics of Zn2+ bridge formation because the Zn2+ on-rate places a lower limit on how often the voltage sensor is located in the appropriate position for Zn2+ coordination. The large increase in channel current seen at some voltages upon Zn2+ application to 419H/362H/ILT channels provides a convenient means of assessing the kinetics of bridge formation. When Zn2+ is rapidly applied to the extracellular solution, we observe rapid increases in channel current (τ = 10–100 ms; Fig. 6) that vary as functions of both voltage and Zn2+ concentration, indicating that the rate of bridge formation is fast. Recovery after the removal of Zn2+ is also rapid (τ = 30–100 ms; Fig. 6) and voltage dependent, but independent of Zn2+ concentration. Simulations using models incorporating four bridges per channel suggest that the underlying Zn2+ binding rate is likely to be >107 M−1s−1, and the Zn2+ unbinding rate is probably between 10 and 120 s−1 (Figs. 7 and 8). The rapid unbinding rate indicates that the Zn2+ bridge between 362 and 419 is not capable of trapping a rarely sampled conformation. The rate of metal bridge formation is more rapid than the rate of ∼106 M−1s−1 observed for Cd2+ coordination within the internal pore regions of the Shaker Kv channel (del Camino and Yellen, 2001) or the P2X receptor channel (Li et al., 2010), examples where at least three Cys residues coordinate the metal ion. Collectively, the rapid binding and unbinding rates for 419H/362H channels suggest that bridging occurs in the open state, and in that state, His residues at 362 in S4 and 419 in S5 are optimally positioned to coordinate Zn2+.
Can Zn2+ bind before channels open?
The experimental results thus far with 419H/362H channels suggest that Zn2+ binds rapidly to the open state and stabilizes it over the pre-open state, requiring that Zn2+ bind more tightly to the open state than to the pre-open state. These results do not exclude the possibility that Zn2+ is able to weakly bind channels in the pre-open state before the S4 helices have undergone their final movement. To explore this possibility, we consider multiple kinetic models to explain the actions of Zn2+ on the final opening transition of 419H/362H/ILT channels (Figs. 7 and 8). Ledwell and Aldrich (1999) found that much of their data obtained on ILT channels at positive voltages could be reproduced using a two-state model to represent the final opening transition between the pre-open and open states. We initially explored whether a simple three-state model with Zn2+ binding only to the open state (Fig. 7, Scheme 2) can reproduce our data for 419H/362H/ILT channels over voltage ranges that similarly focus on the final opening transition (refer to Materials and methods). As observed by Ledwell and Aldrich (1999) for ILT channels, in the absence of Zn2+, both the steady-state G-V curve and the voltage-dependent activation and deactivation rates from 419H/362H/ILT channels can be reasonably well described using a single set of rates for the transition between pre-open and open states (Fig. 7, shown in black). However, this three-state model is unable to reproduce the voltage-dependent activation and deactivation rates in the presence of Zn2+; regardless of how fast we make the Zn2+ binding and unbinding rate constants, the predicted voltage-dependent activation and deactivation rates in Zn2+ are always too slow (Fig. 7, shown in blue). We also considered a model in which Zn2+ can bind to the pre-open state (Fig. 7, Scheme 3), necessitating one additional free parameter, a constant that represents how much tighter Zn2+ binds to the open state than the pre-open state and how much faster Zn2+-bound channels open. Although this model can describe the voltage-dependent activation and deactivation rates in the presence of Zn2+ better than Scheme 2, a single set of rate constants cannot reproduce all of the rates over the voltage range studied (Fig. 7).
The models discussed thus far are oversimplified representations of the final opening transition that is isolated with the ILT mutations because they do not take into account that each channel contains four Zn2+ binding sites, one between each of the four S4 and S5 helices. Scheme 4 extends the four-state model to a 10-state model by adding individual Zn2+ binding reactions to both the pre-open and open states (Fig. 7), but nevertheless fails to reproduce all of the activation and deactivation rates in the presence of Zn2+ (Fig. 7, shown in blue). In the final model we considered (Fig. 8, Scheme 5), each voltage sensor is able to move independently between a pre-open (A) and open (O) position, but Zn2+ can only bind after a given S4 has moved to its O position. Unlike the other models, all of which reduce to a simple two-state model in the absence of Zn2+, this scheme expands the final opening transitions into four independent transitions. In each of these transitions, S4 moves between activated and “open” positions, with the channel only opening to a conducting state when the last of the four S4 helices moves into the open position. Scheme 5 better reproduces subtle features of the voltage-dependent activation and deactivation rates. These rates are not identical in the voltage range where they overlap, and their individual maxima do not occur at the midpoint of the G-V (Fig. 8), as is the case for a two-state model (see control conditions in Fig. 7). In the presence of Zn2+, Scheme 5 reproduces the activation and deactivation rates better than the four- or 10-state models, even though this model has one fewer free parameter. Considering these models leads us to conclude that Zn2+ must bind to 419H/362H/ILT channels before the channel actually opens. Schemes 3 and 4 accomplish this by allowing Zn2+ to bridge before and after the final movement of the S4 helix, whereas in Scheme 5, each S4 can move independently and Zn2+ can bridge any given S4 (with an S5) only after it has moved into its final state. In this case, channel opening cannot occur until all of the S4 helices have moved.
A distinct bridge with Zn2+ binding to the pre-open state
Our next objective was to explore the state dependence of Zn2+ bridges between His residues introduced at R362 in S4 and F416 in S5, one helical turn below the 419 position studied thus far. Lainé et al. (2003) previously reported that Cd2+ bridges between Cys residues at F416 and R362 produce a slowing of opening and an apparent rightward shift in the G-V relationship, whereas Broomand et al. (2003) found that disulphide bonds between these same two Cys residues do not form when channels are held closed, but form readily when cells are repeatedly depolarized to open channels. Although this group concluded that the disulphide bond forms in the open state (Broomand et al., 2003), an alternate possibility that would be consistent with all the data is that bridges between 362 in S4 and F416 in S5 only form after the voltage sensors have activated and entered the pre-open state. The inhibitory effect in both instances could be explained if these bridges stabilize the pre-open state relative to the open state. To explore this possibility, we studied channels containing F416H and R362H mutations (416H/362H) and initially determined G-V relations (Fig. 9 J) using tail currents obtained after steps of both activation (Fig. 9, A–F) and deactivation (Fig. 9, G–I). There is a slight weakening of the voltage dependence in the presence of 10 µM Zn2+ (Fig. 9, blue) compared with control (black), which results in a small rightward shift of the G-V curve at some voltages. In the presence of Zn2+, the kinetics of opening from a holding potential of −50 mV are significantly slower compared with opening from −150 mV (Fig. 9, M, liter). The kinetics of opening from either voltage in control solutions are similarly rapid (Fig. 9 K), as are those for either 362H or wild-type cells in both control and Zn2+ (Fig. 9 M), revealing that this effect of Zn2+ occurs only in 416H/362H (Fig. 9 M). The fast opening rate in Zn2+ during steps from −150 mV is consistent with Zn2+ being unable to bind at −150 mV, where the voltage sensors remain in the resting state, whereas the slower opening rate in Zn2+ during steps from −50 mV suggests that Zn2+ is binding at −50 mV, where some channels are in partially activated states. The channel needs to be held at −50 mV for only 100 ms to observe slowing of opening (Fig. 9, M, liter), indicating that the rate of Zn2+ binding in this case is also quite rapid. Although Zn2+ slows opening from −50 mV, it has only small effects on the amplitude of steady-state currents at the end-test depolarizations and insignificant effects on the G-V at the most depolarized voltages, suggesting that either Zn2+ must unbind before the channel can open or that it stabilizes a pre-open state relative to the open state.
To distinguish whether Zn2+ is bridging 416H/362H in the pre-open state that is stabilized by the ILT mutations or some earlier partially activated state, we introduced the 416H/362H mutations into the ILT background. A modified G-V from 416H/362H/ILT channels that has been normalized to the conductance and +150 mV is plotted for multiple cells in Fig. 10 J, where no consistent effect of Zn2+ can be seen. These ILT-containing channels are not fully opened even at +200 mV, and without reaching the top of the G-V, it is difficult to distinguish small inhibitory effects of Zn2+ bridging from the variable gating properties of ILT channels (see Fig. 4 and Smith-Maxwell et al., 1998b). Nevertheless, Zn2+ does produce a clear slowing of channel opening when elicited by depolarizations from a holding voltage of −50 mV, where many channels are in the pre-open state, but not when elicited by depolarization from −150 mV, where the voltage sensors are in the resting state. The slow opening of ILT channels observed in the presence of Zn2+ from a holding voltage of −50 mV is not observed in several channel constructs lacking the F416H mutation, consistent with the effect arising from a bridge between 362 and 416. Collectively, these results suggest that Zn2+ bridges form between 362 and 416 in the pre-open state and stabilize that state relative to the open state.
The objective of this study was to explore the state dependence of bridges between S4 and S5 to constrain the location and motions of the S4 helix during the final opening step in the Shaker Kv channel. Our results on metal bridges formed between His residues at 362 in S4 and 419 in S5 suggest that this bridge greatly favors the open state compared with the pre-open state (Figs. 1–5), providing a clear demonstration that the S4 helix moves relative to S5 during the final opening transition. We also studied Zn2+ bridges between 362 in S4 and 416 in S5, and in this case our results suggest that the bridge forms when the channels enter the pre-open state after the early steps in voltage sensor activation and before the final opening transition (Figs. 9 and 10). Collectively, these results suggest that the S4 helix moves during the final opening transition from a position where a His at 362 in S4 can favorably bridge with 416 in S5 to one where 362 favorably bridges with 419. In the x-ray structure of the Kv1.2 channel, the Cβ atom of the residue equivalent to 419 is located 6.6 Å extracellular to that of the 416 equivalent, whereas in the Kv1.2 paddle chimera structure, this distance is 5.1 Å (Long et al., 2005, 2007) (Fig. 11, B–D), suggesting that the R1 position of the S4 helix moves in an extracellular direction during the final opening transition. Our results also demonstrate that the kinetics of bridge formation in the open state between 362 and 419 are rapid (Fig. 6), indicating that His residues at these positions must often be ideally positioned to coordinate Zn2+. In the open Kv1.2 structure, the residue equivalent to R362 (R294) is not ideally positioned to bridge with 419 (A351 in Kv1.2), as the distance between Cβ atoms of these two residues is too long (13.7 Å) for His at these positions to coordinate Zn2+ (Alberts et al., 1998) (Fig. 11 D), although only a modest rotation of the S4 helix (counterclockwise viewed from outside) and movement toward S5 would be necessary to allow for optimal coordination. In contrast, the residue equivalent to R362 in the structure of the open Kv1.2 paddle chimera (R290) is positioned closer to 419 (A347 in the chimera), with a distance between Cβ atoms of 8.5 Å (Fig. 10, A–C), which is more compatible with the strict requirements for Zn2+ coordination (Alberts et al., 1998).
The equilibrium of voltage sensors between resting and activated states, as reflected in the gating charge (Q) versus voltage (V) relation, is sensitive to the initial voltage from which gating currents are elicited. For example, in a variety of voltage-activated channels and the Ci-VSP voltage-sensitive phosphatase, Q-V relations exhibit a pronounced shift to negative voltages when gating currents are elicited from positive voltages (Bezanilla et al., 1982; Olcese et al., 1997; Villalba-Galea et al., 2008). Villalba-Galea et al. (2008) have proposed that prolonged activation of voltage sensors at positive voltages causes them to shift into a relaxed state, and that the crystal structures of Kv channels represent this relaxed state rather than the activated state. Our constraints with bridges between S4 in both pre-open and open states are compatible with the crystal structure of the Kv1.2 paddle chimera, as discussed above, suggesting that the structural differences between activated and relaxed voltage sensors are relatively subtle and unlikely to involve a substantial repositioning of the S4 helix relative to S5.
To understand the state dependence of Zn2+ bridging between 362 and 419, we explored a range of kinetic models. A key conclusion that we take from these models is that the bridge can form before channels open even though the bridge ultimately stabilizes the open state (Figs. 7 and 8; and see below). Models where bridges can only form in the open state (e.g., Fig. 7, Scheme 2) poorly reproduce the observed kinetics of opening and closing in the presence of Zn2+, when they are also constrained to fit the observed shift in the closed–open equilibrium evident in the G-V relations. This is because the opening and closing rates in the absence of Zn2+ limit how rapidly Zn2+ can bind and how fast the channel can close after Zn2+ unbinding. Models that treat the final opening transition as a single concerted motion of the four voltage sensors and gate (e.g., Fig. 7, Schemes 2–4) also cannot reproduce the observed kinetics of opening and closing even if they allow for bridging before opening of the channel. In contrast, Scheme 5 (Fig. 8) reproduces the observed kinetics of opening and closing in both the absence and presence of Zn2+ by allowing each voltage sensor to independently move between pre-open and open positions before the channel actually opening. These findings together imply that the final opening step defined using the ILT construct is not actually a single transition but likely involves movement of each S4 helix between pre-open and open positions. Although Scheme 5 (Fig. 8) treats these motions of the four S4 helices as independent, there may be cooperative interactions (Pathak et al., 2005) that we have omitted for simplicity. It should also be noted that experimental conditions and variations between channel constructs can have effects on the cooperativity of individual transitions (Sack and Aldrich, 2006). The prominent lags expected for multiple transitions are not observed in ILT when activating from voltages where the voltage sensors have already undergone their initial activation (e.g., 0 mV in ILT and −50 mV in 419H/362H/ILT) because the late transitions have weak voltage dependence, and at these intermediate voltages, channels are distributed between the multiple pre-open states in Scheme 5 (Fig. 8). It is important to note that although our results clearly demonstrate voltage sensor movement during the late steps in channel opening, some of the voltage dependence observed in these late steps may result from other sources.
The emerging picture whereby the voltage sensors move in both the early activating steps and the late opening transition has several additional implications for understanding the gating mechanisms and pharmacology of voltage-dependent ion channels in a more general context. First, there are a wide variety of different ion channels that contain S1–S4 voltage-sensing domains, yet it remains unclear whether their gating mechanisms involve the equivalent of both the early and late transitions that operate within the Shaker Kv channel. The Shaw Kv channel (Kv3) appears to primarily use the equivalent of the final opening transition in Shaker (Smith-Maxwell et al., 1998a,b; Ledwell and Aldrich, 1999), providing a clear example of a channel that only uses a subset of the voltage-sensing conformation changes that are present in Shaker. It will be fascinating to explore whether S4 motions are required to gate other weakly voltage-dependent channels, including Ca2+-activated potassium channels (Ma et al., 2006), cyclic nucleotide gate channels (Benndorf et al., 1999; Martínez-François et al., 2009), and TRP channels (Voets et al., 2004, 2007). Second, the two bridges studied here provide clear examples of how molecules might perturb the gating mechanisms of voltage-activated ion channels by interacting with specific conformations of the voltage sensors. Because the voltage sensors move during both the early activating steps and the late opening transition, ligands that bind to voltage sensors can potentially influence any conformation change involved in gating the channel.
We thank Miguel Holmgren, Lorin Milescu, Joe Mindell, Andrew Plested, Shai Silberberg, and members of the Swartz laboratory for helpful discussions, and the NINDS DNA sequencing facility for DNA sequencing.
This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NINDS, National Institutes of Health, and a National Institute of General Medical Sciences PRAT fellowship to L.R. Phillips.
Christopher Miller served as editor.