Jones, L.P., S.-k. Wei, and D.T. Yue. The Journal of General Physiology. Volume 112, No. 2, August 1998. 125–143.

Page 137.

Line five of Figure 9 legend contained an error in which two symbols were incorrectly labelled. The correct legend is shown below.

Figure 9. Activation and inactivation properties of a COOH-terminal truncated version of α1E1EΔ, amino acids 1–1871) that lacks a putative β binding site. All measurements for both α1E and α1EΔ are in 10 mM Ba2+. (A) Traces illustrating activation of ionic currents for α1EΔα2δ (cell 375_19) or α1EΔβ2aα2δ (cell 370_6) using the same voltage protocol as in Fig. 2. Data are shown for test pulse potentials of −30, −20, −10, 10, and 50 mV. (B) Comparison of G-V for α1EΔ and α1E indicates that modulation of α1EΔ activation by β subunits is preserved. Symbols correspond to data for α1EΔ and wild-type α1E1EΔβ2aα2δ, ○, n = 4; α1EΔα2δ, •, n = 11; α1Eα2δ, □, n = 11; and α1Eβ2a, ▪, n = 8). Lines are single-Boltzmann fits to the α1Eα2 and α1Eβ2a data with fit parameters z = 2.4, V1/2 = −10.1; and z = 3.4, V1/2 = −18.2, respectively. The shift in V1/2 values relative to Fig. 6 C corresponds to a surface potential shift between 10 mM (used here) and 2 mM Ba2+ (Fig. 6). (C) Steady state inactivation. Traces after a 20-s prepulse (as in Fig. 7) to the indicated potentials are shown for α1EΔ in combination with α2δ (cell 376_9), β3 (cell 375_4), β2aα2δ (cell 370_11), and β3α2δ (cell 371_10). (D) Comparison of h(∞)-V relations for α1EΔ (symbols) and α1E (same data as in Fig. 7, shown as lines connecting mean data values, without explicit reproduction of data points as symbols). Symbols correspond to the following constructs: α1EΔα2δ, •; α1EΔβ2aα2δ, ○; α1EΔβ3, ▿; α1EΔβ3α2δ, ×. Data for α1E is shifted by −7 mV to overlay the α1EΔ data. Average fit values and cell numbers are summarized in Tables V (G-V) and III [h(∞)-V] for both α1E and α1EΔ.