Numerous studies have described the altered expression and the causal role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in human cancer. However, to date, efforts to modulate miRNA levels for therapeutic purposes have been challenging to implement. Here we find that nucleolin (NCL), a major nucleolar protein, posttranscriptionally regulates the expression of a specific subset of miRNAs, including miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-103, that are causally involved in breast cancer initiation, progression, and drug resistance. We also show that NCL is commonly overexpressed in human breast tumors and that its expression correlates with that of NCL-dependent miRNAs. Finally, inhibition of NCL using guanosine-rich aptamers reduces the levels of NCL-dependent miRNAs and their target genes, thus reducing breast cancer cell aggressiveness both in vitro and in vivo. These findings illuminate a path to novel therapeutic approaches based on NCL-targeting aptamers for the modulation of miRNA expression in the treatment of breast cancer.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are noncoding single-stranded RNA molecules of ∼22 nt in length (Bartel, 2004). They have a critical role in regulating gene expression by targeting mRNAs in a sequence-specific manner (Pillai et al., 2007). A large body of evidence indicates that the multigene regulatory capacity of miRNAs is altered in human cancer (Croce, 2009; Pichiorri et al., 2010). In fact, miRNA loci are subject to genetic and epigenetic changes, and miRNA “signatures” have been found informative for tumor classification and clinical outcome (Calin et al., 2005; Volinia et al., 2010; Visone et al., 2011). Several miRNAs are specifically up-regulated in various types of tumors (Volinia et al., 2006), and a wide range of studies have demonstrated how their down-regulation could potentially affect tumorigenesis, metastasis formation, and drug resistance (Croce, 2009; Garofalo and Croce, 2011).
Nucleolin (NCL) is a highly conserved nucleocytoplasmic multifunctional protein, abundantly expressed in the nucleolus (Srivastava and Pollard, 1999). NCL functions to regulate mRNA translation and stability of several tumor progression genes, including BCL2 (Otake et al., 2007; Abdelmohsen et al., 2011). A previous study has shown that NCL is also an integral component of the DROSHA–DGCR8 microprocessor complex (Shiohama et al., 2007). Although the role of NCL and the DROSHA–DGCR8 microprocessor complex in ribosomal RNA biogenesis is well characterized (Srivastava and Pollard, 1999; Wu et al., 2000; Fukuda et al., 2007; Jalal et al., 2007), only recently has its ability to modulate processing from primary miRNA (pri-miRNA) structures to precursor forms been reported (Pickering et al., 2011).
NCL has also been found on the cell surface, where it serves as an anchor protein for specific ligands (Farin et al., 2009; Watanabe et al., 2010; Tayyari et al., 2011; Greco et al., 2012). Several studies have demonstrated its localization on the surface of different types of cancer cells but not on their normal counterparts (Soundararajan et al., 2008; Bates et al., 2009a; Hovanessian et al., 2010; Destouches et al., 2011). These findings support the idea that NCL might be considered a cancer cell–specific receptor that is able to mediate tumor-selective uptake of specific molecules. The importance of NCL in cancer biology was recently highlighted by studies showing that NCL plays a critical role in tumorigenesis and angiogenesis (Shi et al., 2007; Reyes-Reyes and Akiyama, 2008; El Khoury et al., 2010; Destouches et al., 2011; Farin et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2012). Furthermore, the ability of this protein to bind specific RNA and G-rich DNA elements with high affinity (Brooks and Hurley, 2010; Abdelmohsen et al., 2011; Sun et al., 2011) makes it targetable by the first G-rich aptamer (AS1411) that has reached phase II clinical trials for cancer therapy (Teng et al., 2007; Soundararajan et al., 2008; Bates et al., 2009a; Keefe et al., 2010).
Here we show that NCL promotes the maturation of a specific set of miRNAs that are implicated in the pathogenesis of several human cancers, such as miR-21, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222, whose overexpression is often associated with greater aggressiveness and resistance to antineoplastic therapies (Di Leva et al., 2010; Iliopoulos et al., 2010; Martello et al., 2010; Farazi et al., 2011). Our study focused on the potential use of NCL as a therapeutic target for the regulation of these miRNAs in breast cancer. We also report that AS1411 diminishes breast cancer aggressiveness in vivo through miRNA regulation. Our results are, to our knowledge, the first to identify new molecular and therapeutic functions of this aptamer for breast cancer treatment.
NCL affects the expression of a specific set of miRNAs through posttranscriptional regulation
To determine the extent to which miRNA expression is regulated by NCL, we combined the results from a full-spectrum analysis of miRNA levels using NanoString technology (Fortina and Surrey, 2008; Ioffe et al., 2012) and miRNA next-generation sequencing in HeLa cells, in which the interaction between NCL and the microprocessor complex was previously shown (Shiohama et al., 2007). We first used NanoString analysis to isolate a signature associated with transient NCL knockdown (si-NCL) at 72 h (Table S1). Several miRNAs were significantly down-regulated (>1.5-fold; P < 0.05; Table S1), and Northern blot analysis confirmed that mature miR-21, miR-103, miR-10a, miR-222, and miR-221 levels were reduced upon NCL knockdown, whereas nonregulated miRNAs such as miR-155 and miR-30a were unaffected (Fig. 1 A). Next, we performed miRNA high-throughput sequencing of HeLa cells stably expressing double-strand interfering RNA against NCL or scrambled sequences (sh-NCL or sh-Scr). Cells were first infected with the indicated shRNAs and then, after 72 h, replated for an additional 48 h to avoid changes in miRNA half-lives associated with different confluence status (Hwang et al., 2009; Rissland et al., 2011). A distinct group of miRNAs was found significantly down-regulated (more than fivefold; P < 0.01; Table S2). Of note, both the analyses failed to identify up-regulated miRNAs upon NCL knockdown. Combining the two approaches, we observed a common core of 12 mature miRNAs, including miR-21, miR-103, miR-10a, miR-222, and miR-221 in which the down-regulation increased with prolonged treatments and was not associated with a reduction of their primary forms (Fig. 1, B and C; and not depicted).
We also observed differentially expressed miRNAs between the two approaches (Tables S1 and S2). These differences could stem from the ability of high-throughput sequencing to unveil different miRNA isoforms that are not detectable by predefined probes used by NanoString technology or quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) such as miR-191, miR-107, miR-744, miR-629, miR-574, miR-210, and miR-1249 (Table S2). Furthermore, by high-throughput screening, performed after 5 d (72 + 48 h), we observed the down-regulation of the mature form of several miRNAs, such as miR-93, miR-181a/b, miR-192, miR-30a/c, and let-7 family, which was also associated to the decrease of their primary transcripts upon NCL silencing (sh-NCL; Table S2 and not depicted), suggesting a different level of regulation other than posttranscriptional.
The down-regulation of miR-103, miR-10a, miR-222, and miR-221 was also observed in HEK-293 cells, in which the growth status does not affect miRNA expression (not depicted; Hwang et al., 2009). After 48 h of NCL knockdown, we also found a significant reduction of miR-21 and miR-103 levels in MCF-7 breast cancer cells, in which these two miRNAs are abundantly expressed (not depicted). To confirm that NCL–miRNA interaction also occurs in human cells, we performed RNA immunoprecipitation (RIP) experiments in HeLa cells using an anti-NCL antibody. NCL coimmunoprecipitated with endogenous pri–miR-221-222, pri–miR-103-1, and pri–miR-21 in HeLa cells (Fig. 1 D). Conversely, pri–miR-155 did not coimmunoprecipitate in this cell system (Fig. 1 D). Moreover, NCL silencing after exogenous expression of pri–miR-21 and pri–miR-221 decreased their precursor and mature forms, increasing pri-miRNAs, whereas miR-155 was unaffected (Fig. 1, E and F). Addition of recombinant NCL protein to total HEK-293 cell extracts increased pri–miR-21 and pri–miR-221 in vitro processing (Fig. 1 G and not depicted). Thus, our data indicate that NCL is able to affect the biogenesis of a specific subset of miRNAs.
NCL knockdown results in significant reduction of posttranscriptional silencing of specific miRNA target genes in vitro and in vivo
We examined whether NCL impairment could modulate miRNA target genes in cancer cells. NCL knockdown abrogated endogenous miR-21– and miR-103–mediated posttranscriptional silencing of two reporter constructs containing six miR-21 (miR-21–6X-BS) or four miR-103 binding sites (miR-103–4X-BS; Fig. 2 A). This silencing was not detected when a reporter construct containing four miR-30 family binding sites (miR-30s–4X-BS) was used (Fig. 2 A). Reduced NCL expression significantly decreased the silencing effect of ectopic pri-miRNAs but did not affect the activity of exogenous mature forms (Fig. 2 B). According to these data, reduced levels of endogenous miR-103 upon 72 h of NCL knockdown in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 2 C) increased both the expression of DICER mRNA, its known direct target (Martello et al., 2010), and of a reporter gene containing its 3′ untranslated region (UTR), whereas cotransfection of miR-103 reversed these effects (Fig. 2, D and E). Moreover, NCL impairment led to increased mRNA levels of several miR-221-222 and miR-21 target genes such as PDCD4 in MCF-7 cells (not depicted; Frankel et al., 2008) and TIMP3 (Fig. 2 F; Garofalo et al., 2009; Sayed et al., 2010), FAS (Fig. 2 G), and PTEN (Fig. 2 H; Sayed et al., 2010; Darido et al., 2011) in HeLa cells, whereas exogenous miR-221/222 and miR-21 rescued these effects (Fig. 2, F–H). Notably, PTEN up-regulation upon NCL silencing resulted in reduced AKT activation (pAKT; Fig. 2 H). Stable NCL knockdown in HeLa and MCF-7 cells indicated that NCL impairment affects their clonogenic survival as previously published (Otake et al., 2007).
Previous studies have shown that NCL down-regulation affects tumorigenicity of cancer cells (El Khoury et al., 2010; Destouches et al., 2011; Krust et al., 2011). Here we investigated whether NCL-regulated miRNAs could have a direct role in this process. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were subcutaneously injected into 50 nude mice, and 1 wk after injection, four groups of mice with comparable tumor size were treated with a combination of si-NCL or scrambled sequence siRNA, plus intratumor injections of scramble double-stranded RNAs or a pool of miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-103 (Fig. 3 A). Scramble-treated tumors increased almost sevenfold in 3 wk, whereas si-NCL and si-NCL/scramble groups increased only twofold (Fig. 3 A). Notably, miRNA reexpression by intratumor injection in mice treated with si-NCL showed an approximately fourfold increase in tumor size, partially reversing the effect of si-NCL. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of tumor sections revealed that the si-NCL/miRNA-treated mice displayed higher Ki-67 staining compared with si-NCL treatment alone (Fig. 3, B and C), but no significant differences were observed in caspase-3 activation (Fig. 3, B and C), indicating a lower tumor proliferation rate in si-NCL–treated mice rather than increased apoptosis. Increased PTEN protein expression, and a consequent reduction of AKT phosphorylation (pAKT), was also found upon NCL silencing, and this effect was reversed by miRNA injections (Fig. 3, B and C). By Western blot analysis of the mouse xenograft tumors, we observed DICER up-regulation upon si-NCL in vivo transfection (Fig. 3 D), likely caused by negative regulation of miR-103 (Fig. 3 E), previously described as DICER-targeting miRNA (Martello et al., 2010). miR-21, miR-221, and miR-222 down-regulation after NCL knockdown was also observed (Fig. 3 E).
These findings demonstrate that the in vivo effects of NCL modulation on cell proliferation and tumorigenicity are caused in part by NCL-dependent miRNAs. This is compatible with the fact that miRNA reexpression only partially reverts the effect of si-NCL and also highlights the importance of cytoplasmic and cell membrane NCL (Fig. 3 B) in these processes.
NCL overexpression is associated with up-regulation of
miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-103 in human breast cancer
Several miRNAs directly regulated by NCL, such as miR-21, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222, participate in the control of cell proliferation and tumorigenesis, particularly in breast cancer (Iliopoulos et al., 2010; Martello et al., 2010; Farazi et al., 2011). Thus, we sought to determine whether NCL-increased expression was associated with higher levels of these miRNAs in breast cancer cells. We first observed that NCL is overexpressed in human breast cancer cell lines compared with normal-like breast cells (MCF-10F; Fig. 4 A). We also analyzed 15 specimens paired to normal controls (tumor and normal tissue from the same patient) by IHC, Western blot, and RT-PCR and found higher NCL levels in tumor tissues (Fig. 4 B and not depicted) compared with their normal counterparts.
Moreover, by NanoString profiling of 57 normal breast and 183 triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) RNAs, we observed a significant (P < 0.005) overexpression of NCL-associated miRNAs in tumor RNAs in comparison with normal tissues (Fig. 4 C). To confirm a positive correlation between NCL and its target miRNA levels, we evaluated NCL expression by IHC in 70 out of 183 TNBC tissues previously used for miRNA profiling. We observed NCL staining in 80% of the cases (30% NCL ++, 50% NCL +; Fig. 4 D) and found a positive correlation between NCL and miR-21, miR-103, and miR-222 expression (Fig. 4 E). In contrast, no correlation was found with the expression of miRNAs not regulated by NCL, such as miR-30a and miR-155 (Fig. 4 E). Furthermore, miRNA in situ hybridization (ISH) and NCL IHC staining on 110 independent cases of breast cancers confirmed the positive correlation between NCL expression and miR-221 and miR-21 levels (Fig. 4 F), but no staining was detected when a nonspecific miRNA probe was used in breast cancer tissues (Fig. 4 G). These data indicate that the higher expression of a selected group of miRNAs is significantly associated with increased NCL levels in human breast cancer.
NCL-targeting compounds modulate expression of
miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-103 and their related target genes in vitro and in vivo
Previous studies have shown that the aptamer AS1411 binds NCL with high affinity on the cell surface (Soundararajan et al., 2008) and, after internalization, acts as a molecular decoy, blocking and shortening the half-life of NCL-regulated RNAs (Ishimaru et al., 2010). Based on our previous findings, we hypothesized that AS1411 could inhibit the biogenesis of NCL-dependent miRNAs. Accordingly, we detected a significant decrease in expression of mature miR-221, miR-222, miR-21, miR-103, and miR-10a, but not miR-155 and let-7a, as well as up-regulation of the respective pri-miRNAs in HeLa cells after AS1411 treatment (not depicted). Furthermore, we observed an increasing down-regulation of these miRNAs, correlated with increased accumulation of pri-miRNA transcripts, after 48, 72, and 96 h of AS1411 treatment (Fig. 5 A) of MCF-7 cells. Interestingly, immunoblot analysis showed a partial delocalization of NCL from the nucleus to the cytosol in MCF-7 cells after 48 h of treatment (Fig. 5 B), indicating that AS1411 was internalized by the cells. Furthermore, coimmunoprecipitation experiments in cells exogenously expressing Flag-DGCR8 showed that AS1411 treatment can affect NCL ability to interact with the microprocessor complex (Fig. 5 C).
By global transcriptional profiling (GEO series no. GSE41971) and Gene Ontology enrichment analysis, we also explored the effects of AS1411 on gene expression in MCF-7 cells (not depicted). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering segregated samples based on treatment assignment, suggesting common transcriptional consequences in response to AS1411 (not depicted). According to our results, RT-PCR in MCF-7 showed that changes in expression of mature miRNAs (Fig. 5 A) correlated with higher expression of their target mRNAs (Fig. 5 D). We also found that BCL-2 mRNA levels were significantly down-regulated only after 96 h of exposure (fold change 0.3 ± 0.1; P < 0.05) but not at 72 h after treatment, confirming our gene expression profile data, for which down-regulation was not detected (Fig. 5 D). By using the miRò knowledge base (Laganà et al., 2009), we identified several validated and predicted targets of miR-21, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222 among the most up-regulated genes (fold change > 1.3; P < 0.05) upon treatment (Table S3). Specifically, we performed an enrichment analysis for the biological processes in which the identified targets are involved. Upon AS1411 treatment, we identified the up-regulation of several genes involved in signal transduction, cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, and cell motility, including PTEN, DICER, PDCD4, and CDC25A (Table S3; Laganà et al., 2009).
In vivo, AS1411 had significant antitumorigenic activity (Fig. 6 A) in xenograft models of highly aggressive breast cancer (MDA-MB-231). Immunoblot analysis of AS1411-treated tumors showed an increase in DICER and PTEN levels associated with a severe decrease of pAKT and Vimentin (Fig. 6, B and C), in line with previously published data (Martello et al., 2010; Shorning et al., 2011). qRT-PCR confirmed a significant reduction of mature miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-103 but not of nonspecific regulated miRNAs, including miR-30a or let-7a (Fig. 6 D). IHC analysis showed an ∼50% decrease in Ki-67 nuclear staining, associated with a decrease of Vimentin, Fibronectin, and pAKT cytosolic staining in these samples but not significant caspase-3 activation (Fig. 6 E). Although the total NCL amount was almost unaffected (Fig. 6 E), NCL partially relocated to the cytosol in AS1411-treated tumors (Fig. 6 F). These results indicate that AS1411 modulates the expression of specific NCL-regulated miRNA target genes involved in cancer progression in vitro and in vivo. In line with the ability of NCL to regulate the expression of several miRNA target genes, cell proliferation assays in MDA-MB-231 cells stably interfered for PTEN showed that PTEN impairment only partially rescued the inhibitory effect of NCL-targeting treatments (not depicted).
Biological consequences of NCL targeting in breast cancer cells through miRNA regulation
Several studies have reported an association of miR-221 and miR-222 up-regulation with drug resistance in cancer (Garofalo et al., 2008, 2009; Rao et al., 2011). Moreover, it has been shown that the up-regulation of these miRNAs has a causal role in the development of resistance to the antiestrogen drug Fulvestrant (Rao et al., 2011). Therefore, we evaluated whether AS1411 might sensitize cells to Fulvestrant. We found that AS1411 treatment or NCL knockdown in MCF-7 cells increased the sensitivity to Fulvestrant treatment (Fig. 7 A) compared with cysteine-rich aptamer (drug control [DCT]), which we used as a control drug, or scrambled siRNA sequences (si-Scr). Reexpression of exogenous miR-221 and miR-222 in MCF-7 cells partially abrogated the inhibitory effect of AS1411 on cell growth (Fig. 7 A). We also noted that in Fulvestrant-resistant MCF-7 cells (MCF-7F; Rao et al., 2011), in which miR-221 and miR-222 were highly expressed in comparison with the parental cells, NCL targeting by siRNA or AS1411 led to a decrease of cell growth and increased apoptosis induced by Fulvestrant (Fig. 7, B and C). Knockdown of miR-221 and miR-222 by 2′-O-methyl-antagonist reduced the growth of MCF-7F to the same extent as NCL-targeting treatment (Fig. 7 B). By Annexin V analysis, we observed that exogenous reexpression of mature miR-221 and miR-222 upon AS1411 treatment interfered with the ability of AS1411 to drive cells to apoptosis (Fig. 7 C). Because of the ability of AS1411 to modulate the expression of genes such as DICER, PTEN, and PDCD4 involved in cancer metastasis control (Akar et al., 2010; Martello et al., 2010; Shorning et al., 2011), we next treated MDA-MB-231 cells in vitro at different time points (from 24 to 96 h) with AS1411 or DCT. We observed a difference in the levels of NCL-associated miRNA target genes after 96 h of treatment (Fig. 8 A). Confirming our in vivo data (Fig. 6, A–F), those changes were associated with increased NCL in the cytosol (Fig. 8 B), down-regulation of mesenchymal markers vimentin, fibronectin, and ICAM1 (Fig. 8 C), and subsequent down-regulation of NCL-regulated miRNAs (Fig. 8 D). We next asked whether inhibition of NCL diminished the ability of highly metastatic breast cancer cells such as MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-436 to migrate and invade. After 48 h of AS1411 treatment or NCL silencing, the ability of these cells to migrate was reduced by almost 50% without decreasing viability (Fig. 8, E and F) of the cells. The migration effects were reversed by exogenous expression of a pool of miR-103, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-21 (Fig. 8, E and F). Moreover, by Matrigel invasion assays using MDA-MB-436 cells after 48 h of NCL-inhibiting treatments (si-NCL or AS1411), we observed a >60% reduction in the ability of these cells to invade (Fig. 8 F). This effect was reversed by exogenous expression of specific mature miRNAs during the treatments. Conversely, cell migration was only partially rescued in sh-PTEN MDA-MB-231 cells after si-NCL or AS1411 treatments (not depicted). Together, our findings suggest that AS411 can affect breast cancer cell biological properties through miRNA regulation.
G-rich NCL-targeting aptamer reduces breast cancer metastasis in vivo
To further examine the ability of AS1411 to control cellular migration and invasion in vivo, we inoculated highly metastatic, luciferase-positive MDA-MB-231 cells into the mammary fat pad of NOD-SCID mice. Mice with visible primary tumors were treated with intraperitoneal injections of AS1411 or DCT, alone or in combination with intratumoral injections of an miRNA pool or with a mixture of scrambled sequences (Fig. 9 A). We did not detect differences in primary tumors of mice subjected to different treatments (Fig. 9 A). After 6 wk from the beginning of the experiment, we detected enhanced bioluminescence signals from lungs of mice treated with DCT or AS1411 + miRNAs compared with those treated with AS1411 or AS1411 + Scr (Fig. 9 B). After 7 wk, primary tumors were dissected, and lungs were examined for the presence of metastatic lesions (Fig. 9, C and D). Intraperitoneal injection of AS1411 did not affect the growth of primary tumors (Fig. 9, A and B). However, histological examination confirmed a higher number of metastatic foci in the lungs of mice treated with DCT compared with AS1411-treated mice (Fig. 9, C and D). Of note, as previously shown in vitro (Fig. 8, E and F), the exogenous expression of NCL-regulated miRNAs overcame the effects of AS1411 treatment, resulting in increased metastasis from MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 9, B–D). We also repeated these experiments using another highly aggressive mouse breast cancer cell line (4T1) and observed that the size of the primary tumors was almost unaffected between the two treatments, whereas AS1411-treated mice displayed almost twofold fewer metastatic lung nodules than the control group (not depicted). Notably, in both xenograft models, DCT-treated mice had a mean total body weight loss of ∼6% compared with AS1411-treated animals (not depicted), suggesting that the active aptamer is not toxic. In agreement with these data, previously published biodistribution studies have demonstrated that AS1411 and other related aptamers can be selectively accumulated in the tumors but are also rapidly eliminated in urine without causing toxicity (Ireson and Kelland, 2006; Bates et al., 2009b). These findings strongly support the possible use of drugs targeting NCL to decrease breast cancer aggressiveness in vivo.
The RNA-binding protein NCL is a major component of the ribosomal RNA nucleolar-processing complex (Ginisty et al., 1998; Srivastava and Pollard, 1999). In line with its role in RNA processing, a previously published study (Pickering et al., 2011) and our data suggest a direct involvement of NCL in miRNA biogenesis. In this study, we demonstrated that abrogation of NCL expression affects the biogenesis of a specific cohort of miRNAs, including miR-10a, miR-21, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222. The assumption that the loop structure of miRNA precursors could be important for NCL binding to the primary transcript and subsequently to the microprocessor complex has been previously reported (Pickering et al., 2011), but no studies have been conducted to characterize the nature of these interactions. Our bioinformatic analysis revealed that NCL-regulated pre-miRNAs show UGU- and UG-rich elements in their terminal loop (TL) and/or stem loop regions (TL), and these motifs are conserved across mammalian species (unpublished data). Although these results are also compatible with the ability of G-rich aptamers to compete for NCL binding to a specific set of miRNAs, the nature of these interactions will require further investigations.
This is, to our knowledge, the first large-scale study showing a clear association of NCL with specific miRNAs causally involved in cancer (Mercatelli et al., 2008; Zhang et al., 2012). Although a recent study reported that NCL regulates the biogenesis of miR-15a and miR-16 (Pickering et al., 2011), we may not have detected the same effects because of the low expression levels of this cluster in HeLa cells.
Notably, several NCL-dependent miRNAs, such as miR-21, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222, play a relevant role in breast cancer, affecting aggressiveness and resistance to antineoplastic therapies (Di Leva et al., 2010; Iliopoulos et al., 2010; Martello et al., 2010; Farazi et al., 2011). The link between NCL expression and its regulated miRNAs in breast cancer is strengthened by our findings that NCL is up-regulated in breast cancer samples and positively correlated with its regulated miRNAs but not with other NCL-independent miRNAs also causally involved in breast cancer, such as miR-155 (Chang et al., 2011).
The delivery of siRNAs, shRNAs, or anti-miRNAs specifically to human cancer cells in vivo remains a major issue for novel anticancer therapies based on gene or miRNA silencing. It has been previously reported that the aptamer AS1411 displays a decoy activity on NCL, preventing its binding to specific mRNAs (Bates et al., 2009a,b), and here our data demonstrated that AS1411 is able to modulate NCL binding to the microprocessor complex, affecting the processing of a specific group of miRNAs. We are also reporting that AS1411 affects cell motility and invasive properties of breast cancer cells both in vitro and in vivo by modulating the expression of several well-established targets of NCL-dependent miRNAs, including PTEN, DICER, and PDCD4 (Esteva et al., 2010; Martello et al., 2010; Chang et al., 2011). In our experimental set, we did not observe, after short-term NCL impairment (siRNAs or aptamers), differences in BCL-2 mRNA expression previously observed in MCF-7 cell stable colonies in which NCL expression was partially knocked down (Otake et al., 2007; Soundararajan et al., 2008). However, accordingly with these published data, we noticed a decrease of BCL-2 mRNA levels upon longer treatment with AS1411 (Fig. 5 D). We also observed that the impairment of one single target, such as PTEN, was not sufficient to completely rescue the ability of NCL-targeting treatments to affect cancer cell proliferation and migration. These data are in agreement with the widely demonstrated ability of a single miRNA to regulate cellular processes by affecting the expression of multiple genes (Garofalo and Croce, 2011). Thus, it is not surprising that the effects of NCL targeting on cancer cell biology are not completely dependent on one target gene.
Our study is the first to show that NCL targeting can participate in control of breast cancer metastasis in vivo. In fact, although intraperitoneal injections of AS1411 in mice with highly aggressive breast cancer tumors established in the fat pad did not affect growth of primary tumors, we observed >50% reduction in lung lesions upon treatment with the active aptamer, whereas forced reexpression of miR-103, miR-21, miR-221, and miR-222 during the AS1411 treatment completely reverted these effects.
We are also reporting that NCL impairment in Fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer cells restored the drug-dependent inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis (Rao et al., 2011), suggesting that NCL-targeting compounds could improve the effectiveness of antineoplastic drugs conventionally used in clinical practice. Although in vivo experiments with enforced expression of NCL-regulated miRNAs did not completely rescue the proliferative properties of cancer cells, we were able to significantly reverse the effect of AS1411 in invasion experiments. This is compatible with the fact that the gene network controlling the maintenance of aggressive phenotype appears mainly under positive control by miRNAs (Polyak and Weinberg, 2009; Inui et al., 2010; Martello et al., 2010), whereas the effects on proliferation might not reveal immediate phenotypic consequences in virtue of the “balancing effect” between miRNAs favoring and opposing the same process (Ventura and Jacks, 2009). Moreover, our data are in agreement with previously published data demonstrating that NCL also exerts an miRNA-independent role in cancer cell proliferation and tumorigenicity (Shi et al., 2007; Reyes-Reyes and Akiyama, 2008; El Khoury et al., 2010; Destouches et al., 2011; Farin et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2012).
This is the first study of the functional role of NCL in miRNA regulation with clear clinical implications. Our work provides data to support the idea that NCL pharmacological targeting could be relevant for the development of novel antineoplastic protocols. This new approach will modulate cancer aggressiveness and drug sensitivity through the inhibition of NCL-dependent processing of specific miRNAs that are highly expressed in cancers.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Cell lines, transfections, and human tissues.
HEK-293 and HeLa cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% FBS, l-glutamine, and antibiotics (Life Technologies; Invitrogen). MCF-7 cells were grown in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, l-glutamine, antibiotics, and 0.01 mg/ml bovine insulin. MCF-7F cells were grown in MEM supplemented with 10% FBS, l-glutamine, antibiotics, 0.01 mg/ml bovine insulin, and 100 nM Fulvestrant (Rao et al., 2011). MDA-MB-231, MDA-MB-436, and NIH-3T3 cells were grown in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, l-glutamine, antibiotics, and 0.01 mg/ml bovine insulin. Cell lines were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection and cultured in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. All of the transfections were performed by using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen), as suggested by the manufacturer.
Tumor tissue and normal controls were obtained from a breast cancer tumor bank at the Ohio State University (OSU). Written informed consent was provided by patients for use of this breast tumor material after review and approval of a specified protocol by the OSU institutional review committee.
Human plasmids of pMIRNA1-pri–miR-21, pMIRNA1-pri–miR-103, pMIRNA1-pri–miR-30, pMIRNA1-pri–miR-221, pMIRNA1-pri–miR-222, and pMIRNA1-pri–miR-155, containing a GFP reporter gene, were provided by System Biosciences. Human plasmid of pri–miR-21 for in vitro processing was amplified by PCR and cloned into pCR4-TOPO (Invitrogen): For, 5′-CCACTAGTTGGGGTTCGATCTTAACAGG-3′; Rev, 5′-GGGCGGCCGCTTTCAAAACCCACAATGCAG-3′. Luciferase reporter gene plasmids containing multiple binding sites for miR-30 or miR-21 were provided by Addgene. Luciferase reporter gene plasmid containing four miR-103 binding sites (Sponge miR-103; 5′-TCGAGTCATAGCCCTGAGCATGCTGCTATGCTCATAGCCCTGAGCATGCTGCTATGCTCATAGCCCTGAGCATGCTGCTATGCTCATAGGCATGCTGCTATGCGC-3′) was generated and cloned into psiCHECK2. Luciferase reporter gene plasmid containing 3′ UTR of Dicer was provided by M. Garofalo and G. Romano (OSU, Columbus, OH). Flag-DGCR8 and pcDNA4/TO/cmyc-Drosha were provided by Addgene. Human GFP-tagged NCL was amplified by PCR and cloned into NT-GFP Fusion TOPO-TA Expression vector (Invitrogen): For, 5′-ATGGTGAAGCTCGCGAAGGTAAA-3′; Rev, 5′-TCAAACTTCGTCTTCTTTCCTTG-3′. NCL–C-Term, including the C-terminal region of NCL protein from amino acid 308 to the end of the protein, was cloned into pET-29a(+) vector (EMD Millipore): For, 5′-CGCATATGAATCTCTTTGTTGGAAACCTAAAC-3′; Rev, 5′-GCCTCGAGCTATTCAAACTTCGTCTTCTTTCC-3′. H6-NCL RNA binding domains from 1 to 4 (RDB1–4; from amino acid 303 to 647) were cloned into pET-15b vector (EMD Millipore): For, 5′-CCCCATATGCCGACTACGGCTTTCAAT-3′; Rev, 5′-CCCGGATCCTCAAGGTTTGGCCCAGTCCAA-3′. The pGL4.51[luc2/CMV/Neo] vector (Promega) was used to make the stable clone of MDA-MB-231 cells expressing the luciferase reporter gene luc2 (Photinus pyralis) used for the animal experiments.
RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assay (REMSA).
REMSAs were performed by using the LightShift Chemiluminescent EMSA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In brief, 4 pmol of biotinylated TL of miR-155 miR-21 (see “Oligonucleotides” section) were incubated with increasing amounts (10–100 ng) of recombinant H6-NCL (RBD1–4) for 30 min as described by the manufacturer at room temperature. For supershift experiments, recombinant proteins were preincubated with anti-H6 antibody for 30 min at room temperature. Binding reactions were run on a native 5% polyacrylamide–1× TBE gel. Transfer of binding reactions to nylon membranes and detection were performed according to the manufacturer’s instruction.
Expression and purification of recombinant proteins.
NCL–C-Term recombinant protein was expressed in rabbit reticulocytes using the TnT-Coupled Reticulocyte Lysate System (L4600; Promega), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. H6-NCL-RBD was expressed in Escherichia coli BL21 cells (DE3; Agilent Technologies) and purified using nickel affinity chromatography (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qia-Expressionist Handbook). Protein purity and quantification were assessed using SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining.
DNA aptamers (AS1411 and DCT) and biotinylated RNA oligonucleotides used for REMSA and oligonucleotide pull-down were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies and are listed in the Supplemental materials and methods.
siRNAs and shRNAs.
To transiently silence the expression of human NCL, Dicer, and Drosha proteins, siRNAs, consisting of a pool of three to five target-specific 19–25 nt siRNAs, were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. and transfected at a final concentration of 100 nM. Used siRNAs were NCL siRNA, Dicer siRNA, and RNase III Drosha siRNA. Control siRNA-A was used as negative control. shRNA NCL, shRNA PTEN, and shRNA control were provided by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.
Anti-C23, anti–hnRNP-U, anti-DICER, anti-FAS, anti-PTEN, anti-Vimentin, anti-Fibronectin, and anti-HSP90 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.; anti-DROSHA, anti-GFP, anti-Biotin, anti–Ki-67, and anti-TIMP3 were purchased from Abcam; anti-Flag and anti–β-ACTIN were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich; anti-GAPDH, Lamin-B1, AKT, phospho-AKT (Ser473), and cleaved Caspase-3 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology; and anti-PTEN was purchased from Cascade BioScience.
Immunoblotting and immunoprecipitations.
Proteins were extracted in lysis buffer (1% NP-40, 1 mm EDTA, 50 mm Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, and 150 mm NaCl, supplemented with complete protease inhibitors), subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted onto Nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with antibodies as indicated, according to standard procedures. For immunoprecipitation experiments, subconfluent HeLa cells were transfected with the DGCR8-Flag expression vectors. 24 h after transfection, cells were treated with 10 µM AS1411 or control drug (DCT) for an additional 24 h. Total proteins were extracted as described above, and 1–2 mg of total protein extracts was immunoprecipitated with 5 ml anti-Flag (Sigma-Aldrich)–specific resin overnight at 4°C with rotation. Immunoprecipitates were washed three times with buffer I (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 0.5% NP-40) and once with buffer II (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 0.5% NP-40). Proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE, electroblotted onto Nitrocellulose membranes, and probed with antibodies as indicated.
RIPs were performed using the Magna RIP kit (EMD Millipore). HeLa cells were transfected as indicated, collected, and lysed in 500 µl RIP lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitor and RNase inhibitor. After 5 min of incubation on ice, 50 µl of magnetic bead suspension was transferred to each tube. The beads were washed two times using 500 µl RIP wash buffer, and then 5 µg anti-Flag or anti-NCL antibodies were added at room temperature for 30 min. The beads were washed five times with wash buffer then in 900 µl of immunoprecipitation buffer (0.5 M EDTA, RNase inhibitor, and RIP wash buffer), and 100 µl of cellular lysate was added at 4°C for overnight on rotation. Beads were then washed six times in RIP wash buffer. RNA was purified using proteinase K buffer (RIP wash buffer, 10% SDS, and 10 mg/ml proteinase K) and precipitated with salt solution I, salt solution II, precipitate enhancer, and ethanol. The isolated RNA from RIP was analyzed by qRT-PCR. The results were expressed as the relative fold enrichment of the target precipitation as compared with the normal rabbit IgG control. Data reported are the mean ± SD from three independent sets of experiments performed in triplicate.
Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol (Invitrogen), and the integrity of RNA was assessed with an Agilent BioAnalizer 2100 (Agilent Technologies). Northern blotting was performed as described previously (Pichiorri et al., 2010). Oligonucleotides used as probes were the complementary sequences of the mature miRNA (miRNA registry). All images were acquired using a Typhoon 9200 scanner (GE Healthcare).
HeLa cells were transiently transfected with either siRNA against NCL or siRNA control. Total RNA was prepared using TRIzol (Invitrogen). The RNA was analyzed by NanoString assay, a novel digital technology, performed as described by the manufacturer (NanoString Technologies, Inc.).
Samples analyzed by NanoString assay were normalized using the variance stabilization normalization. The mean linkage hierarchical clustering algorithm was conducted to identify subgroups of significant miRNAs (Huber et al., 2002). These results have been obtained using both the Rank Product package (version 2.16.0) of the BioConductor Library under the R System and the Rank Product library in connection to the cluster analysis module of the Tmev system (Yeung et al., 2003). The obtained data were deposited in the GEO database (series no. GSE41971). The UGU motif was identified by computing a structural alignment of the most regulated pre-miRNAs using the LocARNA tool (Will et al., 2007). A consensus structure was generated by the RNAalifold tool.
Small RNA library generation and sequencing.
Subconfluent HeLa cells were transfected with NCL shRNA or control shRNA plasmids, and stably transfected clones were selected by using 1 µg/ml puromycin. Total RNA was extracted by TRIzol, and libraries for deep sequencing were prepared from 2 µg of total RNA. Specifically, 2 µg of total RNA underwent size selection by Flashpage Fractionator (Life Technologies). RNA that was 40 bp and under was then quality checked by RNA Pico Chip from Agilent Technologies. The Total RNA-Seq kit (Applied Biosystems) was used to produce a cDNA library by the following steps. 5′- and 3′-specific adapters underwent hybridization and ligation to the RNA. cDNA was produced by reverse transcription and then purified and size-selected on a gel. The gel slices containing the cDNA library were amplified by PCR with primers specific to the adapter sequences and then purified and sized selected on a gel. Templated sequencing beads were produced via emulsion PCR with the EZ Bead system (Applied Biosystems). The templated sequencing beads were sequenced on a SOLiD 5500 system (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Life Technologies).
Sequence processing and mapping.
Mapping of SOLiD reads was performed using both the small RNA pipeline (Life Technologies) and PASS (Campagna et al., 2009). The small RNA pipeline and PASS were used to extract counts and extensions of miRNA in small RNA reads, from 18 nt in length. When matching to either miRNome (precursor sequences from miRBase) or human genome, we recorded alignments with up to one mismatch. Only reads with at least three sequenced copies per sample were inputted in the SQL database. We currently populated the miRNA expression database with >500 different human samples sequenced on SOLiD. Raw digital expression values (read counts) were obtained by summing the number of reads that mapped to one of the reference databases, human genome hg19 or miRBase release 17.0. The confidence in the correct assignment of short reads to miRNAs or genomic locations was increased by discarding reads mapping to more than four loci (almost all known human miRNAs are equally or less repetitive). To quantify the short RNA reads, we used RPKM scaling (Mortazavi et al., 2008) based on the read count of each analyzed sample (reads per kilobase per million of total aligned reads). Thresholding was performed at ≤10 RPKM. Datasets with <250,000 matched reads were not analyzed further.
Statistical analysis of sequence processing and mapping.
R (http://www.r-project.org) and ArrayTools were used for statistical and clustering analysis. Filtering of expression tables was performed as follows. Reads were not analyzed further when <20% of the expression data had at least a 1.5-fold change in either direction from the median value and when percentage of data missing or filtered out exceeds 50%. Multivariate permutations test was computed based on 1,000 random permutations, and parametric p-values were calculated, alongside false detection rates. Additional iso-miRNAs are listed when more expressed or with higher fold changes than the mature form. Classification prediction was performed using different models, and misclassification error was estimated for each model by using leave-one-out cross-validation (Simon et al., 2003).
1.5 × 105 HeLa cells were transfected in 12-well plates with the aforementioned siRNAs. 24 h after siRNA transfection, cells were retransfected with 500 ng of the aforementioned firefly luciferase reporter plasmids along with 50 ng pCMV-Renilla. Luciferase and Renilla activity were assessed with the Dual-Light Luciferase system (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, 24 h after the transfection. The Luciferase activity was normalized for the Renilla activity. All the experiments were performed three times in triplicate, and the mean ± SD was reported.
qRT-PCR for miRNA and mRNA quantification.
qRT-PCRs were performed with the TaqMan PCR kit (Applied Biosystems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by detection with the 7900HT Sequence Detection System (Applied Biosystems). The appropriate TaqMan probes for mRNA, miRNA, and pri-miRNA quantification were purchased from Applied Biosystems. All reactions were performed in triplicate. Simultaneous quantification of small endogenous nucleolar RNA U44/U48 or U6 was used as a reference for miRNA and pri-miRNA TaqMan assay data normalization. Simultaneous quantification of OAZ1 or GAPDH mRNAs was used as a reference for mRNA TaqMan assay data normalization. The comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method for relative quantification of gene and miRNA expression (User Bulletin #2; Applied Biosystems) was used to determine miRNA, pri-miRNA, or mRNA expression levels. SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems) was used for pre-miRNA quantification. Simultaneous quantification of small endogenous nucleolar RNA U6 was used as a reference for assay data normalization. All primers used for amplification steps are listed in the Supplemental materials and methods.
Student’s t test was used to determine significance (indicated as p-value). All error bars represent the SD of the mean. Pearson correlation index was calculated to test the association between NCL and its target miRNA expression levels. Expression values for NCL and miRNAs (obtained by IHC, real-time, and NanoString assays) from all the analyzed samples were tested using the Bartlett test to evaluate the homogeneity of variance among the samples. The Kruskal-Wallis was used to assess the significance of variations observed among different sample classes on the basis of the Bartlett test p-value. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used when the Bartlett test p-value was <0.001.
Preparation of RNA substrates and in vitro processing assays.
For pri-miRNA processing assays, total cell extracts were prepared in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl, and 0.2 mM EDTA from either HeLa or HEK-293 cells and incubated (typically 40 µg per 40-µl reaction at 37°C for the indicated times) with in vitro synthesized and uniformly labeled pri-miRNA (1 µl of 104–5 cpm) in processing buffer containing 6.4 mM MgCl4, 0.5 µl RNasin (40 U/µl; Ambion), and NCL–C-Term, when required. The pri-miRNA was in vitro synthesized, and UTP was uniformly labeled using the Riboprobe In Vitro Transcription System (Promega).
Nuclear/cytoplasmic RNA and protein differential extraction.
Nuclear/cytoplasmic RNA and protein differential extraction was performed using the Paris kit (Ambion) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Subconfluent HeLa and MCF-7 cells were transfected with NCL shRNA or control shRNA plasmids, and stably transfected clones were selected by using 1 µg/ml puromycin. After 10 d, cells were stained with 500 mg/ml crystal violet in 20% methanol, and resulting colonies were counted. The mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate was reported.
Xenograft tumor samples were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, processed, embedded in paraffin, and sectioned at 4 µm. Slides with specimens were then placed in a 60°C oven for 1 h, cooled, deparaffinized, and rehydrated through xylene and graded ethanol solutions to water. All slides were placed for 5 min in a 3% hydrogen peroxide solution in water to block the endogenous peroxidase. Antigen retrieval was performed by HIER, in which the slides were placed in a citric acid solution, pH 6.1, for 25 min at 96°C and cooled for 15 min in solution. Slides were placed on a Dako Autostainer and immunostaining system for use with IHC. Thin sections were then treated with primary antibodies for Ki-67, Fibronectin, Vimentin, NCL, pAKT, active caspase-3, and PTEN, followed by biotinylated secondary antibodies and the DAB chromogen.
MCF-7F, MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MDA-MB-436 cells were treated with 10 or 20 µM AS1411 or control drug (DCT) and harvested at different time points. MCF-7F cells were treated with increasing concentration of Fulvestrant (50–200 nM) and with 10 or 20 µM AS1411. To show the instability of miRNA at 24–48 h, HeLa and MCF-7 cells were treated with 5 µg/ml Actinomycin D and cultured for 24 and 48 h before RNA extraction.
miRNA locked nucleic acid ISH of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue section.
ISH was performed on deparaffinized human breast tissues using a previously published protocol (Nuovo et al., 2009), which includes a digestion in 1.3 mg/ml pepsin for 30 min. The sequences of the probes containing the six dispersed locked nucleic acid–modified bases with digoxigenin conjugated to the 5′ end were miR-221, 5′-GAAACCCAGCAGACAATGTAGCT-3′; and miR-21, 5′-UAGCUUAUCAGACUGAUGUUGA-3′. The probe cocktail and tissue miRNA were co-denatured at 60°C for 5 min, followed by hybridization at 37°C overnight and a low stringency wash in 0.2× SSC and 2% bovine serum albumin at 4°C for 10 min. The probe–target complex was seen as a result of the action of alkaline phosphatase on the chromogen nitroblue tetrazolium and bromochloroindolyl phosphate (NBT/BCIP). Negative controls included the use of a probe, which should yield a negative result in such tissues. No counterstain was used, to facilitate colabeling for NCL protein. After ISH for the miRNAs, as previously described (Nuovo et al., 2009), the slides were analyzed for IHC using the optimal conditions for NCL (1:100; cell conditioning for 30 min). For the IHC, we used the Ultrasensitive Universal Fast Red system from Ventana Medical Systems. The percentage of tumor cells expressing NCL and miR-221 and miR-21 was then analyzed with emphasis on colocalization of the respective targets. Co-expression analysis was performed with the Nuance system (Cambridge Research Institute) per the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Gene expression microarray.
Experimental samples were prepared, labeled, and hybridized to Affymetrix H133 Plus 2.0 gene chips and scanned on a GeneChip scanner 3000 (Affymetrix). From the scanned images, the expression intensities were calculated and normalized using the robust multichip average (RMA) method and its implementation in R/Bioconductor, consisting of three steps: a background adjustment, quantile normalization, and finally log-transformed perfect match value summarization. Linear Models for Microarray data (LIMMA) and its implementation in the MultiExperiment Viewer (MeV version 4.2) software suite were used to identify the statistically deregulated genes. Multiple testing adjustments for false discovery rate based on Benjamini and Hochberg’s method were performed. The genes were filtered for significance (false discovery rate–adjusted p-value ≤ 0.05) and fold change (at least ±1.5). Using the deregulated genes, a hierarchical clustering was performed using TMeV 4.0 software from TIGR. The Pearson correlation was used as a measure of similarity or distance between samples. As a rule for the linkage of clusters, the mean linkage method was used. The obtained data were deposited in the GEO database (series no. GSE41972).
Migration, invasion, and wound-healing assays.
Transwell insert chambers with 8-µm porous membrane (Greiner bio-one) were used for the migration assay, and Cell Invasion plates (EMD Millipore) were used for invasion assay. 48 h after transfection and/or treatments, 3 × 104 cells were washed three times with PBS and added to the top chamber in serum-free media. The bottom chamber was filled with media containing 10% FBS. Cells were incubated for 24 h for the migration assay and 72 h for the invasion assay at 37°C in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator. To quantify migrating cells, cells on the top chamber were removed by using a cotton-tipped swab, and the migrated cells were fixed in PBS and 25% glutaraldehyde, stained with Crystal Violet stain, visualized under a phase-contrast microscope (E200; Nikon), and photographed. Crystal violet–stained cells were moreover solubilized in acetic acid and methanol (1:1), and absorbance was measured at 595 nm. The results are means ± SD of three independent experiments performed in triplicate.
For wound-healing assays, confluent cells were treated for 24 h with 10 µM AS1411 or the control aptamer (DCT), and a scratch was made using a sterile pipette tip. The experiment was performed four times in quadruplicate. Images of migrating cells were acquired at different time points, up to 8 h. Representative images of each treatment at 6 and 8 h after the scratch are reported.
Cell viability and apoptosis assays.
Where indicated, cells were previously transfected or treated as reported in the figure legends. 104 cells were counted and plated in 96-well plates in quadruplicate and incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. MCF-7 cells (treated with AS1411 or/and transfected with si-NCL, Scr, or miR-221-222) were treated with Fulvestrant (Sigma-Aldrich) for 24 h at different concentration (0, 50, 100, and 150 nM). MCF-7F cells (treated with AS1411 or/and transfected with si-NCL, Scr, or miR-221-222) were treated with Fulvestrant for 24–72 h at 100 nM. Cell viability was examined with a 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-dipheniltetrazolium bromide Cell Titer 96AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Metabolically active cells were detected by adding 20 µl of cell titer to each well. After 1-h incubation, the plates were analyzed in a Multilabel Counter (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Reported data were the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments performed in quadruplicate.
Apoptosis was assessed using Annexin V–FITC apoptosis detection kits followed by flow cytometric analysis. For Annexin V staining, cells (treated with AS1411 or transfected with si-NCL or Scr) were treated with Fulvestrant at different concentrations (100 or 150 nM) for 24 h and then treated as for DNA content analysis, except that fixation was omitted, and the cells (5 × 105 per sample) were resuspended in PBS containing 25 µg/ml Annexin V–FLUOS (Roche) and 50 µg/ml propidium iodide before FACS analysis. The percentage of apoptosis indicated was corrected for background levels found in the corresponding untreated controls. The percentage of apoptotic cells was expressed as the mean ± SD of three experiments performed in quadruplicate.
In vivo experiments.
Animal experiments were performed according to OSU institutional guidelines after review by an institutional review board. A total of 5 × 106 viable MDA-MB-231 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of 80 5-wk-old female nude mice (Foxn1nu/Foxn1nu; Charles River). The tumor size was measured three times per week using a caliper, and the volume was calculated in cubed millimeters using the formula L × W × H. 5 × 106 viable MDA-MD-231 breast cancer cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank of 50 nude mice. At 1 wk after injection, a group of 32 mice with comparable tumor size (80 ± 20 mm3) were randomly divided into four groups, using 8 mice for each treatment. Specifically, we used the combination of si-NCL or scrambled sequence siRNA (si-Scr) mixed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) once a day every 3 d for 20 d plus direct tumor injection of double-stranded RNA scrambled sequence or a pool of mature miR-21, miR-221, miR-222, and miR-103 (miRNAs) diluted in Lipofectamine 2000 (100 µl total volume). RNA oligonucleotides for miRNA mix (miR-10a, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222) were purchased from Ambion (100 nM final concentration). For the treatments with aptamers, 20 mice with tumors of comparable size (50 ± 20 mm3) were selected and randomly divided into two groups using 8 mice for each treatment. Specifically, we used the combination of subcutaneous injection (adjacent to the tumor area) of AS1411 or aptamer control sequence (CCT-rich sequence; DCT) once a day (10 µM), every 5 d, for 20 d. For the NOD-SCID engraftment model, 2 × 106 viable Luc+ MDA-MB-231 cells were injected into the fourth left-side mammary fat pad of 35 female NOD-SCID mice (NOD/ShiLtSz; Charles River). 2 wk after tumor cell inoculation, 20 mice were treated 5 d a week by intraperitoneal injections of AS1411 (5 mg/kg) or DCT diluted in 100 µl PBS, and 14 mice, divided in two groups of 7 mice, were also treated with intratumoral injections with miRNA mix or scrambled (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) diluted in Lipofectamine solution (100 µl total volume for mouse for treatment). Tumor size was assessed every 7 d by bioluminescence imaging, as described below. After 4 wk of treatment, mice were analyzed by bioluminescence images and then sacrificed after one more week.
106 viable 4T1 cells were injected into the fourth left-side mammary fat pad of 30 female NOD-SCID mice. After 1 wk of injection, all mice were treated every day for 3 wk with the regimens described above. Mice were sacrificed after 4 wk of injection. Tumors were isolated and used for RNA extraction, protein extraction, and IHC analysis.
Detection of tumor progression by bioluminescence imaging.
Mice were injected with 75 mg/kg Luciferin (Xenogen), and tumor growth was detected by bioluminescence at 10 min after the injection. The home-built bioluminescence system used an electron multiplying charge-coupled device (Andor Technology Limited) with an exposure time of 30 s and an electron multiplication gain of 500 voltage gain × 200, 5-by-5 binning, and with background subtraction. Images were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health).
Online supplemental material.
Table S1 shows a list of miRNAs, obtained by NanoString technology, differentially expressed at 72 h in HeLa cells transfected with si-NCL versus si-Scr. Table S2 shows a list of miRNAs differentially expressed between sh-NCL and sh-Scr at 72 + 48 h in HeLa cells obtained by high-throughput sequencing. Table S3, included as a separate Excel file, shows Gene Set Enrichment Analysis and Gene Ontology terms of miR-21, miR-103, miR-221, and miR-222 target genes after AS1411 treatments in MCF-7 cells. The Supplemental materials and methods section lists oligonucleotides used for in vivo and in vitro experiments.
We thank Dr. K. Huebner for careful reading of the draft manuscript and for helpful scientific discussion and D. Wernicke, S. Lutz, and S. Palko for administrative support. We thank B. Ogbemudia for his technical and experimental support. We are grateful to Dr. G. Di Leva for scientific advice, Dr. M. Garofalo and Dr. G. Romano for providing the reporter constructs for 3′ UTR of Dicer, Dr. H. Alder and P. Fadda for the qRT-PCR and NanoString data (Nucleic Acid Shared Resource, the Ohio State University [OSU] Comprehensive Cancer Center [CCC]), and Mr. J. Palatini and the microarray shared resource facility (OSU CCC) for the high-throughput sequencing data. We also thank the campus microscopy and images facility (OSU CCC), D. Devor-Henneman, Dr. K. La Perle, Dr. B. Bolon, and all of comparative pathology and mouse phenotyping Shared Resource (OSU) for helping with the animals experiments, and Dr. A. Ferro for the help with bioinformatic analysis.
We are grateful for research support from National Cancer Institute (NCI) grants to C.M. Croce, the Kimmel Foundation award (to F. Pichiorri), OSU Start-up Funds (to F. Pichiorri), and National Institutes of Health grant CA107106 (to M.A. Freitas). This study was partially supported by NCI grant U01 CA154200 and by the Spielman Fund for breast cancer research (to C.L. Shapiro).
The authors declare no conflict of interests.
F. Pichiorri and D. Palmieri contributed equally to this paper.