In spite of high frequencies of metal allergies, the structural basis for major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted metal recognition is among the unanswered questions in the field of T cell activation. For the human T cell clone SE9, we have identified potential Ni contact sites in the T cell receptor (TCR) and the restricting human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR structure. The specificity of this HLA-DR–promiscuous VA22/VB17+ TCR is primarily harbored in its α chain. Ni reactivity is neither dependent on protein processing in antigen-presenting cells nor affected by the nature of HLA-DR–associated peptides. However, SE9 activation by Ni crucially depends on Tyr29 in CDR1α, an N-nucleotide–encoded Tyr94 in CDR3α, and a conserved His81 in the HLA-DR β chain. These data indicate that labile, nonactivating complexes between the SE9 TCR and most HLA-DR/peptide conjugates might supply sterically optimized coordination sites for Ni ions, three of which were identified in this study. In such complexes Ni may effectively bridge the TCR α chain to His81 of most DR molecules. Thus, in analogy to superantigens, Ni may directly link TCR and MHC in a peptide-independent manner. However, unlike superantigens, Ni requires idiotypic, i.e., CDR3α-determined TCR amino acids. This new type of TCR–MHC linkage might explain the high frequency of Ni-reactive T cells in the human population.
Studies dealing with the characterization of antigenic epitopes for T cells have primarily focused on protein antigens. However, T cells may also be triggered by a vast variety of low molecular haptens that frequently result in allergic hyperreactivities (1–3). A subclass of these allergens consists of metals that might be encountered repeatedly via cutaneous, respiratory, oral, or intramuscular routes. These contacts may result in immune-mediated pathologies such as contact hypersensitivity to Au, Be, Co, and in particular to Ni (1, 4), pulmonary granulomatous disease, also called chronic beryllium disease (5), cobalt-induced hard metal lung disease (6), or nephropathy as a result of treatment with gold salts (7). Contact allergy or granulomas may also be caused by aluminium hydroxide, a commonly used adjuvant in vaccines. Thus, 620 cases of itching granulomas and contact allergy to aluminium were recently reported for children undergoing diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccination (8). Although the capacity of these metals to induce MHC-restricted T cell activation is well established (9), the nature of the allergenic epitopes recognized by metal-specific T cells remains unknown in most cases.
Several models have been proposed to explain the activation of metal-reactive T cells: (a) analogous to typical haptens such as TNP or penicillin (1), metal-specific TCR may react to determinants formed by a complex of metal ions with MHC-embedded self-peptides (9, 10), (b) TCR may recognize metal-modified amino acid residues of the MHC molecule itself or metal-provoked conformational changes in the MHC (11), and (c) metals may affect the processing of self-antigens, resulting in T cells reactive to cryptic self-peptides (12, 13).
None of these models is mutually exclusive and each metal may use several pathways to activate T cells. The first and third of these models have been suggested for Ni- (10, 13) as well as for Au-reactive T cells (9, 12). The second model is favored in the case of Co (hard metal lung disease) and Be (chronic beryllium disease) where the development of disease has been correlated to HLA-DPB1 alleles expressing glutamate in position 69 of the DP β chain (14–16). Glu69 has been implicated in the binding of Be (14) as well as of Co (11).
We have chosen to study nickel as a model of metal-induced T cell activation because Ni represents one of the most common contact allergens in humans (4). This study concentrates on one particular CD4+, Ni-reactive human T cell clone, clone SE9. This clone belongs to a group of TCRBV17-expressing T cells that we and others found overrepresented among Ni-specific CD4+ T cells of patients suffering from particularly severe Ni contact hypersensitivity (17, 18). However, unlike VB17+ clones from other patients, the TCR of clone SE9 exhibited a dominance of its TCR α chain in determining antigen specificity. Its α chain retained HLA-DR–restricted Ni reactivity even upon pairing with unrelated β chains (19), indicating that in this case the usage of BV17 is not related to Ni specificity. We took advantage of this apparently selective localization of Ni contact sites in the TCR α chain to investigate the relevance of the different activation models listed above in the case of clone SE9.
Materials And Methods
Antigens, Reagents, and Media.
If not specified otherwise, reagents were used at the following concentrations: 10−4 M NiSO4 × 6H2O, 1 μg/ml phytohemagglutinin (PHA-P; Murex), 20 ng/ml staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB;*
Abbreviations used in this paper: Ii, invariant chain; SEB, staphylococcal enterotoxin B.
Cell Lines and T Cell Clones.
The Ni-specific human T cell clone SE9 and the murine hybridoma T913 carrying the SE9 TCR have been previously described (19). The T cell donor SE expressed HLA-DRB1*0101, DRB1*1501, and DR51. The TCR− huCD4+ murine T cell hybridoma 54ζ17 (21) was provided by O. Acuto (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France). HLA-DR homozygous B cell lines JESTHOM (International Histocompatibility Workshop [IHW] no. 9004, DRB1*0101), HOM-2 (IHW no. 9005, DRB1*0101), WT47 (IHW no. 9063, DRB1*1302, DR52), and SWEIG (IHW no. 9037, DRB1*1101, DR52) were from the IHW. Mouse fibroblasts transfected with human HLA-DRB1*0101, DRB1*0401, DRB1*1501, or DR53, designated as L-DR1 (L544.H8), L-DR4 (L243.6), L-DR15 (L466.1), and L-DR53 (L257.6), were obtained from F. Sinigaglia (Roche Ricerce, Milano, Italy). The mouse fibroblast cell line Dap-3 (L cells) and wild-type or mutated HLA-DR1 liter cell transfectants (22, 23) as well as the DR1 cotransfectants of 293 cells with wild-type or mutated invariant chain (Ii; 24) have been previously described.
Expression Vectors for Wild-type and Mutated TCR.
The constructs for the CDR2α mutated or wild-type TCR α genes were cloned into the pV2–15α vector (25) and transfected into 54ζ17 cells by electroporation as previously described (19). Mutation of the CDR2α amino acids Asp53 and Asp54 to Ala was obtained by overlapping PCR as previously described (19) using the following complementary primer pair (mutated nucleotides underlined, only sense orientation shown): GCCACGAAGGCTGCTGCCAAGGGAAG. For mutations in CDR1 and 3, cDNA's coding for TCR α and β chains were amplified by RT-PCR from RNA of hybridoma T913 using primers EcoHVA22 liter (sense) AAACCGgaattcCGGAGGAATGAACTATTCTCCAGG (EcoRI site in lower case) and CAendBam (antisense) TTCTCGCggatccGCGCAGACCTCAACTGGAC (BamHI site in lower case). Upon cloning into pCR®-Blunt (Invitrogen), inserts were sequenced using the Big Dye sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems). Sequences were read on a 310 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Using the QuickChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) and appropriate mutation primers (see below), point mutations were introduced into the α chain's CDR1 and 3 sequences. All α chain constructs, including the wild-type T913 α chain, were then excised with EcoRI and BamHI and recloned into the pLXSN retroviral vector (neomycin resistance) as described by Backstrom et al. (26) and Naeher et al. (27). Correspondingly, the wild-type T913 β chain was amplified by RT-PCR from T913 RNA using the primers EcoHVB17 liter (sense) AAACCGgaattcCGGAGGAATGAGCAACCAGGTGCT and CB2endBam (antisense) TTCTCGCggatccGCGCATGTCTCAGGAATTTTTTTT, and cloned into pLXSP (puromycin resistance; reference 27). We used the BOSC packaging cell line and followed published procedures (26) to express the various TCR αβ combinations in 54ζ17 hybridoma cells. TCR+ cell lines were cloned by limiting dilution and assayed for IL-2 responsiveness to SEB or NiSO4. Sequencing primers were huLVβ17 sense (ATGAGCAACCAGGTGCTCTGC), huVβ17 sense (TTTCAGAAAGGAGATATAGCT), huVα22 sense (CCTCCTGAAAGCCACGAAGGCTGA), Cα antisense (TGTCCTGAGACCGAGGATCT), murine Cβ antisense (TGATGGCTCAAACAAGGAGAC), as well as commercial M13f and M13r primers (Invitrogen). Mutation primers (only sense primers shown, mutated nucleotides underlined) were for CDR1: MutVA22CDR1G-P s: GTACACAGCCACACCATACCCTTCC; MutVA22CDR1T-A s: GTACACAGCCGCAGGATACCCTTC; MutVA22CDR1Y-A s: GCCACAGGAGCCCCTTCCCTTTTC; MutVA22CDR1Y-H s: CACAGCCACAGGACACCCTTCC. For CDR3: MutVA22CDR3+AvG s: CTTC-TGTGCTCTGGCTGGGTATACCGGCAC; MutVA22CDR3G-P s: CTTCTGTGCTCTGCCGTATACCGG; MutVA22CDR3T-A s: GCTCTGGGGTATGCCGGCACTGCC; MutVA22CDR3Y-A s: GTGCTCTGGGGGCTACCGGCACTG; MutVA22CDR3Y-F s: TGTGCTCTGGGGTTTACCGGCA; MutVA22CDR3Y-H s: TCTGTGCTCTGGGGCATACCGG.
IL-2 Secretion and Proliferation Assays.
Supernatants of 20 h cocultures of 5 × 104 TCR transfectants and 5 × 104 X-irradiated APCs with or without antigen were assayed for IL-2 by proliferation ([3H]thymidine incorporation) of an IL-2–dependent T cell line as previously reported (28). Antigen-specific proliferation of clone SE9 was determined by incorporation of [3H]thymidine as previously described (19).
Functional Characterization of Clone SE9 and Its TCR Expressed in the Mouse Hybridoma T913.
The Ni-reactive human T cell clone SE9 was isolated from the peripheral blood of donor SE. It expresses a VA22+/VB17+ TCR, the CD4 coreceptor, and the skin-homing molecule CLA (19 and unpublished data). Upon stimulation with NiSO4, SE9 secretes large amounts of IL-4 and IL-5, less IL-10 and IL-2, and little to no IFN-γ (unpublished data). Expression of the variable parts of the SE9 TCR, fused to murine constant α and β segments, together with human CD4 in the mouse hybridoma 54ζ17 (21) resulted in the transfectant T913, which possessed an identical pattern of specificity as clone SE9 (19). Thus, the specificity of SE9 is defined exclusively by its TCR.
Ni reactivity was determined by proliferation ([3H]thymidine incorporation) for clone SE9 and by IL-2 secretion (proliferation of IL-2–dependent CTLL cells) for hybridoma T913. Both stimuli were inhibited by mAbs to HLA-DR, but not to HLA-DP nor HLA-DQ (Fig. 1, A and B)
. However, in both cases, HLA-DR restriction was highly promiscuous in that B cell lines from different donors as well murine L cells transfected with a variety of individual HLA-DR alleles served as APC, albeit with variable efficacy (Fig. 1 C; reference 19). These variations do not relate to differences in MHC expression (unpublished data), but probably reflect differences in the overall fit of the SE9 TCR to the different HLA-DR alleles. In contrast, HLA-DR53 was completely ineffective in mediating Ni activation (Fig. 1 C).
TCR transfections had further shown that the T913 α chain could be combined with unrelated β chains from other human or even murine TCR without loss of its DR-promiscuous Ni specificity (19). Although this implied that the specificity of the T913 TCR is largely determined by its AV22+ α chain, the activation is not due to a superantigen-like coupling of HLA-DR by Ni to genomically determined amino acids of AV22. A hybrid TCR containing the T913 β chain together with the AV22+ α chain of a different Ni-reactive clone (clone 3.14; reference 17) was expressed in transfectants comparably to the original TCR in hybridoma T913 (Fig. 2, A and B)
. Both hybridomas responded to SEB stimulation, but only the SE9 TCR was activated by NiSO4 (Fig. 2, C and D). Hence, the Ni contacts apparently involve unique sequences of the T913 α chain, most likely within the V/J joining CDR3 loop.
Ni Recognition in the Absence of Antigen Processing.
Clone SE9 as well as the transfectant T913 both reacted to Ni in the presence of glutaraldehyde-fixed as well as unfixed APC (Fig. 3, A and B)
. Thus, antigen processing was not required and cryptic self-peptides could be excluded as Ni-induced determinants for clone SE9. However, SE9 cells did not proliferate in response to APC (fixed or unfixed), which had been preincubated with NiSO4 for 1 h and subsequently washed (pulsed APC; Fig. 3 C). These findings, indicating the necessity of permanent availability of Ni ions in the medium, argue against the existence of preformed Ni-MHC determinants for the SE9 TCR.
Ni Recognition Is Independent of the Nature of MHC-associated Peptides.
The promiscuous HLA-DR restriction infers that the nature of the DR-associated Ni epitopes might be independent of the sequences of DR-associated peptides. To directly address this question, we stimulated T913 cells in the presence of a series of human 293 cells cotransfected with HLA-DRB1*0101 as well as with different human Ii constructs (24). These constructs encoded either wild-type Ii, containing the original CLIP sequence, or an Ii variant in which CLIP was replaced either by the DRB1*0101-restricted peptide HA307–319 of the influenza hemagglutinin or by its mutated variant in which Lys316 had been replaced by His (HA(K>H); see legend to Fig. 4
for sequences). In the Ii-HA307–319 transfectants, the vast majority of DR1 molecules have been shown to present different length variants of the artificially introduced HA peptide sequence in their peptide binding grooves (24).
As shown in Fig. 4 A, all three 293 transfectants were absolutely comparable in presenting Ni to T913, and the extent of this activation was similar to Ni responses induced by DR1-expressing human B cells (Fig. 3 B). Ni specificity of the reaction is demonstrated by the lack of responses in the absence of NiSO4 (Fig. 4 B). In experiments not shown here we demonstrated that transfectants expressing either one of the two HA peptide variants, but not CLIP, both effectively stimulate DR1-restricted human T cell clones induced by HA307–319. In this context it is worth noting that unlike the results of Romagnoli et al. (10), these reactions were not inhibited by the addition of Ni, even when the His-containing mutant peptide was presented.
His81 in the DR1 β Chain, A Possible Contact Site for Nickel.
As shown above, Ni reactivity of the SE9/T913 TCR is restricted by human HLA-DR molecules encoded by a variety of different DR alleles (Fig. 1 B) and is not affected by the nature of DR-associated peptides (Fig. 4). Therefore, we assumed that a Ni coordination complex might bridge conserved amino acid side chains of the HLA-DR β chain with hypervariable amino acids of the TCR α chain. The lack of Ni presentation by HLA-DR53 (Fig. 1 C) pointed to histidine in position 81 of the DR β chain because DR53 is the only one of all DR alleles tested (Fig. 1 C) in which the highly conserved His81 is missing. Using L cells transfected either with wild-type DRB1*0101 or with DR1 harboring point mutations replacing His81 by Ala, Asp, Glu, or Tyr, we found (Fig. 5
A) that mutations of His81 to Ala, Asp, or Glu completely eliminated the presentation of Ni whereas mutation to Tyr strongly reduced, but did not eliminate reactivity. This result is not due to major structural distortions in the mutated DR1 molecules because the DR1-restricted human T cell clone HACoH8, specific for the hemagglutinin peptide HA309–317, responded to its antigen in the presence of APCs expressing either wild-type DR1 or DR1 molecules carrying the various mutations in position 81 (Fig. 5 B).
Antigen Contacts within the TCR Hypervariable Sequences.
As demonstrated above, the Ni reactivity of the SE9/T913 receptor, although largely defined by its α chain (19), does not resemble a superantigen-like activation via the genomically defined VA22 sequence (Fig. 2). Therefore, to determine antigen contact sites within the T913 α chain we introduced a series of defined point mutations into all of its hypervariable regions, including N-nucleotide determined amino acids of the CDR3 loop. Table I
depicts the amino acid sequences of the three hypervariable regions in single letter code and indicates the point mutations introduced by PCR technology. Unexpectedly, and unlike results of TCR mutations in other systems (29), most of these mutations do not, or only partially, reduce TCR reactivity to Ni (Figs. 6 and 7)
. Replacement of Lys51 by Ser in CDR2 had already been shown not to affect Ni recognition (19). Here we show that Ala mutations of the two aspartic acids in positions 53 and 54 (Fig. 6) also did not impair TCR specificity, making antigen contacts via the CDR2 loop rather unlikely.
The effects of CDR3 mutations are summarized in Fig. 7, A and B. These mutations included an elongation of CDR3α by insertion of Ala between positions 92 and 93, an Ala mutation of Thr95, and Ala, Phe, or His mutations of Tyr94 (Table I). As shown in Fig. 7 A, CDR3 elongation had absolutely no effect on Ni reactivity and the exchange of Thr95 for Ala only partially impaired the reaction. However, mutations of Tyr94 to Ala (Fig. 7 A), Phe, or His (Fig. 7 B), completely abolished antigen reactivity of the recombined TCR.
For CDR1, Fig. 7 C reveals that exchange of Thr27 for Ala did not affect Ni recognition at all and even the Gly28 to Pro mutation, probably inducing a notable sterical alteration of the CDR1 loop, resulted in only partial reduction of reactivity. However, mutation of Tyr29 to Ala completely destroyed the reactivity for Ni (Fig. 7 C). A Tyr to Phe mutation was not tested in this position, but replacement of Tyr29 by His left the TCR reactivity surprisingly unaltered (Fig. 7 D). Hence, antigen contact is clearly mediated by Tyr29 and its functional replacement by His points toward a direct involvement of Ni in this contact.
In this context it is important to note that all mutated TCR α chains effectively paired with the T913 β chain and the resulting TCR were expressed well on the surface of transfected hybridomas (unpublished data). Regardless of their reactivity or nonreactivity to Ni, all TCR transfectants were strongly activated by the VB17-reactive superantigen SEB (unpublished data).
HLA-restricted αβ T cells with specificity for Ni ions have been isolated from peripheral blood as well as from skin lesions of Ni-allergic patients (20, 30–32) and are regarded as essential elements in nickel-contact dermatitis (33). The finding that Ni blocked MHC-restricted T cell recognition of a His-containing peptide has lead to the assumption that Ni-specific T cells recognize complexes of Ni with HLA-associated peptides (10). This rather indirect evidence was supported by our observation that some T cell clones reacted to Ni in the context of their respective HLA restriction element on one type of APC, but not on others (28). More recently, Lu et al. (34) demonstrated the requirement of particular (though not yet identified) peptides for presentation of Ni to one of our previously described AV1/BV17+ T cell clones (ANi2.3). It appears from these data that Ni-induced epitopes for T cells may, indeed, be formed by a complex of Ni ions with selective MHC-associated peptides in a hapten-like fashion. The same study also revealed a significant contribution of His81 in the β chain of HLA-DR52 in forming a Ni/MHC/peptide epitope for clone ANi2.3. However, although His81 is conserved in most HLA-DR β chains, clone ANi2.3 is selectively restricted to only one DR allele (34, 35). This might be related to the restrictive requirements concerning the sequences of DR-associated peptides (34) as well as to the previously described requirement for an Arg-Asp motif in the CDR3β loop of the ANi2.3 TCR (35). As in the case with peptide-specific TCR, the receptor of clone ANi2.3 will recognize its specific epitope on only a small fraction of MHC molecules expressed on APCs, a number even more reduced by the very low Ni concentrations available in vivo.
However, such hapten-like interaction with MHC–peptide complexes is clearly not the only way for Ni to activate T cells. Here we describe clone SE9 (or hybridoma T913) as an example of a quite different type of TCR–Ni–MHC interaction. This receptor reacts to Ni independently of the nature of MHC-associated peptides (Fig. 4) or of the presenting HLA-DR allele (Fig. 1). Essential antigen contact sites had previously been shown to localize to the α chain of the SE9 TCR (19) and antigen presentation by processing inactive APCs pointed to Ni ions as part of the antigenic epitope (Fig. 3). We have identified the conserved His81 residue in HLA-DR β chains as a major contact site for the SE9 TCR. The fact that the same residue is essential for Ni presentation to clone ANi2.3 (34) strongly points to His81 in HLA-DR β chains as a major coordination site for Ni. The lack of peptide participation in Ni presentation and the involvement of the conserved His81 may explain the promiscuous DR restriction of clone SE9 (Figs. 4 and 5). His81 has been recognized as a site for Zn coordination in the context of Zn-dependent superantigens (23, 36–38). However, the finding that it participates in direct presentation of metal ions such as Ni to DR allele-specific as well as to DR-promiscuous Ni-reactive T cells is of particular interest in the context of metal allergies. His81 is potentially one of the central attachment sites for allergenic Ni epitopes. Epitopes involving additional Ni coordination sites on DR-associated peptides would be more likely restricted to defined DR alleles, like the one recognized by clone ANi2.3, whereas peptide-independent clones such as SE9 would tend to be DR promiscuous.
The two clones further differ in that Ni-epitopes specific for clone SE9 (Fig. 3), but not those for clone ANi2.3 (35), are lost by washing of Ni-treated APCs. Again, this might be explained by the different role of peptides in epitope formation. Although Lu et al. (34) presented evidence for stable Ni–MHC coordination complexes involving His81 as well as peptide-determined amino acids, we found no peptide contribution to SE9-specific epitopes and, hence, probably fewer coordination sites on the DR surface. In fact, we not only were unable to prepulse APC with Ni for clone SE9 (Fig. 3), but also prepulsing with Ni of the T cells, i.e. SE9 or T913, did not mediate reactivity (unpublished data). Thus, neither APCs nor the SE9 TCR alone express enough coordination sites to bind Ni tightly enough to prevent its dissociation in the absence of surplus Ni2+ in the medium. Therefore, we assume that only short-lived and normally unproductive complexes of the SE9/T913 TCR with HLA-DR provide a sterically perfect arrangement of amino acids (including His81) to accommodate Ni in a stable coordination complex. In that sense we envisage Ni like a bolt that may connect two parts only during a state of accurate positioning, requiring its permanent presence in the surrounding medium.
Concerning the role of the TCR α chain in this complex, we excluded a superantigen-like interaction via germline-determined sequences of the AV22 element (Fig. 2). Ala mutations within the three α chain hypervariable regions identified two absolutely essential Tyr residues: one in position 29 of the germline-encoded CDR1 common to all AV22 sequences, and the other in the N-nucleotide–determined position 94 of the CDR3, which is unique to SE9 (Fig. 7 and Table I). Interestingly, the crystal structure of a TCR/HA307–319–HLA-DR1 complex (39) reveals close contacts between residue Pro29 in the TCR CDR1α loop and the His81 in the HLA-DR1 β chain helix. The fact that our SE9 TCR reacts to Ni on the very same HA307–319–HLA-DR1 complex suggests a similar orientation, including close proximity between the TCR α chain residue Tyr29 and His81 in HLA-DR1.
The potential role of tyrosine residues as coordination sites for Ni in our TCR–MHC complex is corroborated by several additional observations. On the one hand, Tyr29 could be replaced by His, probably the best chelator of Ni, without any loss of specificity (Fig. 7 D). On the other hand, the exchange of Tyr94 by Phe destroyed reactivity, indicating that not the hydrophobic properties of the aromatic ring, but rather the p-hydroxy group of Tyr determines Ni specificity. Finally, the only mutation of His81 in the DR β chain that left the Ni-presenting properties at least partially intact was a change to Tyr (Fig. 5).
Even though Tyr is not generally regarded as a ligand for Ni, it has been reported as a coordination partner for Cu in bacterial RNase (40). Moreover, in the Ni complex of bacterial urease two of six Ni coordination sites are occupied by oxygens of water molecules (41, 42). The more acidic OH group of Tyr would thus certainly appear as a possible electrophilic partner in a complex. However, a definitive decision as to whether the identified amino acids in TCR and MHC indeed serve as coordination sites for Ni or rather are involved in protein–protein interactions can only be made on the basis of a crystal structure of the complete complex.
No specificity could be assigned to the CDR2 loop of the T913 α chain (Fig. 6). Even though position 51 of several TCR α chains has been reported to be essential for MHC contacts (43, 44), Lys51 in the SE9 α chain has been shown not to be required for Ni reactivity (19). Similarly, Ni specificity was not impaired by mutation of Asp53 and Asp54 in CDR2 (Fig. 6), although aspartic acid has been described to be involved in metal-mediated superantigen binding (38) as well as in the binding site for Ni in human serum albumin (45, 46).
All together, our findings reveal the TCR of clone SE9 as an example of a so far unpredicted possibility for antigen-specific and MHC-restricted T cell activation. Metal ions, and possibly other low molecular weight compounds as well, may form and stabilize intramolecular bridges between TCR and MHC, independent of the primary structure of MHC-associated peptides. Most superantigens achieve a similar connection by bridging nonpolymorphic MHC regions to Vβ family–specific sequences of the TCR. In the SE9 TCR, in contrast, Ni ions require an N-region–determined Tyr in the α chain CDR3 loop, i.e., within the idiotypic TCR sequences. The flexibility of such interactions is stressed by our finding that introduction as well as removal of the structural constraints of proline residues within the CDR1 or CDR3 loops was well tolerated, and that even elongation of CDR3 by one amino acid did not affect Ni reactivity (Fig. 7).
We detected these mechanisms due to the exceptional features of clone SE9, particularly the dominance of its TCR α chain in determining specificity. It is well conceivable that other clones might use both α and β chains of their TCR to form similar peptide-independent complexes, however, their identification would be extremely more difficult. Relating to Ni allergy, the impact of such types of TCR is apparent. APCs present significantly more Ni epitopes to peptide-independent than peptide-dependent T cells, a difference further increased for clones like SE9 recognizing Ni on different HLA-DR alleles. Even if such receptors represent a minority within the Ni-reactive repertoire, their effectiveness and amplifying properties in skin responses to Ni might be significant. The question whether the proposed model also applies to the allergic cross-reactivities to other metals remains unanswered because clone SE9 did not cross-react to Cu, Pd, Co, nor Cr (unpublished data).
The authors wish to thank Dr. E. Palmer for supply of retroviral vectors and technical advice, Dr. Jörg Vollmer for fruitful discussions, and Dr. Ian Haidl for critically revising the manuscript.
This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research within the Clinical Research Group “Pathomechanisms in Allergic Inflammation” (BMBF FKZ 01GC0102).
K. Gamerdinger and C. Moulon contributed equally to this work.
C. Moulon's present address is Dictagene, Chemin de la Vuliette 4, CH-1000 Lausanne 25, Switzerland.