The chemokine receptor CXCR4 is the major coreceptor used for cellular entry by T cell– tropic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 strains, whereas CCR5 is used by macrophage (M)-tropic strains. Here we show that a small-molecule inhibitor, ALX40-4C, inhibits HIV-1 envelope (Env)-mediated membrane fusion and viral entry directly at the level of coreceptor use. ALX40-4C inhibited HIV-1 use of the coreceptor CXCR4 by T- and dual-tropic HIV-1 strains, whereas use of CCR5 by M- and dual-tropic strains was not inhibited. Dual-tropic viruses capable of using both CXCR4 and CCR5 were inhibited by ALX40-4C only when cells expressed CXCR4 alone. ALX40-4C blocked stromal-derived factor (SDF)-1α–mediated activation of CXCR4 and binding of the monoclonal antibody 12G5 to cells expressing CXCR4. Overlap of the ALX40-4C binding site with that of 12G5 and SDF implicates direct blocking of Env interactions, rather than downregulation of receptor, as the mechanism of inhibition. Thus, ALX40-4C represents a small-molecule inhibitor of HIV-1 infection that acts directly against a chemokine receptor at the level of Env-mediated membrane fusion.
HIV-1 infection is characterized by massive virus production, calculated to be on the order of 109 virus particles per day (1, 2). New combination chemotherapies have lead to dramatic and sustained reductions of viral load in many individuals, often to undetectable levels (3). However, these therapies require rigorous adherence to a complicated drug regimen, are expensive, and can cause significant side effects. These factors, coupled with the likelihood that resistant viruses may emerge with time, argue for the continued development of compounds that can block HIV-1 replication at multiple levels of the viral life cycle. Recent advances have shown that certain chemokine receptors, in conjunction with CD4, play a critical role in enabling HIV-1 to enter a cell. Macrophage (M)-tropic virus strains use the chemokine receptor CCR5 to enter cells (4–8), whereas the T cell line–tropic viruses that may emerge years after infection use the chemokine receptor CXCR4 (9).
The importance of chemokine receptors for virus infection in vivo is shown by the fact that individuals who lack CCR5 are highly resistant to virus infection (10–12). The central role of CCR5 in viral transmission and the lack of obvious consequences associated with loss of CCR5 function suggests that chemokine receptors may represent invariant cellular targets for antiviral agents. Indeed, the natural ligands to CCR5 and CXCR4 inhibit virus infection in vitro (5, 13–16), and the ligands for CCR5 (RANTES, MIP-1α, MIP-1β) have been identified as major antiretroviral factors secreted by CD8+ T cells (16). Chemically modified forms of RANTES inhibit HIV-1 entry more potently than wild-type RANTES, indicating that more effective chemokines can be developed (17, 18). However, chemokines (8–10-kD proteins) are subject to the limitations of any structurally complex, labile protein in terms of therapeutic potential. Therefore, small molecule inhibitors of chemokine receptor use are desirable. In this study, we demonstrate that a small-molecule inhibitor of HIV-1 infection can be developed that prevents viral entry by directly targeting the chemokine receptor CXCR4.
Materials And Methods
All cells were maintained in DMEM or RPMI-1640 containing 10% FCS. Vaccinia viruses encoding HIV-1 envelopes (Envs) included vSC60 (BH8; reference 19), vCB28 (JR-FL; reference 19), and vBD3 (89.6; reference 7). Primary virus strains were described previously (20), and infection was monitored by p24 production. The development and synthesis of ALX40-4C has been described previously (21).
Infection and Fusion Assays.
293T cells were transfected with plasmids encoding Env and the NL4-3 luciferase virus backbone (pNL-Luc-E−R−; reference 22). Plasmids encoding the HIV-1 Envs ADA, HXB2, and NL4-3 were provided by John Moore (Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, New York), and pNL-Luc-E−R− was provided by Ned Landau (Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center). Cells were infected with 100 μl of viral supernatant in a total volume of 500 μl with 4 μg/ml polybrene. Cells were lysed 4 d after infection and 50 μl of the resulting lysate was assayed for luciferase activity. ALX40-4C was added to cells 1 h before infection. Virus production from PBMCs and MT2 cell infections was assessed in culture supernatant by p24 content (Coulter Corp., Miami, FL).
To quantitate cell–cell fusion events, we used a luciferase-based gene reporter assay (7, 23). PA317-T4 cells were transfected with T7 luciferase and coreceptor constructs by CaPO4 transfection, and incubated at 37°C overnight. T7 RNA polymerase and Env proteins were introduced into effector 293T cells by infection with recombinant vaccinia viruses and incubation at 32°C overnight in the presence of rifampicin. Target and effector cells were mixed in 24-well plates at 37°C in the presence of ara-C and rifampicin. After 5 h, cells were lysed and assayed for luciferase activity. For inhibition, 10 μM ALX40-4C was preincubated with target cells 30 min before addition of effector cells.
Ca2+ Mobilization Assays.
Response to ligand was determined in the human T cell line SupT1. Cells were incubated in media containing 2.5 μM Fura-2/AM (Molecular Probes Inc., Eurgene, OR) at 37°C in the dark for 1 h. Cells were allowed to efflux for 15 min in PBS before resuspension in Delbecco's PBS containing calcium and magnesium at 2 × 106 cells/ml. Ca2+ mobilization was measured in an Aminco-Bowman luminescence spectrometer.
Quantitation of surface molecules on SupT1, PM1, and 293T cells was performed by washing with 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS)/PBS, blocking with 10% normal rabbit sera in PBS, staining with 10 μg/ml of the indicated monoclonal antibody in 100 μl for 30 min, and detecting with an FITC-conjugated second antibody. For blocking, ALX40-4C was added after blocking cells with rabbit sera, ∼5 min before addition of antibodies, and in a total volume of 100 μl. Cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde after staining and were kept on ice during entire procedure. Cells were analyzed on a Becton Dickinson (Mountain View, CA) FACScan® using CellQuest software.
ALX40-4C Blocks Virus Infection at the Level of Entry.
ALX40-4C (N-α-acetyl-nona-d-arginine (Arg) amide), a polypeptide of nine Arg residues stabilized by terminal protection and inclusion of d amino acids, inhibits infection by T-tropic virus strains at a step before reverse transcription with an IC50 of 3 nM in the HUT78 T cell line and in PBLs, but does not inhibit infection by M-tropic virus strains (21). The region of HIV-1 responsible for this tropism-specific inhibition localizes to the V3 loop of the Env glycoprotein, but the mechanism of inhibition is undefined (21). To further localize the effects of ALX40-4C, we used luciferase reporter viruses based on a common NL4-3 HIV-1 core and pseudotyped with different Env proteins (22). As a result, all reporter viruses are genetically identical and have identical HIV-1 cores, so that postentry blocks will affect all reporter viruses equally.
Reporter viruses pseudotyped with the T-tropic Envs NL4-3 and HXB2 (that use CXCR4 as a coreceptor), the M-tropic Env ADA (that uses CCR5), or the murine leukemia virus (MLV) Env that enters cells independently of CD4 or chemokine receptors, were used to infect PM1 cells, a T cell line that expresses CD4, CXCR4, and CCR5 (6). As shown in Fig. 1,A, ALX40-4C inhibited infection of viruses containing the NL4-3 and HXB2, but not the ADA or MLV Envs. An antibody to CD4 inhibited all HIV-1 strains tested. Inhibition of HXB2 infection in PM1 cells was achieved with an IC50 of ∼0.3 μM (data not shown). Since ALX40-4C did not prevent infection by ADA, we conclude that it did not block CD4 binding or postentry steps of viral replication, suggesting that its inhibitory effects are at the level of virus entry and might be coreceptor specific, consistent with involvement of the V3 loop in ALX40-4C sensitivity (21). To test this, we transiently transfected feline cells that stably express human CD4 with plasmids encoding the coreceptor of interest. HIV-1 NL4-3 only infected cells expressing CXCR4, whereas HIV-1 ADA only infected cells expressing CCR5 (Fig. 1 B). As with PM1 cells, ALX40-4C inhibited the entry of NL4-3, but did not significantly affect entry of ADA.
ALX40-4C Blocks Infection by Some Primary Virus Strains.
Previously, ALX40-4C was shown to inhibit infection of PBLs by some primary virus strains (21). To examine this in more detail, we tested the ability of ALX40-4C to inhibit infection of 10 primary virus strains. Of these, seven formed syncytia on MT2 cells (SI isolates) which express CXCR4 but not CCR5, whereas three did not form syncytia (NSI isolates). ALX40-4C inhibited infection of human PBMCs by three of seven SI strains, and did not inhibit the three NSI strains (Table 1). Since a number of primary virus strains have demonstrated dual-tropic properties (5, 7, 24), the failure of ALX40-4C to inhibit all of the SI strains in PBMCs could be due to use of alternative coreceptors such as CCR5. Therefore, we tested the ability of ALX40-4C to inhibit infection of MT2 cells (which do not express CCR5) by the SI strains. In this system, six of seven primary SI strains were inhibited. Whether the single primary SI strain that was not inhibited uses CXCR4 differently from the other viruses or whether it uses an as yet unidentified coreceptor present in MT2 cells is not known. Nevertheless, these results extend earlier findings and show that ALX40-4C can inhibit CXCR4-dependent infection by primary HIV-1 strains.
ALX40-4C Blocks HIV-1 Usage of CXCR4.
Although the ability of ALX40-4C to block T-tropic, but not M-tropic viruses at post-CD4 levels of entry implied blocking of coreceptor use, we could not distinguish if ALX40-4C blocked the chemokine receptor directly or blocked regions of Env that may mediate interactions with the chemokine receptor. Therefore, we carried out infections with reporter viruses containing dual-tropic Env proteins from the HIV-1 strains 89.6 and SF2. Both the HIV-1 89.6 and SF2 Env proteins can mediate efficient membrane fusion in either a CXCR4- or a CCR5-dependent manner. We found that ALX40-4C inhibited infection by both viruses only when cells expressed CXCR4 (Fig. 2). CCR5-dependent virus infection was not affected, indicating that the inhibitory effects of ALX40-4C are CXCR4-dependent and are not directed at the Env protein.
To confirm that the inhibitory effects we observed were due to Env-mediated fusion events, we used a cell–cell fusion assay that depends only on Env-mediated membrane fusion for signal activity (7, 23). In this assay, murine PA317-T4 cells which express human CD4, the coreceptor of interest, and contain luciferase under control of the T7 promoter, are mixed with 293T cells that express the Env protein of interest and T7 polymerase. Fusion of the two cell populations results in cytoplasmic mixing and expression of luciferase. Use of the cell–cell fusion assay confirmed our infection results by demonstrating ALX40-4C inhibition of fusion between cells expressing dual (89.6) and T-tropic (BH8) Env proteins and cells expressing CD4 and CXCR4 (Fig. 3). Fusion between cells expressing dual- and M-tropic (JR-FL) Env proteins and cells expressing CD4 and CCR5 was not significantly affected.
ALX40-4C Binds Directly to CXCR4.
Although ALX40-4C inhibited CXCR4-dependent membrane fusion with both T- and dual-tropic Env proteins, chemokine receptors can be used differently by divergent virus strains, raising the possibility that ALX40-4C could interact with a region in a dual-tropic Env protein that mediates interactions with CXCR4 without affecting its ability to use CCR5 (25–28). Thus, we tested its ability to prevent CXCR4 activation by the chemokine stromal-derived factor (SDF)-1α and to prevent binding by an anti-CXCR4 monoclonal antibody (12G5; reference 29). Binding of SDF-1α to CXCR4 results in intracellular G protein–mediated signals that include Ca2+ mobilization (13, 14). We found that ALX40-4C, when incubated with SupT1 cells that express CXCR4 and that normally respond to SDF-1α, was able to eliminate Ca2+ mobilization (Fig. 4,A). We also found that incubation of SupT1 (Fig. 4 B), PM1 (not shown), or 293T cells (not shown) expressing CXCR4 with 10 μM ALX40-4C completely inhibited binding of 12G5. Since binding reactions were performed at 4°C, these results indicate that ALX40-4C inhibited 12G5 binding directly rather than by inducing receptor downregulation.
ALX40-4C, a polypeptide of nine Arg residues stabilized by terminal protection and inclusion of d amino acids, inhibits HIV-1 NL4-3 with an IC50 of 3 nM in the HUT78 T cell line and in PBLs (21). In this study, we found that ALX40-4C inhibited entry of T-tropic, but not M-tropic HIV-1 strains. ALX40-4C also inhibited primary dual-tropic virus strains, but only when cells expressed CXCR4 alone. Infection of cells that express both CCR5 and CXCR4 by dual-tropic virus strains was not inhibited by ALX40-4C, likely reflecting the ability of these viruses to use CCR5 when CXCR4 is blocked.
Addition of ALX40-4C to cells expressing CXCR4 prevented SDF-1α–induced changes in intracellular calcium and prevented binding of a monoclonal antibody, 12G5, to cells expressing CXCR4. The epitope recognized by 12G5 resides in the first and second extracellular loops, the same region of CXCR4 that is used by both dual- and T-tropic HIV-1 strains (26, 30) and that overlaps with the activation site of SDF-1α (our unpublished results). These loops are highly negatively charged, and so represent an obvious site to which the cationic ALX40-4C can bind. It is interesting to note that increasing numbers of basic residues in the V3 loop of Env play an important role in the shift from M to T tropism (31, 32). Since the V3 region is implicated in coreceptor specificity and is the region of Env responsible for sensitivity to ALX40-4C (21), it is tempting to speculate that the V3 region of T- and dual-tropic Envs interacts with the negatively charged first and second extracellular loops of CXCR4, and that this interaction is prevented by the polycationic compound ALX40-4C. Our results with SDF-1α and 12G5 suggest that ALX40-4C interacts directly with CXCR4. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that ALX40-4C may also bind to other cell surface molecules. Of note, ALX40-4C inhibits entry of herpes simplex virus type 1, a virus that is also sensitive to other polycations (33).
The identification of chemokine receptors as potential new antiviral targets is offset by the limitations of using chemokine ligands therapeutically and by the variation in susceptibility to chemokine inhibition of different strains of HIV-1 (Trkola, A., and J.P. Moore, manuscript submitted). ALX40-4C demonstrates the feasibility of developing small-molecule antagonists to the chemokine receptors that target a broad spectrum of HIV-1 strains that enter via a specific chemokine receptor. The ability to inhibit T-tropic HIV-1 strains may prove critically important in future treatments since T-tropic strains of HIV-1 are associated with CD4 decline and progression to AIDS (34). In addition, under conditions in which CCR5 is blocked, evolution of HIV-1 towards using CXCR4 could potentially be enhanced, thus raising the possibility of hastening disease progression, rather than delaying it. The use of a compound such as ALX40-4C in conjunction with an anti-CCR5 compound may avoid such pressures by targeting both major HIV-1 coreceptors.
The authors thank John Moore for sharing unpublished results on chemokine inhibition.
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI-40880, AI-38225, and NS-35705, Department of Veterans Affairs medical research funds, and the University of California at Los Angeles AIDS Institute. B.J. Doranz was supported by a Howard Hughes Medical Institute predoctoral fellowship, and K. Grovit-Ferbas was supported by National Institutes of Health postdoctoral training grant T32/AI07388.
Address correspondence to William A. O'Brien, Infectious Diseases, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Galveston, TX 77555-0835. Phone: 409-747-2361; FAX: 409-747-0507; E-mail: email@example.com; or address correspondence to Robert W. Doms, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104. Phone: 1-215-898-0890; FAX: 1-215-573-2883; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org