The Problem: Tumor Immunity Is Not Effectively Induced in Tumor-bearing Hosts.

Animal experiments as well as clinical experience, notably in melanoma, indicate that the immune system can recognize and kill tumor cells. In particular, CTLs recognize MHC class I–peptide complexes on the tumor cell surface, and the peptides are derived from nonmutated or mutated genes that can be primarily expressed in the tumors (13). Why then does the immune system fail to eradicate most antigenic cancers? One clue is the observation that CTLs for melanoma and other human tumors are not known to be expanded. For example, CTL precursors are not increased in melanoma patients, whereas humans who are infected with a virus like influenza frequently show expansions in virus-specific CTLp. Therefore tumors have antigens for T cells, but these do not appear to be immunogenic in vivo.

The Hypothesis: Lack of Tumor Antigen Presentation by Dendritic Cells In Vivo Is a Major Problem that Can Be Bypassed by Delivery of Tumor Antigens on Autologous Dendritic Cells.

One possible reason for a lack of tumor immunity is that the antigens are not being presented by dendritic cells (DCs). DCs are antigen-presenting cells that are specialized to prime helper and killer T cells in vivo (recently reviewed in references 4 and 5). To do so, DCs perform a series of coordinated tasks. Immature DCs develop from hematopoietic progenitors and are strategically located at body surfaces and in interstitial spaces of most tissues. There, DCs are equipped to capture antigens and to produce large numbers of immunogenic MHC–peptide complexes. In the presence of maturation-inducing stimuli such as inflammatory cytokines or stimulation via CD40 (6), DCs upregulate adhesion and costimulatory molecules to become more potent, terminally differentiated, stimulators of T cell immunity. At the same time, numerous intracellular MHC II compartments seem to discharge MHC II–peptide complexes to the cell surface where they can be unusually long lived (7, 8). DCs also migrate to secondary lymphoid organs to select and stimulate rare antigen-specific T cells (9, 10).

Nonetheless, there is no evidence that DCs capture and process antigens from malignant cells in vivo. Tumors, for example, can make products like IL-10 (11, 12) and vascular endothelial growth factor (13) that could decrease DCs development and function. Is a lack of tumor antigen presentation by DCs a major problem in generating T cell– mediated resistance to tumors in vivo? If so, could DCs be used as adjuvants to induce strong tumor-specific immunity?

Some Evidence: Administration of DCs that Are Presenting Tumor Antigens Induces Therapeutic Immunity in Tumor-bearing Mice.

The ability to explore DCs as adjuvants for immunization against tumors emerged with better knowledge on their growth and development. By applying appropriate cytokines, such as GM-CSF, one can generate large numbers of DCs ex vivo from mice, rats, and humans (14–23, and Talmor, M., A. Mirza, S. Turley, I. Mellman, L.A. Hoffman, and R.M. Steinman, manuscript submitted for publication). Therefore, autologous DCs from tumor-bearing patients can be expanded ex vivo, charged with tumor antigens, and reinfused to induce tumor-specific T cells including CTLs. This new approach would bypass the proposed obstacle, i.e., that tumor antigens do not access DCs in vivo. Prior work using bone marrow–derived murine DCs have shown induction of CTL-mediated tumor immunity and resistance in vivo (see review in reference 24).

Two new papers in this issue of the journal (25, 26) emphasize the treatment of established tumors with DCs and the use of gene transfection to charge DCs with a model antigen. Both Specht et al. and Song et al. used the murine tumor CT26.CL25, a subclone of the CT26.WT BALB/c undifferentiated colon adenocarcinoma that is stably transduced with Escherichia coli β-galactosidase as a model antigen. After intravenous inoculation of CT26.CL25 tumor cells and formation of lung metastases, no β-galactosidase– specific CTLs were noted. However, after a single intravenous or subcutaneous injection of 4–5 × 105 antigen-bearing DCs, (a) a specific CTL response was induced, (b) the number of lung metastases decreased, and (c) survival was improved. The DCs were generated from marrow progenitors (Song et al. also used a murine epidermis-derived DC line) and transduced with the β-galactosidase gene via retroviral (25) or adenoviral (26) vectors. These findings illustrate the lack of tumor antigen presentation in vivo and its reversal with tumor antigen-charged DCs. It is now necessary to study authentic tumor antigens, rather than models like β-galactosidase. Interesting other new strategies for the induction of tumor immunity, such as naked DNA encoding tumor antigens and cytokine-transfected tumor cells, are also dependent on the presenting function of host DCs (27).

If antitumor immunity can be induced with DCs in vivo, it should become possible to explore potential obstacles to successful immunotherapy of cancers. For example, once CTLs are induced, it will then be easier to determine if the CTLs migrate to the tumor and are activated there, and if there is a loss of tumor antigen presentation. If one cannot induce CTLs via DCs, has tolerance to the tumor antigen been induced?

Clinical trials are now addressing the safety and efficacy of tumor antigen–charged DCs. Melanoma is being emphasized because this is a prevalent tumor for which many antigens have been shown to be recognized by CTLs. Several variables have to be addressed to identify optimal strategies, and we would like to consider some of these.

Several Methods to Generate Human DCs for Clinical Use.

Recent studies have uncovered complexity in the DC lineage with several subsets, functions, and maturation stages (22, 23, 28, 29). Besides classical immunostimulatory “myeloid” DCs, there may be regulatory fas-ligand bearing “lymphoid” DCs (30). With respect to the stage that will prove optimal for immunization, the evidence indicates that the more potent mature DCs should be prioritized. The many groups that have demonstrated the efficacy of DCs in mice have primarily used mature, marrow-derived cells.

Immunostimulatory human DCs are generated from proliferating CD34+ and from nonproliferating CD14+ progenitors. The CD34+ method uses GM-CSF and TNF-α as cytokines, and either bone marrow, cord blood, or adult blood as a source of progenitors (1618). Adult blood is the most accessible, but requires G-CSF pretreatment of the patient to increase the otherwise minimal percentage of CD34+ cells. The CD14+ method uses GM-CSF and IL-4 as key cytokines (22, 23), and the abundant monocyte fraction as the starting population. One variable among labs is the type of serum that is being used, FCS versus human serum or plasma. FCS batches vary considerably in efficacy, and batches that are LPS-free do not appear to work well (Schuler, G., unpublished data). For therapy, FCS also might be infectious and immunogenic, and it therefore should be avoided, especially since it is feasible to generate potent DCs in the absence of FCS (2123). Hsu et al. (31) also have used preformed DCs from blood, vaccinating B cell lymphoma patients with the Ig idiotype from the tumor.

A set of criteria has developed to document the maturation of DCs. MLR stimulatory activity should be strong, since mature human DCs induce a strong MLR at DC/T cell ratios of 1:1,000 with stimulation indices of 20 or more. Mature DCs have large veils or sheet-like processes that extend in several directions from the cell body. The phenotype includes expression of CD83 and CD25, and high levels of CD86 and HLA-DR. When cytokines are removed, mature DCs are stable, whereas if cells are not matured, they can revert to adherent macrophages. With maturation, the DCs also can produce large amounts of IL-12 and become resistant to the suppressive effects of IL-10 on antigen-presenting function.

The Frequency and Route of DC Injections.

In mice, mature DCs induce immunity to tumors after injection by the subcutaneous or intravenous routes. The optimal injection site for human immunization needs to be determined. It may be that upon intracutaneous injection, DCs will activate in the draining lymph nodes those T cells that preferentially home back to skin and are therefore most effective at this site. In mice, recent data indicate that upon intravenous injection, DCs home not only to spleen but also to liver-draining lymph nodes (32). Direct intranodal injection is another possibility (33), but should not be necessary given the homing properties of DCs.

The development of strong memory would reduce the frequency of DC injections, but to date, there has been little work on T cell memory after DC priming in situ. Strong memory might be facilitated by the fact that MHC II–peptide complexes can be retained for long periods, providing the DCs themselves with a type of “memory” (7, 8). Human studies will indicate how long memory persists after DC priming, and how often the DCs will have to be given to achieve optimal immunity.

Tumor Antigens and Loading Methods.

For assessing variables that lead to optimal immunogenicity, peptide-pulsed DCs should be suitable. One can then test if the peptide-specific CTLs also kill the tumor in question and not just experimental, peptide-pulsed targets. The value of immunizing MHC class II–restricted, CD4+, helper and killer T cells needs to be explored. Investigators also are studying many approaches to bypass the MHC restriction that is imposed by the use of peptides. Genetic transduction is one such approach, as carried out by Song et al. (26) and Specht et al. (25), and will allow the DCs to tailor the peptides from a tumor antigen so that the peptides can be presented by any given patient's HLA products. Genetically transduced DC might also express MHC-peptide complexes for very long periods, which may be vital given recent data on the relatively short half life of MHC I–peptide complexes on DCs (8).

A single dose of DCs modified with adenoviral and retroviral vectors can be effective for immunizing tumor-bearing mice, as shown by the two papers in the current issue. For repeated vaccinations, induction of antiviral or antivector immunity may pose problems. Nonviral or modified viral vectors therefore need exploration.

If exogenous proteins can target MHC I products of human DCs, as described for mouse marrow–derived DCs (34), recombinant tumor antigens will need to be tested. An exciting goal is to arm DCs with the full antigenic spectrum of tumor cells. Some reported approaches are to transduce DCs with tumor-derived RNA (35), to fuse DCs with whole tumor cells (36), and to induce DCs to phagocytose and present whole tumor cells (Albert, M.L., B. Sauter, and N. Bhardwaj, manuscript submitted for publication).

Another recent development is the production of monoclonal antibodies that recognize MHC–peptide complexes (37, 38). This could soon permit researchers to monitor and optimize the many possible antigen-loading procedures for DCs.

Monitoring the Efficacy of Active Immunization with DCs.

Pilot experiments (31, 39, 40) suggest that DC injections are safe, and larger trials are underway. It will be important now to demonstrate immune efficacy, and use these responses as a guide to optimizing this approach. Proving that immunization has occurred, particularly for CTLs, is not straightforward. Classical measurements for effector CTLs in blood (51Cr–release assays) may be insensitive, whereas standard precursor frequency measurements are laborious, especially for kinetic studies. Restimulation in vitro to activate memory CTLs is far from routine with human cells, but may now be feasible after DC enrichment (41). Novel quantification methods for CD8+ T cells such as semiautomated ELISPOT analysis (42) and binding of tetrameric MHC–peptide complexes (43) should be tested.

Additional Strategies to Avoid Tumor Evasion of the DC-induced Immune Response.

There are animal models in which it is difficult to reject established tumors with immune activated T cells (44). After DC-based immunization procedures are established, it will be possible to investigate potential obstacles to the efficacy of tumor-specific CTLs. Ancillary strategies may be required, for example, to (a) mobilize and activate the immune T cells in the tumor, (b) obviate tumor-mediated resistance as by expression of fas ligand (45) and inhibitory cytokines (12, 13), and (c) reverse the downregulation of antigen presentation that can occur (46, 47). Supplemental anti tumor approaches such as inhibitors of proteases (48) and angiogenesis (49) may be necessary.

Some Future Issues in DC-based Immune Therapy and Vaccination.

The new animal experiments in this issue indicate that DC therapy for established tumors can be a significant strategy. Clinical studies of DC therapy for existing tumors and DC vaccination at the time that a primary tumor is removed should both be considered. Current methods for DC-based immunization are within the realm of other cell therapies in terms of feasibility.

It is also possible that ex vivo generation of DCs will be superseded by methods to effectively load DCs with tumor antigens in situ, and to activate their stimulatory and migratory functions. Antitumor immunity may develop if DCs (or other cells) are substantially expanded in vivo by, e.g., flt3 ligand (50). A recent report even reveals that DCs themselves can have an NK-like, cytolytic activity on certain targets (51).

We have emphasized human studies here, but the careful animal experiments of Specht et al. and Song et al. in this issue illustrate that a lack of tumor antigen presentation by DCs can be an important cause for the absence of T cell– mediated resistance in tumor-bearing hosts. Additionally, the ex vivo and genetic transduction approaches in these two papers are of wide interest for human studies. This is an intriguing time for using DCs to actively manipulate the immune response to tumors and other clinically important antigens.

References

References
1
Van Der Bruggen
P
,
Traversari
C
,
Chomez
P
,
Lurquin
C
,
De Plaen
E
,
Van Den Eynde
B
,
Knuth
A
,
Boon
T
A gene encoding an antigen recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma
Science (Wash DC)
1991
254
1643
1647
[PubMed]
2
Boon
T
,
Cerottini
J-C
,
Van Der Bruggen
P
,
Van Pel
A
Tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes
Annu Rev Immunol
1994
12
337
365
[PubMed]
3
Rosenberg
SA
,
Kawakami
Y
,
Robbins
PF
,
Wang
RF
Identification of the genes encoding cancer antigens: implications for cancer immunotherapy
Adv Cancer Res
1996
70
145
177
[PubMed]
4
Cella
M
,
Sallusto
F
,
Lanzavecchia
A
Origin, maturation and antigen presenting function of dendritic cells
Curr Opin Immunol
1997
9
10
16
[PubMed]
5
Schuler
G
,
Thurner
B
,
Romani
N
Dendritic cells: from ignored cells to major players in T-cell–mediated immunity
Int Arch Allergy Immunol
1997
112
317
333
[PubMed]
6
Van Kooten
C
,
Banchereau
J
Functions of CD40 on B cells, dendritic cells and other cells
Curr Opin Immunol
1997
9
330
337
[PubMed]
7
Pierre
P
,
Turley
SJ
,
Gatti
E
,
Hull
M
,
Meltzer
J
,
Mirza
A
,
Inaba
K
,
Steinman
RM
,
Mellman
I
Developmental regulation of MHC class II transport in mouse dendritic cells
Nature (Lond)
1997
388
787
792
[PubMed]
8
Cella
M
,
Engering
A
,
Pinet
V
,
Pieters
J
,
Lanzavecchia
A
Inflammatory stimuli induce accumulation of MHC class II complexes on dendritic cells
Nature (Lond)
1997
388
782
787
[PubMed]
9
Ingulli
E
,
Mondino
A
,
Khoruts
A
,
Jenkins
MK
In vivo detection of dendritic cell antigen presentation to CD4+T cells
J Exp Med
1997
185
2133
2141
[PubMed]
10
Austyn
JM
New insights into the mobilization and phagocytic activity of dendritic cells
J Exp Med
1996
183
1287
1292
[PubMed]
11
Dummer
W
,
Becker
JC
,
Schwaaf
A
,
Leverkus
M
,
Moll
T
,
Brocker
EB
Elevated serum levels of interleukin-10 in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma
Melanoma Res
1995
5
67
68
[PubMed]
12
Chen
Q
,
Daniel
V
,
Maher
DW
,
Hersey
P
Production of IL-10 by melanoma cells: examination of its role in immunosuppression mediated by melanoma
Int J Cancer
1994
56
755
760
[PubMed]
13
Gabrilovich
DI
,
Chen
HI
,
Girgis
KR
,
Cunningham
HT
,
Meny
GM
,
Nadaf
S
,
Kavanaugh
D
,
Carbone
DP
Production of vascular endothelial growth factor by human tumors inhibits the functional maturation of dendritic cells
Nat Med
1996
2
1096
1103
[PubMed]
14
Inaba
K
,
Steinman
RM
,
Witmer-Pack
M
,
Aya
H
,
Inaba
M
,
Sudo
T
,
Wolpe
S
,
Schuler
G
Identification of proliferating dendritic cell precursors in mouse blood
J Exp Med
1992
175
1157
1167
[PubMed]
15
Inaba
K
,
Inaba
M
,
Romani
N
,
Aya
H
,
Deguchi
M
,
Ikehara
S
,
Muramatsu
S
,
Steinman
RM
Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor
J Exp Med
1992
176
1693
1702
[PubMed]
16
Caux
C
,
Dezutter-Dambuyant
C
,
Schmitt
D
,
Banchereau
J
GM-CSF and TNF-α cooperate in the generation of dendritic Langerhans cells
Nature (Lond)
1992
360
258
261
[PubMed]
17
Szabolcs
P
,
Moore
MAS
,
Young
JW
Expansion of immunostimulatory dendritic cells among the myeloid progeny of human CD34+ bone marrow precursors cultured with c-kitligand, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and TNF-α
J Immunol
1995
154
5851
5861
[PubMed]
18
Strunk
D
,
Rappersberger
K
,
Egger
C
,
Strobl
H
,
Kromer
E
,
Elbe
A
,
Maurer
D
,
Stingl
G
Generation of human dendritic cells/Langerhans cells from circulating CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells
Blood
1996
87
1292
1302
[PubMed]
19
Herbst
B
,
Kohler
G
,
Mackensen
A
,
Veelken
H
,
Kulmburg
P
,
Rosenthal
FM
,
Schaefer
HE
,
Mertelsmann
R
,
Fisch
P
,
Lindemann
A
In vitro differentiation of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells toward distinct dendritic cell subsets of the Birbeck granule and MIIC-positive Langerhans cell and the interdigitating dendritic cell type
Blood
1996
88
2541
2548
[PubMed]
20
Strobl
H
,
Riedl
E
,
Scheinecker
C
,
Bello-Fernandez
C
,
Pickl
WF
,
Rappersberger
K
,
Majdic
O
,
Knapp
W
TGF-β1 promotes in vitro development of dendritic cells from CD34+ hemopoietic progenitors
J Immunol
1996
157
1499
1507
[PubMed]
21
Siena
S
,
Di Nicola
M
,
Bregni
M
,
Mortarini
R
,
Anichini
A
,
Lombardi
L
,
Ravagnani
F
,
Parmiani
G
,
Gianni
AM
Massive ex vivo generation of functional dendritic cells from mobilized CD34+ blood progenitors for anticancer therapy
Exp Hematol
1995
23
1463
1471
[PubMed]
22
Bender
A
,
Sapp
M
,
Schuler
G
,
Steinman
RM
,
Bhardwaj
N
Improved methods for the generation of dendritic cells from nonproliferating progenitors in human blood
J Immunol Methods
1996
196
121
135
[PubMed]
23
Romani
N
,
Reider
D
,
Heuer
M
,
Ebner
S
,
Eibl
B
,
Niederwieser
D
,
Schuler
G
Generation of mature dendritic cells from human blood: an improved method with special regard to clinical applicability
J Immunol Methods
1996
196
137
151
[PubMed]
24
Young
JW
,
Inaba
K
Dendritic cells as adjuvants for class I major histocompatibility complex–restricted antitumor immunity
J Exp Med
1996
183
7
11
[PubMed]
25
Specht
JM
,
Wang
G
,
Do
MT
,
Lam
JS
,
Royal
RE
,
Reeves
ME
,
Rosenberg
SA
,
Hwu
P
Dendritic cells retrovirally transduced with a model tumor antigen gene are therapeutically effective against established pulmonary metastases
J Exp Med
1997
186
1213
1221
[PubMed]
26
Song
W
,
Kong
H
,
Carpenter
H
,
Torii
H
,
Granstein
R
,
Rafii
S
,
Moore
MAS
,
Crystal
RG
Dendritic cells genetically modified with an adenovirus vector encoding the cDNA for a model tumor antigen induce protective and therapeutic antitumor immunity
J Exp Med
1997
186
1247
1256
[PubMed]
27
Casares, S., K. Inaba, T. Brumeanu, R.M. Steinman, and C.A. Bona. 1997. Antigen presentation by dendritic cells after immunization with DNA encoding a major histocompatibility complex class II–restricted viral epitope. J. Exp. Med. In Press.
28
Caux
C
,
Vanbervliet
B
,
Massacrier
C
,
Dezutter-Dambuyant
C
,
de Saint-Vis
B
,
Jacquet
C
,
Yoneda
K
,
Imamura
S
,
Schmitt
D
,
Banchereau
J
CD34+hematopoietic progenitors from human cord blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell pathways in response to GM-CSF+ TNF α
J Exp Med
1996
184
695
706
[PubMed]
29
Caux
C
,
Massacrier
C
,
Vanbervliet
B
,
Dubois
B
,
Durand
I
,
Cella
M
,
Lanzavecchia
A
,
Banchereau
J
CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors from human cord blood differentiate along two independent dendritic cell pathways in response to GM-CSF+TNFα. II. Functional analysis
Blood
1997
90
1458
1470
[PubMed]
30
Suss
G
,
Shortman
K
A subclass of dendritic cells kills CD4 T cells via Fas/Fas-ligand–induced apoptosis
J Exp Med
1996
183
1789
1796
[PubMed]
31
Hsu
FJ
,
Benike
C
,
Fagnoni
F
,
Liles
TM
,
Czerwinski
D
,
Taidi
B
,
Engleman
EG
,
Levy
R
Vaccination of patients with B-cell lymphoma using autologous antigen-pulsed dendritic cells
Nat Med
1996
2
52
58
[PubMed]
32
Kudo
S
,
Matsuno
K
,
Ezaki
T
,
Ogawa
M
A novel migration pathway for rat dendritic cells from the blood: hepatic sinusoids-lymph translocation
J Exp Med
1997
185
777
784
[PubMed]
33
Kundig
TM
,
Bachmann
MF
,
DiPaolo
C
,
Simard
JJL
,
Battegay
M
,
Lother
H
,
Gessner
A
,
Kuhlcke
K
,
Ohashi
PS
,
Hengartner
H
,
Zinkernagel
RM
Fibroblasts as efficient antigen-presenting cells in lymphoid organs
Science (Wash DC)
1995
268
1343
1347
[PubMed]
34
Watts
C
Capture and processing of exogenous antigens for presentation on MHC molecules
Annu Rev Immunol
1997
15
821
850
[PubMed]
35
Boczkowski
D
,
Nair
SK
,
Snyder
D
,
Gilboa
E
Dendritic cells pulsed with RNA are potent antigen-presenting cells in vitro and in vivo
J Exp Med
1996
184
465
472
[PubMed]
36
Gong
J
,
Chen
D
,
Kashiwaba
M
,
Kufe
D
Induction of antitumor activity by immunization with fusions of dendritic and carcinoma cells
Nat Med
1997
3
558
561
[PubMed]
37
Porgador
A
,
Yewdell
JW
,
Deng
Y
,
Bennink
JR
,
Germain
RN
Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide–MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody
Immunity
1997
6
715
726
[PubMed]
38
Dadaglio
G
,
Nelson
CA
,
Deck
MB
,
Petzold
SJ
,
Unanue
ER
Characterization and quantitation of peptide–MHC complexes produced from hen egg lysozyme using a monoclonal antibody
Immunity
1997
6
727
738
[PubMed]
39
Nestle
FO
,
Gilliet
M
,
Alijagic
S
,
Wiesner
W
,
Grabbe
S
,
Dummer
R
,
Burg
G
,
Schadendorf
D
Vaccination of melanoma patients with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells
Melanoma Res
1997
7
S14
. (Abstr.)
40
Lotze
MT
,
Storkus
WJ
,
Falo
L
,
Baar
J
,
Davis
I
,
Tueting
T
,
Esche
C
,
Whiteside
TL
,
Elder
EM
,
Kinzler
DM
,
Paradise
C
,
Kirkwood
JM
Dendritic cells (DC) and the immunotherapy of melanoma
Melanoma Res
1997
7
S4
. (Abstr.)
41
Bhardwaj
N
,
Bender
A
,
Gonzalez
N
,
Bui
LK
,
Garrett
MC
,
Steinman
RM
Influenza virus–infected dendritic cells stimulate strong proliferative and cytolytic responses from human CD8+ T cells
J Clin Invest
1994
94
797
807
[PubMed]
42
Herr
W
,
Linn
B
,
Leister
N
,
Wandel
E
,
Zum
KHM
,
Buschenfelde
,
Wolfel
T
The use of computer-assisted video image analysis for the quantification of CD8+ T lymphocytes producing tumor necrosis factor α spots in response to peptide antigens
J Immunol Methods
1997
203
141
152
[PubMed]
43
Altman
JD
,
Moss
PAH
,
Goulder
PJR
,
Barouch
DH
,
McHeyzer-Williams
MG
,
Bell
JI
,
McMichael
AJ
,
Davis
MM
Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes
Science (Wash DC)
1996
274
94
96
[PubMed]
44
Wick
M
,
Dubey
P
,
Koeppen
H
,
Siegel
CT
,
Fields
PE
,
Chen
L
,
Bluestone
JA
,
Schreiber
H
Antigenic cancer cells grow progressively in immune hosts without evidence for T cell exhaustion or systemic anergy
J Exp Med
1997
186
229
238
[PubMed]
45
Walker
PR
,
Saas
P
,
Dietrich
PY
Role of Fas ligand (CD95L) in immune escape: the tumor strikes back
J Immunol
1997
158
4521
4524
[PubMed]
46
Seliger
B
,
Maeurer
MJ
,
Ferrone
S
TAP off– tumors on
Immunol Today
1997
18
292
299
[PubMed]
47
Jager
E
,
Ringhoffer
M
,
Altmannsberger
M
,
Arand
M
,
Karbach
J
,
Jager
D
,
Oesch
F
,
Knuth
A
Immunoselection in vivo: independent loss of MHC class I and melanocyte differentiation antigen expression in metastatic melanoma
Int J Cancer
1997
71
142
147
[PubMed]
48
Chirivi
RGS
,
Garofalo
A
,
Crimmin
MJ
,
Bawden
LJ
,
Stoppacciaro
A
,
Brown
PD
,
Giavazzi
R
Inhibition of the metastatic spread and growth of B16-BL6 murine melanoma by a synthetic matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor
Int J Cancer
1994
58
460
464
[PubMed]
49
Wang
Y
,
Becker
D
Antisense targeting of basic fibroblast growth factor and fibroblast growth factor receptor–1 in human melanomas blocks intratumoral angiogenesis and tumor growth
Nat Med
1997
3
887
893
[PubMed]
50
Lynch
DH
,
Andreasen
A
,
Maraskovsky
E
,
Whitmore
J
,
Miller
RE
,
Schuh
JACL
Flt 3 ligand induces tumor regression and antitumor immune responses in vivo
Nat Med
1997
3
625
631
[PubMed]
51
Josien
R
,
Heslan
M
,
Soulillou
J-P
,
Cuturi
M-C
Rat spleen dendritic cells express natural killer cell receptor protein 1 (NKR-P1) and have cytotoxic activity to select targets via a Ca2+-dependent mechanism
J Exp Med
1997
186
467
472
[PubMed]

Author notes

Address correspondence to Dr. R.M. Steinman, Laboratory of Cellular Physiology and Immunology, The Rockefeller University, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: 212-327-8106; FAX: 212-327-8875; E-mail: steinma@rockvax.rockefeller.edu