The stability of centrifugally purified PR8 influenza virus at pH 7 in 0.001, 0.01, 0.1, and 1.0 M phosphate buffers, in veronal and borate buffers, and in adjusted solutions of saline and distilled water was investigated. The results demonstrate that the stability of this virus can vary considerably at pH 7 depending upon the nature and concentration of the salts present. Borate, veronal, and phosphate buffers at a concentration of about 0.1 M showed almost equal ability to maintain virus activity over several weeks of time at 4°C. In many cases, it may prove inconvenient to use veronal buffer, however, because of the difficulty in determining protein concentration in its presence. The 0.1 M phosphate buffer has proved in tests not described here to be slightly more consistent in preserving virus activity than the borate and may, therefore, be considered slightly superior to the latter. It is apparent that unbuffered saline is a poor solvent for preserving virus activity regardless of pH. The activity of partially inactivated virus in distilled water and in saline solutions was increased ten to 1000 times by diluting such solutions with 0.1 M phosphate buffer. Some reactivation was also effected with veronal but not with borate buffers.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 1944
Article|
March 01 1944
THE STABILITY OF INFLUENZA VIRUS IN THE PRESENCE OF SALTS
C. A. Knight
C. A. Knight
From the Department of Animal and Plant Pathology of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, New Jersey
Search for other works by this author on:
C. A. Knight
From the Department of Animal and Plant Pathology of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, Princeton, New Jersey
Received:
December 04 1943
Online ISSN: 1540-9538
Print ISSN: 0022-1007
Copyright, 1944, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York
1944
J Exp Med (1944) 79 (3): 285–290.
Article history
Received:
December 04 1943
Citation
C. A. Knight; THE STABILITY OF INFLUENZA VIRUS IN THE PRESENCE OF SALTS . J Exp Med 1 March 1944; 79 (3): 285–290. doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.79.3.285
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement