Mice either normal or splenectomized after exposure to X-ray are markedly more susceptible to bovine tuberculosis than are normal animals. Animals splenectomized a short time prior to inoculation are also more susceptible than normal, while those splenectomized eight to ten days before inoculation have about the same resistance as normal. The mice splenectomized three to four weeks before inoculation have a resistance increased over the normal, as has already been shown by Lewis and Margot. As X-ray in the doses used apparently affects only the lymphoid tissue and as the hypertrophy of the remaining lymphoid tissue after splenectomy is so rapid that the circulating lymphocytes may be much above the normal by the third week, it is concluded that this evidence, taken with the well known association of the lymphocytes with tuberculous lesions, points strongly to the lymphocyte as an important agent in the defensive mechanism against tuberculosis.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 October 1914
Article|
October 01 1914
EXPERIMENTS ON THE RÔLE OF LYMPHOID TISSUE IN THE RESISTANCE TO EXPERIMENTAL TUBERCULOSIS IN MICE
James B. Murphy,
James B. Murphy
From the Laboratories and Hospital of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.
Search for other works by this author on:
Arthur W. M. Ellis
Arthur W. M. Ellis
From the Laboratories and Hospital of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.
Search for other works by this author on:
James B. Murphy
From the Laboratories and Hospital of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.
Arthur W. M. Ellis
From the Laboratories and Hospital of The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research.
Received:
August 18 1914
Online ISSN: 1540-9538
Print ISSN: 0022-1007
Copyright, 1914, by The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research New York
1914
J Exp Med (1914) 20 (4): 397–403.
Article history
Received:
August 18 1914
Citation
James B. Murphy, Arthur W. M. Ellis; EXPERIMENTS ON THE RÔLE OF LYMPHOID TISSUE IN THE RESISTANCE TO EXPERIMENTAL TUBERCULOSIS IN MICE . J Exp Med 1 October 1914; 20 (4): 397–403. doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.20.4.397
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement