Immunization of mice by infection or intraperitoneal injection with homotypic A2, heterotypic A0, or recombinant A0A2 virus have differing effects on transmission of influenza A2 virus infection. Immunization by infection with A2 virus resulted in refractoriness to reinfection either by artificial aerosols or by exposure to infected cage-mates. Immunization by inoculation with inactivated A2 virus vaccine resulted in a decreased susceptibility to transmitted infection in immunized contacts, but following A2 virus challenge, transmission of infection by immunized infectors was not altered. Immunization by infection with influenza A0 virus or recombinant A0A2 virus resulted in a decreased susceptibility to transmitted A2 virus infection in immunized contacts, and to decreased transmission after A2 virus infection in immunized infector mice. These differing effects on transmission of infection are attributed to differences in specific local immunologic responses following the various immunization procedures.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 March 1967
Article|
March 01 1967
EXPERIMENTAL TRANSMISSION OF INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTION IN MICE : III. DIFFERING EFFECTS OF IMMUNITY INDUCED BY INFECTION AND BY INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINE ON TRANSMISSION ON INFECTION
Jerome L. Schulman
Jerome L. Schulman
From the Division of Virus Research, Department of Public Health, Cornell University Medical College, New York
Search for other works by this author on:
Jerome L. Schulman
From the Division of Virus Research, Department of Public Health, Cornell University Medical College, New York
Received:
October 07 1966
Online ISSN: 1540-9538
Print ISSN: 0022-1007
Copyright © 1967 by The Rockefeller University Press
1967
J Exp Med (1967) 125 (3): 467–478.
Article history
Received:
October 07 1966
Citation
Jerome L. Schulman; EXPERIMENTAL TRANSMISSION OF INFLUENZA VIRUS INFECTION IN MICE : III. DIFFERING EFFECTS OF IMMUNITY INDUCED BY INFECTION AND BY INACTIVATED INFLUENZA VIRUS VACCINE ON TRANSMISSION ON INFECTION . J Exp Med 1 March 1967; 125 (3): 467–478. doi: https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.125.3.467
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement