Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
1-20 of 85
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account

Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Close Modal
Sort by
Journal Articles
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 1. Structure of BetP and spin-label locations. (A and B) The structure of BetP shown as cartoon helices, highlighting TM helices 1′, 5′, 6′, and 8′ lining the substrate pathway (blue) and helices 3′, 4′, 8′, and 9′ in the hash domain More about this image found in Structure of BetP and spin-label locations. (A and B) The structure of Bet...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 2. Measurements for BetP in E. coli polar lipid proteoliposomes with spin labels introduced at positions 450 and 516. (A) Uptake of betaine in nanomolar per milligram protein was measured at 0.6 osmol/kg as a function of time for WT and More about this image found in Measurements for BetP in E. coli polar lipid proteoliposom...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 3. Convergence of simulated to experimental distance distributions. The probability of a distance P(r) is plotted versus distance (r). The PELDOR-based distances (black lines), measured in the presence of 500 mM NaCl (A) or 300 mM NaCl More about this image found in Convergence of simulated to experimental distance distributions. The proba...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 4. The EBMetaD bias does not change the overall conformation of the protein. (A–D) Structural similarity (in RMSD) of each simulated ensemble with respect to the two extreme conformations of BetP. EBMetaD simulation trajectories initiated More about this image found in The EBMetaD bias does not change the overall conformation of the protein. (...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 5. Work required by each simulation system to reproduce the experimental distance distribution. The work was computed by averaging the bias potential applied over the last 0.8 µs of each simulation of G450R5/S516R5. Simulations were More about this image found in Work required by each simulation system to reproduce the experimental dista...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 6. Work required by each D470-protonated simulation system to reproduce the experimental distance distribution. The work was computed by averaging the bias potential applied over the last 0.8 µs of each simulation of G450R5/S516R5 with More about this image found in Work required by each D470-protonated simulation system to reproduce the ex...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 7. Breakdown of contributions to the work for each molecular simulation system. Work computed with the Kullback-Leibler divergence between the biased and debiased trajectories (see Materials and methods) for the distance between the Cα More about this image found in Breakdown of contributions to the work for each molecular simulation system...
Images
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 8. Analysis of backbone distances and spin-label orientations . Distributions of Cα–Cα atom distances (A–D) and spin-label side chain orientations calculated for the biased trajectories (dashed lines) and after de-biasing those same More about this image found in Analysis of backbone distances and spin-label orientations . Distributions ...
Journal Articles
Images
Figure 1. Structural features and mechanical abstraction of the NOMPC ion channel. (A) The NOMPC structure (Jin et al., 2017). The channel is a homotetramer with the N-terminal domain starting at AR 1 in contact with an MT (blue and gray blocks). The four-helix bundle extending up from the MT is 29 ARs long terminating in the linker helices (violet) before moving into the preS1 elbow and first TM helix S1 of the membrane spanning region. Like KV and NaV voltage-gated ion channels, the TM domain is composed of six TM segments labeled S1–S6 with the S4–S5 linker (orange) connecting S1–S4 to the pore domain (S5–S6). The S6 inner pore helix, which occludes the pore domain in this closed structure, is connected to the TRP domain (dark blue), a long helix that runs parallel to the membrane on the cytoplasmic side and makes contact with the linker helices and the S4–S5 linker. Adjacent helical chains come into close contact at two points along the length of the helical bundle (#1 and #2). The three consecutive sets of six AR repeats used in our molecular simulations are colored blue (ANK1), red (ANK2), and green (ANK3), and the inset shows a zoomed-in representation of ANK1. The approximate position of the membrane is indicated with black lines. (B) A finite element model of NOMPC. The four chains of the bundle were modeled as cylindrical rods with radius r = 1.0 nm and a shape matching the NOMPC structure in panel A (effective helical radius R = 3.43 nm used for analytic calculations). The C-terminal AR 29 terminates into the TRP region, a rigid plate representing the linker helices and TRP domain. The contact points from panel A are indicated in the model.
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 1. Structural features and mechanical abstraction of the NOMPC ion channel. (A) The NOMPC structure ( Jin et al., 2017 ). The channel is a homotetramer with the N-terminal domain starting at AR 1 in contact with an MT (blue and gray More about this image found in Structural features and mechanical abstraction of the NOMPC ion channel. (A...
Images
Figure 2. Normal modes of the NOMPC channel. (A) Side view of the lowest-order NMA performed on the entire NOMPC channel. The starting structure is represented as a white tube, and the cyan and black tube representations of a single AR chain depict the maximum displacement of the chains along mode 1. The trajectory is superposed on the TM domain. The inset shows the cytoplasmic view of the channel highlighting the extreme displacements of the TRP domain (cyan and black) for this mode. As can be seen, the TRP domain moves as a rigid body. The TM domain is at the top, and the MT binding domain is at the bottom. (B) Side view of the lowest-order NMA performed on the entire NOMPC channel with the N-terminal residues clamped. This mode mimics NOMPC binding to an MT. The lowest-order mode still shows the largest deflections along the z axis, but the amplitude is suppressed compared with A. The color scheme is as in A.
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 2. Normal modes of the NOMPC channel. (A) Side view of the lowest-order NMA performed on the entire NOMPC channel. The starting structure is represented as a white tube, and the cyan and black tube representations of a single AR chain More about this image found in Normal modes of the NOMPC channel. (A) Side view of the lowest-order NMA p...
Images
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of the AR chains extracted from equilibrium MD simulations. (A) Structure of ANK1 highlighting the six ARs and the second (cyan) and fifth (red) repeats used to calculate the COM-to-COM distance from AR2 to AR5 (d2,5). (B) The time evolution of the distance d2,5 from A for ANK1 (blue), ANK2 (red), and ANK3 (green). (C) The stiffness spring constant and 95% CI for ks for ANK1–ANK3 computed from the data in B using Eq. 2. (D) Structure of ANK1 highlighting the six ARs and the second (cyan) and fifth (red) repeats used to calculate the angular displacement of AR2 with respect to AR5 (θ2,5). The dots represent the COM and Cα atoms used to define AR orientations. (E) The time evolution of the angle θ2,5 from D for ANK1 (blue), ANK2 (red), and ANK3 (green). (F) The torsional spring constant and 95% CI for kθ for ANK1–ANK3 computed from the data in E using Eq. 3. Error bars in C and F are the 95% CI obtained using a Monte Carlo bootstrap technique.
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 3. Mechanical properties of the AR chains extracted from equilibrium MD simulations. (A) Structure of ANK1 highlighting the six ARs and the second (cyan) and fifth (red) repeats used to calculate the COM-to-COM distance from AR2 to AR5 (d More about this image found in Mechanical properties of the AR chains extracted from equilibrium MD simula...
Images
Figure 4. Shape, force, and energy of helical bundle deformation computed from the finite element model. (A–C) Starting (gray) and final representation (dark gray, blue, and red) of NOMPC for the no-contact (A), frictionless (B), and rough contact models (C). (D) The force per chain is represented as a function of the vertical displacement (Δz) for the three different models (black dashed curve, no contact; blue, frictionless contact; and red, rough contact). These force–displacement curves are per-chain values, and the entire force of the bundle is four times the reported value. (E) The energy is represented as a function of the vertical displacement (Δz) for the three different models (black dashed curve, no contact; blue, frictionless contact; and red, rough contact). These energy–displacement curves are for the entire four-helix bundle. The gray region in D and E represents displacements before helix–helix contact.
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 4. Shape, force, and energy of helical bundle deformation computed from the finite element model. (A–C) Starting (gray) and final representation (dark gray, blue, and red) of NOMPC for the no-contact (A), frictionless (B), and rough More about this image found in Shape, force, and energy of helical bundle deformation computed from the fi...
Images
Figure 5. Force and twisting moment exerted on the TRP domain. (A) Cytoplasmic view of the channel domain with TRP domain highlighted blue. The radial/parallel direction r||, angular/tangential direction r⊥, and direction of positive torque mz are defined with respect to an isolated TRP domain. (B–D) Radial force (B), tangential force (C), and twisting moment (D) exerted by each chain on the TRP region as a function of vertical displacement (Δz) for the three contact models (black dashed curve, no contact; blue, frictionless contact; and red, rough contact). The gray region in B–D represents displacements before helix–helix contact.
Published: 06 February 2019
Figure 5. Force and twisting moment exerted on the TRP domain. (A) Cytoplasmic view of the channel domain with TRP domain highlighted blue. The radial/parallel direction r||, angular/tangential direction r, and direction of positive torque mz More about this image found in Force and twisting moment exerted on the TRP domain. (A) Cytoplasmic view ...

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal