Attractant was added to a suspension of bacteria (the background concentration of attractant) and then these bacteria were exposed to a yet higher concentration of attractant in a capillary. Chemotaxis was measured by determining how many bacteria accumulated in the capillary. The response range for chemotaxis lies between the threshold concentration and the saturating concentration. The breadth of this range is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. Attractants detected by the same chemoreceptor can have their response ranges in widely different places. Over the center of the response range (on a logarithmic scale), bacteria give similar sized responses to similar fractional increases of concentration, i.e. they respond to ratios of attractant concentration, but the response peaks at the center of the range. The size of the response is different for attractants detected by different chemoreceptors. For a detectable response, a smaller increase in attractant concentration is needed for attractants detected by some chemoreceptors than for attractants detected by others. Although the data are inadequate, it appears that the Weber law may be observed over a wide range of concentrations for some attractants but not for others. In the Appendix we aim to explain some of these results in terms of the interaction of an attractant with its chemoreceptor according to the law of mass action.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 August 1973
Article|
August 01 1973
The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range : Weber law and related phenomena
Robert Mesibov,
Robert Mesibov
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Search for other works by this author on:
George W. Ordal,
George W. Ordal
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Search for other works by this author on:
Julius Adler
Julius Adler
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Search for other works by this author on:
Robert Mesibov
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
George W. Ordal
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Julius Adler
From the Departments of Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Received:
November 28 1972
Online ISSN: 1540-7748
Print ISSN: 0022-1295
Copyright © 1973 by The Rockefeller University Press
1973
J Gen Physiol (1973) 62 (2): 203–223.
Article history
Received:
November 28 1972
Citation
Robert Mesibov, George W. Ordal, Julius Adler; The Range of Attractant Concentrations for Bacterial Chemotaxis and the Threshold and Size of Response over This Range : Weber law and related phenomena . J Gen Physiol 1 August 1973; 62 (2): 203–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.62.2.203
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Weber and noise adaptation in the retina of the toad Bufo marinus.
J Gen Physiol (April,1990)
THE VISUAL DISCRIMINATION OF INTENSITY AND THE WEBER-FECHNER LAW
J Gen Physiol (November,1924)
Fresh-water Fish Chemoreceptors Responsive to Dilute Solutions of Electrolytes
J Gen Physiol (July,1966)
Email alerts
Advertisement