JGP study (De Giorgis et al. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.202413739) reveals that the auxiliary Cavβ3 subunit regulates the cardiac calcium channel Cav1.2 by modulating the two-step activation of VSD II.

Voltage-gated calcium channels (Cavs) control a variety of physiological processes, from muscle contraction to neurotransmitter release. The pore-forming α1 subunits of Cavs have four voltage-sensing domains (VSDs), each of which contains a positively charged transmembrane segment (S4) that moves in response to membrane depolarization, triggering pore opening and calcium influx. Channel opening is also regulated by α2δ and β subunits on the outer and inner surfaces of the plasma membrane, respectively, but how β subunits, in particular, affect VSD movements is unknown. In this issue of JGP, De Giorgis et al. reveal that the β3 subunit promotes the opening of cardiac Cav1.2 channels by stabilizing VSD II in an intermediate, partially active position (1).

(Left to right) Daniela De Giorgis, Guido Mellado, Jose Antonio Garate, and Alan Neely.

In 1993, Alan Neely and colleagues found that the β subunit shifts the voltage dependence of Cav1.2 opening so that they mediate Ca2+ influx at more negative membrane potentials (2). Surprisingly, though, the β subunit had no effect on CaV1.2 gating currents, which arise from the movement of positively charged residues in the channel’s VSDs. “The fact that the β subunit promotes channel opening without affecting voltage-sensor movement couldn’t be reconciled with the prevailing view that voltage-sensor movement was obligatory for channel opening,” says Neely, now a professor at the University of Valparaíso in Chile. “This remained an unsolved puzzle for over 30 years!”

VCF reveals that Cav1.2’s VSD II displays a biphasic voltage-dependent fluorescence whose intermediate, negative phase is enhanced in the presence of the auxiliary Cavβ3 subunit. This suggests that Cavβ3 promotes Cav1.2 opening by modulating the two-step activation of VSD II.

One possible explanation lies in the fact that Cav gating currents represent the sum of all four VSD movements and are influenced not only by the number of charged residues moved across the membrane but also by the speed at which they move. Voltage-clamp fluorometry (VCF), however, can trace even the slowest movements of individual VSDs: voltage-dependent changes in the fluorescence of fluorophores attached to the S4 segment reflect changes in the fluorophore’s local environment as the VSD moves in response to membrane depolarization.

Using this technique, researchers have found that VSD II and VSD III are the main drivers of Cav1.2 opening (3) and that the auxiliary subunit α2δ promotes this process by enhancing the coupling between these two VSDs and the pore domain (4). Now, Neely, along with first author Daniela De Giorgis, Guido Mellado, and co-corresponding author Jose Antonio Garate, used VCF to investigate how the β subunit regulates Cav1.2 opening and VSD movement (1).

As expected—given their limited involvement in Cav1.2 opening—the movements of VSD I and VSD IV were unaffected by the presence or absence of Cavβ3. More surprisingly, the β subunit also had little effect on the behavior of VSD III.

To analyze the movements of VSD II by VCF, De Giorgis et al. attached a fluorophore to its S4 segment and introduced a tryptophan to a nearby region of the Cav1.2 pore domain that could potentially quench the fluorescent signal as the VSD II undergoes voltage-induced movements. Notably, in the absence of Cavβ3, the researchers observed a biphasic change in voltage-dependent fluorescence: the fluorescent signal decreased upon mild depolarization but increased at more positive membrane potentials. This suggests that VSD II activates via a two-step process, passing from an inactive to an active conformation via a third, intermediate configuration in which the fluorescent signal is maximally quenched.

The biphasic behavior of VSD II was maintained in the presence of Cavβ3, but the intermediate phase was enhanced: the fluorescent signal became quenched at more negative membrane potentials than it did in the absence of Cavβ3, and greater depolarizations were required to unquench the signal.

To gain structural insights into their VCF data and the intermediate state of VSD II, De Giorgis et al. performed molecular dynamics simulations based on two recent cryo-EM structures of Cav1.2 (5, 6). In simulations of Cav1.2 in its resting state (5), the fluorophore attached to VSD II did not come close to the quenching tryptophan in the channel’s pore domain. In simulations of a Cav1.2 state thought to be partially active (6), the fluorophore was positioned close enough to the pore domain tryptophan for the fluorescent signal to be quenched.

De Giorgis et al. were able to recapitulate their data using an allosteric model of Cav1.2 activation adapted to include an intermediate, partially active conformation of VSD II that is optimally coupled to channel opening. Cavβ3 appears to promote Cav1.2 activation by stabilizing this intermediate conformation.

Neely and colleagues now want to validate their allosteric model of Cav1.2 activation. “We are currently developing experimental strategies to demonstrate that the coupling between VSDs and the pore is allosteric, meaning that the channel can open even when all VSDs are resting, as is the case in calcium-activated potassium channels,” Neely says.

1.
De Giorgis
,
G.
, et al
.
2026
.
J. Gen. Physiol.
2.
3.
Pantazis
,
A.
, et al
.
2014
.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
.
4.
Savalli
,
N.
, et al
.
2016
.
J. Gen. Physiol.
6.
Chen
,
Z.
, et al
.
2023
.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.
This article is distributed under the terms as described at https://rupress.org/pages/terms102024/.