Among all voltage-gated K+ channels from the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the weakly rectifying K+ channel (Kweak channel) AKT2 displays unique gating properties. AKT2 is exceptionally regulated by phosphorylation: when nonphosphorylated AKT2 behaves as an inward-rectifying potassium channel; phosphorylation of AKT2 abolishes inward rectification by shifting its activation threshold far positive (>200 mV) so that it closes only at voltages positive of +100 mV. In its phosphorylated form, AKT2 is thus locked in the open state in the entire physiological voltage range. To understand the molecular grounds of this unique gating behavior, we generated chimeras between AKT2 and the conventional inward-rectifying channel KAT1. The transfer of the pore from KAT1 to AKT2 altered the permeation properties of the channel. However, the gating properties were unaffected, suggesting that the pore region of AKT2 is not responsible for the unique Kweak gating. Instead, a lysine residue in S4, highly conserved among all Kweak channels but absent from other plant K+ channels, was pinpointed in a site-directed mutagenesis approach. Substitution of the lysine by serine or aspartate abolished the “open-lock” characteristic and converted AKT2 into an inward-rectifying channel. Interestingly, phosphoregulation of the mutant AKT2-K197S appeared to be similar to that of the Kin channel KAT1: as suggested by mimicking the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated states, phosphorylation induced a shift of the activation threshold of AKT2-K197S by about +50 mV. We conclude that the lysine residue K197 sensitizes AKT2 to phosphoregulation. The phosphorylation-induced reduction of the activation energy in AKT2 is ∼6 kT larger than in the K197S mutant. It is discussed that this hypersensitive response of AKT2 to phosphorylation equips a cell with the versatility to establish a potassium gradient and to make efficient use of it.
Potassium is the predominant, inorganic ion of plant cells where it plays a major role as an osmoticum contributing to cellular hydrostatic (turgor) pressure, growth, and responses to the environment. The transport of potassium is accomplished by a variety of transport proteins (Véry and Sentenac, 2003; Amtmann et al., 2004). An important role is played by voltage-gated potassium channels of the so-called Shaker family (Pilot et al., 2003). Shaker-like plant potassium channels belong to the superfamily of voltage-gated K+ channels (Yellen, 2002). A functional K+ channel is a tetramer built up of four α subunits as indicated by coexpression studies (MacKinnon, 1991; Dreyer et al., 1997) and directly evidenced by the X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent Shaker K+ channel (Long et al., 2005a). A single α-subunit shows a topology of six transmembrane domains (identified as S1–S6) flanked by cytosolic NH2 and COOH termini, and a P (pore) loop and helix between S5 and S6 that contribute to the channel pore and ion selectivity filter. The voltage-sensing property of voltage-gated potassium channels is associated with the first four transmembrane domains and mainly with the S4 helix (Bezanilla, 2000; Männikkö et al., 2002; Latorre et al., 2003).
The family of plant voltage-gated potassium channels segregates into at least three functionally different subfamilies (Pilot et al., 2003): (1) hyperpolarization-activated, inward-rectifying Kin channels mediate potassium uptake, (2) depolarization-activated, outward-rectifying Kout channels mediate potassium release, and (3) weak-rectifying Kweak channels can mediate both potassium uptake and release. A model system for investigations of the properties of Kweak channels is the Arabidopsis Kweak channel AKT2 (Cao et al., 1995b; Ketchum and Slayman, 1996; Marten et al., 1999; Lacombe et al., 2000; Dreyer et al., 2001; Hoth et al., 2001; Chérel et al., 2002; Geiger et al., 2002; Michard et al., 2005). In literature this channel is also called AKT3 and AKT2/3. AKT3 refers to a truncated AKT2 protein lacking the first 15 amino acids. In order to be consistent with the gene nomenclature (Cao et al., 1995b) we used in all cases the name AKT2 throughout this manuscript. AKT2 is predominantly expressed in the phloem and in guard cells and was proposed to fulfill different functions in these tissues. Among them is the control of the electrical membrane potential. Thereby, AKT2 may regulate sugar transport in the phloem and may play a role in electric cell signaling and membrane excitability. AKT2 was also proposed to be involved in the plant response to drought by adjusting potassium/sugar homeostasis (Marten et al., 1999; Lacombe et al., 2000; Deeken et al., 2002).
However, the results from recent biophysical approaches brought new aspects into the interpretation of the physiological function of AKT2-like channels and fueled the speculations on their diverse roles in the plant (Michard et al., 2005). Detailed electrophysiological analyses revealed an unexpected bimodal gating behavior of AKT2. It was particularly demonstrated that this channel, depending on its phosphorylation state, displays either the properties of a Kin channel or acts as a “potassium selective leak.” Indeed, it was shown that the unique gating behavior of Kweak channels originates from the superimposition of two distinct gating modes (Dreyer et al., 2001): so-called gating mode#1 AKT2 channels activate at voltages more negative than −50 mV, whereas gating mode#2 channels are open in the entire physiological voltage interval (−250 mV to +50 mV). Interestingly, mode#2 channels are also voltage gated and close at nonphysiological voltages more positive than +100 mV, suggesting that the mechanistic difference between mode#1 and mode#2 channels is mainly a shifted activation threshold.
Further studies indicated that the setting of the gating mode is correlated with the phosphorylation status of the channel protein. One single channel can be converted from one mode into the other by phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events (Dreyer et al., 2001; Chérel et al., 2002; Michard et al., 2005). Two putative phosphorylation sites highly conserved among the Kweak subfamily and located in the S4–S5 linker and in the S6–COOH terminus linker of AKT2-like polypeptides (e.g., AKT2-S210 and AKT2-S329) were identified. When both serines in AKT2 were mutated to alanines, the mutant channel was inward rectifying and thus mimicked gating mode#1 channels, and when both serines were mutated to asparagines the mutant channel exhibited instantaneous currents only and thus mimicked gating mode#2 channels (Michard et al., 2005).
Phosphorylation appears to be a widely used process to regulate the activity of plant ion channels (Dreyer et al., 2004). For instance, biochemical approaches evidenced the phosphorylation of the Kin channel KAT1 in planta (Li et al., 1998; Mori et al., 2000). However, at the functional level the modulation of KAT1 activity (Berkowitz et al., 2000) and gating (Tang and Hoshi, 1999) by phosphorylation was far less pronounced (activation threshold shifted by around +50 mV) compared with the effects observed on AKT2 (activation threshold shifted by >+200 mV). Thus, although the concept of phosphoregulation allows to explain all our experimental observations on AKT2, so far it raises the following question. Which molecular peculiarities render the gating of Kweak channels highly sensitive to phosphorylation when compared with Kin channels?
In the present study we created chimeras between the Kweak channel AKT2 and the Kin channel KAT1. The results indicated that the regions upstream of the pore (from the NH2 terminus to S4) contain sites crucial for weak rectification. We identified a Kweak-specific lysine residue in the voltage-sensing S4 helix that is essential for the weak rectification properties of AKT2. We conclude that the presence of this lysine residue strongly sensitizes AKT2 to phosphoregulation.
Materials And Methods
Standard molecular genetic methods were employed. Site-specific mutations were generated with the pAlter mutagenesis system (for details see online supplemental material, available at http://www.jgp.org/cgi/content/full/jgp.200509413/DC1). Mutants were verified by sequencing. For expression, the coding regions of the various channels were cloned into the mammalian expression vector pCI (Promega).
Expression and Electrophysiology
Culture and transfection of COS-7 cells as well as whole-cell and single channel recordings from COS cells were performed as described previously (Dreyer et al., 2001). The bath solution as well as the pipette solution in the cell-attached configuration contained (in mM) 150 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1.5 MgCl2, 10 HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.4). The whole-cell pipette solution contained (in mM) 150 KCl, 1.5 MgCl2, 3 EGTA, 10 HEPES/NaOH (pH 7.2), 2.5 MgATP. This ATP concentration had been shown to avoid channel activity rundown (Michard et al., 2005). Expression in Xenopus oocytes was performed as previously described (Dreyer et al., 2001). Measurements were repeated routinely at the end of each treatment with the addition of 10 mM Cs+ to distinguish AKT2 currents and any background, nonselective leak, and to set a baseline of relative conductance. When 10 mM extracellular Cs+ was applied, almost 100% of AKT2-mediated currents were blocked at voltages more negative than −150 mV (Lacombe et al., 2000).
Data were analyzed according to common protocols (Sakmann and Neher, 1995; Blatt, 2004). Relative conductance (rel.G[V]) was obtained from tail current (I0[V]) analyses with double-pulse voltage-clamp protocols in whole-cell recordings (Dreyer et al., 2001): after activating pulses in the −180 to +140 mV range, tail currents were recorded at voltage VT (e.g., −40 mV). These tail currents displayed exponential deactivation kinetics. The instantaneous tail current (I0) was obtained by extrapolating the kinetics to the time of the voltage jump to VT and subsequently plotted against the voltage V applied during the preceding activating pulse. I0(V) is proportional to the conductance (rel.G[V]) at the end of the activating pulse. For channels displaying two distinct gating modes (e.g., AKT2), a sum of two scaled Boltzmann functions was fitted to the resulting curves such that
where F, R, and T have their usual meaning, δ1 and δ2 denote the apparent gating charges, and V1/2,1 and V1/2,2 the half-activation voltages of the two modes. Because the I0(V) data in the experimentally accessible voltage interval from −180 to +140 mV were not sufficient to robustly fit all six free parameters independently, usually constraints were imposed on the parameters (details are outlined in the figure legends). Fittings were performed using a Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm (Marquardt, 1963) and the resulting values used to calculate relative conductance (rel.G) separately for the different gating modes:
For AKT2 mutants displaying apparently only one gating mode Eq. 1 was applied with Imax.mode#2 = δ2 = V1/2,2 = 0. All results are reported as mean ± 1 SD where appropriate. To describe gating with a two state model and to quantify the energy difference between open and closed state, ΔGOC, a Boltzmann function was fitted to the mean rel.G(V) values:
resulting in ΔGOC = δ × F/(RT) × (V − V1/2) × kT values, which could be compared.
Single channel currents were low-pass filtered at 2.5 kHz and sampled at 10 kHz. Traces showing a stable baseline were used to generate histograms with bin width of 0.02 pA. Histograms were fitted with sums of Gauss functions:
Each Gauss function is characterized by a mean value ik, a variance σk, and an amplitude Ak. k = 0 represents the channel in the closed conformation, k = 1 one open channel, k = 2 two open channels, etc. Single channel amplitudes were deduced from the differences between the means: ISC = i1 – i0. The channel open probability was calculated from the relations between the surfaces under the different Gauss curves. If a patch contained only one active channel (N = 1) popen was calculated as popen = A1/(A1 + A0). One patch out of seven contained three channels. In this case the binomial distribution was applied, i.e., popen was deduced from fitting to the following set of four equations:
Online Supplemental Material
The online supplemental material (available at http://www.jgp.org/cgi/content/full/jgp.200509413/DC1) provides details on the cloning strategies and the primers used to generate mutants and chimeras.
The Region Upstream the S5 Segment Contains Elements Essential for Weak Rectification
Previous studies suggested that nonphosphorylated plant Kweak channels share functional similarities with Kin channels. After phosphorylation, however, their functional characteristics fundamentally diverge. Nonphosphorylated (mode#1) Kweak channels mediate time- and voltage-dependent inward potassium currents, whereas phosphorylated (mode#2) Kweak channels mediate instantaneous, leak-like potassium currents. Usually, in standard electrophysiological experiments, these two components superimpose and generate the impression of a weak rectification of the currents.
To understand the apparent differences in phosphoregulation between the Kin channel KAT1 and the Kweak channel AKT2, we constructed recombinant chimeric channels between both. We swapped (a) the region between S4 and the COOH terminus comprising the P domain, (b) the COOH termini, and (c) the entire regions downstream the S4 segment (Figs. 1–4)
. The electrophysiological phenotypes of the chimeras were analyzed after expression in COS cells and Xenopus oocytes (Figs. 2–4). When the fragment between S4 and the COOH terminus of AKT2 was replaced by the corresponding region of KAT1, the chimera exhibited a voltage-dependent gating identical to the AKT2 wild-type characterized by the two K+ current components: an instantaneous “leak-like” component and a hyperpolarization-activated time-dependent component (Fig. 2 A). The two current components of both channels were blocked by extracellular Cs+ ions (Fig. 2 B). A more refined pharmacological fingerprint, however, unmasked the chimera. In contrast to wild-type AKT2, the chimera was neither blocked by protons (Fig. 2 C) nor sensitive to a reduction in the external K+ concentration (Fig. 2 D). Additionally, the chimera was less Ca2+ sensitive when compared with AKT2 (Fig. 2 E). Consequently, with respect to its susceptibility toward H+, K+, and Ca2+, the chimera had the features of the KAT1 pore (Hedrich et al., 1995; Véry et al., 1995; Becker et al., 1996; Hoth et al., 1997; Dreyer et al., 1998) rather than the features of the AKT2 pore (Fig. 2, left; Hoth et al., 2001; Geiger et al., 2002). Thus, the replacement of the pore altered the properties of the permeation pathway. However, this exchange left the gating properties unaffected.
When the entire region downstream the S4 segment of AKT2 was replaced by that of KAT1, the resulting chimera mediated only instantaneously activating currents. A time-dependent component was not observable (Fig. 3 A). Similar results were obtained when only the COOH terminus was exchanged (Fig. 3 B), indicating that the COOH terminus of KAT1 is influencing the gating process differently compared with the AKT2 COOH terminus.
The inverse chimeras comprising the NH2 terminus and the first four membrane-spanning segments (i.e., S1–S4) of KAT1 mediated either inward-rectifying currents or were electrically silent (Fig. 4). Interestingly, the exchange of the COOH termini did not alter the gating properties. The features of the chimera KAT1-CtAKT2 (Fig. 4 D) were not fundamentally different from that of the KAT1 wild type (Fig. 4 A).
Taken together, the results indicated that the putatively voltage-sensing module of AKT2, i.e., the NH2 terminus and the first four membrane-spanning segments, confers the weak rectification property on the chimeric channels (for comparison see Cao et al., 1995a). In the following we investigated further the role of the putative primary voltage sensor, the S4 segment, in AKT2 channel gating.
The S4 Segment Is Involved in AKT2 Gating
Voltage-dependent gating of diverse animal and plant voltage-gated channels has been shown to depend on the S4 segment carrying a high density of positive charges (Dreyer et al., 1999, 2004; Männikkö et al., 2002; Bezanilla and Perozo, 2003; Latorre et al., 2003; Swartz, 2004). Therefore, this region was proposed to be also involved in the gating of plant Kweak channels (Michard et al., 2005). To elucidate the role of the S4 segment (ranging from AKT2-L285 to AKT2-D206; Fig. 5)
in AKT2 gating, we introduced an additional charge at position G186 by generating the mutation AKT2-G186R. The mutation did not alter the bimodal gating feature of the AKT2 channel (Fig. 6
, A–C). Like the AKT2 wild type, the mutant AKT2-G186R mediated both an instantaneous current component and a hyperpolarization-activated time-dependent current component (Fig. 6, A and B). However, the gating properties of the mutant channel were affected (Fig. 6 D): an analysis of the deactivation currents (“tail current” analysis as described in MATERIALS AND METHODS and in Dreyer et al., 2001) revealed a strong shift of the voltage dependence of channels of both gating modes. For the gating mode#1 (nonphosphorylated state; AKT2 wild-type channels function as inward rectifiers) the shift could be quantified to be ∼+85 mV (Fig. 6 D). Interestingly, the generation of an additional positive charge in the S4 segment of the Kweak channel AKT2 had a similar effect as previously shown for the Kin channel KAT1. In KAT1 the equivalent mutation, KAT1-S168R, changed the properties of voltage sensing by inducing a shift of the channel activation threshold by about +100 mV (Dreyer et al., 1997). The S4 segment may therefore be involved in the gating of AKT2 mode#1 channels as it has been shown for hyperpolarization-activated channels from plants (Latorre et al., 2003) and animals (Männikkö et al., 2002). In addition, the results indicated that the S4 segment was also involved in the unusual gating of AKT2 mode#2 (phosphorylated state) channels. Like in gating mode#1, also in gating mode#2 the mutant AKT2-G186R activated at more positive voltages than the wild type. The data were well described if we assumed that the mutation induced an identical shift in both gating modes (Fig. 6 D, gray lines).
A Lysine Residue in S4 Is Essential for the Instantaneous Current Component of AKT2
We identified nine channels closely related to AKT2 in publicly available databases, showing 60–75% identity with AKT2 and constituting a distinct channel subfamily (Kweak channels) (Pilot et al., 2003). These channels exhibit the conserved putative phosphorylation sites in the S4–S5 linker and downstream of the S6 segment, which were shown to be involved in setting the gating mode of AKT2 (Michard et al., 2005). The S4 segments of channels from the AKT2 subfamily were compared with those of Kin and Kout channels (Fig. 5). Among the different channel subfamilies, six positively charged residues (R or K) are highly conserved (Fig. 5, “+”). Positive residues in S4 are assumed to be essential for the task of voltage sensing (Bezanilla and Perozo, 2003; Swartz, 2004). In addition to these conserved charged residues, the S4 segment of AKT2 comprises two further positive charges: a lysine residue at AKT2-K197 (Fig. 5, arrow) and a histidine residue at AKT2-H198. Notably, the lysine residue is conserved in all members of the Kweak subfamily. Kin and Kout channels possess noncharged residues at the equivalent positions. The sequence comparison further revealed that the S4 segments of Kweak, Kin, and Kout channels show at the targeted positions the largest diversity.
Both, K197 and H198 were mutated to serines (Fig. 7)
, residues found at the equivalent positions in KAT1, the Kin model channel. The mutation H198S did not markedly affect AKT2 gating (Fig. 7 B). In contrast, the single mutant AKT2-K197S as well as the double mutant AKT2-K197S-H198S resembled plant Kin channels, i.e., they were purely inward rectifying (Fig. 7, A and C). Both mutants completely lacked the instantaneous current component and only exhibited time- and voltage-dependent currents upon voltage stimulation more negative than −80 mV. A similar result was obtained when the lysine at position AKT2-K197 was replaced by aspartate, a negatively charged amino acid. Like AKT2-K197S, the mutant AKT2-K197D was also inward rectifying (Fig. 7, D–F). For AKT2-K197D K+ currents were observed only at voltages more negative than −120 mV, indicating that this mutant channel activated more negative than AKT2-K197S. Thus, the lysine residue in the S4 segment of AKT2 is essential for the presence of the instantaneous K+ current component. Moreover, the charge born by the residue at position 197 appeared to be important in determining channel properties. Its neutralization (via the K197 to S mutation) abolished instantaneous currents, and its replacement by a negative charge (via the K197 to D mutation) had an even stronger effect, by additionally shifting the activation threshold to more negative voltages.
The similarity between AKT2-K197S and Kin channels was further evidenced at the single channel level. When we employed the patch-clamp technique on AKT2-K197S expressing COS cells in the inside-out configuration, AKT2-K197S activity was lost in the time range of seconds (even with 2.5 mM MgATP in the bath solution; unpublished data). We therefore performed AKT2-K197S single channel recordings in the cell-attached configuration (Fig. 8)
. When a membrane patch containing a single ion channel was challenged with different membrane voltages, channel openings were only observed at membrane voltages more negative than −80 mV. Frequency of channel openings and lifetime of the open state increased upon further membrane hyperpolarization (Fig. 8 A). When the membrane voltage was stepped from −40 to −180 mV, channel activity was observed after a significant delay (Fig. 8 B, white arrow). After stepping back to −40 mV, the activated open channel remained open for a short time before it closed permanently (Fig. 8 B, gray arrow). The single channel conductance of the observed channel was ∼21 pS (Fig. 8 C), similar to that reported for the AKT2 wild type (25–30 pS) (Marten et al., 1999; Lacombe et al., 2000). Thus, the mutation K197S did not significantly alter the single channel conductance. Further evidence that the mutant AKT2-K197S underlies the investigated single channel activity was provided by analyzing the single channel open probability (Fig. 8 D). The single channel popen values superimposed satisfyingly with the relative conductance values obtained for AKT2-K197S in whole-cell measurements (Fig. 8 D, solid line; Fig. 7 F). Thus, the gating features of the mutant AKT2-K197S resembled those of plant Shaker-like Kin channels (Hoshi, 1995; Mueller-Roeber et al., 1995; Zei and Aldrich, 1998).
The Response of AKT2-K197S to Phosphorylation Is Far Weaker than in the Wild Type
When expressed in COS cells or in Xenopus oocytes, the switch between the two gating modes of the AKT2 wild type is promoted by cell-intrinsic PKA-specific phosphorylation (Michard et al., 2005). The application of the PKA inhibitor H89 on AKT2-expressing oocytes induced an increase in time-dependent mode#1 currents and a decrease in instantaneous mode#2 currents. The PKA activator Br-cAMP on the contrary increased mode#2 currents and decreased mode#1 currents. To investigate the role of phosphoregulation on the mutant AKT2-K197S we applied PKA inhibitors and activators to AKT2-K197S expressing Xenopus oocytes (Br-cAMP and H89) and COS cells (Br-cAMP), in parallel with experiments performed on the AKT2 wild type (Michard et al., 2005). However, whereas the effectors influenced the features of the wild type, the gating properties of AKT2-K197S were not significantly altered (unpublished data). Therefore we chose another approach to estimate the response of the K197S mutant to phosphorylation. As shown previously, the two double mutants AKT2-S210A-S329A (Fig. 9
B) and AKT2-S210N-S329N (Fig. 9 C) mimicked the dephosphorylated (mode#1) and the phosphorylated (mode#2) state of the AKT2 wild type, respectively (Fig. 9 G) (Michard et al., 2005). The AKT2-S210A-S329A mutant displayed inward-rectifying time-dependent currents, only, whereas the AKT2-S210N-S329N showed only instantaneous currents. Consequently, these double mutants were generated in the AKT2-K197S background (Fig. 9 D). Both triple mutants, AKT2-K197S-S210A-S329A (Fig. 9 E) and AKT2-K197S-S210N-S329N (Fig. 9 F), conducted inward-rectifying potassium currents when expressed in COS cells. Nevertheless, the two mutants differed in their activation threshold. Whereas AKT2-K197S-S210N-S329N was active at voltages more negative than −70 mV, AKT2-K197S-S210A-S329A activity was only observed at voltages more negative than −120 mV (Fig. 9 H).
The analysis of the gating properties of the triple mutants suggested that the AKT2-K197S mutant is still modulated by phosphorylation of the residues S210 and S329, but also that the phosphorylation of these two sites, instead of inducing a >200 mV shift of the activation potential (as observed for the AKT2 wild-type channel) only induced an ∼50 mV shift in the AKT2-K197S mutant channel.
Quantification of the Role of K197 in Phosphoregulation of AKT2
To quantify the gating parameters of gating modes#1 and #2 of the AKT2 wild type and the channel AKT2-K197S, the gating of each of the four mutants S210A-S329A, S210N-S329N, K197S-S210A-S329A, and K197S-S210N-S329N was approximated by a two-state model in which a channel can either be open, O, or closed, C (Fig. 10
A). In this model, the relative conductance of each channel can be described by a Boltzmann function (Eq. 4, rel.G = (1 + exp[ΔGOC/kT])−1; Fig. 9 G and H, circles and triangles, gray lines). The relative conductance of the AKT2 wild type and the mutant K197S were well described by weighted sums of the Boltzmann functions obtained for the matching double A and double N mutants (Fig. 9, G and H, diamonds, black lines).
From the obtained parameters we could estimate in as much phosphorylation influenced the activation energies of the channels AKT2 and AKT2-K197S, assuming that the double A and double N mutants represent the dephosphorylated (mode#1) and phosphorylated state (mode#2) (Fig. 10 B). It turned out that for the AKT2 wild type, phosphorylation (inducing a transition from gating mode#1 to mode#2) reduced the energy needed to activate the channel by about Δ(ΔG) ≈ 9 kT. As a consequence, the channel did not close and was locked in an open state in the entire physiological voltage range when phosphorylated. In contrast, the phosphorylation of the mutant AKT2-K197S resulted in a reduction of the activation energy of only Δ(ΔG) ≈ 2.3 kT; ∼6 kT smaller than in the wild type. As a consequence, changes of the phosphorylation status of the mutant do not dramatically affect channel gating, and the mutant AKT2-K197S appears to be similar to plant Kin channels, like e.g., KAT1. Similar to AKT2-K197S, the effects of phosphorylation on KAT1 channel gating are hardly observable (Tang and Hoshi, 1999). Thus, the presence of the lysine residue K197 in the putative voltage sensor of AKT2 sensitizes the Kweak channel to phosphoregulation.
The weak rectification of the channel AKT2 is unique among all Shaker-like K+ channels of the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. The ability to mediate both potassium uptake and release is the major characteristic of members of the Kweak channel subfamily and suggests that AKT2-like channels have enough functional flexibility to perform different tasks in the plant (Marten et al., 1999; Lacombe et al., 2000; Ache et al., 2001; Deeken et al., 2002). Besides these physiological aspects, the unique gating behavior of AKT2-like channels is also interesting from the biophysical/mechanistic point of view. Previous studies suggested that, despite their unique characteristics, Kweak channels share some functional similarities with Kin channels (e.g., their activation upon hyperpolarization). In this study we generated mutants of the Kweak channel AKT2 and created chimeras between AKT2 and the Kin channel KAT1 in order to get molecular insights into the mechanistic similarities and differences between Kweak and Kin channels.
Rectification Properties of Kweak Channels Do Not Depend on the Pore Region
The results presented here demonstrate that the weak rectification of AKT2 is not correlated with the structure of the pore, contrasting apparently a previous report by Hoth et al. (2001). Hoth and coworkers exchanged the pore region of the Kweak channel AKT3 (=AKT2-M1_D15del; nomenclature according to den Dunnen and Antonarakis, 2001) with that of the plant Kin channel KST1 (a channel homologous to KAT1 and 75% identical to KAT1 in the exchanged region). The resulting chimera was characterized as an inward-rectifying channel. The inverse chimera (i.e., KST1 bearing the pore region of AKT2) was characterized as a weak-rectifying channel. From their results, Hoth et al. concluded that essential elements for the rectification are located within the channel pore (Hoth et al., 2001). The results of our study here do not support this conclusion: on the one hand, when the pore of AKT2 was exchanged with that of the Kin channel KAT1, the chimera was still weakly rectifying. On the other hand, the three purely inward-rectifying AKT2 mutants K197S, K197D, and S210A-S329A comprised the AKT2 pore.
Instead, the data here and a series of previous studies (Dreyer et al., 2001; Chérel et al., 2002; Michard et al., 2005) provide growing evidence for an alternative concept: (a) the weak rectification of AKT2 originates from the superimposition of channels gating in two distinct gating modes; (b) in both gating modes AKT2 channels are activated by hyperpolarization; (c) the main difference between channels of the two gating modes are their strongly distinct activation thresholds, so-called mode#2 channels activate >+200 mV more positive than so-called mode#1 channels; (d) the setting of the gating mode depends on the phosphorylation status of the channel; (e) the voltage sensor influences the response to phosphorylation.
Phosphorylation Feeds Back on Channel Gating
In AKT2 two putative phosphorylation sites (highly conserved among Kweak channels) have been pinpointed that are involved in setting the gating modes (Michard et al., 2005). One is located in the S4–S5 linker (AKT2-S210) and the other in the S6–COOH terminus linker (AKT2-S329). Interestingly, previous studies on animal depolarization-activated voltage-gated potassium channels and on hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide–gated pacemaker channels (HCN) identified these regions to be essential for coupling the voltage sensor to the intracellular activation gate (Chen et al., 2001; Lu et al., 2002). For both potassium channel classes (voltage-gated outward and inward rectifiers) it was shown that the S4–S5 linker and the S6–COOH terminus linker interact and modulate channel gating (Tristani-Firouzi et al., 2002; Decher et al., 2004). These reports suggest a conserved role of the S4–S5 and the S6–COOH terminus linkers in channel gating within the large superfamily of voltage-gated potassium channels. In this context the effect of phosphorylation of the two serine residues in AKT2 (S210 and S329) could be understood in terms of structural rearrangements within the S4–S5 and the S6–COOH terminus linkers, which in turn feed back on channel gating by affecting the activation threshold.
A Lysine Residue in S4 Amplifies the Feedback Process
Phosphorylation of the two serine residues in the S4–S5 linker and in the S6–COOH terminus linker of AKT2 shifts the activation threshold of the channel by >+200 mV positive along the voltage axis. Intriguingly, in this study we uncovered that a highly conserved lysine residue in the S4 segment of AKT2 plays an important role in this feedback process. If K197 was replaced by, e.g., a serine, the response to phosphorylation was so small that it could not be resolved by modulating the activity of endogenous kinases and phosphatases in COS cells and Xenopus oocytes. Only the mutation of the phosphorylation sites S210 and S329 suggested that AKT2-K197S was still modulated by phosphorylation, however, far weaker than the wild type. It can be concluded that the presence of the lysine residue sensitizes AKT2 to the structural rearrangements in the S4–S5 and S6–COOH terminus linkers induced by phosphorylation (or mimicked by mutations).
Reciprocal Effects of the Coupling between the Voltage Sensor and the Phosphorylated Regions
A previous study on AKT2 revealed that phosphorylation is voltage dependent (Michard et al., 2005), suggesting that the neighbored voltage sensor and the S4–S5 and S6–COOH terminus linkers (Lai et al., 2005) reciprocally affect each other. Recent structural analyses of a depolarization-activated potassium channel have revealed that the movement of the voltage sensor induces structural rearrangements in the S4–S5 and S6–COOH terminus linkers (Long et al., 2005b). We propose a similar mechanism also for AKT2. When AKT2 is in the closed state, the phosphorylation sites in the S4–S5 and S6–COOH terminus linkers (S210 and S329) are very likely shielded by other parts of the channel protein and therefore inaccessible to kinases. The movement of the voltage sensor upon hyperpolarization may induce structural rearrangements in the S4–S5 and S6–COOH terminus linkers, which then may lay the residues S210 and S329 bare to cytosolic kinases. Phosphorylation of these serines in turn may change further the structure of the two linkers and expose sites (either the phosphate groups themselves or other charged/polarized residues of the channel polypeptide), which then interact with the voltage sensor and lock the channel in the open state. The results presented in this study indicate that this interaction, i.e., the response to phosphorylation events, was strongly reduced in the AKT2-K197S mutant but not in the G186R mutant and therefore point to the importance of the lysine residue.
The Structure of the Entire Voltage-sensing Module Is Important for Kweak Properties
The lysine residue in S4 plays an essential role in determining the sensitivity of AKT2 toward phosphorylation events. However, the generation of a lysine residue in the S4 segment of the Kin channel KAT1 at the position equivalent to AKT2-K197 did not induce any significant change in channel gating (Fig. 11)
. At first glance this result is not surprising since neither the KAT1 wild type nor the KAT1-S179K mutant comprises any phosphorylation site in the S4–S5 or the S6–COOH terminus linker. At closer inspection, however, the comparison between the mutant KAT1-S179K and the chimera displayed in Fig. 3 A indicated that an additional lysine residue in an S4 segment of a Kin channel alone is not sufficient to generate a hypersensitive response to changes in the S4–S5 and S6–COOH terminus linkers. The hypersensitive response of the Kweak channel AKT2 to phosphorylation therefore depends on the overall structure of the entire voltage-sensing module (segments S1–S4).
Physiological Implications of the Hypersensitive Response to Phosphorylation
Depending on its phosphorylation status an AKT2 channel gates in two distinct gating modes. Actually, current signatures of both AKT2 gating modes have been described in the plant (Bauer et al., 2000; Ivashikina et al., 2005), indicating that the hypersensitive response of Kweak channels to phosphorylation is a physiologically relevant mechanism. The bimodal gating behavior renders AKT2-like channels intriguingly versatile. Especially the observation that Kweak channel α subunits confer the weak rectification property even to heteromeric K+ channels (Ache et al., 2001) indicates an important role of the hypersensitive response to phosphorylation at the cellular level. In gating mode#1 (nonphosphorylated) AKT2-like channels act as potassium uptake channels, allowing the cell (driven by plasma membrane H+-ATPases) to accumulate larger amounts of K+, e.g., during stomatal opening (Ivashikina et al., 2005). Phosphorylation switches Kweak channels from gating mode#1 to gating mode#2 and locks the channel open. This switch not only biases the membrane potential strongly to the equilibrium potential of K+ and thus stabilizes the membrane voltage (Deeken et al., 2002), it also activates a physiologically important “potassium battery.” In fact, “open leak” K+ channels allow the use of the transmembrane potassium gradient (in addition to the transmembrane proton gradient) to energetically charge other electrogenic transport processes. Thus, by regulating the phosphorylation status of AKT2-like K+ channel subunits the cell can control whether it charges the potassium battery or whether it makes use of it.
Together with a series of previous studies (Dreyer et al., 2001; Chérel et al., 2002; Michard et al., 2005) the data presented here allow us to reasonably explain the gating characteristics of Kweak channels. (a) Weakly rectifying plant K+ channels (Kweak channels) are in fact specialized inwardly rectifying channels (Kin channels) in the sense that they activate upon hyperpolarization rather than upon depolarization. (b) The specialization of Kweak channels is their hypersensitive response to certain phosphorylation events that shift the activation threshold of the channels by >+200 mV positive along the voltage axis. (c) A lysine residue that is highly conserved among Kweak channels is essential for this hypersensitive response. Elimination of this lysine residue yielded channel mutants that gated like conventional Kin channels (e.g., AKT2-K197S, AKT2-K197D). (d) The lysine residue must be embedded in a proper structure of the voltage-sensing module to make an impact.
The understanding of the gating features of AKT2 suggests that this channel is very likely part (or target) of intra- and intercellular signaling cascades. Consequently, the future challenge will be to comprehend the integration of AKT2-like channels in these (currently unknown) signaling cascades.
We are grateful to Dr. R. O'Mahony for comments on the manuscript.
This work was supported in part by an EU Marie Curie Fellowship to I. Dreyer (contract no. ERBBIO4CT985058), by a Fellowship of the International Quality Network Program Potsdam to E. Michard, and by the GABI-Génoplante joint programs (GABI FKZ 0312852, GENOPLANTE contract no. AF2001093).
David C. Gadsby served as editor.
E. Michard's present address is Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, R. Quinta Grande 6, PT-2780-156 Oeiras, Portugal.