Current-voltage curves for DIDS-insensitive Cl− conductance have been determined in human red blood cells from five donors. Currents were estimated from the rate of cell shrinkage using flow cytometry and differential laser light scattering. Membrane potentials were estimated from the extracellular pH of unbuffered suspensions using the proton ionophore FCCP. The width of the Gaussian distribution of cell volumes remained invariant during cell shrinkage, indicating a homogeneous Cl− conductance among the cells. After pretreatment for 30 min with DIDS, net effluxes of K+ and Cl− were induced by valinomycin and were measured in the continued presence of DIDS; inhibition was maximal at ∼65% above 1 μM DIDS at both 25°C and 37°C. The nonlinear current-voltage curves for DIDS-insensitive net Cl− effluxes, induced by valinomycin or gramicidin at varied [K+]o, were compared with predictions based on (1) the theory of electrodiffusion, (2) a single barrier model, (3) single occupancy, multiple barrier models, and (4) a voltage-gated mechanism. Electrodiffusion precisely describes the relationship between the measured transmembrane voltage and [K+]o. Under our experimental conditions (pH 7.5, 23°C, 1–3 μM valinomycin or 60 ng/ml gramicidin, 1.2% hematocrit), the constant field permeability ratio PK/PCl is 74 ± 9 with 10 μM DIDS, corresponding to 73% inhibition of PCl. Fitting the constant field current-voltage equation to the measured Cl− currents yields PCl = 0.13 h−1 with DIDS, compared to 0.49 h−1 without DIDS, in good agreement with most previous studies. The inward rectifying DIDS-insensitive Cl− current, however, is inconsistent with electrodiffusion and with certain single-occupancy multiple barrier models. The data are well described either by a single barrier located near the center of the transmembrane electric field, or, alternatively, by a voltage-gated channel mechanism according to which the maximal conductance is 0.055 ± 0.005 S/g Hb, half the channels are open at −27 ± 2 mV, and the equivalent gating charge is −1.2 ± 0.3.
Electrodiffusion, Barrier, and Gating Analysis of DIDS-insensitive Chloride Conductance in Human Red Blood Cells Treated with Valinomycin or Gramicidin
Address correspondence to J.C. Freedman, Department of Physiology, SUNY Health Science Center, 766 Irving Avenue, Syracuse, NY 13210. Fax: 315-464-7712; E-mail: [email protected]
Due to the inward Cl− concentration gradient, electrodiffusion actually predicts a very slight outward rectification of Cl− current, as would be apparent over an extended range of voltage.
In Läuger (1973), Eq. 58 contains a typographical error. The equation given for g/g0 at high salt has the wrong limiting behavior at V = 0 and does not produce the graph of g/g0 vs voltage shown in his Fig. 3,B; the modification in Eq. 9 above produces the plots in Läuger's Fig. 3 B.
Jeffrey C. Freedman, Terri S. Novak; Electrodiffusion, Barrier, and Gating Analysis of DIDS-insensitive Chloride Conductance in Human Red Blood Cells Treated with Valinomycin or Gramicidin . J Gen Physiol 1 February 1997; 109 (2): 201–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.109.2.201
Download citation file:
Sign in
Client Account
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
Email alerts
Advertisement