The magnitude of olfactory responses can be related to three primary variables [number of odorant molecules (N), sniff volume (V), and sniff duration (T)] and three derived variables [concentration (C = N/V), flow rate (F = V/T), and delivery rate (D = N/T)]. To evaluate the effects of these interdependent variables upon the olfactory response, the summated multiunit discharges were recorded from the olfactory nerves of nine frogs in response to octane presented at two levels (in 2:1 ratio) of each primary variable. This presentation defined eight "sniff" combinations representing three levels of each derived variable. In an ANOVA of the logs of the responses, the effect of each primary variable was highly significant, with no significant interactions. A multiplicative regression model incorporating the effects of the three primary variables represented responses exceedingly well, with positive effects of N and T and a negative effect of V. When, with this model, the effect of each of the derived variables was isolated from the effects of all other variables, the analysis showed a positive effect for C, a near-zero positive effect for D, and a negative effect for F. Placing certain constraints upon the model parameters generates 13 distinct one- and two-variable models (e.g., the [C, T] model requires N and V to have equal but opposite effects). In ranking these reduced models in terms of their ability to predict the neural response, the predictive ability of [F, N] and [C, T] was at least as good as that of the three-variable model.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 February 1984
Article|
February 01 1984
A parametric study of the stimulation variables affecting the magnitude of the olfactory nerve response.
M M Mozell
P R Sheehe
S W Swieck, Jr
D B Kurtz
D E Hornung
Online ISSN: 1540-7748
Print ISSN: 0022-1295
J Gen Physiol (1984) 83 (2): 233–267.
Citation
M M Mozell, P R Sheehe, S W Swieck, D B Kurtz, D E Hornung; A parametric study of the stimulation variables affecting the magnitude of the olfactory nerve response.. J Gen Physiol 1 February 1984; 83 (2): 233–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.83.2.233
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionSuggested Content
"Imposed" and "inherent" mucosal activity patterns. Their composite representation of olfactory stimuli.
J Gen Physiol (November,1987)
Olfactory stimulation variables. Which model best predicts the olfactory nerve response?
J Gen Physiol (September,1985)
The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Odorants at the Level of the Olfactory Receptor Sheet
J Gen Physiol (September,1966)
Email alerts
Advertisement