Sodium efflux from rings of frog stomach muscle was measured at 5° and 15°C in three different steady states. After incubation in normal, K-free, or ouabain (10-4 M) solutions, intracellular cations stabilized at markedly differing levels. At 5°C, inhibition of Na extrusion was shown in the rate coefficients for 22Na efflux, which were slightly smaller in K-free than in normal solutions, and much smaller in ouabain. Due to the intracellular Na concentration differences, total Na efflux was similar in K-free and ouabain solutions, and only ⅕ as large in normal solution. At 15°C, normal total Na flux was only 1/7;–1/10 inhibitors, and may be underestimated. The total flux differences may involve dependence of the Na pump and Na permeation on internal Na concentration. The Q10 of the steady-state fluxes was 3.7 in ouabain, 2.8 in K-free solution, and 1.9 in normal solution. The high temperature dependence of influx as well as efflux suggests transport mechanisms other than simple diffusion. Sodium turnover in the cell water was 46–66 mM/hr in inhibitors at 15°C, and a high rate of Na extrusion in normal muscle is suggested. However, cell volume:surface ratio is only 1.6 µ and all estimates of Na flux were under 3 pmoles/cm2 per sec, indicating low Na permeability.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
1 July 1969
Article|
July 01 1969
Sodium Flux in the Smooth Muscle of Frog Stomach
Elizabeth W. Stephenson
Elizabeth W. Stephenson
From the Department of Physiology, the George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, D. C. 20005
Search for other works by this author on:
Elizabeth W. Stephenson
From the Department of Physiology, the George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, D. C. 20005
Received:
May 29 1968
Online ISSN: 1540-7748
Print ISSN: 0022-1295
Copyright © 1969 by The Rockefeller University Press
1969
J Gen Physiol (1969) 54 (1): 53–75.
Article history
Received:
May 29 1968
Citation
Elizabeth W. Stephenson; Sodium Flux in the Smooth Muscle of Frog Stomach . J Gen Physiol 1 July 1969; 54 (1): 53–75. doi: https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.54.1.53
Download citation file:
Sign in
Don't already have an account? Register
Client Account
You could not be signed in. Please check your email address / username and password and try again.
Could not validate captcha. Please try again.
Sign in via your Institution
Sign in via your InstitutionEmail alerts
Advertisement