Panel A features the horizontal axis, which represents time in milliseconds, and the vertical axis represents flux in channel units. Each line graph corresponds to a different conditioning energy level, ranging from 0 to 14 kT, as indicated by the legend on the left. Panel B is a scatter plot comparing suppression in the test pulse versus decay in the conditioning. The horizontal axis represents decay, and the vertical axis represents suppression. The scatter plot includes black symbols representing the model and red symbols representing data from Szentesi 1, Szentesi 2, and Szentesi 3. The legend in Panel B differentiates between the model and the Szentesi data sets. The black line in Panel B represents the model's prediction.
Near-equality of decay and suppression. (A) Simulation of the flux elicited by a conditioning-test pair of pulses. The test energy/voltage is high (−14 , corresponding to +10 mV) and the conditioning energy varies, spanning the range [0 to −14 ] as listed. (B) Black symbols: suppression in the test pulse vs. decay in the conditioning (defined with Fig. 6). Red symbols, “Szentesi 1”—data measured on rat muscle by Szentesi et al. (2000). “Szentesi 2” and “Szentesi 3” data in Szentesi et al. (2004), kindly provided by Péter Szentesi.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.