Figure 2.
CD4, Tim-4, and CD163 identify transcriptionally distinct macrophages in the small intestine. (A) Left: Representative flow cytometry plots showing the frequency of Tim-4−CD4−-, Tim-4−CD4+-, and Tim-4+CD4+-expressing cells within the CD163− and CD163+ subsets of total small intestinal macrophages from WT mice. Right: Frequency of Tim-4−CD4−-, Tim-4−CD4+-, and Tim-4+CD4+-expressing cells within the CD163− and CD163+ subsets of total small intestinal macrophages from WT mice. Data (n = 4 per group) are pooled from two independent experiments. Statistical comparisons were performed with an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction for parametric data and a Mann–Whitney test for nonparametric data. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of global gene expression from CD163− and CD163+ subsets of Tim-4−CD4−, Tim-4−CD4+, and Tim-4+CD4+ macrophage of the small intestine isolated by FACS from five pooled WT mice, from at least three independent sorts. (C) Gene expression profile of the 3,206 genes differentially expressed (P-adjusted <0.001) in CD163− and CD163+ subsets of Tim-4−CD4−, Tim-4−CD4+, and Tim-4+CD4+ macrophage of the small intestine with clusters identified by k-means clustering. (D) Top GO terms associated with each of the four clusters formed by the 3,206 DEGs. (E) Heatmaps showing expression profiles of genes in the top two pathways identified by PANTHER pathway analysis for clusters 1 and 2. Refer to the image caption for details. Panel A: Flow cytometry plots and vertical bar graphs showing frequencies of C D 4 and T i m-4 subsets within C D 163 positive and negative macrophages. Panel B: P C A plot showing transcriptional differences among macrophage subsets based on C D 4, T i m-4, and C D 163 expression. Panel C: Heatmap showing differential gene expression patterns across macrophage subsets grouped into distinct clusters. Panel D: Horizontal bar graphs showing enriched G O biological processes associated with each gene cluster. Panel E: Heatmaps showing pathway-specific gene expression differences across macrophage subsets for key signaling and metabolic pathways.

CD4, Tim-4, and CD163 identify transcriptionally distinct macrophages in the small intestine. (A) Left: Representative flow cytometry plots showing the frequency of Tim-4CD4-, Tim-4CD4+-, and Tim-4+CD4+-expressing cells within the CD163 and CD163+ subsets of total small intestinal macrophages from WT mice. Right: Frequency of Tim-4CD4-, Tim-4CD4+-, and Tim-4+CD4+-expressing cells within the CD163 and CD163+ subsets of total small intestinal macrophages from WT mice. Data (n = 4 per group) are pooled from two independent experiments. Statistical comparisons were performed with an unpaired t test with Welch’s correction for parametric data and a Mann–Whitney test for nonparametric data. *, P ≤ 0.05; **, P ≤ 0.01. (B) Principal component analysis (PCA) of global gene expression from CD163 and CD163+ subsets of Tim-4CD4, Tim-4CD4+, and Tim-4+CD4+ macrophage of the small intestine isolated by FACS from five pooled WT mice, from at least three independent sorts. (C) Gene expression profile of the 3,206 genes differentially expressed (P-adjusted <0.001) in CD163 and CD163+ subsets of Tim-4CD4, Tim-4CD4+, and Tim-4+CD4+ macrophage of the small intestine with clusters identified by k-means clustering. (D) Top GO terms associated with each of the four clusters formed by the 3,206 DEGs. (E) Heatmaps showing expression profiles of genes in the top two pathways identified by PANTHER pathway analysis for clusters 1 and 2.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal