Figure 4.

BM Ly6Chi monocyte subpopulations represent two distinct mobilizable pools. (A and B) BM monocyte subsets (cMoP, CXCR4hi and CXCR4lo Ly6Chi monocytes, and Ly6Clo monocytes) were quantified for their numbers (A) and their normalized CXCR4 MFI (B) at ZT5 and ZT13. Results are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 4–5) and representative of one out of three experiments. ns, not significant; *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (Student’s t test). (C) BM monocyte subset counts after LPS administration. Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5) and representative of one out of five independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001 (one-way ANOVA). (D) BrdU+ CXCR4hi and CXCR4lo subset counts after 2 h of LPS administration. Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5) and representative of one out of three independent experiments. ns, not significant; ***, P < 0.001 (Student’s t test). (E) CCR2 expression (left) and CCR2 MFI (arbitrary units; right) of CXCR4hi and CXCR4lo subsets. Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). ****, P < 0.0001 (Student’s t test). (F) Chemotaxis assay of CXCR4hi and CXCR4lo subsets towards CCL2. Results expressed as mean ± SD (n = 5) and representative of two independent experiments. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 (two-way ANOVA).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal