Figure 5.

Infected macrophages present antigen in DC-ablated mice. (A) VV-NP-S-eGFP–infected cells (green) just under the collagenous capsule of the node (second harmonic generation (blue)). Numbers of infected cells in nonablated (untreated) and DC-ablated (DTx-treated) mice (right). (B) Confocal microscopy of a frozen section of a DC-ablated LN 10 hpi with VV-NP-S-mCherry (red) showing only the red and green channels (left), only the red and grey channels (middle), or all channels (right). FITC-dextran (green) and anti-CD11b staining (white) identify macrophages. (C) Same as shown in B, except staining with F4/80 (grey) to identify medullary macrophages. (D) Numbers of infected cells of each cell type in the node. Cells were gated into CD11c+CD169 (DCs) or CD11cdimCD169+ (CD169+ macrophages), then CD169+ macrophages were further gated based on F4/80 expression. Background (blue) is caused by low cell recovery and macrophage autofluorescence. (E) Flow cytometric analysis of LN single-cell suspensions from untreated or DTx-treated animals 6 hpi with VV-venus-ubiquitin-SIINFEKL. Cells were stained with 25D-1.16 recognizing Kb-SIINFEKL complexes. Histograms are gated on infected cells (Venus eYFP+). Infected with virus lacking SIINFEKL (grey shaded histograms), infected without 25D-1.16 stain (black lines), infected untreated mice (blue lines), and infected DTx-treated mice (red lines). Scale bars are shown in micrometers. Results are shown from one experiment of two (A–C) or four (D and E).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal