Figure S3.

Expression of Ccl2 and Ccl8 in Tet2 WT -CCl 4 and Tet2 ΔMye -CCl 4 mice and the effect of CCL2 and CCL8 inhibition on liver fibrosis progression. (A and B) Changes in (A) Ccl2 and (B) Ccl8 mRNA levels detected by RT-PCR in liver tissues of Tet2WT-CCl4 and Tet2ΔMye-CCl4 mice (Tet2WT, n = 4; Tet2ΔMye, n = 4; Tet2WT-CCl4, n = 5; Tet2ΔMye-CCl4, n = 5). (C–F) Detection of CCL2 and CCL8 level in Tet2+/+and Tet2−/− monocytes (C and D), granulocytes (E), and DCs (F) (n = 5 for each group). (G) Treatment schedule of Bindarit or PBS for Tet2WT-CCl4 and Tet2ΔMye-CCl4 mice. (H) Immune cell infiltration and the pathological structure of livers were evaluated by H&E staining for PBS and Bindarit in Tet2WT-CCl4 and Tet2ΔMye-CCl4 mice (n = 3). Green arrows indicate infiltrated immune cells in liver tissues. Scale bar, 100 μm. (I and J) mRNA levels of Col1a1 (I) and Acta2 (J) in livers of Tet2WT-CCl4 and Tet2ΔMye-CCl4 mice treated with PBS or Bindarit (n = 3 for each group). (K and L) Changes in serum ALT (K) and AST (L) after Bindarit treatment in Tet2WT-CCl4 and Tet2ΔMye-CCl4 mice (n = 4 for each group). (M) Representative flow cytometry graphs of MDMs in liver tissues of Tet2WT-CCl4 and Tet2ΔMye-CCl4 mice treated with PBS or Bindarit. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments with similar results (A–F and I–L). All data are shown as mean ± SD and were analyzed by two-tailed, paired Student’s t test (C–F) or two-way ANOVA with Sidak’s multiple comparison test (A, B, and I–L). ***P < 0.001; **P < 0.01; *P < 0.05; P > 0.05 not significant (ns).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal