Figure S4.

Gating strategy of cell sorting, difference in RUNX2 expression by variants, and the effect of RUNX2 and BHLHE40. (A) Gating strategy for the identification of CD4+ naïve T cells. (B) Gating strategy for the identification of GFP+ BFP+ CD4+ CD103+ TRM cells and IFN-γ–positive T cells. (C) Bar graph showing the expression levels of RUNX2 variant1 and variant2 in T cells and Saos2. n = 4 per group. Statistical significance for the comparisons was determined using a paired t test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01. (D) Volcano plot showing upregulated and downregulated genes in RUNX2 overexpression (left), BHLHE40 overexpression (center), and both overexpression groups (right). (E) FACS analysis of CD103 and IFN-γ in RUNX1- and RUNX3-overexpressed T cells. n = 5 per group. Statistical significance for the comparisons was determined using a paired t test and RM one-way ANOVA, Dunnett’s multiple comparison test, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001. (F) CUT&RUN peaks for RUNX2, BHLHE40, and H3K27ac, along with ATAC-seq peaks, are shown for TRM_2, TRM_1, TEM, and naïve T cells within the IFNG and GZMB regions. Solid boxes indicate open chromatin regions in TRM_2 that colocalize with RUNX2 and BHLHE40 peaks, as detected by MACS2. The dashed box marks IFNG promoter regions without RUNX2 and BHLHE40 binding.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal