Figure S3.

The correlation analysis. (A) The relationship between CFTR ERAD (Fig. 3 F) and the retrotranslocation rates of ∆F508-CFTR (Fig. 4 D) was analyzed for correlation. (B) Correlation analysis was performed to examine the connection between CFTR ER disappearance (Fig. 4 F) and the retrotranslocation rates of ∆F508-CFTR (Fig. 4 D). (C) The correlation between CFTR K48-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 B) and K63-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 C). (D) The correlation between CFTR K48-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 B) and the ERAD rate (Fig. 3 F). (E) The correlation between CFTR K63-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 C) and the ERAD rate (Fig. 3 F). (F) The correlation between CFTR K48-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 B) and the retrotranslocation rate of ∆F508-CFTR (Fig. 4 D). (G) The correlation between CFTR K63-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 C) and the retrotranslocation rate of ∆F508-CFTR (Fig. 4 D). (H) The correlation between the CFTR K48-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 B) and UBQLN2 binding (Fig. 6 D). (I) The correlation between the CFTR K63-linked polyubiquitination (Fig. 5 C) and UBQLN2 binding (Fig. 6 D). (J) The correlation between the CFTR ERAD (Fig. 3 F) and UBQLN2 binding (Fig. 6 D). (K) The correlation between the retrotranslocation (Fig. 4 D) and UBQLN2 binding (Fig. 6 D).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal