Figure 4.

Restoration of ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ channel currents by second site changes in the same and adjacent domains. Currents suppressed by S104K in domain I of ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ are restored by second site substitution of aspartate in domains I, II, and IV but not III. Similarly, currents suppressed by T216K in domain II of ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ are restored by second site substitution in domains I, II, and III but not IV. Currents were studied as in Fig. 2 A. (A) Predicted topology of ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ with S104K in domain I (blue circles); domains I–IV are indicated, as are TM spans with second site changes (red bars). (B) Currents from ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ channel variants. To reveal phenotype, oocytes with WT–WT, S104K (I)–WT, and S104K (I)–S104K (III) were incubated for extended periods. (C) Current amplitudes ± SEM at −100 mV from oocytes expressing S104K (I) ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ channels with no other change or second sites altered to aspartate as indicated. Statistical differences versus S104K (I) ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ are indicated (n = 6). (D) Top view of a KcsA channel noting positions homologous to S104K in domain I (blue) and TM segments studied in each of four domains (red). (E) Predicted topology of ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ with T216K in domain II (blue circles); domains I–IV are indicated, as are TM spans with second site changes (red bars). (F) Representative currents from the indicated ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ channel variants. (G) Current amplitudes ± SEM at −100 mV from oocytes expressing T216K (II) ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ channels with no other change or second sites altered to aspartate as indicated. Statistical differences versus T216K (II) ΔK2PØ–ΔK2PØ are indicated (n = 14–16). (H) Top view of a KcsA channel noting positions homologous to T216K in domain II (blue) and TM segments studied in each of four domains (red). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal