Figure 2.

Direct evidence for two ASCT2 Na+-binding sites. (A) Original anion current recordings upon the application of 10 mM alanine (timing indicated by the bars) at [Na+] of 0.2 mM (left), 2 mM (middle), and 140 mM (right). The membrane potential was 0 mV, and the pipette solution contained 140 mM NaSCN and 10 mM alanine. The external anion was Mes. Na+ was replaced by NMG+. (B) [Na+] dependence of the maximum alanine-induced current, Imax, at saturating [alanine] (V = 0 mV, normalized to the current at 140 mM Na+). The solid line represents a fit of Eq. 8 (see Appendix), assuming a two-site binding model. The fitted parameters are: KNa1 = 0.1 mM, KNa1 = 2.8 mM, and r = 1.9. (C) Determination of the Km of ASCT2 for alanine at different [Na+]. The solid lines represent fits to a Michaelis–Menten-type equation. (D) Dependence of the Km for alanine on [Na+]. The solid red line represents a fit using the equation Km = (1 + KNa1/[Na+])KS/(1 + [Na+]/KNa2) (Eq. 9; see Appendix), assuming a two-site binding model (KNa1 = 0.1 mM, KNa2 = 8.5 mM, and KS = 7.5 mM; KNa1 was fixed in the fitting procedure). The dashed blue line represents a model in which two [Na+] bind before the amino acid (Eq. 10; see Appendix). The black solid line represents a model in which only alanine binding and one subsequent Na+-binding step were included (Km = KS/(1 + [Na+]/KNa2), KNa2 = 6.5 mM, and KS = 9 mM). (E) Minimal sequential mechanism for Na+ and amino acid (AA) binding to the transporter, T. The bars illustrate the anion-conducting states.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal