IgMhi and IgMlo TS B cells differ functionally and in their potential to differentiate. (A) Histograms of flow cytometry data demonstrating cell trace violet (CTV) dilution following 5 d of culture with CD40L + anti-IgM in IgMhi and IgMlo TS B cells from an HCD. (B) Scatter plots demonstrating increased proliferation of IgMhi TS compared with IgMlo TS B cells when stimulated with CD40L + anti-IgM for 5 d (medians, Wilcoxon test). *, P < 0.05. (C) Flow cytometry contour plots demonstrating that an IgMhi phenotype is maintained on IgMhi TS B cells after CpG stimulation for 5 d. (D) Scatter plots demonstrating that an IgMhi phenotype is maintained on IgMhi TS B cells after CpG stimulation for 5 d (mean ± SD, paired t test). **, P < 0.01. (E) Flow cytometry contour plots and scatter plots demonstrating greater up-regulation of CD45RB by IgMhi than IgMlo TS and naive (CD27−IgD+CD10−) B cell subsets at day 5 culture with CpG (mean ± SD, paired t test). *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01. (F) Flow cytometry contour plots and scatter plots demonstrating higher frequency of IL10 expressing cells among IgMhi TS B cells following 6-h stimulation with PMA/ionomycin (median, Wilcoxon test). *, P < 0.05.