Figure 3.

Ensemble variance analysis of CRAC channels with residual inactivation phenotypes. (A) A thapsigargin-pretreated cell expressing Ch-STIM11-469 and WT Orai1-GFP was held continuously at −100 mV in 2 mM Ca2+o, and as indicated by the bars, DVF solutions containing variable low [Ca2+]o were applied transiently to produce and partially block the Na+-CRAC current. Colored circles indicate peak currents corresponding to the 200-ms sweeps shown in (B), which were divided into 25-ms segments for analysis (see Materials and methods). (C) Ca2+ block of Na+ currents for WT STIM1 + WT Orai1, STIM11–469 + WT Orai1, and WT STIM1 + Orai1 W76A. Na+ current was measured immediately after applying DVF solution containing the indicated [Ca2+]o, and normalized to the value for the pure DVF solution. Each point represents the mean ± SEM for n = 3–4 cells. Lines are fits of the Hill equation, block = 1/[1 + (K1/2/[Ca])nH]. (D) Normalized variance versus current plots for each condition were fitted by a parabolic function to determine open probability (see Materials and methods). (E) Variance/current versus block plots were fitted by a linear function to determine unitary current (see Materials and methods). Unitary channel properties are summarized in Table 1. WT data are reproduced from Mullins et al. (2016).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal