Concatenated tetrameric hERG1 (WT4) channels have similar biophysical and pharmacological properties as channels formed by coassembly of single WT hERG1 subunits. (A) Representative WT and WT4 hERG1 channel currents recorded at the indicated Vt (−70 to 30 mV stepped in 20-mV increments). (B) The voltage dependence of WT channel gating (upright green triangles, activation; sideways green triangles, C-type inactivation) is similar to WT4 channels (upside-down black triangles, activation [n = 6]; sideways black triangles, C-type inactivation [n = 8]). Data were fitted to Boltzmann function (smooth curves) to determine V0.5act and z values (presented in Table 1). (C) Time constants (τ deact) for fast and slow components of current deactivation for WT (green triangles, n = 10) and WT4 (black triangles, n = 11) channels at the indicated return potential (Vret). (D) Effect of 10 µM PD on WT and WT4 hERG1 channel currents elicited by 4-s step to 0 mV. Itail was measured at −70 mV. (E and F) Itest-Vt relationships in the absence (black triangles) and presence of 10 µM PD (red triangles) for oocytes injected with cRNA encoding single WT subunits (E, n = 10) or WT4 channels (F, n = 7). Currents were normalized to peak Itest (at −20 mV) measured under control conditions. (G) Effect of 10 µM ICA on currents for WT and WT4 channels. (H and I) Itest-Vt relationships in the absence (black triangles) and presence of 10 µM ICA (blue triangles) for oocytes injected with cRNA encoding single WT subunits (H, n = 5) or WT4 channels (I, n = 10). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = number of oocytes).