Figure 5.
Figure 5. Logarithmically binned latency histograms of IP3R channels responding to changes in and . In each case, (, ) are changed as indicated: (A) IP3 activation: (2 µM, 0 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). (B) IP3 deactivation: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (2 µM, 0 µM). (C) Ca2+ activation: (0 µM, 10 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). (D) Ca2+ deactivation: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (0 µM, 10 µM). (E) Ca2+ and IP3 activation: (0 µM, 0 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). (F) Ca2+ and IP3 deactivation: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (0 µM, 0 µM). (G) Ca2+ inhibition: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (300 µM, 10 µM). (H) Ca2+ inhibition recovery: (300 µM, 10 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). The experimental latency distributions given by the bars are taken from Mak et al. (2007). The solid and dotted lines, respectively, are from the CM when fit to the latency data alone and to the latency and time-series data simultaneously.

Logarithmically binned latency histograms of IP3R channels responding to changes in and . In each case, (, ) are changed as indicated: (A) IP3 activation: (2 µM, 0 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). (B) IP3 deactivation: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (2 µM, 0 µM). (C) Ca2+ activation: (0 µM, 10 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). (D) Ca2+ deactivation: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (0 µM, 10 µM). (E) Ca2+ and IP3 activation: (0 µM, 0 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). (F) Ca2+ and IP3 deactivation: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (0 µM, 0 µM). (G) Ca2+ inhibition: (2 µM, 10 µM) → (300 µM, 10 µM). (H) Ca2+ inhibition recovery: (300 µM, 10 µM) → (2 µM, 10 µM). The experimental latency distributions given by the bars are taken from Mak et al. (2007). The solid and dotted lines, respectively, are from the CM when fit to the latency data alone and to the latency and time-series data simultaneously.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal