Figure 2.

SUMO1 suppresses IDR in hippocampal neurons. Neurons were studied under voltage clamp in whole cell mode, and native INa, IKA, and IDR were assessed for response to intracellular application of 75 pM SUMO1101 (•), with heat-denatured SUMO1101 (■, Rest), or 250 pM SENP1 (▴). IDR was also assessed for response to 75 pM SUMO292 (△) or SUMO392 (▽). An ensemble current trace and mean I-V relationships and normalized G-V relationships are shown. Recording conditions and biophysical parameters for IDR are shown in Table I; values for INa and IKA are in Table S1. Bars represent 1 nA and 10 ms in A and 1 nA and 100 ms in B and C. (A) INa magnitude and I-V relationships were unaltered by SUMO1101 or SENP1. Protocol: 50-ms test pulses to −10 from −80 mV every 10 s (n = 10 –14 cells). (B) IKA magnitude and I-V relationships were unaltered by SUMO1101 or SENP1. Protocol: 500-ms test pulses to +50 from −80 mV every 10 s to activate both IKA and IDR, followed by repetition with an additional 250-ms pulse to −30 mV before the test pulse to inactivate IKA and isolate IDR. IKA was determined by subtracting IDR from the total potassium current in the presence of 50 nM tetrodotoxin to remove contaminating sodium currents (n = 10–20 cells). (C) IDR magnitude was augmented by SENP1, unaltered by heat-denatured SUMO1101, and diminished by SUMO1101. The difference in the midpoint of the G-V relationships with SENP1 (n = 20 cells) and SUMO101 (n = 10 cells) was 36 ± 5 mV. (D) IDR magnitude was diminished by SUMO2 and SUMO3. The difference in the midpoint of the G-V relationships between SENP1 (C) and SUMO292 (n = 10 cells) was 37 ± 7 mV, and it was 37 ± 1 mV between SENP1 and SUMO392 (n = 10 cells).

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal