Figure 3.

ATP release on electrical stimulation is not accompanied by a change in intracellular Ca2+. (A and B) Representative simultaneous recordings of ionic currents and fluorescence in a type III cell loaded with 4 μM Fluo-4 (n = 6). The depolarization of the taste cell to −10 mV for 100 ms (A and B, top panels) elicited the VG Ca2+ current (A, bottom panel, dotted line) that produced the Ca2+ transient monitored as an increase in Fluo-4 fluorescence (B, bottom panel). A relative change in fluorescence intensity is expressed as ΔF/F0, where F0 is a value of Fluo-4 emission measured just before cell stimulation. (C and D) Representative concurrent recordings of ionic currents (middle panel) and Fluo-4 fluorescence (bottom panel) in a type II cell (n = 21). Unlike ionomycin, 2-s depolarization (top panel) did not affect intracellular Ca2+ in 17 of 21 type II cells (C). In 4 out of 21 cells, depolarization induced a small increase in Fluo-4 fluorescence (D). (E) Representative concurrent recordings of a membrane current and intracellular Ca2+ in a type II cell and an ATP sensor response (n = 9). The 5-s depolarization (top panel) of the taste cell produced no change in cytosolic Ca2+ (the second trace from the bottom) but triggered ATP release, thereby stimulating the ATP sensor (bottom panel). The recording conditions were as in Fig. 1.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal